09.11.2012 Views

OFFERING MEMORANDUM Global Offering of up to ... - Nordex

OFFERING MEMORANDUM Global Offering of up to ... - Nordex

OFFERING MEMORANDUM Global Offering of up to ... - Nordex

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The calculation <strong>of</strong> imputed taxes, <strong>to</strong>o, was based on future tax rates, cf. Note (1).<br />

Inven<strong>to</strong>ries include raw materials and s<strong>up</strong>plies (operating s<strong>to</strong>res), as well as work in process (goods/<br />

services). In conformity with IAS 2, raw materials and s<strong>up</strong>plies were stated at purchase cost. Allowances<br />

were charged for slow-moving items, varying according <strong>to</strong> age and product, and for inven<strong>to</strong>ries whose<br />

fair market prices were below their carrying values. Work in process for which no cus<strong>to</strong>mer contract<br />

existed and <strong>to</strong> which IAS 11 did hence not apply were valued at production cost pursuant <strong>to</strong> IAS 2. The<br />

production cost components <strong>to</strong> be included according <strong>to</strong> IAS 2 were recognized wherever the costs<br />

were reliably measurable. Borrowing costs were not included in production cost. Provided and <strong>to</strong> the<br />

extent that in specific cases production cost (including any overheads yet <strong>to</strong> be incurred) was<br />

foreseeable <strong>to</strong> outweigh expected net revenues, the underlying asset was written down <strong>to</strong> its lower net<br />

realizable value. Moreover, prepayments made on inven<strong>to</strong>ries were stated, and those received on<br />

account <strong>of</strong> inven<strong>to</strong>ries were deducted, at their face values.<br />

Future receivables under long-term construction contracts (i.e., costs and estimated earnings in excess<br />

<strong>of</strong> billings) were accounted for according <strong>to</strong> their percentage <strong>of</strong> completion (‘‘PoC’’) according <strong>to</strong> IAS 11<br />

where based on a specific cus<strong>to</strong>mer contract and contract costs were reliably allocable. Prorated<br />

earnings were realized according <strong>to</strong> the PoC where the latter as well as <strong>to</strong>tal contract costs and<br />

revenues were reliably determinable in conformity with IAS 11. The PoC was determined by using the<br />

cost-<strong>to</strong>-cost method, i.e., by relating the costs incurred <strong>to</strong> the estimated <strong>to</strong>tal contract costs. Applying<br />

this PoC <strong>to</strong> revenues, the resulting portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>to</strong>tal contract revenues was realized accordingly. Contract<br />

costs comprise all direct costs allocable <strong>to</strong> the contract, as well as all indirect costs separately billable <strong>to</strong><br />

the cus<strong>to</strong>mer (as defined in IAS 11) and if reliably measurable. Costs <strong>of</strong> debt were expensed. If the<br />

contract revenues were not determinable with reasonable reliability, valuation was based on contract<br />

costs according <strong>to</strong> IAS 11.<br />

When determining contract costs and revenues, any new insights with respect <strong>to</strong> the periods under<br />

review at the time the (combined) pro forma consolidated financial statements were prepared were<br />

duly taken in<strong>to</strong> account. Losses incurred for specific contracts and ascertained subsequently were also<br />

accounted for.<br />

In the balance sheet, this item was disclosed as ‘‘future receivables under long-term construction<br />

contracts’’ and, in the income statement, under net sales. Where specific contracts produced a loss on<br />

balance, such loss was shown separately on the liabilities side as ‘‘future payables under long-term<br />

construction contracts.’’ In the income statement, such losses were disclosed as cost <strong>of</strong> materials.<br />

Prepayments received on contracts were <strong>of</strong>fset against ‘‘future receivables under l/t construction<br />

contracts’’ unless the <strong>to</strong>tal turned in<strong>to</strong> a negative balance (i.e., a payable).<br />

Trade receivables and sundry current assets were recognized at par, duly allowing for any and all<br />

foreseeable risks. General allowances for doubtful accounts were eliminated when restating the<br />

separate financial accounts <strong>to</strong> conform <strong>to</strong> IAS.<br />

Cash & cash equivalents are valued at par.<br />

In accordance with IAS 37, the sundry accruals provide for all uncertain obligations <strong>to</strong> third parties.<br />

Provisions were made wherever current legal or economic commitments existed that resulted from past<br />

events and whose settlement was probable <strong>to</strong> entail an outflow <strong>of</strong> resources embodying economic<br />

benefits. Accruals were measured on the basis <strong>of</strong> best estimates. Discounting was waived for lack <strong>of</strong><br />

materiality.<br />

Liabilities were recognized at the amounts repayable.<br />

Expenses and income <strong>of</strong> the periods were recognized when realized, regardless <strong>of</strong> the payment date.<br />

Revenues were recognized when the agreed product or service was provided or when realized early as<br />

required by the PoC method under IAS 11. Period-related income and expenses were only accounted<br />

for <strong>to</strong> the extent allocable <strong>to</strong> the period.<br />

F-15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!