OFFERING MEMORANDUM Global Offering of up to ... - Nordex
OFFERING MEMORANDUM Global Offering of up to ... - Nordex
OFFERING MEMORANDUM Global Offering of up to ... - Nordex
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
written <strong>of</strong>f in the year <strong>of</strong> their addition, however, no significant effects on the gro<strong>up</strong>’s net income were<br />
thus caused. In the fixed-asset analysis, low-value assets are imputed <strong>to</strong> have been disposed <strong>of</strong> in the<br />
year <strong>of</strong> their addition.<br />
In accordance with IAS 20, any investment grants and/or allowances received for the purchase <strong>of</strong> fixed<br />
assets were treated as a reduction in asset cost.<br />
The production cost components <strong>to</strong> be included according <strong>to</strong> IAS were recognized wherever the costs<br />
were reliably measurable. The cost <strong>of</strong> borrowings was recognized as a charge <strong>to</strong> income.<br />
Amortization <strong>of</strong> intangible assets and depreciation <strong>of</strong> property, plant & equipment were based on the<br />
following asset ranges (useful lives):<br />
Useful life Rate charged<br />
Capitalized development costs 5 years 20%<br />
Licenses, EDP s<strong>of</strong>tware and similar rights 2-5 years 20%-50%<br />
Land and equivalent titles, and buildings 10-25 years 4%-10%<br />
Production plant and machinery 4-12 years 8.33%-25%<br />
Fac<strong>to</strong>ry and <strong>of</strong>fice equipment 2-18 years 5.56%-50%<br />
For the movements <strong>of</strong> fixed assets, reference is made <strong>to</strong> the fixed-asset analyses attached <strong>to</strong> these<br />
Notes.<br />
Financial assets were stated at cost.<br />
Deferred taxes were recognized in accordance with IAS 12 and resulted from the restatement <strong>of</strong> the<br />
separate annual accounts as well as from consolidation transactions.<br />
The following facts and circumstances underlay deferred taxation in the separate financial statements:<br />
IAS 12 strictly requires that deferred tax assets be capitalized on tax loss carryovers wherever an <strong>of</strong>fset<br />
against pr<strong>of</strong>its available in future periods is reasonably likely. At the amount <strong>of</strong> the deferred tax assets,<br />
the current tax expense was out <strong>of</strong> proportion <strong>to</strong> the disclosed net income. For preparing the<br />
(combined) pro forma consolidated financial statements, deferred tax assets were capitalized for tax<br />
losses carried over by <strong>Nordex</strong> GmbH from 1997 and earlier periods <strong>to</strong> the extent that such losses could<br />
be claimed from the German IRS. The deferred tax assets were released at the amounts needed <strong>to</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong>fset taxes on the pr<strong>of</strong>its earned in 1998 and 1999.<br />
In addition, according <strong>to</strong> IAS 12, temporary differences between the assets, accruals and liabilities<br />
recognized in the IAS-based accounts and the corresponding tax bases entail the obliga<strong>to</strong>ry disclosure<br />
<strong>of</strong> deferred tax assets or liabilities. Deferred tax assets or liabilities were recognized for temporary<br />
differences at the amount at which the current tax expense shown was out <strong>of</strong> proportion <strong>to</strong> the stated<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>it or loss. In the years under review, deferred tax assets or liabilities were solely recognized for<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> the restatement according <strong>to</strong> IAS since the HGB-based financial statements <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nordex</strong> GmbH<br />
presented only insignificant temporary differences versus the corresponding tax bases and all other<br />
subsidiaries were bound by P&L transfer agreements with Borsig Energy GmbH. The resultant, yet<br />
unrecognized, deferred taxes are negligible.<br />
An obligation under IAS 12 <strong>to</strong> recognize deferred taxes ensued from certain consolidation transactions,<br />
viz. the elimination <strong>of</strong> intercompany pr<strong>of</strong>its when applying the percentage-<strong>of</strong>-completion method, as<br />
well as from physical trade transactions and the accounting for transactions based on capital leases<br />
from a gro<strong>up</strong> vantage point.<br />
For enhanced comparability, the deferred taxes were calculated on the basis <strong>of</strong> future tax rates, viz. a<br />
corporate income tax rate <strong>of</strong> 25%, a solidarity surtax thereon <strong>of</strong> 5.5%, and municipal trade tax on<br />
income at the local fac<strong>to</strong>r <strong>of</strong> the municipality <strong>of</strong> residence <strong>of</strong> each subsidiary.<br />
Deferred tax assets and liabilities were disclosed separately in the balance sheets and not netted unless<br />
their <strong>of</strong>fset could be claimed against the same tax <strong>of</strong>fice.<br />
F-14