28.12.2014 Views

full edition - Academy of Knowledge Process - Webs

full edition - Academy of Knowledge Process - Webs

full edition - Academy of Knowledge Process - Webs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

IJCBS<br />

VOLUME 4 I NUMBER 1 I JANUARY, 2013<br />

ISSN 2156-7506<br />

International Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Contemporary Business Studies<br />

In This Issue:<br />

Determinants <strong>of</strong> Manufacturer’s Selection <strong>of</strong> Distributors: A case from Pharmaceutical and Electronic<br />

Appliance Industry<br />

Ahmad Nabeel Siddiquei, Muhammad Ahmad Raza, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Hayat M. Awan,Khurram Shehzad Bukhari<br />

Women’s Justification <strong>of</strong> White-Collar Crime<br />

Petter Gottschalk<br />

Service Quality Measurement and its evaluation <strong>of</strong> leading Private Banks <strong>of</strong> India in Delhi and NCR<br />

Region: An analytical study<br />

Dr. Saroj Kumar Dash,Dr. Asif Parwez,Mr. Firoz Parwez<br />

A Boss causes mental disorder - Stay or Leave<br />

K.R.Sowmya<br />

An International Journal Published by<br />

<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

Copyright © 2013 IJCBS<br />

1


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

Enrich <strong>Knowledge</strong> through Quality Research<br />

International journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

publish monthly (one volume per year) fast publication<br />

is open access to the <strong>full</strong> text<br />

has the editorial board & reviewers comprise <strong>of</strong> renowned scholars across the<br />

globe,<br />

has the quality policy includes indexing according to APA manual and its current<br />

status is international.<br />

is indexed & listed in:<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the largest Research Databases <strong>of</strong> world<br />

Indexed in Proquest<br />

Indexed in CABELL-USA<br />

Open Access Policy<br />

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research<br />

freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange <strong>of</strong> knowledge.<br />

Language<br />

Please write your text in good English (American or British usage is accepted, but not a mixture <strong>of</strong><br />

these). Authors who feel their English language manuscript may require editing to eliminate<br />

possible grammatical or spelling errors and to conform to correct scientific English may wish to use<br />

the English Language Editing service<br />

Submissions to this journal proceeds totally online and please submit your article<br />

via:editorijcbs@ohio.usa.com<br />

Copyright © IJCBS<br />

To protect the copyright <strong>of</strong> the journal enable, IJCBS and the Publisher, authors must assign<br />

copyright in their manuscripts to IJCBS. Authors should make sure on submission that the article is<br />

original, is not under consideration for publication by another journal, has not previously been<br />

published elsewhere and that its content has not been anticipated by previous publication.<br />

www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

2


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

Enrich <strong>Knowledge</strong> through Quality Research<br />

International journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

A journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

Saddal H.A<br />

Editor-in-Chief<br />

Editorial Board<br />

www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

3


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

Enrich <strong>Knowledge</strong> through Quality Research<br />

DR.V.MAHALAKSHMI M.L,MBA,Ph.D<br />

7A, CID Quarters, V.K.Iyer Road,<br />

Mandaveli<br />

www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

4


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

Enrich <strong>Knowledge</strong> through Quality Research<br />

VOLUME 4, NUMBER 1<br />

January, 2013<br />

Contents:<br />

Determinants <strong>of</strong> Manufacturer’s Selection <strong>of</strong> Distributors: A case from Pharmaceutical and Electronic<br />

Appliance Industry<br />

Ahmad Nabeel Siddiquei, Muhammad Ahmad Raza, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Hayat M. Awan,Khurram Shehzad Bukhari…………………………6<br />

Women’s Justification <strong>of</strong> White-Collar Crime<br />

Petter Gottschalk………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..24<br />

Service Quality Measurement and its evaluation <strong>of</strong> leading Private Banks <strong>of</strong> India in Delhi and NCR<br />

Region: An analytical study<br />

Dr. Saroj Kumar Dash,Dr. Asif Parwez,Mr. Firoz Parwez………………………………………………………………………………….………33<br />

A Boss causes mental disorder - Stay or Leave<br />

K.R.Sowmya…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……….47<br />

www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

5


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

Determinants <strong>of</strong> Manufacturer’s Selection <strong>of</strong><br />

Distributors:<br />

A case from Pharmaceutical and Electronic Appliance Industry<br />

Ahmad Nabeel Siddiquei a , Muhammad Ahmad Raza b , Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Hayat M. Awan c and<br />

Khurram Shehzad Bukhari d<br />

a,d<br />

Air University Multan Campus, b,d Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan-Pakistan<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

This case explores the determinants which are considered most important for the<br />

selection <strong>of</strong> Distributors in Pharmaceutical and Electronic Home Appliance Industry. In<br />

today’s competitive market, selecting an appropriate distribution network is considered to<br />

be an essential ingredient <strong>of</strong> success. And Channel management is a key strategic issue<br />

which is concerned with the delivery <strong>of</strong> goods and services to the final consumers. How<br />

manufacturers select distributors who can contribute to distribution efficiency has<br />

become an important issue for channel management. While the last decade has seen large<br />

shifts in manufacturing and distribution practices, there has been very little empirical<br />

research investigating manufacturers’ selection <strong>of</strong> distributors. So recruiting and selecting<br />

a distributor for any company is a key decision that has to be made by a manufacturer in<br />

order to excel in market. This case would discuss all concerned determinants that are<br />

important for the selection <strong>of</strong> Distributor in both <strong>of</strong> the above mentioned industries. They<br />

would be discussed in the form <strong>of</strong> five key constructs which are composed <strong>of</strong> several<br />

other related variables. Then a broad framework would be developed that would lead<br />

towards the selection <strong>of</strong> distributor. A selected candidate must match with the proposed<br />

framework in order to become a channel partner for the company. Importantly, the case is<br />

the first <strong>of</strong> its type that would segregate all important determinants <strong>of</strong> selection on the<br />

basis <strong>of</strong> its criticality.<br />

Keywords: Channel member selection, Distributor, Evaluation criteria, Supply Chain<br />

Management<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

Physical distribution is a collective term for the series <strong>of</strong> inter-related function (principally transport, stock,<br />

storage, goods handling and order processing) involved in physical transfer <strong>of</strong> goods from producer to<br />

consumers. It is only recently that <strong>full</strong> importance has been given to physical distribution in industrial and<br />

business circles. Over the past 30 years, however, managerial attitude towards distribution has been<br />

transformed. Today, distribution is considered to be a major cost center, an important marketing tool and<br />

critical determinant <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>itability and competitive advantage. There is much greater acceptance <strong>of</strong> the fact<br />

that ‘processes <strong>of</strong> manufacturing and distribution are complementary’ and that an unsold product, however<br />

produced efficiently, represents a waste <strong>of</strong> resources (Edward, 1982).<br />

Selecting appropriate distributors as a channel partner has been an important prerequisite <strong>of</strong> effective<br />

channel performance. In this era where the concepts <strong>of</strong> supply chain have really emerged, a strong<br />

distribution network is considered to be a key strategic advantage. Except for those with extraordinary<br />

reputation and prestige, manufacturer cannot expect numerous quality distributors to vie for their business.<br />

Manufacturers normally have to seek and recruit distributors by evaluating potential candidates with an<br />

emphasis on performance (Lin & Chen,2008).<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

6


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

The evaluation tasks typically consists <strong>of</strong> identifying the attributes, criteria or factors relevant to the<br />

decision and then measuring or rating eligible distributors on each factor. The manufacturers’ evaluation<br />

reflects an assessment <strong>of</strong> the values/rewards, cost and benefit analysis and risks inherent in the selection<br />

(Lin & Chen, 2008).<br />

In the past, pharmaceutical companies did not adopt supply chain management concepts. However, now<br />

several factors are pressing pharmaceutical companies to change their traditional manners <strong>of</strong> conducting<br />

business (Ahmad, Awan, Raouf, & Sparks, 2009). At the same time Electronic home appliance industry is<br />

one <strong>of</strong> the growing sectors <strong>of</strong> Pakistan economy. This industry has also been <strong>full</strong> <strong>of</strong> stiff competition and<br />

quality standards innovation. (Pearson & Ellram, 1995) worked on Supply Chain <strong>of</strong> Electronic Home<br />

Appliance industry and have argued that the quality <strong>of</strong> Supply chain <strong>of</strong> this industry has been as important<br />

as the quality <strong>of</strong> product. Product availability, capturing strong and reputed distributor and enlarged supply<br />

network has been at the core <strong>of</strong> this industry’s supply chain. So our focus would be to explore and<br />

evaluate all factors that are important in the selection <strong>of</strong> distributors subjected to Pharmaceutical and<br />

Electronic Home Appliance Industry. Finally, recruiting and selecting a reputed distribution is another area<br />

<strong>of</strong> concern and the factors affecting the selection <strong>of</strong> distributor would be discussed. Since it is an area<br />

where there is a lack <strong>of</strong> research and visible research gap.<br />

2. RESEARCH FRAMEWORK<br />

Distributor selection can be studied in terms <strong>of</strong> five Broad constructs. It includes Firm infrastructure,<br />

Marketing Capabilities, Relationship Intensity, Logistic Capabilities and Strategic Issues. The evaluation<br />

task that takes place is to rate each Distributor on above mentioned factors. Whenever the company is<br />

looking to extend its delivery network or if in other case they are required to recruit and select a distributor<br />

to enhance their channel distribution efficiency, these factors come into play before the final decision has<br />

been made. At the same time, each determinant would be identified and segregated based on its criticality<br />

or importance to be present in a potential candidate. There have been few determinants identified by<br />

various researchers in Manufacturer-Distributor relationship like communication, Power, trust and<br />

dependence (Goodman & Dion, 2001). But all such variables explained the importance <strong>of</strong> marketing and<br />

behavioral variables and provide the separation between both <strong>of</strong> them that is somewhat artificial.<br />

(Goodman & Dion, 2001) Also suggests that the trend now-a-days is to provide support to distributor as<br />

their efficiency has been increased with growing market. The decision to make any organization the partner<br />

should be based on the performance <strong>of</strong> entire channel that would be achieved in the future (Cavusgil, Yeoh,<br />

& Mitri, 1995), (Rosenbloom, 2004). A <strong>full</strong>-fledged eligibility and selection criterion has to be drawn by<br />

the manufacturer prior to their selection. Irrespective <strong>of</strong> how much control and efficiency a manufacturer<br />

has in selection decision, yet they have to involve selection criterion in order to build positive synergy and<br />

collaboration between respective entities (Merritt & Newell, 2001), (Rosenbloom, 2004).<br />

2.1 Firm Infrastructure<br />

The benefits <strong>of</strong> distributor would also be increased through overall channel performance increase<br />

(Cavusgil, Deligonul, & Zhang, 2004), (Kalafatis, 2000). This extent <strong>of</strong> inter-dependability between<br />

channel members gives the idea about the importance <strong>of</strong> recruiting capable and competent distributor in a<br />

particular market (Merritt & Newell, 2001) in countries like Pakistan, where the product availability could<br />

turn out to be critical in the final purchase decision <strong>of</strong> the consumer.<br />

The business situation <strong>of</strong> potential supply/channel chain member determines the possible match between<br />

manufacturer and potential candidate (Braglia & Petroni, 2000);(Mummalaneni, Dubas, & Chao, 1996).<br />

Recently there is an immense revolution in science and technological field which has affected the<br />

pharmaceutical industry to a greatest extent. So this demand adjustment in their supply chain as well (Ricci<br />

& Fraser, 2006). Due to discovery and introduction <strong>of</strong> various pharmacy products, there is all together new<br />

introduction <strong>of</strong> different market and consumers which caused the supply networks to adjust as well. Prior to<br />

selecting a distributor, a manufacturer takes a reasonable time to inquire about the potential distributor and<br />

this inquiry could be from the past and present customers, its operational market or even from the<br />

competitors (Cavusgil, Yeoh, & Mitri, 1995). So it has to be a point <strong>of</strong> strong focus for the manufacturer<br />

before the selection decision. Derived from previous channel and supply chain member selection literature,<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

7


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

the firm infrastructure variables included in this research are: “management ability, financial strength,<br />

physical facilities and experiences.” (Lin & Chen, 2008).<br />

The management ability <strong>of</strong> a potential distributor is considered to be very critical for the selection <strong>of</strong><br />

distributor by manufacturer (Cavusgil, Yeoh, & Mitri, 1995), (Rosenbloom, 2004). Management ability<br />

relates to quality <strong>of</strong> management and its core competencies regarding its market, managerial and strategic<br />

operations. (Braglia & Petroni, 2000), (Rosenbloom, 2004) believes that a channel/supply chain member<br />

chosen by the manufacturer should only be considered if its management capabilities are strong enough. A<br />

number <strong>of</strong> researchers are <strong>of</strong> the view that financial strength <strong>of</strong> the distributor is also very important in<br />

selecting a channel/supply partner (Braglia & Petroni, 2000), (Sink & Langley, 1997), (Yeoh & Calantone,<br />

1995). Financial strength provides evidence <strong>of</strong> the prospective channel member’s overall abilities, in<br />

addition to information concerning specific channel functions (Rosenbloom, 2004). The published figures<br />

could be an important source to attain financial figures <strong>of</strong> distributors yet the information could also be<br />

obtained by frequent visits to their business setup and from third party opinion (Cavusgil, Yeoh, & Mitri,<br />

1995).<br />

If the distributor has an experience in the market or in the same industry its competitive position would be<br />

increased to a great extent (Kaleka, 2002), knowledge/information management, uncertainty reduction, and<br />

resource mobilization are the benefits achieved through useful past experience (Shankar, 1999). This is the<br />

reason numerous researchers proved that the past experience is an important factor in selecting a<br />

manufacturers’ channel partner (Abratt & Pitt, 1989), (Braglia & Petroni, 2000), (Fram, 1992). Number <strong>of</strong><br />

researches suggested that the physical facilities employed by the distributor in Electronic Home Appliance<br />

Industry greatly affect Channel member selection decision (Abratt & Pitt, 1989), (Braglia & Petroni, 2000),<br />

(Cavusgil, Yeoh, & Mitri, 1995). Physical facilities adopted by the distributors include Management<br />

Information Systems, Hi-tech equipments and logistic support gives a strong indication that the firm is<br />

capable enough to carry out Supply/Channel tasks (Braglia & Petroni, 2000), (Kaleka, 2002). Empirical<br />

evidence shows that manufacturers across South Asia and Middle East strongly emphasize on the physical<br />

facilities while they are selecting a distributor (Abratt & Pitt, 1989). Based on the academic work presented<br />

above there is a strong indication that the Firm’s Infrastructure is very valuable while selecting a<br />

distributor.<br />

2.2 Marketing Capabilities<br />

Manufacturers are increasingly relying on the distributors for the various channel and marketing activities<br />

like Promos and Merchandising (Merritt & Newell, 2001) in order to stay focused on core competencies<br />

and resource mobilization (Sink & Langley, 1997). In this way the distributors also act as a marketing<br />

partner for the firm as it provides important marketing information and trends needed to be understood by<br />

the manufacturer as they are supposed to remain vigilant towards the changing customer requirement<br />

(Paun, 1997) while achieving satisfaction <strong>of</strong> customers(Mudambi & Aggarwal, 2003).<br />

The high percentage <strong>of</strong> firms’ overall sale has been done by the distributor and for this the support from the<br />

manufacturing company has been increased now-a-days (Goodman & Dion, 2001). Marketing capabilities<br />

is the collective ability <strong>of</strong> the firm to apply the skills, knowledge, resources and capital to the market<br />

related need <strong>of</strong> the businesses in order to capture highest market share (Weerawardena & O’Cass, 2004).<br />

Distributor/manufacturer relationships are governed by contract which stipulates the distributor margin and<br />

requires the distributor to implement various trade and consumer promotional activities for the<br />

manufacturer (Aman & Hopkinson, 2010). The core <strong>of</strong> this capability lies in the accuracy to reach the<br />

target market efficiently and at the right time (Vorhies & Harker, 2000). The target market scenario is<br />

important as the customers must be those to whom the product is meant for. (Shipley, Cook, & Barnett,<br />

1989), (Weerawardena & O’Cass, 2004) argues that in order to have this the behavior <strong>of</strong> the distributor<br />

must be such that they are willing to understand the customers and market needs prior to their competitors.<br />

According to channel member selection literature, “marketing capabilities generally include sales strength,<br />

market coverage, and product compatibility.” (Lin & Chen, 2008).<br />

High majority <strong>of</strong> firms considers selling ability <strong>of</strong> the distributor as their highest priority because at the end<br />

<strong>of</strong> it is the selling and capturing market share that matters (Cavusgil, Yeoh, & Mitri, 1995), (Yeoh &<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

8


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

Calantone, 1995). A manufacturer will observe detailed sales performance information from a prospective<br />

channel member to get a firsthand view <strong>of</strong> its effectiveness (Mummalaneni, Dubas, & Chao, 1996),<br />

(Rosenbloom, 2004).<br />

Goodman & Dion (2001) provides us with the evidence that highly devoted distributor comes with the<br />

market intelligence based on the strength in their relationship. Even more the willingness <strong>of</strong> distributor in<br />

distributing only one manufacturers’ family <strong>of</strong> product depends on the commitment <strong>of</strong> manufacturer in<br />

distributor’s organization and its benefits (Goodman & Dion, 2001).<br />

Marketing competence is also thought <strong>of</strong> as a distributors’ ability to cover the maximum geographical<br />

territory (Braglia & Petroni, 2000), (Stern, El-Ansary, & Coughlan, 1996). It would help in achieving high<br />

volume <strong>of</strong> sales, gaining market share, economies <strong>of</strong> scale and scope, market penetration, high product<br />

availability and finally attaining high brand reputation as far as the network and availability is concerned<br />

(Cavusgil, Yeoh, & Mitri, 1995), (Rosenbloom, 2004), (Yeoh & Calantone, 1995).<br />

Marketing capabilities is also measured by the fact that how the manufacturer is evaluating the product line<br />

<strong>of</strong> distributor (Cavusgil, Yeoh, & Mitri, 1995). If the distributor is carrying similar products or the products<br />

having the same distribution mechanism than it would be a great plus for the distributor. This concept has<br />

also been endorsed by various other researchers. The distributor has the responsibility to sale and delivers<br />

the goods to all economically feasible outlets in the agreed locality/market. “In return, the distributor<br />

receives the manufacturer goods exclusively in a particular area. This exclusivity renders the manufacturer<br />

highly dependent upon the efforts <strong>of</strong> distributors to maximize sales. This dependence is mitigated, however,<br />

by contractual terms and the manufacturer’s brand power. In turn distributors accept control which is<br />

mitigated by exclusive access to a geographic market with respect to popular and well supported brands”<br />

(Aman & Hopkinson, 2010).<br />

Mentioning the fact that manufacturers’ prefer the distributors who are experienced enough in carrying<br />

complementary and compatible products instead the substitute (Fram, 1992), (Rosenbloom, 2004), (Yeoh<br />

& Calantone, 1995). Summing up the idea, the manufacturer would give importance to the distributor<br />

having a strong market competence and this fact is also been supported by (Berman, 1999).<br />

2.3 Relationship intensity<br />

The impact <strong>of</strong> commitment, trust and relationships has a meaningful impact on the strong and long-term<br />

relationship between channel partners (Frazier, 1999). Channel management research has now been<br />

emphasizing a lot on managing the relationships between people, firms and organizations performing<br />

distribution functions, it would help in creating value for the customers providing the product at right time<br />

and place (Weitz & Jap, 1995). ). There have been few determinants identified by various researchers in<br />

Manufacturer-Distributor relationship like communication, Power, trust and dependence (Goodman &<br />

Dion, 2001). The development <strong>of</strong> a manufacturer’s relationship with its channel members greatly affects<br />

channel cooperation, channel efficiency and the manufacturer’s competitive advantage (Kaleka, 2002).<br />

However this concept is growing with the growing concept <strong>of</strong> relationship marketing where even the<br />

exchanges are nominated as relationship exchange (Weitz & Jap, 1995). Therefore, manufacturers will<br />

evaluate relationship factors care<strong>full</strong>y when selecting channel/supply chain members (Mummalaneni,<br />

Dubas, & Chao, 1996), (Min, 1993). However, these relationship-related factors, within the context <strong>of</strong><br />

channel member selection, are not sufficiently discussed in the current literature.<br />

Extant research has used terms such as relationship strength, relationship quality, relationship intensity, and<br />

relationship magnitude when describing inter-firm relationships (Bove & Johnson, 2001), (Golicic, Foggin,<br />

& Mentzer, 2003), (Rindfleisch & Moorman, 2001). A positive link between relationship intensity and<br />

channel outcomes has also been supported (Santoro, 2000). Following on these findings, we propose that<br />

the construct “relationship intensity” is an important factor for a manufacturer’s selection <strong>of</strong> distributors.<br />

This construct includes the distributor’s enthusiasm to build a relationship, commitment, and willingness to<br />

share information as well as the manufacturer’s familiarity with the distributor. At the same time one could<br />

really argue that a good distributor turns out to be a critical success factor for the manufacturer. (Goodman<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

9


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

& Dion, 2001) argues that securing distributor commitment is a difficult task as they act as an independent<br />

business entity. Each distributor is an independent, appointed intermediary who performs the responsibility<br />

<strong>of</strong> purchasing goods from the manufacturers, selling and delivering to wholesalers and also to some<br />

retailers, most notably urban retailers in case <strong>of</strong> Pakistan(Aman & Hopkinson, 2010).<br />

Scholars suggested that firms should seek distributors who show enthusiasm for the contract and who are<br />

hungry for success (Anderson & Weitz, 1991), (Yeoh & Calantone, 1995), (Rosenbloom, 2004),<br />

(Coughlan, Anderson, Stern, & El-A, 2001) also emphasize the value <strong>of</strong> a prospective channel member’s<br />

enthusiasm and aggressiveness, which is believed to be closely related to long-term success in handling the<br />

manufacturer’s products. Therefore, manufacturers would prefer distributors who are enthusiastic to<br />

cooperate.<br />

Commitment is considered crucial to the long-term success <strong>of</strong> a business relationship, providing the basis<br />

for a cooperative spirit in marketing channel relationships, leading to an overall stronger partnership<br />

(Andaleeb, 1996). A manufacturer’s acquaintance/familiarity with the prospective distributor is considered<br />

important; as such familiarity can be positively related to its expectation <strong>of</strong> future coordination with the<br />

distributor in a channel relationship (Celly & Frazier, 1996). Manufacturers are more likely to choose<br />

distributors with whom they are familiar or who are recommended by channel customers (Shipley, Egan, &<br />

Edgett, 1991). Likelihood <strong>of</strong> a successful partnership increases as the above qualities enhance mutual<br />

communication and relationship maintenance.<br />

2.4 Logistic Capabilities<br />

A good distribution network considers Logistics as a source <strong>of</strong> core strategic advantage (Novack, Rinehart,<br />

& Langley, 1994), (Fawcett, Stanley, & Smith, 1997), (Zhao, Dro ¨ge, & Stank, 2001). A well-managed<br />

logistic services handled by a distributor not only brings financial advantage (Cost Saving) but also the<br />

operational efficiency, flexibility and value <strong>of</strong> the entire supply channel (Fuller, O’Conor, & Rawlinson,<br />

1993). A well-managed channel requires that its members be equipped with good logistics capabilities.<br />

(Bowersox, Closs, & Stank, 1999), (Day, 1994), (Desarbo, Benedetto, Song, & Sinha, 2005), (Lynch,<br />

Keller, & Ozment, 2000) created a strong relationship between Firms’ logistics capabilities and its<br />

performance from the literature <strong>of</strong> marketing, logistics and Supply Chain.<br />

There is a diverse academic research available on logistic capability and firms’ performance. “Derived<br />

from (Fawcett, Stanley, & Smith, 1997), (Morash, Droge, & Vickery, 1996) and (Zhao, Dro ¨ge, & Stank,<br />

2001), inventory management, delivery efficiency, flexibility, innovation, logistics cost, and customer<br />

service are included in this research”.<br />

For any distributor the primary operational responsibility is to manage its inventory providing the highest<br />

service level and minimum inventory holding cost(Lambert, Cooper, & Pagh, 1998), and it is <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

considered to be the foremost and fundamental factor <strong>of</strong> firms’ logistic capability (Looman, Ruffni, & de<br />

Boer, 2002), (Svensson, 2003). Researchers studied the efficiency to deliver products as another important<br />

aspect <strong>of</strong> firms’ logistic capability (Daugherty, Stank, & Ellinger, 1998), (Fawcett, Stanley, & Smith,<br />

1997), (Morash, Droge, & Vickery, 1996). Whenever we talk about delivery efficiency it means the time<br />

between order taking and product delivery must be minimized and order quantity must be accurate and<br />

precise (Morash, Droge, & Vickery, 1996), and these capabilities are important for supply chain member<br />

selection (Cavusgil, Yeoh, & Mitri, 1995), (Da Silva, Davies, & Naude ´, 2002). (Fawcett, Stanley, &<br />

Smith, 1997), (Vickery, Calantone, & Dro ¨ge, 1999) cited that ” logistics system’s ability to accommodate<br />

special or non-routine requests and provide rapid response to customer requests, indicates a firm’s<br />

competence to respond to the needs <strong>of</strong> markets, and is regarded as an important sign <strong>of</strong> logistics<br />

performance.” Manufacturers’ value flexibility, when selecting channel/supply chain members (Da Silva,<br />

Davies, & Naude ,2002), (Sink & Langley, 1997). Organizations’ success lies in the level <strong>of</strong> its innovation<br />

(Calantone, Cavusgil, & Zhao, 2002), (Mone, McKinley, & Barker, 1998) and the effective performance <strong>of</strong><br />

its logistics (Chapman, Soosay, & Kandampully, 2003), (Fawcett, Stanley, & Smith, 1997), (Flint, Larsson,<br />

Gammelgaard, & Mentzer, 2005).<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

10


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

A distributor must be willing to enhance the value-added content <strong>of</strong> its logistic services and it would be a<br />

source <strong>of</strong> competitive advantage for the organization (Fawcett, Stanley, & Smith, 1997), (Flint, Larsson,<br />

Gammelgaard, & Mentzer, 2005), (Morash, Droge, & Vickery, 1996). So the innovation becomes the<br />

important factor for the selection <strong>of</strong> distributor (Fawcett, Stanley, & Smith, 1997). Customer service is<br />

another aspect <strong>of</strong> logistic capability <strong>of</strong> the firm(Fawcett, Stanley, & Smith, 1997), (Mentzer, Flint, & Hult,<br />

2001), (Morash, Droge, & Vickery, 1996) and channel member selection (Min, 1993), provided that the<br />

organization considers the high quality <strong>of</strong> customer service as a core responsibility <strong>of</strong> their distribution<br />

network, given the tendency to view customer service orientation as a principal determinant <strong>of</strong> channel<br />

activities and the heightened attention to the importance <strong>of</strong> service quality in many supply chain practices<br />

(Katsikeas, Paparoidamis, & Katsikeas, 2004).<br />

2.5 Strategic Issues<br />

Various practitioners believe that the distributor to be selected must have a strategic importance for the<br />

manufacturer. A manufacturer has interests associated with the distributor prior to the selection. It could be<br />

in the form <strong>of</strong> achieving high market share, to counter any strategy <strong>of</strong> the competitor or making a high<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ile organization as their channel partner. The interests could vary but these issues are in their mind and<br />

they become cautious and analytical in their approach. Sometimes a cultural match is important between<br />

both parties. So it becomes easier to carry out business between them. A positive synergy usually develops<br />

if a culture is being matched.<br />

3. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK<br />

Figure 1 presents the research framework delineating the four determinant constructs that influence<br />

manufacturers’ distributor selection. The constructs are drawn from the literature as well as from the insight<br />

<strong>of</strong> practitioners.<br />

Firm Infrastructure<br />

Marketing<br />

Capabilities<br />

Relationship Intensity<br />

Logistics Capabilities<br />

Determinants <strong>of</strong> Manufacturers’<br />

Selection <strong>of</strong> Distributor<br />

Strategic Issues<br />

Figure 1: The Conceptual Framework<br />

(Adapted from Lin and Chen, 2001)<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

11


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

4. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY<br />

Measure development<br />

And pretest<br />

Item Generation from literature<br />

Expert Opinions<br />

Pre-Test<br />

Two stages main<br />

Survey procedure<br />

Survey for Exploratory Analysis Exploratory<br />

Analysis<br />

Survey for Confirmatory Analysis<br />

Confirmatory Analysis<br />

Source: Hsu, Kannan, Leong and Tan, 2006;”Supplier Selection Construct: Instrument development and validation”<br />

The figure shows two steps procedure that is used to develop survey instrument and to test the distributor<br />

selection constructs. The first step, measure development and pretest, was used to develop and validate the<br />

survey instrument, while the second step two stages main survey procedure, was used to test and validate<br />

the research construct Items generation was meant to identify the factors that are important for the selection<br />

<strong>of</strong> distributor from the literature <strong>of</strong> Marketing, Supply Chain management and Logistics. Expert opinions<br />

were taken from three managers <strong>of</strong> pharmaceutical distribution center <strong>of</strong> three different companies and<br />

three managers from three different companies <strong>of</strong> electronic home appliances industry. Pretesting would be<br />

done from another five managers <strong>of</strong> respective industries .Surveys for exploratory and confirmatory<br />

analysis would involve data collection from the final sample <strong>of</strong> five different companies <strong>of</strong> respective<br />

industries to confirm and test the validity <strong>of</strong> research construct across the industry. The data was collection<br />

through the questionnaire using deductive and inductive approach, based on the literature and insights<br />

drawn from the experts’ opinion.<br />

Sampling was done based on the organizations’ performance and its current market share relevant to both<br />

industries. So, all the ten manufacturers’ in the sample are the leading organizations <strong>of</strong> their industries thus<br />

making the research findings more valid, relevant and authentic.<br />

The sampling frame consisted <strong>of</strong> 10 manufacturers representing five from each industry. The sample<br />

represented both national and international organizations <strong>of</strong> both industries. Two Local and three foreign<br />

manufacturers were picked for the sample from pharmaceutical industry. Similarly, two Local and three<br />

foreign invested companies were chosen for the same in Electronic home appliance industry.<br />

5. ELECTRONIC HOME APPLIANCE INDUSTRY ANALYSIS<br />

Our empirical findings are quite supportive <strong>of</strong> the conceptual framework to explore dimensions <strong>of</strong><br />

distributors’’ selection. The five key constructs in our model all have positive and crucial for the selection<br />

<strong>of</strong> distributor. As shown above, are the factors that are extracted from the literature and validated through<br />

the factor analysis. It extracted five constructs. As explained earlier the factor weight <strong>of</strong> 0.60 has been as a<br />

minimum cut-<strong>of</strong>f value which makes the criteria more strict and valid. The prior research that been done<br />

related to this topic set the criteria <strong>of</strong> 0.50 (Chris and Len, 2008) making our research results even more<br />

authentic.<br />

For the first construct i.e. Firm Infrastructure we have four items that must be present in a potential<br />

distributor in order to get selected as a channel/supply partner. The first item in it refers to the management<br />

capability <strong>of</strong> the firm. So we could safely say that the management quality in terms <strong>of</strong> their personnel<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

12


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

repute, vision and market standing has been considered very important from the manufacturer’s view point.<br />

The operational competency also lies in the same item and has been given the same response therefore. As<br />

we found in previous literatures that supply chain quality in Electronic home Appliance Industry is as<br />

important as the product quality. Therefore, we found a valid result to strengthen our argument. The second<br />

construct correspond to the marketing capabilities <strong>of</strong> the distributor. The firms’ reputation in the market,<br />

the ability to sale goods and the geographical coverage are considered to be the most important for the<br />

selection criteria <strong>of</strong> distributor. Obviously, it is the sale that matters for the manufacturer because ultimately<br />

it would lead towards the highest gain <strong>of</strong> market share. Therefore, these industry manufacturers’ prefer<br />

those distributor whom they think are gutsy enough to increase their sale graphs. The third construct that<br />

was explored in the literature and proposed by this research is about the Relationship intensity between<br />

both channels partner both business and strategic relations are a part <strong>of</strong> it. They are measured through<br />

information sharing, enthusiasm to build relations, commitment to sales, ordering and payments, and finally<br />

the familiarity <strong>of</strong> both parties. All the factors are critical to selection decision except for familiarity and<br />

information sharing which has been proved by this research. The results would lead us to explain that even<br />

if the firms’ are in business relation with each other for the first time, it does not matter. Rather the<br />

relationship would progress in a positive way if commitments related to sales, ordering and payments are<br />

fulfilled and at the same time, there must be a strong willingness to build relationship for a longer period <strong>of</strong><br />

time. As it would, uplift the trust between both channel members.<br />

The fourth construct was related to the Logistic capabilities <strong>of</strong> the distributor. Inventory management,<br />

efficient delivery and accommodation on non-routine orders are first three items comprising this factor. The<br />

remaining are the increasing value-added services and logistics cost reduction. All the factors related to this<br />

constructed derived from the literature has been proved in this research. It shows very high priority given to<br />

the Logistic abilities <strong>of</strong> distributor. The findings <strong>of</strong> this construct complemented the fact that the valueadded<br />

by one channel member would increase the value <strong>of</strong> entire supply channel. Similarly, the efforts to<br />

reduce the cost <strong>of</strong> distribution by the distributor does have a positive influence on the selection decisions <strong>of</strong><br />

manufacturer’s <strong>of</strong> this industry. There has been enough evidence to say that the Electronic home appliance<br />

industry manufacturer’s focuses on the distributor logistic power. Because the supply chain value could be<br />

increased dramatically if the distributor has the mentioned capabilities in him.<br />

Items<br />

INF1<br />

INF2<br />

INF3<br />

INF4<br />

MKT1<br />

MKT2<br />

MKT3<br />

REL1<br />

REL2<br />

REL3<br />

LOG1<br />

LOG2<br />

LOG3<br />

LOG4<br />

LOG5<br />

STR1<br />

Firm<br />

Infrastructure<br />

.674<br />

.947<br />

.992<br />

.806<br />

Table 1 Rotated factor loadings for the final 16-items instrument<br />

Market<br />

Capabilities<br />

.830<br />

.806<br />

.977<br />

Relationship<br />

Intensity<br />

STR2<br />

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis<br />

Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization<br />

Logistic<br />

Capabilities<br />

Strategic<br />

Issues<br />

Cronbach’s<br />

Alpha<br />

.90<br />

.88<br />

.885<br />

.706<br />

.889 .83<br />

.888<br />

.745<br />

.967<br />

.780<br />

.885<br />

.89<br />

.953<br />

.889 .90<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

13


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

This case provides us with another dimension <strong>of</strong> distributor selection and that is the Strategic issue<br />

concerning the selection <strong>of</strong> distributor. Although this construct has been included in Supplier selection<br />

researches but for the very first time it is the part <strong>of</strong> distributor selection research. It has also been proven<br />

that any distributor who is considered to be strategically important for a manufacturer in a particular market<br />

does have every possibility to be selected as channel member. It is so because the manufacturer could gain<br />

the competitive advantage through its supply network.<br />

The proposed framework comprised <strong>of</strong> five constructs i.e. firm infrastructure, marketing capabilities,<br />

relationship intensity, logistics capabilities and strategic issues hence been significantly supported by the<br />

manufacturers’ <strong>of</strong> electronic home appliance industry.<br />

Multivariate Analysis has been applied to judge the relation <strong>of</strong> Manufacturer’s firm size and Nationality<br />

(foreign invested or domestic) with the selection decision.<br />

Table 2 Multivariate Analysis<br />

Source Dependent Variable Type III Sum <strong>of</strong> Squares df Mean Square F Sig.<br />

Firm_size mkt_capa 3.654 1 3.654 .442 .626<br />

Firm_infra 1.520 1 1.520 6.955 .231<br />

Log_cap_str .013 1 .013 .006 .950<br />

relation_int 1.864 1 1.864 .448 .625<br />

Sal_turn mkt_capa 2.421 1 2.421 .293 .684<br />

Firm_infra 6.380 1 6.380 29.197 .116<br />

Log_cap_str .048 1 .048 .022 .906<br />

relation_int .177 1 .177 .042 .871<br />

Man_nat mkt_capa .262 1 .262 .032 .888<br />

Firm_infra_str .472 1 .472 2.161 .380<br />

Log_cap 5.554 1 5.554 2.563 .355<br />

relation_int 6.547 1 6.547 1.573 .429<br />

It was found to have no significant impact on distributor selection decision. This indicates us that there is<br />

no difference between manufacturers’ <strong>of</strong> different sizes and nationalities for the distributor selection. The<br />

result is reinforcing the cross-national comparative results <strong>of</strong> (Shipley D. , 1984) and (Abratt & Pitt, 1989).<br />

5.1 Critical Selection Factor Structure<br />

Table 3 below shows the critical selection factor structure comprising the 21 factors, sorted in descending<br />

order <strong>of</strong> criticality and stratified into three tiers representing stages <strong>of</strong> priorities emphasis. Tier I consists <strong>of</strong><br />

the 5 factors and their presence in a potential distributor are most critical to its selection. Tier II consists <strong>of</strong><br />

11 factors which plays a supporting role in manufacturers’ choice <strong>of</strong> distributor. Whereas, Tier III<br />

constitutes <strong>of</strong> 6 factors and are described as the maintaining factors to the selection <strong>of</strong> distributor. It is<br />

important here to describe the Critical, Supporting and Maintaining factors as to their level <strong>of</strong> importance to<br />

a successful selection <strong>of</strong> distributor by the manufacturer approach devised by Thiagarajan and Zairi (1998)<br />

and again validated by Awan and Bukhari (2008):<br />

• Critical: Factors those are critical and absolutely essential. There is a good chance that an organization<br />

will not be selected as a Channel partner if the Manufacturer does not find these factors in potential<br />

Distribution candidate.<br />

• Supporting: Factors those are important but not absolutely essential. There will be a chance that an<br />

organization may be selected as a channel partner in spite <strong>of</strong> the absence <strong>of</strong> such factors, but the potential<br />

distributor candidate may have to address these issues in future in order to maintain the efficient supply<br />

chain process.<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

14


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

• Maintaining: Factors are <strong>of</strong> minor importance. These factors will not seriously affect the distributor<br />

selection decision process.<br />

The critical quality factor structure suggests that in Tier-I there are factors related to the reputation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

potential distributor in the market as well as its commitment to ordering and payment procedures. Both<br />

these variables refer to the factor <strong>of</strong> relationship intensity between the manufacturer and the distributor. In<br />

addition to this Tier-I also presents the importance <strong>of</strong> value added logistic services considered by the<br />

manufacturer and the cultural match that has to be made between both the organizations. So, this tier<br />

validating the constructs <strong>of</strong> relationship intensity and logistic capabilities founded through literature.<br />

Table 3 Critical Indices <strong>of</strong> selection Factors in Electronic Home Appliance Sector<br />

Index Values<br />

Selection Factors<br />

Tier I<br />

0.233333333<br />

0.233333333<br />

0.233333333<br />

0.233333333<br />

0.233333333<br />

Tier II<br />

0.466666667<br />

0.466666667<br />

0.466666667<br />

0.466666667<br />

0.466666667<br />

0.466666667<br />

0.466666667<br />

0.466666667<br />

0.466666667<br />

0.466666667<br />

0.466666667<br />

Tier III<br />

0.700000000<br />

0.700000000<br />

0.700000000<br />

0.700000000<br />

0.700000000<br />

Critical<br />

The distributor has good reputation in market<br />

The distributor is committed to ordering and payment procedure<br />

You company is familiar with the distributor<br />

The distributor is aggressive in increasing the value added contents <strong>of</strong> logistics<br />

The distributor has cultural match with the company<br />

Supporting<br />

The distributor has good management capabilities<br />

The distributor is in good financial position<br />

The distributor is equipment with good physical facilities<br />

The distributor covers the markets that your company wants to reach<br />

The distributor carries product that do not directly compete with your products<br />

The distributor is enthusiastic to build a relationship with your company<br />

The distributor is committed to minimum sales quota<br />

The distributor is willing to share information with company<br />

The distributor is able to accommodate special/non-routine request<br />

The distributor is able to minimize logistics costs<br />

The distributor provides good customer service<br />

Maintaining<br />

The distributor is experienced in distributing electronics related product<br />

The distributor has good sales competence<br />

The distributor manages inventory well<br />

The distributor delivers goods efficiently<br />

The distributor has strategic importance to firm<br />

The electronic home appliance manufacturer in Pakistan considers that the presences <strong>of</strong> these factors are<br />

extremely important to be present in the potential distributor in order to become the permanent supply<br />

chain partner. Tier II presents the highest number <strong>of</strong> factors that must be present in a distributor in order to<br />

be selected as supply member. The managerial capabilities, financial strength, market coverage and<br />

physical facilities owned by the distributor are important for its selection. Manufacturers consider that that<br />

the management must be operationally competent and quality oriented.<br />

In the same way, the financial strength gives us the overall idea about the prospective member in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

its Business pr<strong>of</strong>ile and assets owned by them. So both these factors are complementing each other.<br />

Manufacturers’ <strong>of</strong> electronics do consider the importance <strong>of</strong> enthusiasm present in potential distributor to<br />

build strong and long-term relationship. So they consider a need to share information about market and<br />

future strategies. Tier-II also involves the commitment <strong>of</strong> distributor to meet sales targets. This is very<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

15


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

much evident even from the literature that the manufacturer would favor that party whose has the ability to<br />

increases the sales figures, accommodating non-routine requests and ability to minimize the logistic cost.<br />

Tier-III consists <strong>of</strong> 5 determinants that are considered as maintaining factors for the selection <strong>of</strong> distributor.<br />

It involves the experience in carrying related products, the inventory management, sales competence,<br />

product delivery and strategic importance.<br />

6. PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY ANALYSIS<br />

A scientific and technological revolution is sweeping the pharmaceutical industry that enables drug makers<br />

to produce pr<strong>of</strong>itable new medicines. But revolutions demand adjustments, and this revolution requires the<br />

supply chains to adjust with it. The pharmaceutical companies who have long been considered the laggards<br />

in supply chain management. Therefore, the findings determined from this industry would be very<br />

interesting. The pharmaceutical manufacturers’ in Pakistan considers the importance <strong>of</strong> strong Firm<br />

Infrastructure in their channel members. Prior to selection, a potential candidate is evaluated on the<br />

parameters <strong>of</strong> its Managerial capabilities, financial strength, Experience and availability <strong>of</strong> physical<br />

facilities which is in complete accordance with our proposed framework and hence validated through the<br />

extraction <strong>of</strong> factor analysis.<br />

Table 4 Rotated factor loadings for the final 16-items instrument<br />

Item<br />

Firm<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Marketing<br />

Capabilities<br />

Relationship<br />

Intensity<br />

Logistic<br />

Capabilities<br />

Cronbachs’<br />

Alpha<br />

INF1<br />

INF2<br />

INF3<br />

INF4<br />

.940<br />

.918<br />

.944<br />

.971<br />

.95<br />

MKT1<br />

MKT2<br />

MKT3<br />

.991<br />

.988<br />

.885<br />

.96<br />

REL2<br />

REL3<br />

REL4<br />

REL5<br />

.931<br />

.901<br />

.940<br />

.724<br />

.85<br />

LOG2<br />

LOG3<br />

LOG4<br />

LOG5<br />

LOG6<br />

.956<br />

.655<br />

.873<br />

.888<br />

.788<br />

.90<br />

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis<br />

Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization<br />

In this way, our first proposed construct has been validated. The financial strength gives the added<br />

advantage that the distributor can sold as many products as manufacturer expected. Since this industry is<br />

one <strong>of</strong> the highly competitive ones and the options <strong>of</strong> substitute products for whole sellers, retailers and<br />

consumers are very large. So the experience <strong>of</strong> the distributor and its operational competency would come<br />

into play. Making this construct a logical parameter to be considered and also having the support <strong>of</strong><br />

literature.<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

16


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

The next one is the Marketing capabilities held by the distributor. This is the second construct proposed in<br />

the framework and has been proved by the survey. For any distributor, the ultimate purpose is to sale the<br />

product by meeting targets set by the manufacturer. If the distributor has got enough resources and will to<br />

cover those areas asked by the manufacturer so it would have the positive influence and more are the<br />

chances that the distributor gets selected as channel partner. The most among point that a manufacturer<br />

considers here is that the distributor must not be carrying the competitors’ product in their product line. The<br />

reason behind that are the high product alternatives available to channel members <strong>of</strong> this industry. So the<br />

manufacturer would want to keep themselves on the safer side by demanding their distributor to be<br />

exclusive as far their product line is considered so that the focus could also be increased. The manufacturer<br />

would prefer those distributors that fulfill these conditions as they consider them to be critical for the<br />

channel success.<br />

Relationship intensity between two channel members is important in supply chain because critical may<br />

involve the coordination <strong>of</strong> both parties. They may not consider the enthusiasm found in their potential<br />

distributor rather the fulfillment <strong>of</strong> commitments shown by the candidate is important. The manufacturers’<br />

base their insight on the more realistic terms. Commitments to ordering and payment procedures are critical<br />

to them and hence ranked important by the respondents <strong>of</strong> this research. The agreed terms on sales quote<br />

must also be regarded and fulfilled by the distributor. As this industry has been growing and technology has<br />

revolutionized it to a greatest extent. So it demands the supply chain members to share each every<br />

information related to market, product and consumers. The manufacturers’ would prefer those distributors<br />

who are willing to share the information with their manufacturers’. Our responding manufacturers’ showed<br />

the importance <strong>of</strong> this in their responses. Similarly, one has enough evidence with this to say that the nature<br />

<strong>of</strong> Pharmaceutical industry requires them to provide feedback continuously in order to stay ahead <strong>of</strong> the<br />

competitors.<br />

The distributors’ efficiency in product delivery, reducing lead time and precise order delivery considered to<br />

be very important for the selection decision by manufacturer. Pharmaceutical manufacturers’ are <strong>of</strong> the<br />

view that the rate <strong>of</strong> special/non-routine requests is very high in this industry. This uncertainty is a courtesy<br />

<strong>of</strong> several varying factors. But the point to understand is the distributor must be vigilant enough every time<br />

to entertain such demands. One could consider the fact that medicines have limited lives and they tend to<br />

expire after that. So delivery must be efficient to negate this issue otherwise it’s a waste <strong>of</strong> a resource. It<br />

requires them to provided value added logistic services and remaining cost efficient at the same time. The<br />

pharmaceutical manufacturers argue that the distributor must be thinking all the time and has all the<br />

knowledge to sort out transportation and logistics issues. The variables <strong>of</strong> logistic capabilities explored at<br />

the initial stage <strong>of</strong> this research are been supported by the manufacturers as well. We could safely say that<br />

the constructs explored through the literature that are comprised <strong>of</strong> Firm Infrastructure, Marketing<br />

Capabilities, Relationship Intensity and Logistic capabilities are hence been significantly proved and<br />

validating the framework.<br />

Multivariate Analysis has been applied to judge the relation <strong>of</strong> Manufacturer’s firm size and Nationality<br />

(foreign invested or domestic) with the selection decision. It was found to have no significant impact on<br />

distributor selection decision. This indicates us that there is no difference between manufacturers’ <strong>of</strong><br />

different sizes and nationalities for the distributor selection. Our result is also reinforcing the cross-national<br />

comparative results <strong>of</strong> (Shipley D. , 1984) and (Abratt & Pitt, 1989).<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

17


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

Table 4 Multivarite Analysis<br />

Source Dependent Variable Type III Sum <strong>of</strong> Squares df Mean Square F Sig.<br />

Firm_size Firm_infra .095 1 .095 24.212 .128<br />

makt_capa 3.184 1 3.184 13768.839 .212<br />

log_cap 4.246 1 4.246 2.908 .338<br />

Log_capa 6.101 1 6.101 8.405 .211<br />

sal_turn Firm_infra 3.251 1 3.251 826.554 .022<br />

makt_capa 6.532 1 6.532 28250.020 .548<br />

log_cap 4.544 1 4.544 3.112 .328<br />

Log_capa 2.608 1 2.608 3.593 .309<br />

Man_nat Firm_infra .614 1 .614 156.138 .051<br />

makt_capa 4.974 1 4.974 21510.133 .616<br />

log_cap 1.314 1 1.314 .900 .517<br />

Log_capa 2.551 1 2.551 3.514 .312<br />

6.1 Critical Selection Factor Structure<br />

The critical indices for Pharmaceutical Industry consist <strong>of</strong> 18 factors which are also divided into three tiers<br />

namely Critical, Supporting and maintaining respectively. The critical factors <strong>of</strong> Tier-I involves three<br />

critical elements which are financial position <strong>of</strong> the company, its experience in the distribution and the<br />

commitment to minimum sales quota. The manufacturers’ <strong>of</strong> pharmaceutical industry considers that the<br />

financial standing <strong>of</strong> distributor and the assets owned by them gives the overall picture <strong>of</strong> their business<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ile. They must be experienced enough and must be committed to sales quotas. These are the most<br />

essential factors that are considered in Pharmaceutical distributor selection decision. And we are confident<br />

to say that the distributor lacking in these dimensions has a very rare chance to be selected as a channel<br />

partner.<br />

Tier-II involves eight elements comprising <strong>of</strong> the managerial capabilities, physical facilities, reputation <strong>of</strong><br />

potential channel member, familiarity between both entities and manufacturer-distributor relationship are<br />

few <strong>of</strong> the variables that provides the supporting role for the selection decision made by the manufacturer.<br />

Index<br />

Value<br />

Tier I<br />

0.466666667<br />

0.466666667<br />

0.466666667<br />

Tier II<br />

0.700000000<br />

0.700000000<br />

0.700000000<br />

0.700000000<br />

0.700000000<br />

0.700000000<br />

0.700000000<br />

0.700000000<br />

Table 6 Critical Indices <strong>of</strong> selection Factors in Pharmaceutical Sector<br />

Selection Factors<br />

Critical<br />

The distributor is in good financial position<br />

The distributor is experienced in distributing Pharmacy related product<br />

The distributor is committed to minimum sales quota.<br />

Supporting<br />

The distributor has good management capabilities.<br />

The distributor is equipment with good physical facilities.<br />

The distributor has good reputation in market.<br />

The distributor has good sales competence.<br />

The distributor is enthusiastic to build a relationship with your company.<br />

The distributor is committed to ordering and payment procedure.<br />

You company is familiar with the distributor.<br />

The distributor delivers goods efficiently.<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

18


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

Tier III<br />

0.933333333<br />

0.933333333<br />

0.933333333<br />

0.933333333<br />

0.933333333<br />

0.933333333<br />

0.933333333<br />

Maintaining<br />

The distributor covers the markets that your company wants to reach.<br />

The distributor carries product that do not directly compete with your products<br />

The distributor manages inventory well.<br />

The distributor is able to accommodate special/non-routine request.<br />

The distributor is aggressive in increasing the value added contents <strong>of</strong> logistics<br />

The distributor is able to minimize logistics costs.<br />

The distributor provides good customer service.<br />

The manufacturers <strong>of</strong> this industry consider that the familiarity must be high between both channel<br />

members and the distributor must be enthusiastic to share the information with the manufacturer. The<br />

delivery <strong>of</strong> goods made by the distributor to the market is also important element that needs to be<br />

considered before the selection decision. The distributor must be efficient in product delivery, building<br />

relationships and must posses’ strong managerial competency in order to be selected as a Supply chain<br />

member.<br />

Tier-III constitutes <strong>of</strong> seven maintaining elements which may not be mandatory but their presence in any<br />

potential distributor would give an extra advantage for the organization to be selected as a channel partner.<br />

The market coverage, inventory management, value added logistics contents, customer service are few <strong>of</strong><br />

them. Distributor carrying the alternative products, non-routine order handling and minimizing logistics<br />

costs is the few other maintaining elements. The manufacturers thus give less priority to them as compared<br />

to the critical and supporting ones.<br />

7. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS<br />

The multi-criteria decision to select distributors is one <strong>of</strong> the most important issues in channel management<br />

for manufacturers. Our empirical findings are quite supportive <strong>of</strong> the conceptual framework to explore<br />

dimensions <strong>of</strong> distributor selection. The five key factors in our model all have positive and significant<br />

effects on manufacturers’ selection <strong>of</strong> distributors in Electronic Home appliance industry and four in<br />

Pharmaceutical industry. This indicates that manufacturers, when selecting distributors, pay attention to not<br />

only distributors’ firm infrastructure and marketing capabilities emphasized by most previous research, but<br />

also on distributors’ relationship intensity and logistics capabilities. In addition considering Strategic Issues<br />

is also another fact that must be evaluated. There exists no significant difference between large and small or<br />

domestic and foreign-invested firms in the distributor selection, indicating that the all <strong>of</strong> the factors may be<br />

applied to firms <strong>of</strong> different sizes and nationalities. This study fills an important research gap and improves<br />

our knowledge <strong>of</strong> distributor selection by proposing and empirically testing a framework to serve as a<br />

foundation for examining manufacturers’ distributor selection. It also identified that how critical one single<br />

factor could be for the selection. Distributors performing well with respect to the four factors will build<br />

their competitive advantage. In addition to this, it also shows us the fact that how individual industries<br />

prefer different factors based on the criticality. It shows us the fact that selection criteria varies with the<br />

industry and both have separate priorities.<br />

The case provides us solid implications for both manufacturers and distributors. In an era <strong>of</strong> low margins,<br />

manufacturers must not only maximize their manufacturing and internal operation, but also cope with the<br />

growing importance <strong>of</strong> distributors in marketing/distribution efficiency, customer satisfaction, and cost<br />

savings. Recruiting good distributors in marketing channels can improve a manufacturer’s performance,<br />

and even increase its competitive advantage. Selection <strong>of</strong> distributors is a multi criteria assessment <strong>of</strong> both<br />

tangible and intangible factors, and is as critical to the success <strong>of</strong> a firm as the selection <strong>of</strong> good employees.<br />

From candidate distributors, manufacturers must select those that are most able to sell the products and<br />

serve the needs <strong>of</strong> target markets in order to achieve better firm performance (e.g. pr<strong>of</strong>itability). Therefore,<br />

finding competent distributors is an important issue for manufacturers, especially for many medium and<br />

small-sized firms that might lack sufficient knowledge and information to select distributors.<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

19


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

8. CONCLUSION<br />

Manufacturers must realize that superior distribution support can help differentiate products and services in<br />

the marketplace, add value and amplify pr<strong>of</strong>itability. Since distributors can be used to enhance a<br />

manufacturer’s competitive position in the marketing channel, distributor selection will continue to be an<br />

important issue for the foreseeable future. If we collective analyze the research findings from both <strong>of</strong> the<br />

industries it would be clear that the majority <strong>of</strong> items considered by both <strong>of</strong> the industry’s manufacturers<br />

are same. Still there are some practices which appears to be different relevant to both industries.<br />

• Willingness to share the information and the distributors’ familiarity with manufacturers’ have not<br />

been considered important by the Electronic Home appliance Industry. While at the same time,<br />

there are considered very valuable factors by the Pharmaceutical manufacturers. The reason<br />

probably lies in the fact that Information Sharing is important in Pharmaceutical industry because<br />

<strong>of</strong> the nature <strong>of</strong> their products. It may require solid description for the distributor to understand<br />

what they are actually distributing relevant to the technical aspect <strong>of</strong> the product. At the same<br />

time, the reverse flow <strong>of</strong> feedback from consumers to manufacturers makes it more important for<br />

the distributor to be more knowledgeable and stay aware <strong>of</strong> the product and supply chain issues.<br />

• Inventory management has been considered very important by the Electronic Home appliance<br />

Industry and inverse is the situation with the Pharmaceutical industry. The reason behind is that<br />

the Electronic appliance captures more space, are delicate and needed to be placed at a safe and<br />

secure warehouse. To achieve that purpose any candidate distributor must possess a good facility<br />

<strong>of</strong> warehouse or go-down. Therefore, the manufacturer gives preference to this fact. And the<br />

pharmaceutical medicines could not be stored for a longer period <strong>of</strong> time and delivery lead time is<br />

very low in their scenario. Above all, large number <strong>of</strong> medicines could be stored even in a small<br />

space. That is why we have got different views from both <strong>of</strong> the industries.<br />

• Pharmaceutical supply chain needs to provide high standard <strong>of</strong> service quality and this has been<br />

suggested by various scholars. In the same way, it has been proved with this research that the<br />

customer service standards must be higher but the other industry’s manufacturers think differently<br />

about it.<br />

• The critical selection factors in electronic home appliance industry are reputation in market,<br />

Commitment to sales and ordering, Familiarity between both parties, value-added content <strong>of</strong><br />

logistics and cultural match are the most critical individual items <strong>of</strong> selection prevailing in the<br />

industry.<br />

• The industry practice does shows that among individual factors financial position, Experience and<br />

Commitment to sales quota are most critical factors that are considered. Any potential distributor<br />

who is lacking in any <strong>of</strong> these factors would not be selected as a channel partner.<br />

REFERENCE<br />

Abratt, R., & Pitt, L. (1989). Selection and motivation <strong>of</strong> industrial distributors: a comparative analysis.<br />

European Journal <strong>of</strong> Marketing , 23 (2), 144-53.<br />

Ahmad, N., Awan, M. U., Raouf, A., & Sparks, L. (2009). Development <strong>of</strong> a service quality scale for<br />

pharmaceutical supply chains. International Journal <strong>of</strong> Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing<br />

, 3 (1), 26-45.<br />

Aman, A., & Hopkinson, G. (2010). The changing structure <strong>of</strong> distribution channels in Pakistan.<br />

International Journal <strong>of</strong> Retail & Distribution Management , 38 (5), 341-359.<br />

Andaleeb, S. (1996). An experimental investigation <strong>of</strong> satisfaction and commitment in marketing channels:<br />

the role <strong>of</strong> trust and dependence. Journal <strong>of</strong> Retailing , 72 (1), 77-93.<br />

Anderson, E., & Weitz, B. (1991). Forging a strategic distribution alliance. Chief Executive , 10, 70-3.<br />

Anderson, E., & Weitz, B. (1992). The use <strong>of</strong> pledges to build and sustain commitment in distribution<br />

channels. Journal <strong>of</strong> Marketing Research , 29 (1), 18-34.<br />

Berman, B. (1999). Marketing Channels. New York: John Wiley & Sons.<br />

Bove, L., & Johnson, L. (2001). Customer relationships with service personnel: do we measure closeness,<br />

quality or strength Journal <strong>of</strong> Business Research , 54 (3), 189-97.<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

20


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

Bowersox, D., Closs, D., & Stank, T. (1999). 21st Century Logistics: Making Supply Chain Integration a<br />

Reality. Council <strong>of</strong> Logistics Management (CLM) , 264.<br />

Braglia, M., & Petroni, A. (2000). A quality assurance-oriented methodology for handling trade-<strong>of</strong>fs in<br />

supplier selection. International Journal <strong>of</strong> Physical Distribution & Logistics Management , 30<br />

(2), 96-111.<br />

Calantone, R., Cavusgil, S., & Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm<br />

performance. Industrial Marketing Management , 31 (6), 515-24.<br />

Cavusgil, S., Deligonul, S., & Zhang, C. (2004). Curbing foreign distributor opportunism: an examination<br />

<strong>of</strong> trust, contracts, and the legal environment in international channel relationships. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

International Marketing , 12 (2), 7-27.<br />

Cavusgil, S., Yeoh, P., & Mitri, M. (1995). Selecting foreign distributors: an expert systems approach.<br />

Industrial Marketing Management , 24 (4), 297-304.<br />

Celly, K., & Frazier, G. (1996). Outcome-based and behavior-based coordination efforts in channel<br />

relationships. Journal <strong>of</strong> Marketing Research , 33 (2), 200-10.<br />

Chapman, R., Soosay, C., & Kandampully, J. (2003). Innovation in logistics services and the new business<br />

model. International Journal <strong>of</strong> Physical Distribution & Logistics Management , 33 (7), 630-50.<br />

Churchill, G. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures <strong>of</strong> marketing constructs. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Marketing Research , 16 (1), 64-73.<br />

Coughlan, A., Anderson, E., Stern, L., & El-A. (2001). Marketing Channels,, . Englewood Cliffs, NJ:<br />

Prentice-Hall.<br />

Da Silva, R., Davies, G., & Naude ´, P. (2002). Assessing customer orientation in the context <strong>of</strong><br />

buyer/supplier relationships using judgemental modeling. Industrial Marketing Management , 31<br />

(31), 241-52.<br />

Daugherty, P., Stank, T., & Ellinger, A. (1998). Leveraging logistics/distribution capabilities: the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

logistics service on market share. Journal <strong>of</strong> Business Logistics , 19 (2), 35-51.<br />

Day, G. (1994). The capabilities <strong>of</strong> the market-driven organization. Journal <strong>of</strong> Marketing , 58 (4), 37-51.<br />

Desarbo, W., Benedetto, C., Song, M., & Sinha, I. (2005). Revisiting the Miles and Snow strategic<br />

framework: uncovering interrelationships between strategic types, capabilities, environmental<br />

uncertainty, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal , 26 (1), 47-74.<br />

Fawcett, S., Stanley, L., & Smith, S. (1997). Developing a logistics capability to improve the performance<br />

<strong>of</strong> international operations. Journal <strong>of</strong> Business Logistics , 18 (2), 101-27.<br />

Flint, D., Larsson, E., Gammelgaard, B., & Mentzer, J. (2005). Logistics innovation: a customer valueoriented<br />

social process. Journal <strong>of</strong> Business Logistics , 26 (1), 113-47.<br />

Fram, E. (1992). We can do a better job <strong>of</strong> selecting international distributors. Journal <strong>of</strong> Business &<br />

Industrial Marketing , 7 (2), 61-70.<br />

Frans, A., Bosch, V., Volbedra, H., & Boer, M. (1999). Coevolution <strong>of</strong> firm absorptive capacity and<br />

knowledge environment: organizational forms and combinative capabilities. Organization Science<br />

, 10 (5), 551–568.<br />

Frazier, G. L. (1999). Organizing and Managing Channels <strong>of</strong> Distribution. Jouranal <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Marketing Sciences , 27 (2), 226-240.<br />

Fuller, J., O’Conor, J., & Rawlinson, R. (1993). Tailored logistics: the next advantage. Harvard Business<br />

Review , 71 (3), 87-98.<br />

Gerbing, D., & Anderson, J. (1988). An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating<br />

unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal <strong>of</strong> Marketing Research , 25 (2), 186-92.<br />

Golicic, S., Foggin, J., & Mentzer, J. (2003). Relationship magnitude and its role in interorganizational<br />

relationship structure. Journal <strong>of</strong> Business Logistics , 24 (1), 57-75.<br />

Goodman, L., & Dion, P. (2001). The determinants <strong>of</strong> commitment in the distributor-manufacturer<br />

relationship. Industrial Marketing Management , 30 (3), 287-300.<br />

Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis (5th Ed. ed.). New<br />

York: Macmillan,Prentice-Hall.<br />

Hinkin, T. (1998). A brief tutorial on development <strong>of</strong> measure for use in survey questionnaires.<br />

Organizational Research Methods , 1 (1), 104-21.<br />

Kalafatis, S. (2000). Buyer-seller relationships along channels <strong>of</strong> distribution. Industrial Marketing<br />

Management , 31 (3), 215-28.<br />

Kaleka, A. (2002). Resources and capabilities driving competitive advantage in export markets: guidelines<br />

for industrial exporters. Industrial Marketing Management , 31 (4), 273-83.<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

21


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

Katsikeas, C., Paparoidamis, N., & Katsikeas, E. (2004). Supply source selection criteria: the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

supplier performance on distributor performance. Industrial Marketing Management , 33 (8), 755-<br />

64.<br />

Lambert, D., Cooper, M., & Pagh, J. (1998). Supply chain management: implementation issues and<br />

research opportunities. International Journal <strong>of</strong> Logistics Management , 9 (2), 1-19.<br />

Lin, J.-S. C., & Chen, C.-R. (2008). Determinants <strong>of</strong> manufacturers’ selection <strong>of</strong> distributors. Supply Chain<br />

Management , 13 (5), 356–365.<br />

Looman, A., Ruffni, F., & de Boer, F. (2002). Designing ordering and inventory management<br />

methodologies for purchased parts. Journal <strong>of</strong> Supply Chain Management , 38 (2), 22-9.<br />

Lynch, D., Keller, S., & Ozment, J. (2000). The effects <strong>of</strong> logistics capabilities and strategy on firm<br />

performance. Journal <strong>of</strong> Business Logistics , 21 (2), 47-67.<br />

Mentzer, J., Flint, D., & Hult, G. (2001). Logistics service quality as a segment-customized process.<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Marketing , 65 (4), 82-104.<br />

Mentzer, J., Flint, D., & Kent, J. (1999). Developing a logistics service quality scale. Journal <strong>of</strong> Business<br />

Logistics , 20 (1), 9-32.<br />

Merritt, N., & Newell, S. (2001). The extent and formality <strong>of</strong> sales agency evaluations <strong>of</strong> principals.<br />

Industrial Marketing Management , 30 (1), 37-49.<br />

Min, H. (1993). International supplier selection: a multi-attribute utility approach. International Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Physical Distribution & Logistics Management , 24 (5), 24-33.<br />

Mone, M., McKinley, W., & Barker, V. (1998). Organizaional decline and innovation: a contingency<br />

framework. <strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Management Review , 23 (1), 115-32.<br />

Morash, E., Droge, C., & Vickery, S. (1996). Strategic logistics capabilities for competitive advantage and<br />

firm success. Journal <strong>of</strong> Business Logistics , 17 (1), 1-22.<br />

Mudambi, S., & Aggarwal, R. (2003). Industrial distributors: can they survive in the new economy<br />

Industrial Marketing Management , 32 (4), 317-25.<br />

Mummalaneni, V., Dubas, K., & Chao, C. (1996). Chinese purchasing managers’ preferences and trade<strong>of</strong>fs<br />

in supplier selection and performance evaluation. Industrial Marketing Management , 25 (2),<br />

115-24.<br />

Novack, R., Rinehart, L., & Langley, C. J. (1994). An internal assessment <strong>of</strong> logistics value. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Business Logistics , 15 (1), 113-55.<br />

Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.<br />

O’Connell, J., & Argyris, C. (1997). Blackwell Encyclopedic Dictionary <strong>of</strong> International Management.<br />

Blackwel Publishers, Oxford.<br />

Patton, W. (1996). Use <strong>of</strong> human judgment models in industrial buyers’ vendor selection decisions.<br />

Industrial Marketing Management , 25 (2), 135-49.<br />

Paun, D. (1997). A study <strong>of</strong> best versus average buyer-seller relationships. Journal <strong>of</strong> Business Research ,<br />

17 (2), 13-21.<br />

Pearson, J., & Ellram, L. (1995). Supplier selection and evaluation in small versus large electronics firms.<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Small Business Management , 33 (4), 53-65.<br />

Ricci, M., & Fraser, H. (2006). Revolution in the pharmaceutical supply chain. Retrieved December 6,<br />

2008, from www.dddmag.com/revolution-in-the-pharmaceutical.aspx<br />

Rindfleisch, A., & Moorman, C. (2001). The acquisition and utilization <strong>of</strong> information in new product<br />

alliances: a strength <strong>of</strong> ties perspective. Journal <strong>of</strong> Marketing , 65 (2), 1-18.<br />

Rosenbloom, B. (2004). Marketing Channels: A Management View (Vol. 7th ed). South-Western,<br />

Cincinnati, OH.<br />

Santoro, M. (2000). Success breeds success: the linkage between relationship intensity and tangible<br />

outcomes in industry-university collaborative ventures. The Journal <strong>of</strong> High Technology<br />

Management Research , 11 (2), 255-73.<br />

Shankar, V. (1999). New product introduction and incumbent response strategies: their inter-relationship<br />

and the role <strong>of</strong> multimarket contact. Journal <strong>of</strong> Marketing Research , 3, 327-44.<br />

Shipley, D. (1984). Selection and motivation <strong>of</strong> distribution intermediaries. Industrial Marketing<br />

Management , 13 (4), 249-56.<br />

Shipley, D., & Jobber, D. (1994). Size effects on sales management practices <strong>of</strong> small firms: a study <strong>of</strong><br />

industrial distributors. Journal <strong>of</strong> Personal Selling & Sales Management , 14 (1), 31-43.<br />

Shipley, D., Cook, D., & Barnett, E. (1989). Recruitment, motivation, training and evaluation <strong>of</strong> overseas<br />

distributors. European Journal <strong>of</strong> Marketing , 23 (2), 79-93.<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

22


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

Shipley, D., Egan, C., & Edgett, S. (1991). Meeting source selection criteria: direct versus distributor<br />

channels. Industrial Marketing Management , 20 (4), 297-303.<br />

Sink, H., & Langley, C. J. (1997). A managerial framework for the acquisition <strong>of</strong> third-party logistics<br />

services. Journal <strong>of</strong> Business Logistics , 18 (2), 163-89.<br />

Stern, L., El-Ansary, A., & Coughlan, A. (1996). Marketing Channels, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River,<br />

NJ.<br />

Svensson, G. (2003). The principle <strong>of</strong> balance between companies’ inventories and disturbances in logistics<br />

flows: empirical illustration and conceptualization. International Journal <strong>of</strong> Physical Distribution<br />

& Logistics Management , 33 (9), 765-84.<br />

Vickery, S., Calantone, R., & Dro ¨ge, C. (1999). Supply chain flexibility: an empirical study”, Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Supply Chain Management. A Global Review <strong>of</strong> Purchasing & Supply , 35 (3), 16-24.<br />

Vorhies, D., & Harker, M. (2000). The capabilities and performance advantage <strong>of</strong> market-driven firms: an<br />

empirical investigation. Australian Journal <strong>of</strong> Management , 25 (2), 145-72.<br />

Weerawardena, J., & O’Cass, A. (2004). Exploring the characteristics <strong>of</strong> the market-driven firms and<br />

antecedents to sustained competitive advantage. Industrial Marketing Management , 33 (5), 419-<br />

28.<br />

Weitz, B. A., & Jap, S. D. (1995). Relationship Marketing and Distribution Channels. Journal <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Marketing Science , 23 (4), 305-320.<br />

Yeoh, P., & Calantone, R. (1995). An application <strong>of</strong> the analytical hierarchy process to international<br />

marketing: selection <strong>of</strong> a foreign distributor. Journal <strong>of</strong> Global Marketing , 8 (3-4), 39-65.<br />

Zhao, M., Dro ¨ge, C., & Stank, T. (2001). The effects <strong>of</strong> logistics capabilities on firm performance:<br />

customer-focused versus information-focused capabilities. Journal <strong>of</strong> Business Logistics , 22 (2),<br />

91-107.<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

23


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

Women’s Justification <strong>of</strong> White-Collar Crime<br />

Petter Gottschalk<br />

BI Norwegian Business School<br />

Nydalsveien 37<br />

0484 Oslo<br />

Norway<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

In an empirical study <strong>of</strong> white-collar criminals in Norway, only 8 % out <strong>of</strong> 255 convicted<br />

criminals in recent years were women. There are many potential explanations for the low<br />

female share <strong>of</strong> crime. This paper concentrates on women’s lack <strong>of</strong> rationalization and<br />

justification <strong>of</strong> the criminal act. Several arguments lead us to believe that the justification<br />

to commit financial crime is less prominent among women. Examples include female fear<br />

<strong>of</strong> being caught, where women perceive a greater subjective risk, and where the<br />

consequences <strong>of</strong> imprisonment are perceived worse by women than men.<br />

Keywords: Financial crime; empirical study; neutralization theory; theory <strong>of</strong> self-control,<br />

white-collar crime.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

White-collar crime is financial crime committed by trusted persons in important business positions.<br />

Research on white-collar crime is <strong>of</strong>ten based on anecdotal evidence, where famous white-collar criminals<br />

serve as examples for case studies (Baird and Zelin, 2009; Bookman, 2008; Bucy et al., 2008; Dodge,<br />

2009; Fleet and Fleet, 2006; Friedrichs, 2009; Garoupa, 2007; Hansen, 2009; Heath, 2008; Messerschmidt,<br />

1997; Perri and Brodi, 2011; Simpson, 2011). While being relevant and interesting cases, the extent <strong>of</strong><br />

generalization from such studies is questionable. What seems to be needed is a larger sample <strong>of</strong> whitecollar<br />

criminals that can be studied in terms <strong>of</strong> average values as well as variation in criminal<br />

characteristics.<br />

With a larger sample, we can study white-collar convicts using statistical techniques to identify and study<br />

groups <strong>of</strong> white-collar criminals. Therefore, this article is based on an empirical sample <strong>of</strong> 255 white-collar<br />

criminals in Norway, convicted in the period from 2009 to 2012. The article is concerned with the<br />

following research question: How can justification theory explain the gender gap in white-collar crime<br />

SAMPLE CRIMINALS<br />

To identify a substantial sample <strong>of</strong> white-collar criminals and to collect relevant information about each<br />

criminal, there are several options available. However, in a small country like Norway with a population <strong>of</strong><br />

only five million people, there are limits to available sample size. One available option would be to study<br />

court cases involving white-collar criminals. A challenge here would be to identify relevant laws and<br />

sentences that cover our definition not only <strong>of</strong> white-collar crime, but also required characteristics <strong>of</strong> whitecollar<br />

criminals. Another available option is to study newspaper articles, where the journalists already have<br />

conducted some kind <strong>of</strong> selection <strong>of</strong> upper class, white-collar individuals convicted in court because <strong>of</strong><br />

financial crime. An advantage <strong>of</strong> this approach is that the cases are publicly known, which makes it more<br />

acceptable to identify cases by individual white-collar names. The selective and otherwise filtered<br />

information in newspapers might be a problem to other kinds <strong>of</strong> studies, but is considered an advantage in<br />

this study. Therefore, the latter option was chosen in this research.<br />

Based on this decision, our sample has the following characteristics as applied by newspapers when<br />

presenting news: famous individuals, famous companies, surprising stories, important events, substantial<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

24


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

consequences, matters <strong>of</strong> principles and significant public interest. The sample consists <strong>of</strong> high pr<strong>of</strong>ile and<br />

large yield <strong>of</strong>fenses. This is in line with research by Schnatterly (2003) who searched the Wall Street<br />

Journal for several years in her study <strong>of</strong> white-collar crime published in the Strategic Management Journal.<br />

As suggested by Barak (2007), newsmaking criminology refers to the conscious efforts and activities <strong>of</strong><br />

criminologists to interpret, influence or shape the representation <strong>of</strong> newsworthy items about crime and<br />

justice. Newsmaking criminology as a perspective on the theory, practice and representations <strong>of</strong> crime and<br />

justice is an important approach for understanding white-collar crime. However, Barak’s work focused on<br />

how the media constructs images <strong>of</strong> crime. In this research, the media is used as a source <strong>of</strong> potentially<br />

objective information, where factual information in terms <strong>of</strong> quantitative numbers is collected from<br />

newspaper accounts.<br />

We make no distinction between prison and jail in this study. A prison or jail in Norway is a place in which<br />

people are physically confined and deprived <strong>of</strong> a range <strong>of</strong> personal freedoms. Imprisonment is a legal<br />

penalty that is imposed by the state for commission <strong>of</strong> a crime judged in court. In the United States, the<br />

difference between jail and prison is primarily a function <strong>of</strong> imprisonment length, where the use <strong>of</strong> prison<br />

over jail implies a more serious punishment.<br />

Our operational definition <strong>of</strong> white-collar crime restricts the sample to those who receive jail time as<br />

punishment. This restriction excludes cases <strong>of</strong> fines as penal response, which is quite common. This sample<br />

restriction enables us to only study serious white-collar crime cases. Our intention is not to identify whitecollar<br />

crime in reference to the law, but mainly with respect to the reporting <strong>of</strong> these <strong>of</strong>fenses resulting in<br />

imprisonment. If the sample would be selected as references by the law, then a number <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fenses would<br />

be defined in non-criminal statutes. Non-criminal statutes cannot, by their definition, result in jail time,<br />

only in civil remedies. Thus, by taking this view, we have essentially omitted most white-collar crime cases<br />

<strong>of</strong> fines from our study, since their severity is <strong>of</strong> a minor extent. Research articles edited by Gerber and<br />

Jensen (2006) suggest that only the most serious white-collar crime <strong>of</strong>fenders end up in prison.<br />

CRIMINAL CHARACTERISTICS<br />

Criminal characteristics collected for each person included gender, age when convicted, age when<br />

committing crime, number <strong>of</strong> years in prison, court level, amount <strong>of</strong> money involved in crime, number <strong>of</strong><br />

persons involved in crime, crime type, position level, personal income, person tax, personal wealth<br />

according to income statement, organization revenue, organization employees, private versus public sector,<br />

internal versus external detection, source <strong>of</strong> detection, corporate versus occupational crime, leader versus<br />

follower, and rotten apple versus rotten apple barrel.<br />

Most white-collar criminals are men. This is confirmed in the sample <strong>of</strong> 255 persons, which included only<br />

20 female criminals and 235 male criminals. Thus, less than 8 percent <strong>of</strong> the white-collar crime sample<br />

from newspaper articles was women – sometimes labeled pink-collar criminals.The youngest white-collar<br />

criminal in Norway was 21 years and the oldest was 77 years old. A distinction is made between age when<br />

convicted and age when committing crime. On average, a person was convicted 5 years after the crime,<br />

thus the average age when committing crime is 43 years old since the average age when convicted was 48<br />

years old.<br />

Most anecdotal cases, such as Rajaratman and Schilling, were men in their 50-ties or older. This is<br />

confirmed in our sample where the average age is 48 years old when convicted in court. These average<br />

numbers are similar to a study by Blickle et al. (2006) <strong>of</strong> 76 convicted German white-collar criminals. In<br />

their responding sample, there were 6 female criminals and 70 male criminals. The mean age <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>of</strong>fenders in Germany was 47 years. In a study reported by Benson and Simpson (2009), the average age <strong>of</strong><br />

common criminals was 30 years, while the average age for white-collar criminals was 40 years. It is unclear<br />

whether the age <strong>of</strong> 40 years can be compared to the age <strong>of</strong> 48 years when convicted, or to the age <strong>of</strong> 43<br />

years when committing the crime in Norway.<br />

The average jail sentence for 255 convicted white-collar criminals in Norwegian courts was 2.2 years, with<br />

a maximum <strong>of</strong> 10 years and a minimum <strong>of</strong> 15 days. The longest jail sentence <strong>of</strong> 10 years was given to a<br />

person involved in bank fraud, where millions were transferred from a rich widow’s account in Norway to<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

25


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

a friend’s account in Dubai. Since the convicted criminal was operating in a group <strong>of</strong> criminals, he was<br />

convicted <strong>of</strong> organized crime, which in Norwegian law causes the jail sentence for a criminal act to be<br />

extended from a more normal level, say six years, to ten years in his case.<br />

All persons in the sample received a jail sentence for white-collar crime. Compared to famous US cases<br />

mentioned above, these sentences are quite modest. However, in a Norwegian context these jail sentences<br />

are quite substantial, only passed by organized crime and murder. Also, when comparing to the sample<br />

used by Blickle et al. (2006) <strong>of</strong> white-collar criminals in Germany, there is no substantial difference, as the<br />

average was 3.9 years imprisonment in Germany in their sample <strong>of</strong> 76 convicts. In a US study <strong>of</strong> several<br />

thousand white-collar crime cases, the average prison sentence was only 11 months (Schanzenbach and<br />

Yaeger, 2006).In the Norwegian court system, there are three levels: district courts, courts <strong>of</strong> appeal and<br />

Supreme Court. Out <strong>of</strong> 255 cases, 143 were decided final in district courts, 101 were decided final in courts<br />

<strong>of</strong> appeal, while 11 cases were decided final in Supreme Court. The average amount involved in each<br />

financial crime case by white-collar criminals was 57 million Norwegian kroner. Since one US dollar is<br />

approximately six Norwegian kroner, this means on average 10 million US dollars. The smallest crime<br />

amount was less than 1 million, and the largest was 1200 million kroner.<br />

57 white-collar criminals operated on their own when committing criminal acts. Most criminals involved<br />

others in the crime. On average, 4 persons were involved with each other in the white-collar crime cases<br />

studied. The maximum number involved in a case was 200 persons, where an accounting firm had been<br />

fixing 200 taxi owners’ accounts so that they paid less tax. To avoid bias in statistics towards this case, only<br />

four persons from this taxi fraud scandal were included in our sample as white-collar criminals: the<br />

accounting responsible, the computer programmer, and two head taxi owners.<br />

We define four main financial crime categories by white-collar <strong>of</strong>fenders: fraud, theft, manipulation, and<br />

corruption. Fraud can be defined as intentional perversion <strong>of</strong> truth for the purpose <strong>of</strong> inducing another in<br />

reliance upon it to part with some valuable thing belonging to him or to surrender a legal right (Henning,<br />

2009). Theft can be defined as the illegal taking <strong>of</strong> another person’s, group’s or organization’s property<br />

without victim’s consent (Hill, 2008). Manipulation can be defined as a means <strong>of</strong> gaining illegal control or<br />

influence over others’ activities, means and results such as tax evasion (Malkawi and Haloush, 2008).<br />

Corruption can be defined as the giving, requesting, receiving or accepting <strong>of</strong> an improper advantage<br />

related to a position, <strong>of</strong>fice or assignment (Kayrak, 2008). In our sample <strong>of</strong> 255 convicted white-collar<br />

criminals, we find 131 cases <strong>of</strong> fraud, 12 cases <strong>of</strong> theft, 62 cases <strong>of</strong> manipulation, and 50 cases <strong>of</strong><br />

corruption.<br />

Consulting firm KPMG (2011) tried to identify characteristics <strong>of</strong> white-collar criminals who commit fraud.<br />

They found the following characteristics <strong>of</strong> the typical fraudster: Male, 36 to 45 years old, commits fraud<br />

against his own employer, works in the finance function or in a finance-related role, holds a senior<br />

management position, employed by the company for more than 10 years, and works in collusion with<br />

another perpetrator. These characteristics are based on 348 actual fraud investigations conducted by KPMG<br />

member firms in 69 countries.<br />

We define three white-collar levels. The first level is owners <strong>of</strong> companies, board members <strong>of</strong> companies,<br />

and chief executive <strong>of</strong>ficers <strong>of</strong> companies. The second level is lawyers, consultants, investors, and brokers.<br />

The third level is middle managers, independent contractors and single-working individuals. In our sample<br />

<strong>of</strong> 255 convicted white-collar criminals, we find 76 individuals (30%) at level 1, 106 individuals (41%) at<br />

level 2, and 73 individuals (29%) at level 3.<br />

Income figures for all taxable income are published annually by Norwegian tax authorities. Almost all 255<br />

convicted white-collar criminals were found on the list for the year 2009. The average personal income was<br />

327 000 kroner (approximately 54 000 US dollars), tax was 135 000 kroner (approximately 22 000 US<br />

dollars), and personal fortune was 6 million kroner (approximately 1 million US dollars).<br />

White-collar <strong>of</strong>fenders worked in an organization with revenues <strong>of</strong> 200 million kroner and 124 employees<br />

on average. 232 criminals worked in private sector organizations, while 23 criminals worked in public<br />

sector organizations.<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

26


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

The financial damage <strong>of</strong> 57 million Norwegian kroner was in most cases occurring outside the organization<br />

where the criminal worked. The victim <strong>of</strong> crime was typically another organization: 201 criminals caused<br />

damage to another organization or outside individual, while only 54 caused financial damage to his or her<br />

own organization. It is interesting to note that very few (23 criminals) worked in the public sector, while<br />

the victim <strong>of</strong> crime was very <strong>of</strong>ten found in the public sector.<br />

How was crime detected Who detected crime In this research, we searched the source <strong>of</strong> detection and<br />

found that journalists in the media investigated and revealed a total <strong>of</strong> 62 out <strong>of</strong> 255 white-collar criminals.<br />

This represents 24 percent, which means that one fourth <strong>of</strong> all white-collar crime was revealed by the press.<br />

However, there is a bias in our sample towards media sources, as only cases presented in the media are<br />

included. Nevertheless, it may seem surprising that journalists make such a significant contribution. After<br />

journalists we find victims <strong>of</strong> crime, who revealed 45 criminals (18%):<br />

1. Journalists: 62 criminals (24%)<br />

2. Victims: 45 criminals (18%)<br />

3. Bankruptcy lawyers: 24 (9%)<br />

4. Internal controls: 22 criminals (9%)<br />

5. Auditors: 18 criminals (7%)<br />

6. Tax authorities: 17 criminals (7%)<br />

7. Banks: 14 criminals (5%)<br />

8. Police: 10 criminals (4%)<br />

9. Stock exchange: 5 criminals (2%)<br />

10. Others: 38 criminals (15%).<br />

While it may seem surprising that journalists detected as many as 62 criminals (24%), it may seem<br />

surprising as well that the police only detected 10 criminals (4%).<br />

FEMALE CRIMINALS<br />

A total <strong>of</strong> 255 white-collar criminals were convicted and received jail sentences in Norwegian courts from<br />

2009 to 2012. As suggested in the research literature, most white-collar criminals are men. This is<br />

confirmed in the sample <strong>of</strong> 255 persons, which included only 20 female criminals and 235 male criminals.<br />

Thus, only 7.8 percent <strong>of</strong> the white-collar crime totals from newspaper articles were women.<br />

Total 255 criminals<br />

235 Male<br />

Criminals<br />

20 Female<br />

Criminals<br />

T-statistic for<br />

difference<br />

Significance <strong>of</strong><br />

t-statistic<br />

Average age convicted 48 years 46 years .896 .380<br />

Average age crime 43 years 41 years .900 .378<br />

Years in prison 2.2 years 1.8 years 1.252 .222<br />

Crime amount 61 million 18 million 2.847 .005<br />

Personal income 341 000 kroner 163 000 kroner 2.835 .007<br />

Personal tax 141 000 kroner 62 000 kroner 3.150 .003<br />

Personal wealth 1.5 million 0 million 3.619 .000<br />

Involved persons 4.1 persons 4.5 persons -.552 .585<br />

Business revenue 207 million 116 million 1.374 .181<br />

Business employees 127 persons 92 persons .574 .571<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> male versus female white-collar criminals<br />

There are some empirical differences between convicted men and women. First, the money amount<br />

involved in the crime was significantly larger for male criminals. Furthermore, according to income<br />

statistics, male criminals had larger personal income, paid more taxes and had a larger personal wealth.<br />

Justification Theory<br />

In criminology, justification is <strong>of</strong>ten mentioned as one <strong>of</strong> three pillars to explain criminal acts. The other<br />

pillars are opportunity to carry out the act, and motivation for the act. These three pillars must work<br />

together before the criminal act can take place (Aguilera and Vedera, 2008).<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

27


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

In the fraud triangle, these pillars are explained as (Ilter, 2009):<br />

• Opportunity to commit crime: Women are in a position to commit white-collar crime.<br />

• Motivation in terms <strong>of</strong> incentives or pressures to commit crime: Women want to or have to<br />

commit white-collar crime.<br />

• Acceptance <strong>of</strong> crime: Women find justification for white-collar crime.<br />

Risk for fraud is thus a combination <strong>of</strong> opportunity and possibility, incentives and pressures, and<br />

rationalization and justification. Several arguments in the following lead us to believe that the extent <strong>of</strong><br />

rationalization and justification is less prominent among women. It is the female fear <strong>of</strong> being caught,<br />

where women perceive a greater subjective risk than men, and where the consequences <strong>of</strong> imprisonment<br />

are perceived worse by women than men, mainly because <strong>of</strong> social collapse that follows after time in<br />

prison. Campbell et al. (2001) argue that women have a lower level <strong>of</strong> acceptable fear than men. It means<br />

that women generally experience more fear than men when they are exposed to the same objective risk.<br />

The level <strong>of</strong> acceptable fear, combined with perceived risk – which is subjective – has an impact on actions<br />

(Gass and Seiter, 2011), where women with more fear at higher risk will avoid criminal activities.<br />

In an experiment with boys and girls, differences were found in risk willingness. They participated in a<br />

lottery. When buying a ticket, there was a 50 percent chance <strong>of</strong> winning 100 dollars and a 50 percent<br />

chance <strong>of</strong> winning nothing. The expected value in the lottery was thus 50 dollars. Participants also had a<br />

definite alternative. This alternative started at 25 dollars and moved upwards. Girls stopped participating in<br />

the lottery at 37 dollars, while boys stopped at 45 dollars, which indicates a greater extent <strong>of</strong> risk<br />

willingness among boys than among girls.<br />

Risk is an element in our model as part <strong>of</strong> both motivation and justification. That women generally have a<br />

higher degree <strong>of</strong> risk aversion than men, does not necessarily apply to the specific group <strong>of</strong> pink-collar<br />

criminals. For example, Adams (2012: 2219) found that more female board members do not necessarily<br />

lead to greater risk aversion in decision-making:<br />

A large literature documents that women are different from men in their choices and preferences,<br />

but little is known about gender differences in the boardroom. If women must be like men to break<br />

the glass ceiling, we might expect gender differences to disappear among directors. Using a large<br />

survey <strong>of</strong> directors, we show that female and male directors differ systematically in their core<br />

values and risk attitudes, but in ways that differ from gender differences in the general population.<br />

These results are robust to controlling for differences in observable characteristics. Consistent with<br />

findings for the population, female directors are more benevolent and universally concerned, but<br />

less power oriented than male directors. However, in contrast to findings for the population, they<br />

are less tradition and security oriented than their male counterparts. They are also more risk loving<br />

than male directors. Thus, having a woman on the board needs not lead to more risk-averse<br />

decision making.<br />

A study in Sweden confirms the finding that having a woman on the board does not necessarily lead to<br />

more risk-averse decision making. On the contrary, the Swedish study indicates that women are more risk<br />

willing than previously assumed. One reason for the greater risk willingness was that women are more in<br />

favor <strong>of</strong> change. It was Adams and Funk (2012) who studied differences among a total <strong>of</strong> 1800 female and<br />

male board members in companies registered on the stock exchange in Sweden. The result <strong>of</strong> the study was<br />

that female board members take greater risks than men on the board. Men are more concerned with<br />

competition, while women like change and being independent.<br />

Justification <strong>of</strong> crime takes place by applying neutralization techniques. White-collar crime involves some<br />

form <strong>of</strong> social deviance and represents a breakdown in social order. According to Heath (2008) based on<br />

Sykes and Matza (1957), white-collar criminals tend to apply techniques <strong>of</strong> neutralization to deny the<br />

criminality <strong>of</strong> their actions. Examples <strong>of</strong> neutralization techniques are (a) denial <strong>of</strong> responsibility; (b) denial<br />

<strong>of</strong> injury; (c) denial <strong>of</strong> the victim; (d) condemnation <strong>of</strong> the condemners; (e) appeal to higher loyalties; (f)<br />

everyone else is doing it; and (g) claim to entitlement. The <strong>of</strong>fender may claim an entitlement to act as he<br />

did, either because he was subject to a moral obligation, or because <strong>of</strong> some misdeed perpetrated by the<br />

victim. Family as a neutralization argument is applied more frequently by women than men. Women tend<br />

to justify their crime by pointing to basic needs <strong>of</strong> the family, while men, to a larger extent, argue in<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

28


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

business terms. However, research by Klenowski et al. (2011) shows that both men and women tend to<br />

justify financial crime by family needs and more generally commit crime for the benefit <strong>of</strong> others.<br />

When <strong>of</strong>fenders are asked to explain their crimes, they typically portray themselves as decent people<br />

despite their wrongdoings. They tend to apply neutralization techniques as defined by neutralization theory<br />

(Bock and Kenhove, 2011; Siponen and Vance, 2010; Sykes and Matza, 1957). To be effective at<br />

managing the stigma <strong>of</strong> crime, motivational accounts must be believable to the social audience. Thus,<br />

Klenowski et al. (2011) found that variations in patterns <strong>of</strong> accounts are likely due to the social position <strong>of</strong><br />

the actors. They examined whether gender constrains the way individuals describe their crimes by<br />

analyzing the motivational accounts <strong>of</strong> male and female white collar <strong>of</strong>fenders. Results show that while<br />

men and women both elicit justifications when discussing their crimes, they do differ in the frequency with<br />

which they call forth specific accounts and in the rhetorical nature <strong>of</strong> these accounts. When accounting for<br />

their crime, white-collar <strong>of</strong>fenders draw on gendered themes to align their actions with cultural<br />

expectations <strong>of</strong> masculinity and femininity. These findings suggest that gender does constrain the accounts<br />

that are available to white-collar <strong>of</strong>fenders.<br />

Cauffman (2008: 126) found that “on average, males tend to have longer criminal careers than females.<br />

Because it is difficult to assess when a criminal career is “finished”, convincing evidence about the duration<br />

<strong>of</strong> criminal careers is sparse. A long-term study by Roger Tarling followed a sample <strong>of</strong> male and female<br />

<strong>of</strong>fenders who were born in 1958 through age thirty-one, finding that the average duration <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fending was<br />

4.9 years for females, and 7.4 years for males.”<br />

The idea that women, to a lesser extent than men, are able to justify white-collar crime might be explained<br />

by moral theory (Bowman and Giligan, 2008) combined with slippery slope theory. Slippery slope theory<br />

implies that a person or an organization is sliding from legal to illegal activities (Arjoon, 2008). This theory<br />

attempts to explain why good people do bad things. The explanation is that people do not really notice<br />

when they slide over the border to crime. Many unethical and criminal acts happen without involved<br />

persons knowing or understanding that they are doing something wrong. Criminal behavior can follow a<br />

downward slope, where sliding downwards is a continuous deterioration in the organization not caused by<br />

any specific event. It is a development, a trend, a path that leads the wrong way. Gender differences can be<br />

found in men realizing grey zones, while women see more black or white. Therefore, women will, to a<br />

lesser extent, be able to justify activities that are on the wrong side <strong>of</strong> the law, because it is black to them,<br />

while it is grey to men.<br />

Women find it more difficult than men to justify criminal acts based on an ethical perspective, according to<br />

Ruegger and King (1992: 181):<br />

The findings suggest that gender is a significant factor in the determination <strong>of</strong> ethical conduct and<br />

that females are more ethical than males in their perception <strong>of</strong> business ethical situations.<br />

Yet another theory can explain gender differences in justification. It is the theory <strong>of</strong> self-control. The lower<br />

the individual’s self-control, the greater is the likelihood <strong>of</strong> his or hers involvement in criminal behavior.<br />

Low self-control is defined in terms <strong>of</strong> characteristics such as impulsive, risk-taking, and self-centered<br />

(Meneses and Akers, 2011). While most scholars – such as Haantz (2002), Holtfeter et al. (2010) and<br />

Huffman et al. (2010) – argue that the main reason for less female white-collar crime is lack <strong>of</strong> opportunity,<br />

they also mention gender differences in self-control. They argue that even if women over time have the<br />

same opportunities as men, they will not commit as much crime, because lack <strong>of</strong> justification leads them to<br />

more self-control.<br />

Self-control theory simply states that white-collar people with a low degree <strong>of</strong> self-control will tend to<br />

commit more financial crime than white-collar people with a high degree <strong>of</strong> self-control (Hansen 2009):<br />

Self-control theory proposes that individuals commit crime because <strong>of</strong> low self-control. Except in rare<br />

cases <strong>of</strong> mass fraud such as the Enron scandal, not all elites within a given organization or industry<br />

will commit crime. Hence, though elites at the top <strong>of</strong> their pr<strong>of</strong>ession and corporation differentially<br />

associate with the people <strong>of</strong> equal status in their own and other corporations, not all corporate elites<br />

commit crimes and behave in an overtly deviant manner.<br />

Social control and self-control could be more developed among women than men, combined with learning<br />

theory results, causing less crime by women. This phenomenon <strong>of</strong> gender difference is explained by<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

29


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

Worthen (2011) in terms <strong>of</strong> parent-child bonding. She suggests that adolescents who have healthy<br />

relationships with their parents are less likely to be involved in delinquency. She found that gender<br />

differences in delinquency can be partially explained by gender differences in mean values <strong>of</strong> each element<br />

<strong>of</strong> the parental bond, i.e., emotional attachment to parents, time spent with parents, and parental<br />

monitoring. Gender differences can, in addition, be partially explained by examining the effects <strong>of</strong> the<br />

elements <strong>of</strong> the parental bond on delinquent involvement as they differ by gender.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Crime justification is only one reason for the substantial discrepancy between 50 % women in the total<br />

Norwegian population, 8 % women in the convicted population, and 6 % women in the prison population.<br />

Figure 1 illustrates a number <strong>of</strong> elements that reduce the female fraction stage by stage on the left hand<br />

side, caused by factors on the right hand side. There are a total <strong>of</strong> five stages.<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> the model is to illustrate and explain how common opinions documented in theoretical<br />

thoughts can predict the decreasing female fraction from general population fraction to imprisonment<br />

fraction. The common opinion in society is that men represent the large majority within all kinds <strong>of</strong> crime,<br />

including white-collar crime (Friedrichs, 2009). The model supports Messerschmidt’s (1997) suggestion<br />

that gender is an important predictor <strong>of</strong> criminal involvement – males dominate criminal activity in society.<br />

Both Friedrichs (2009) and Messerschmidt (1997) receive support from Steffensmeier and Allen (1996),<br />

who list a number <strong>of</strong> empirical studies in different countries where men commit far more crimes than<br />

women. Additionally, Blickle et al. (2006) show that men were the dominant majority among white-collar<br />

criminals in Germany.<br />

Numbers in terms <strong>of</strong> percentage are here suggested for future research, as we have no empirical bases for<br />

these elements. Currently, numbers only suggest how female fraction is reduced from stage to stage, where<br />

50 %<br />

50% WOMEN IN THE POPULATION<br />

RELATIVE NEEDS 80%<br />

40% WOMEN HAVE SAME NEEDS<br />

CRIME OPPORTUNITY 70%<br />

CRIME MOTIVATION 90%<br />

20% WOMEN COMMIT CRIME<br />

CRIME JUSTIFICATION 80%<br />

DETECTION RISK 30%<br />

6% WOMEN ARE PROSECUTED<br />

CONVICTIONS 140%<br />

8% WOMEN PRISON SENTENCE<br />

IMPRISONMENT 70%<br />

6% WOMEN IN PRISON<br />

Figure 1. Model for estimation <strong>of</strong> female fraction in white-collar crime<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

30


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Adams, R.B. (2012). Beyond the Glass Ceiling: Does Gender Matter Management Science, 58 (2), 219-<br />

235.<br />

Aguilera, R.V. and Vadera, A.K. (2008). The Dark Side <strong>of</strong> Authority: Antecedents, Mechanisms, and<br />

Outcomes <strong>of</strong> Organizational Corruption, Journal <strong>of</strong> Business Ethics, 77, 431-449.<br />

Arjoon, S. (2008). Slippery When Wet: The Real Risk in Business, Journal <strong>of</strong> Markets & Morality, 11 (1),<br />

Spring, 11 (1), 77-91.<br />

Baird, J.E. and Zelin, R.C. (2009). An Examination <strong>of</strong> the Impact <strong>of</strong> Obedience Pressure on Perceptions <strong>of</strong><br />

Fraudulent Acts and the Likelihood <strong>of</strong> Committing Occupational Fraud, Journal <strong>of</strong> Forensic<br />

Studies in Accounting and Business, Winter, 1 (1), 1-14.<br />

Barber, B.M. and Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence and common stock<br />

investment, The Quarterly Journal <strong>of</strong> Economics, February, 261-292.<br />

Benson, M.L. and Simpson, S.S. (2009). White-Collar Crime: An Opportunity Perspective, Criminology<br />

and Justice Series, Routledge, NY: New York.<br />

Blickle, G., Schlegel, A., Fassbender, P. and Klein, U. (2006). Some Personality Correlates <strong>of</strong> Business<br />

White-Collar Crime, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 55 (2), 220-233.<br />

Bock, G.W., Zmud, R.W. and Kim, Y.G. (2005). Behavioural intention formation in knowledge sharing:<br />

examining the roles <strong>of</strong> extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational<br />

climate, MIS Quarterly, 29 (1), 87-111.<br />

Bookman, Z. (2008). Convergences and Omissions in Reporting Corporate and White Collar Crime,<br />

DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal, 6, 347-392.<br />

Bowman, D. and Gilligan, G. (2008). Public awareness <strong>of</strong> corruption in Australia, Journal <strong>of</strong> Financial<br />

Crime, 14 (4), 438-452.<br />

Britton, D.M. (2000). Feminism in Criminology: Engendering the Outlaw, Annals <strong>of</strong> the American<br />

<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Political and Social Science, 571, 57-76.<br />

Bucy, P.H., Formby, E.P., Raspanti, M.S. and Rooney, K.E. (2008). Why do they do it: The motives,<br />

mores, and character <strong>of</strong> white collar criminals, St. John's Law Review, 82 (2), 401-571.<br />

Campbell, A., Muncer, S. and Bibel, D. (2001). Women and crime: An evolutionary approach, Aggression<br />

and Violent Behavior, 6(5), 481-497.<br />

Cauffman, E. (2008). Understanding the Female Offender, The Future <strong>of</strong> Children, 18 (2), 119-142.<br />

Comey, J.B. (2009). Go directly to jail: White collar sentencing after the Sarbanes-Oxley act, Harvard Law<br />

Review, 122, 1728-1749.<br />

Dobash, R.E., Dobash, R.P. and Cavanagh, K. (2009). “Out <strong>of</strong> the Blue”: Men Who Murder an Intimate<br />

Partner, Feminist Criminology, 4 (3), 194-225.<br />

Fleet, D.D.van, Fleet, E.W.van (2006). Internal terrorists: the terrorists inside organizations, Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Managerial Psychology, 21 (8), 763-774.<br />

Friedrichs, D.O. (2009). Trusted Criminals: White Collar Crime in Contemporary Society, Wadsworth,<br />

Belmont, CA.<br />

Garoupa, N. (2007). Optimal law enforcement and criminal organization. Journal <strong>of</strong> Economic Behavior &<br />

Organization, 63 (3), 461-474.<br />

Gass, R.H. and Seiter, J.S. (2003). Persuasion – Social influence and compliance gaining, 4. Utgave, UK:<br />

Pearson.<br />

Haantz, S. (2002). Women and White Collar Crime, National White Collar Crime Center, www.nw3c.org.<br />

Hansen, L.L. (2009). Corporate financial crime: social diagnosis and treatment, Journal <strong>of</strong> Financial<br />

Crime, 16 (1), 28-40.<br />

Heath, J. (2008). Business Ethics and Moral Motivation: A Criminological Perspective, Journal <strong>of</strong> Business<br />

Ethics, 83 (4), 595-614.<br />

Holtfreter, K., Beaver, K.M., Reisig, M.D. and Pratt, T.C. (2010). Low self-control and fraud <strong>of</strong>fending,<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Financial Crime, 17 (3), 295-307.<br />

Huffman, M.L., Cohen, P.N. and Pearlman, J. (2010). Engendering Change: Organizational Dynamics and<br />

Workplace Gender Desegregation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, 255-277.<br />

Hurwitz, J. and Smithey, S. (1998). Gender Differences on Crime and Punishment, Political Research<br />

Quarterly, 51 (1), 89-115.<br />

Ilter, C. (2009). Fraudulent money transfers: a case from Turkey, Journal <strong>of</strong> Financial Crime, 16 (2), 125-<br />

136.<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

31


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

Klenowski, P.M., Copes, H. and Mullins, C.W. (2011). Gender, Identity and Accounts: How White Collar<br />

Offenders Do Gender When Making Sense <strong>of</strong> Their Crimes, Justice Quarterly, 28 (1), 49-69.<br />

Lasley, J.R. (1988). Toward a Control Theory <strong>of</strong> White-Collar Offending, Journal <strong>of</strong> Quantitative<br />

Criminology, 4 (4), 347-362.<br />

Lyman, M.D. and Potter, G.W. (2007). Organized crime, 4th <strong>edition</strong>, Pearson Prentice Hall, Uppler Saddle<br />

River, New Jersey.<br />

Meneses, R.A. and Akers, R.L. (2011). A Comparison <strong>of</strong> Four General Theories <strong>of</strong> Crime and Deviance:<br />

Marijuana Use Among American and Bolivian University Students, International Criminal Justice<br />

Review, 21 (4), 333-352.<br />

Messerschmidt, J.M. (1997). Crime as Structured Action: Gender, Race, Class, and Crime in the Making,<br />

SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, London.<br />

Perri, F.S and Brody, R.G. (2011). The Sallie Rohrbach story: lessons for auditors and fraud examiners,<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Financial Crime, 18 (1), 93-104.<br />

Ruegger, D. and King, E.W. (1992). A Study <strong>of</strong> the Effect <strong>of</strong> Age and Gender upon Student Business<br />

Ethics, Journal <strong>of</strong> Business Ethics, 11, 179-186.<br />

Schnatterly, K. (2003). Increasing firm value through detection and prevention <strong>of</strong> white-collar crime,<br />

Strategic Management Journal, 24 (7), 587-614.<br />

Simpson, S.S. (2011). Making Sense <strong>of</strong> White Collar Crime: Theory and Research, The Ohio State Journal<br />

<strong>of</strong> Criminal Law, 8 (2), 481-502.<br />

Siponen, M. and Vance, A. (2010). Neutralization: New Insights into the Problem <strong>of</strong> Employee Information<br />

Systems Security Policy Violations, MIS Quarterly, 34 (3), 487-502.<br />

Smith, R. (2009). Understanding entrepreneurial behavior in organized criminals, Journal <strong>of</strong> Enterprising<br />

Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 3 (3), 256-268.<br />

Steffensmeier, D. and Allan, E. (1996). Gender and crime: Toward a Gendered Theory <strong>of</strong> Female<br />

Offending, Annual Review <strong>of</strong> Sociology, 22, 459-487.<br />

Sykes, G. and Matza, D. (1957). Techniques <strong>of</strong> Neutralization: A Theory <strong>of</strong> Delinquency, American<br />

Sociological Review, 22 (6), 664.670.<br />

Wheeler, S. (1992). The Problem <strong>of</strong> White Collar Crime Motivation, i: White Collar Crime Reconsidered,<br />

Schlegel, K. og Weisburd, D. (redaktører), Boston: Northeastern University Press, s. 108-123.<br />

Worthen, M.G.F. (2011). Gender differences in parent-child bonding: implications for understanding the<br />

gender gap in delinquency, Journal <strong>of</strong> Crime and Justice, 34 (1), 3-23.<br />

Yusuf, T.O. and Babalola, A.R. (2009). Control <strong>of</strong> insurance fraud in Nigeria: an exploratory study,<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Financial Crime, 16 (4), 418-435.<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

32


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

Service Quality Measurement and its evaluation<br />

<strong>of</strong> leading Private Banks <strong>of</strong> India in Delhi and<br />

NCR Region: An analytical study<br />

Dr. Saroj Kumar Dash<br />

Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Department <strong>of</strong> Management Studies, Skyline Institute <strong>of</strong> Engineering and Technology,<br />

Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India<br />

Dr. Asif Parwez<br />

Assistant Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Hindu College <strong>of</strong> Engineering, Sonepat, Haryana, India<br />

Mr. Firoz Parwez<br />

Faculty, Department <strong>of</strong> Computer Science & Information System, Jazan University, Jazan , Kingdom <strong>of</strong><br />

Saudi Arabia(KSA)<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

The subject "quality" is nowadays, in a globalized world, one <strong>of</strong> the key concerns <strong>of</strong><br />

businessmen to face the competition on industries and service areas. Financial groups are<br />

measuring no efforts to achieve quality excellence, starting by customer services and<br />

relationship. Indian banking sector opened its doors to private and international players<br />

after the economic liberalization in the year 1991. It has been almost 2 decades <strong>of</strong><br />

operation <strong>of</strong> the private banks in India. Much has evolved in the overall structure <strong>of</strong><br />

banking during this time but have the private banks delivered the type <strong>of</strong> quality that the<br />

customers expect them to. This research is an effort to evaluate the service quality <strong>of</strong> the<br />

private banks in India. The study is based on primary data collected in the cities <strong>of</strong> Delhi<br />

and NCR through a structured questionnaire designed on the basis <strong>of</strong> SERVQUAL<br />

Model. The banks under study are the five top private banks from Delhi and NCR region.<br />

The study has found that none <strong>of</strong> the banks have been able to meet the customer<br />

expectations and are still dwelling on the ‘zone <strong>of</strong> pain’. The research is very useful for<br />

managers, policymakers, implementers as well as academicians. The research provides<br />

implications for managers as well as policy makers to understand the customer<br />

expectations in India. It can be a guideline for bigger role for the BCSBI (Banking Codes<br />

and Standard Board <strong>of</strong> India). Implications for future research are also discussed. The<br />

novelty <strong>of</strong> the research lies in the context that no effort has been made so far to effect<br />

research on sector specific contribution <strong>of</strong> banks. There is also very little literature<br />

available to identify the need-service gap in this area. The study adds value to the<br />

knowledge in the field <strong>of</strong> banking service quality for development and also opens new<br />

areas <strong>of</strong> research.<br />

Key Words: Customer Satisfaction, SERVQUAL Analysis, GAP Analysis, Private Sector<br />

banks, Service Quality.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Customer satisfaction is a popular research topic among researchers <strong>of</strong> different areas. Banking industry is<br />

not an exception to this. Banking is one <strong>of</strong> the numerouno services in which the customer satisfaction has<br />

had an ever increasing importance in the corresponding research areas. This is essentially because the<br />

banking sector is becoming more and more competitive (Lindenmeier and Tscheulin, 2008). Retail banks<br />

are pursuing this strategy, in part, because <strong>of</strong> the difficulty in differentiating based on the service <strong>of</strong>fering.<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

33


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

Typically, customers perceive very little difference in the services <strong>of</strong>fered by retail banks and any new<br />

<strong>of</strong>fering is quickly matched by competitors (Devlin et al., 1995).<br />

MEASURING CUSTOMER SATISFACTION IN BANKING<br />

Customer Satisfaction, a business term, is a measure <strong>of</strong> how products and services supplied by a company<br />

meet or surpass customer expectation. It is seen as a key performance indicator within business and is part<br />

<strong>of</strong> the strategy for customer retention. The entry <strong>of</strong> private sector commercial banks can be traced to the<br />

period <strong>of</strong> privatization and the need to satisfy customers all the more by the banking sector increased.<br />

However no consistent effort was taken on the part <strong>of</strong> policy makers to trace the level <strong>of</strong> satisfaction from<br />

the services till the year 2003 when BCSBI (Banking Codes and Standards Boards <strong>of</strong> India) an<br />

autonomous body was formed to monitor the level <strong>of</strong> services provided by the Indian banks.<br />

SERVQUAL MODELS<br />

A quite large number <strong>of</strong> models have been derived by experts round the world to derive the level <strong>of</strong> service<br />

quality and therefore the customer satisfaction perhaps the best and the most widely validated research is<br />

one by Parasurama et al. (1995) popularly known as SERVQUAL Model. This is the one that will be used<br />

in this research to evaluate the level <strong>of</strong> service quality <strong>of</strong> Private Sector banks in India. Below is a<br />

discussion on the SERVQUAL Model:<br />

GAP Model (Parasuraman et al. 1985)<br />

The GAP model was proposed by Parasuraman et al. (1985). The model presupposes that service quality is<br />

the differences between expectation and performance relating to quality dimensions. These differences are<br />

referred to as gaps.<br />

The gaps model conceptualizes five gaps which are:<br />

Gap 1: Difference between consumers’ expectation and management’s perceptions <strong>of</strong> consumers’<br />

expectations (not identifying what consumers expect);<br />

Gap 2: Disparity between management’s perceptions <strong>of</strong> consumer’s expectations and service quality<br />

specifications (inappropriate service-quality standards);<br />

Gap 3: Variations between service quality specifications and service actually delivered (poor delivery<br />

<strong>of</strong> service quality);<br />

Gap 4: Difference between service delivery and the communications to consumers about service<br />

delivery (promises mismatch delivery);<br />

Gap 5: Difference between consumer’s expectation and perceived service; this gap depends on size and<br />

direction <strong>of</strong> the four gaps associated with the delivery <strong>of</strong> service quality on the marketer’s side.<br />

Based on the above five gaps, the SERVQUAL instrument was developed. It initially consisted <strong>of</strong> ten<br />

dimensions which were later refined into five dimensions namely, reliability, responsiveness, tangibles,<br />

assurance (communication, competence, credibility, courtesy, and security) and empathy (which capture<br />

access and understanding or knowing the customers). Later in year 1991 SERVQUAL was revised by<br />

replacing “should” word by “would” and in 1994 by reducing the total number <strong>of</strong> items to 22, but five<br />

dimensional structure remaining the same. In addition to this empirical research, the authors later came out<br />

with the extended service quality model. According to this extended model most factors involve<br />

communication and control process implemented in organizations to manage employees.<br />

OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY<br />

The main objectives <strong>of</strong> the study are:<br />

a. To have a clear understanding <strong>of</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> service quality in the Private Sector banks in India.<br />

b. To find out the gap in the dimensions <strong>of</strong> service quality based on the SERVQUAL analysis.<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

34


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY<br />

The study is exploratory in nature. It provides a description <strong>of</strong> contemporary satisfaction parameter in the<br />

Indian Banking Sector. The determination <strong>of</strong> the sample and the area <strong>of</strong> study is justified below:<br />

The research consists <strong>of</strong> 5 banks from the private sectors from Delhi and NCR region. The Top 5 banks<br />

<strong>of</strong> Private Sector Banks selected are ICICI Bank, HDFC Bank, HSBC Bank, Axis Bank and Federal<br />

Bank, The questionnaires were distributed manually to the customers <strong>of</strong> these banks in the cities <strong>of</strong> Delhi<br />

and NCR (National Capital Region). The purpose <strong>of</strong> choosing the capital <strong>of</strong> the country (Delhi) and NCR<br />

region as the study area because private banks in these areas are serving their customers more as<br />

compared to other cities. The basic reasons <strong>of</strong> opening more number <strong>of</strong> private banks are the income level<br />

<strong>of</strong> the customers are fairly high in these areas. The respondents are selected at random on visits to banks.<br />

Therefore for the purpose <strong>of</strong> our research the probability sampling process has been used. The sample<br />

size was determined according to (Cooper and Schindler, 2003), the formula as follows:<br />

(+,-) 0.05 → desired interval range within which the population proportion is expected (subjective<br />

decision).<br />

1.96(σ p ) → 95 percent confidence level for estimating the interval within which the population proportion<br />

is expected (subject decision).<br />

σ p =0.0255 → standard error for the proportion (0.05/1.96)<br />

pq → measure <strong>of</strong> sample dispersion (used here as an estimate <strong>of</strong> the population dispersion).<br />

pq<br />

n =<br />

σ<br />

2<br />

p<br />

For the purpose <strong>of</strong> this research, after running 30 questionnaires a sample size (N) was derived for each<br />

bank as follows.<br />

0.24×<br />

0.76<br />

N = = 280<br />

2<br />

0.0255<br />

Therefore the total sample size for all the 5 banks is 280×5 = 1400.<br />

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS<br />

Following is the detailed analysis <strong>of</strong> the 5 banks under study based on the SERVQUAL analysis.<br />

SERVQUAL analysis for ICICI Bank<br />

Table 1 depicts the SERVQUAL score <strong>of</strong> the five dimensions for ICICI Bank. The highest expectation<br />

score for the tangibility dimension is for E4 and the lowest is for the E3. The perception score for this<br />

dimension is highest for the P2 and lowest for P1. For the reliability dimension the highest score for the<br />

expectation is for E5 and the lowest is for the E8.As against expectation the perception score for reliability<br />

dimension was highest for P6 and lowest for P5. In case <strong>of</strong> responsiveness dimension the highest<br />

expectation was for E12 and the lowest was for E10. The perception scores for this dimension were highest<br />

for P11 and lowest for P10. For the assurance dimension the highest expectation score was for E17 and the<br />

lowest for E14 and E15. The perception score was highest for P15 and the lowest for P17. For the empathy<br />

dimension the highest expectation score was for E21 and the lowest for E22.As against the expectation<br />

scores the perception score for this dimension are highest for P19/22 and the lowest for P18.<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

35


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

Table 1: Average ‘SERVQUAL’ <strong>of</strong> various dimensions for ICICI Bank<br />

Tangible<br />

E1: Excellent banking<br />

companies will have modern<br />

looking equipment.<br />

E2: The physical facilities ate<br />

excellent banks will be visually<br />

appealing<br />

E3: Employees at excellent<br />

banks will be neat appearing<br />

E4: Materials association with<br />

the service (such as pamphlets<br />

or statements) will be visually<br />

appealing at excellent banks.<br />

Reliability<br />

E5: When excellent banks<br />

promise to do something by a<br />

certain time, they do.<br />

E6: When a customer has a<br />

problem, excellent banks will<br />

show a sincere interest in<br />

solving it.<br />

E7: Excellent banks will<br />

perform the service right the<br />

first time.<br />

E8: Excellent banks will<br />

provide the service at the time<br />

them promise to do so.<br />

E9: Excellent banks will insist<br />

on error free records<br />

Responsiveness<br />

E10: Employees <strong>of</strong> excellent<br />

banks will tell customers<br />

exactly when services will be<br />

performed.<br />

E11:Employees <strong>of</strong> excellent<br />

banks will give prompt service<br />

to customers.<br />

E12:Employees <strong>of</strong> excellent<br />

banks will always be willing to<br />

help customers.<br />

E13:Employees <strong>of</strong> excellent<br />

banks will never be too busy to<br />

respond to customers’ requests.<br />

Assurance<br />

E14: The behaviour <strong>of</strong><br />

employees in excellent banks<br />

(E) (P) Gap Score<br />

P-E<br />

Tangible<br />

4.12 P1: Your bank has modern looking 3.46 -0.66<br />

equipment<br />

3.99 P2: Your bank’s physical facilities are<br />

visually appealing<br />

3.88 -0.11<br />

3.96 P3: Your bank’s reception desk 3.75 -0.21<br />

employee are neat appearing<br />

4.45 P4: Materials associated with the 3.70 -0.84<br />

service (such as pamphlets or<br />

statements) are visually appealing at<br />

your bank.<br />

Average Tangible SERVQUAL score -0.45<br />

Reliability<br />

4.54 P5: When your bank promises to do 3.39 -1.15<br />

something by a certain time, it does so.<br />

4.44 P6: When you have a problem, your<br />

bank shows a sincere interest in<br />

solving it.<br />

4.40 P7: Your bank performs the service<br />

right the first time.<br />

4.29 P8: Your bank provides its service at<br />

the time it promises to do so.<br />

4.41 P9: Your bank insists on error free<br />

records.<br />

Average Reliability SERVQUAL<br />

score<br />

Responsiveness<br />

4.37 P10: Employees in your bank tell you<br />

exactly when services will be<br />

performed.<br />

4.50 P11: Employees in your bank give you<br />

prompt service.<br />

4.57 P12: Employees in your bank are<br />

always willing to help you.<br />

4.44 P13: Employees in your bank are<br />

never too busy to respond to your<br />

request.<br />

Average Responsiveness SERVQUAL<br />

score<br />

Assurance<br />

4.12 P14: The behaviour <strong>of</strong> employees in<br />

your bank instill confidence in you.<br />

3.78 -0.66<br />

3.61 -0.79<br />

3.63 -0.66<br />

3.70 -0.71<br />

-0.79<br />

3.43 -0.94<br />

3.64 -0.86<br />

3.50 -1.07<br />

3.57 -0.87<br />

-0.75<br />

3.35 -0.77<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

36


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

will instill confidence in<br />

customers.<br />

E15: Customers <strong>of</strong> excellent<br />

banks will feel safe in<br />

transactions<br />

E16: Employees <strong>of</strong> excellent<br />

banks will be consistently<br />

courteous with customers.<br />

E17: Employees <strong>of</strong> excellent<br />

banks will have the knowledge<br />

to answer customers’ questions.<br />

Empathy<br />

E18: Excellent banks will give<br />

customers individual attention<br />

E19: Excellent banks will have<br />

operating hours convenient to<br />

all their customers.<br />

E20: Excellent banks will have<br />

employees who give customers<br />

personal attention.<br />

E21: Excellent banks will have<br />

their customer’s best interests at<br />

heart.<br />

E22:The employees <strong>of</strong> excellent<br />

banks will understand the<br />

specific needs <strong>of</strong> their customer<br />

4.12 P15: You feel safe in your transactions<br />

with your bank.<br />

4.35 P16: Employees in your bank area<br />

consistently courteous with you.<br />

4.70 P17: Employees in your bank have the<br />

knowledge to answer your questions.<br />

Average Assurance SERVQUAL<br />

score<br />

Empathy<br />

4.9 P18: Your bank gives you individual<br />

attention<br />

4.9 P19: Your bank has operating hours<br />

convenient to all its customers<br />

4.9 P20: Your bank has employees who<br />

give you personal attention.<br />

4.91 P21: Your bank has your best interest<br />

at heart.<br />

4.76 P22: The employees <strong>of</strong> your bank<br />

understand your specific needs.<br />

3.53 -0.59<br />

3.35 -1.00<br />

3.06 -1.64<br />

-1.00<br />

3.59 -1.31<br />

3.94 -0.96<br />

3.81 -1.09<br />

3.74 -1.17<br />

3.94 -0.82<br />

Average Empathy SERVQUAL scores -1.07<br />

SERVQUAL analysis for HDFC Bank<br />

Table 2 depicts the SERVQUAL score <strong>of</strong> the five dimensions for HDFC Bank. The highest expectation<br />

score for the tangibility dimension is for E4 and the lowest is for the E2/3. The perception score for this<br />

dimension is highest for the P2 and lowest for P1. For the reliability dimension the highest score for the<br />

expectation is for E5 and the lowest is for the E8. As against expectation the perception score for reliability<br />

dimension was highest for P6 and lowest for P7. In case <strong>of</strong> responsiveness dimension the highest<br />

expectation was for E71 and the lowest was for E10/11. The perception scores for this dimension were<br />

highest for P11 and lowest for P13. For the assurance dimension the highest expectation score was for E17<br />

and the lowest for E12 and E13. The perception score was highest for P15 and the lowest for P14/16. For<br />

the empathy dimension the highest expectation score was for E21 and the lowest for E18/19/20. As against<br />

the expectation scores the perception score for this dimension are highest for P19/22 and the lowest for<br />

P18.<br />

Table 2 : Average ‘SERVQUAL’ <strong>of</strong> various dimensions for HDFC Bank<br />

Tangible<br />

E1: Excellent banking<br />

companies will have modern<br />

looking equipment.<br />

E2: The physical facilities ate<br />

excellent banks will be visually<br />

(E) (P) Gap Score<br />

P-E<br />

Tangible<br />

4.72 P1: Your bank has modern looking 3.74 -0.98<br />

equipment<br />

4.71 P2: Your bank’s physical facilities are<br />

visually appealing<br />

3.97 -0.74<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

37


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

appealing<br />

E3: Employees at excellent<br />

banks will be neat appearing<br />

E4: Materials association with<br />

the service (such as pamphlets<br />

or statements) will be visually<br />

appealing at excellent banks.<br />

Reliability<br />

E5: When excellent banks<br />

promise to do something by a<br />

certain time, they do.<br />

E6: When a customer has a<br />

problem, excellent banks will<br />

show a sincere interest in<br />

solving it.<br />

E7: Excellent banks will<br />

perform the service right the<br />

first time.<br />

E8: Excellent banks will<br />

provide the service at the time<br />

them promise to do so.<br />

E9: Excellent banks will insist<br />

on error free records<br />

Responsiveness<br />

E10: Employees <strong>of</strong> excellent<br />

banks will tell customers<br />

exactly when services will be<br />

performed.<br />

E11:Employees <strong>of</strong> excellent<br />

banks will give prompt service<br />

to customers.<br />

E12:Employees <strong>of</strong> excellent<br />

banks will always be willing to<br />

help customers.<br />

E13:Employees <strong>of</strong> excellent<br />

banks will never be too busy to<br />

respond to customers’ requests.<br />

Assurance<br />

E14: The behaviour <strong>of</strong><br />

employees in excellent banks<br />

will instill confidence in<br />

customers.<br />

E15: Customers <strong>of</strong> excellent<br />

banks will feel safe in<br />

transactions<br />

E16: Employees <strong>of</strong> excellent<br />

banks will be consistently<br />

courteous with customers.<br />

E17: Employees <strong>of</strong> excellent<br />

banks will have the knowledge<br />

4.71 P3: Your bank’s reception desk 3.82 -0.89<br />

employee are neat appearing<br />

4.74 P4: Materials associated with the 3.93 -0.81<br />

service (such as pamphlets or<br />

statements) are visually appealing at<br />

your bank.<br />

Average Tangible SERVQUAL score -0.86<br />

Reliability<br />

4.54 P5: When your bank promises to do 3.69 -0.85<br />

something by a certain time, it does so.<br />

4.46 P6: When you have a problem, your<br />

bank shows a sincere interest in<br />

solving it.<br />

4.46 P7: Your bank performs the service<br />

right the first time.<br />

4.37 P8: Your bank provides its service at<br />

the time it promises to do so.<br />

4.46 P9: Your bank insists on error free<br />

records.<br />

Average Reliability SERVQUAL<br />

score<br />

Responsiveness<br />

4.12 P10: Employees in your bank tell you<br />

exactly when services will be<br />

performed.<br />

4.12 P11: Employees in your bank give you<br />

prompt service.<br />

4.36 P12: Employees in your bank are<br />

always willing to help you.<br />

4.71 P13: Employees in your bank are<br />

never too busy to respond to your<br />

request.<br />

Average Responsiveness SERVQUAL<br />

score<br />

Assurance<br />

4.12 P14: The behaviour <strong>of</strong> employees in<br />

your bank instill confidence in you.<br />

4.12 P15: You feel safe in your transactions<br />

with your bank.<br />

4.36 P16: Employees in your bank area<br />

consistently courteous with you.<br />

4.71 P17: Employees in your bank have the<br />

knowledge to answer your questions.<br />

4.01 -0.45<br />

3.38 -0.54<br />

3.82 -0.64<br />

3.96 -0.52<br />

-0.44<br />

3.36 -0.76<br />

3.53 -0.59<br />

3.36 -1.00<br />

3.07 -1.64<br />

-1.00<br />

3.36 -0.76<br />

3.53 -0.59<br />

3.36 -1.00<br />

3.07 -1.64<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

38


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

to answer customers’ questions.<br />

Empathy<br />

E18: Excellent banks will give<br />

customers individual attention<br />

E19: Excellent banks will have<br />

operating hours convenient to<br />

all their customers.<br />

E20: Excellent banks will have<br />

employees who give customers<br />

personal attention.<br />

E21: Excellent banks will have<br />

their customer’s best interests at<br />

heart.<br />

E22: The employees <strong>of</strong><br />

excellent banks will understand<br />

the specific needs <strong>of</strong> their<br />

customer<br />

Average Assurance SERVQUAL<br />

score<br />

Empathy<br />

4.90 P18: Your bank gives you individual<br />

attention<br />

4.90 P19: Your bank has operating hours<br />

convenient to all its customers<br />

4.90 P20: Your bank has employees who<br />

give you personal attention.<br />

4.91 P21: Your bank has your best interest<br />

at heart.<br />

4.76 P22: The employees <strong>of</strong> your bank<br />

understand your specific needs.<br />

-1.00<br />

3.57 -1.33<br />

3.92 -0.98<br />

3.79 -1.11<br />

3.72 -1.19<br />

3.92 -0.84<br />

Average Empathy SERVQUAL scores -1.09<br />

SERVQUAL analysis for HSBC Bank<br />

Table 3 depicts the SERVQUAL score <strong>of</strong> the five dimensions for HSBC Bank. The highest expectation<br />

score for the tangibility dimension is for E4 and the lowest is for the E3. The perception score for this<br />

dimension is highest for the P4 and lowest for P1. For the reliability dimension the highest score for the<br />

expectation is for E5 and the lowest is for the E8. As against expectation the perception score for reliability<br />

dimension was highest for P9 and lowest for P5. In case <strong>of</strong> responsiveness dimension the highest<br />

expectation was for E12 and the lowest was for E10. The perception scores for this dimension were highest<br />

for P11 and lowest for P10. For the assurance dimension the highest expectation score was for E17 and the<br />

lowest for E14/15.The perception score was highest for P15 and the lowest for P16. For the empathy<br />

dimension the highest expectation score was for E21 and the lowest for E22. As against the expectation<br />

scores the perception score for this dimension are highest for P19 and the lowest for P18.<br />

Table 3 : Average ‘SERVQUAL’ <strong>of</strong> various dimensions for HSBC Bank<br />

Tangible<br />

E1: Excellent banking<br />

companies will have modern<br />

looking equipment.<br />

E2: The physical facilities ate<br />

excellent banks will be visually<br />

appealing<br />

E3: Employees at excellent<br />

banks will be neat appearing<br />

E4: Materials association with<br />

the service (such as pamphlets<br />

or statements) will be visually<br />

appealing at excellent banks.<br />

Reliability<br />

E5: When excellent banks<br />

promise to do something by a<br />

(E) (P) Gap Score<br />

P-E<br />

Tangible<br />

4.30 P1: Your bank has modern looking 3.59 -0.44<br />

equipment<br />

3.94 P2: Your bank’s physical facilities are<br />

visually appealing<br />

3.78 -0.16<br />

3.92 P3: Your bank’s reception desk 3.64 -0.28<br />

employee are neat appearing<br />

4.53 P4: Materials associated with the 3.87 -0.66<br />

service (such as pamphlets or<br />

statements) are visually appealing at<br />

your bank.<br />

Average Tangible SERVQUAL score -0.38<br />

Reliability<br />

4.53 P5: When your bank promises to do 3.36 -1.17<br />

something by a certain time, it does so.<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

39


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

certain time, they do.<br />

E6: When a customer has a<br />

problem, excellent banks will<br />

show a sincere interest in<br />

solving it.<br />

E7: Excellent banks will<br />

perform the service right the<br />

first time.<br />

E8: Excellent banks will<br />

provide the service at the time<br />

them promise to do so.<br />

E9: Excellent banks will insist<br />

on error free records<br />

Responsiveness<br />

E10: Employees <strong>of</strong> excellent<br />

banks will tell customers<br />

exactly when services will be<br />

performed.<br />

E11:Employees <strong>of</strong> excellent<br />

banks will give prompt service<br />

to customers.<br />

E12:Employees <strong>of</strong> excellent<br />

banks will always be willing to<br />

help customers.<br />

E13:Employees <strong>of</strong> excellent<br />

banks will never be too busy to<br />

respond to customers’ requests.<br />

Assurance<br />

E14: The behaviour <strong>of</strong><br />

employees in excellent banks<br />

will instill confidence in<br />

customers.<br />

E15: Customers <strong>of</strong> excellent<br />

banks will feel safe in<br />

transactions<br />

E16: Employees <strong>of</strong> excellent<br />

banks will be consistently<br />

courteous with customers.<br />

E17: Employees <strong>of</strong> excellent<br />

banks will have the knowledge<br />

to answer customers’ questions.<br />

Empathy<br />

E18: Excellent banks will give<br />

customers individual attention<br />

E19: Excellent banks will have<br />

operating hours convenient to<br />

all their customers.<br />

E20: Excellent banks will have<br />

employees who give customers<br />

4.44 P6: When you have a problem, your<br />

bank shows a sincere interest in<br />

solving it.<br />

4.44 P7: Your bank performs the service<br />

right the first time.<br />

4.36 P8: Your bank provides its service at<br />

the time it promises to do so.<br />

4.47 P9: Your bank insists on error free<br />

records.<br />

Average Reliability SERVQUAL<br />

score<br />

Responsiveness<br />

4.27 P10: Employees in your bank tell you<br />

exactly when services will be<br />

performed.<br />

4.41 P11: Employees in your bank give you<br />

prompt service.<br />

4.50 P12: Employees in your bank are<br />

always willing to help you.<br />

4.37 P13: Employees in your bank are<br />

never too busy to respond to your<br />

request.<br />

Average Responsiveness SERVQUAL<br />

score<br />

Assurance<br />

4.11 P14: The behaviour <strong>of</strong> employees in<br />

your bank instill confidence in you.<br />

4.11 P15: You feel safe in your transactions<br />

with your bank.<br />

4.35 P16: Employees in your bank area<br />

consistently courteous with you.<br />

4.71 P17: Employees in your bank have the<br />

knowledge to answer your questions.<br />

Average Assurance SERVQUAL<br />

score<br />

Empathy<br />

4.90 P18: Your bank gives you individual<br />

attention<br />

4.90 P19: Your bank has operating hours<br />

convenient to all its customers<br />

4.90 P20: Your bank has employees who<br />

give you personal attention.<br />

3.79 -0.65<br />

3.57 -0.87<br />

3.66 -0.70<br />

3.72 -0.75<br />

-0.83<br />

3.74 -0.53<br />

4.00 -0.41<br />

3.87 -0.63<br />

3.87 -0.50<br />

-0.41<br />

3.35 -0.76<br />

3.53 -0.58<br />

3.35 -1.00<br />

3.05 -1.66<br />

-1.00<br />

3.57 -1.33<br />

3.92 -0.98<br />

3.79 -1.11<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

40


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

personal attention.<br />

E21: Excellent banks will have<br />

their customer’s best interests at<br />

heart.<br />

E22:The employees <strong>of</strong> excellent<br />

banks will understand the<br />

specific needs <strong>of</strong> their customer<br />

4.91 P21: Your bank has your best interest<br />

at heart.<br />

4.76 P22: The employees <strong>of</strong> your bank<br />

understand your specific needs.<br />

3.73 -1.18<br />

3.92 -0.84<br />

Average Empathy SERVQUAL scores -1.09<br />

SERVQUAL analysis for Axis Bank<br />

Table 4 depicts the SERVQUAL score <strong>of</strong> the five dimensions for Axis Bank. The highest expectation score<br />

for the tangibility dimension is for E4 and for the rest <strong>of</strong> the parameters it is the same. The perception score<br />

for this dimension is highest for the P2 and lowest for P4. For the reliability dimension the highest score for<br />

the expectation is for E8 and the lowest is for the E5.As against expectation the perception score for<br />

reliability dimension was highest for P6 and lowest for P5. In case <strong>of</strong> responsiveness dimension the highest<br />

expectation was for E12 and the lowest was for E10. The perception scores for this dimension were highest<br />

for P11 and lowest for P10. For the assurance dimension the highest expectation score was for E17 and the<br />

lowest for E14 and E15. The perception score was highest for P14 and the lowest for P17. For the empathy<br />

dimension the highest expectation score was for E21 and the lowest for E14/15. As against the expectation<br />

scores the perception score for this dimension are highest for P19 and the lowest for P18.<br />

Table 4 : Average ‘SERVQUAL’ <strong>of</strong> various dimensions for Axis Bank<br />

(E) (P) Gap Score<br />

P-E<br />

Tangible<br />

Tangible<br />

E1: Excellent banking 4.70 P1: Your bank has modern looking 3.30 -1.40<br />

companies will have modern equipment<br />

looking equipment.<br />

E2: The physical facilities ate 4.70 P2: Your bank’s physical facilities are 3.42 -1.28<br />

excellent banks will be visually<br />

appealing<br />

visually appealing<br />

E3: Employees at excellent 4.70 P3: Your bank’s reception desk 3.27 -1.43<br />

banks will be neat appearing<br />

employee are neat appearing<br />

E4: Materials association with 4.71 P4: Materials associated with the 3.02 -1.69<br />

the service (such as pamphlets service (such as pamphlets or<br />

or statements) will be visually<br />

appealing at excellent banks.<br />

statements) are visually appealing at<br />

your bank.<br />

Average Tangible SERVQUAL score -1.45<br />

Reliability<br />

Reliability<br />

E5: When excellent banks 4.71 P5: When your bank promises to do 3.57 -1.14<br />

promise to do something by a something by a certain time, it does so.<br />

certain time, they do.<br />

E6: When a customer has a 4.77 P6: When you have a problem, your 3.94 -0.83<br />

problem, excellent banks will<br />

show a sincere interest in<br />

solving it.<br />

bank shows a sincere interest in<br />

solving it.<br />

E7: Excellent banks will 4.72 P7: Your bank performs the service 3.76 -0.96<br />

perform the service right the right the first time.<br />

first time.<br />

E8: Excellent banks will 4.73 P8: Your bank provides its service at 3.81 -0.92<br />

provide the service at the time the time it promises to do so.<br />

them promise to do so.<br />

E9: Excellent banks will insist 4.72 P9: Your bank insists on error free 3.88 -0.84<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

41


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

on error free records<br />

Responsiveness<br />

E10: Employees <strong>of</strong> excellent<br />

banks will tell customers<br />

exactly when services will be<br />

performed.<br />

E11:Employees <strong>of</strong> excellent<br />

banks will give prompt service<br />

to customers.<br />

E12:Employees <strong>of</strong> excellent<br />

banks will always be willing to<br />

help customers.<br />

E13:Employees <strong>of</strong> excellent<br />

banks will never be too busy to<br />

respond to customers’ requests.<br />

Assurance<br />

E14: The behaviour <strong>of</strong><br />

employees in excellent banks<br />

will instill confidence in<br />

customers.<br />

E15: Customers <strong>of</strong> excellent<br />

banks will feel safe in<br />

transactions<br />

E16: Employees <strong>of</strong> excellent<br />

banks will be consistently<br />

courteous with customers.<br />

E17: Employees <strong>of</strong> excellent<br />

banks will have the knowledge<br />

to answer customers’ questions.<br />

Empathy<br />

E18: Excellent banks will give<br />

customers individual attention<br />

E19: Excellent banks will have<br />

operating hours convenient to<br />

all their customers.<br />

E20: Excellent banks will have<br />

employees who give customers<br />

personal attention.<br />

E21: Excellent banks will have<br />

their customer’s best interests at<br />

heart.<br />

E22: The employees <strong>of</strong><br />

excellent banks will understand<br />

the specific needs <strong>of</strong> their<br />

customer<br />

records.<br />

Average Reliability SERVQUAL<br />

score<br />

Responsiveness<br />

4.53 P10: Employees in your bank tell you<br />

exactly when services will be<br />

performed.<br />

4.60 P11: Employees in your bank give you<br />

prompt service.<br />

4.66 P12: Employees in your bank are<br />

always willing to help you.<br />

4.60 P13: Employees in your bank are<br />

never too busy to respond to your<br />

request.<br />

Average Responsiveness SERVQUAL<br />

score<br />

Assurance<br />

4.23 P14: The behaviour <strong>of</strong> employees in<br />

your bank instill confidence in you.<br />

4.23 P15: You feel safe in your transactions<br />

with your bank.<br />

4.50 P16: Employees in your bank area<br />

consistently courteous with you.<br />

4.73 P17: Employees in your bank have the<br />

knowledge to answer your questions.<br />

Average Assurance SERVQUAL<br />

score<br />

Empathy<br />

4.90 P18: Your bank gives you individual<br />

attention<br />

4.90 P19: Your bank has operating hours<br />

convenient to all its customers<br />

4.90 P20: Your bank has employees who<br />

give you personal attention.<br />

4.91 P21: Your bank has your best interest<br />

at heart.<br />

4.76 P22: The employees <strong>of</strong> your bank<br />

understand your specific needs.<br />

-0.93<br />

3.65 -0.88<br />

3.92 -0.68<br />

3.78 -0.88<br />

3.78 -0.82<br />

-0.65<br />

4.23 -0.78<br />

3.61 -0.62<br />

3.41 -1.09<br />

3.18 -1.55<br />

-1.01<br />

3.57 -1.33<br />

3.93 -0.97<br />

3.80 -1.10<br />

3.73 -1.18<br />

3.93 -0.83<br />

Average Empathy SERVQUAL scores -1.08<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

42


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

SERVQUAL analysis for Federal Bank<br />

Table 5 depicts the SERVQUAL score <strong>of</strong> the five dimensions for Federal Bank. The highest expectation<br />

score for the tangibility dimension is for E2 and the lowest is for the E3. The perception score for this<br />

dimension is highest for the P3 and lowest for P1. For the reliability dimension the highest score for the<br />

expectation is for E5 and the lowest is for the E8. As against expectation the perception score for reliability<br />

dimension was highest for P6 and lowest for P5. In case <strong>of</strong> responsiveness dimension the highest<br />

expectation was for E12 and the lowest was for E10. The perception scores for this dimension were highest<br />

for P10/11 and lowest for P12/13. For the assurance dimension the highest expectation score was for E16<br />

and the lowest for E14 and E15. The perception score was highest for P15 and the lowest for P17. For the<br />

empathy dimension the highest expectation score was for E21 and the lowest for E22. As against the<br />

expectation scores the perception score for this dimension are highest for P22 and the lowest for P21.<br />

Table 5: Average ‘SERVQUAL’ <strong>of</strong> various dimensions for Federal Bank<br />

(E) (P) Gap Score<br />

P-E<br />

Tangible<br />

E1: Excellent banking<br />

companies will have modern<br />

looking equipment.<br />

E2: The physical facilities ate<br />

excellent banks will be visually<br />

appealing<br />

Tangible<br />

4.76 P1: Your bank has modern looking<br />

equipment<br />

5.00 P2: Your bank’s physical facilities are<br />

visually appealing<br />

3.53 -1.23<br />

3.99 -1.01<br />

E3: Employees at excellent 4.84 P3: Your bank’s reception desk 3.89 -0.95<br />

banks will be neat appearing<br />

employee are neat appearing<br />

E4: Materials association with 4.93 P4: Materials associated with the 3.86 -1.07<br />

the service (such as pamphlets service (such as pamphlets or<br />

or statements) will be visually<br />

appealing at excellent banks.<br />

statements) are visually appealing at<br />

your bank.<br />

Average Tangible SERVQUAL score<br />

Reliability<br />

Reliability<br />

E5: When excellent banks 4.59 P5: When your bank promises to do 3.44 -1.15<br />

promise to do something by a something by a certain time, it does so.<br />

certain time, they do.<br />

E6: When a customer has a 4.46 P6: When you have a problem, your 3.88 -0.58<br />

problem, excellent banks will<br />

show a sincere interest in<br />

solving it.<br />

bank shows a sincere interest in<br />

solving it.<br />

E7: Excellent banks will 4.38 P7: Your bank performs the service 3.68 -0.70<br />

perform the service right the right the first time.<br />

first time.<br />

E8: Excellent banks will 4.26 P8: Your bank provides its service at 3.80 -0.46<br />

provide the service at the time the time it promises to do so.<br />

them promise to do so.<br />

E9: Excellent banks will insist 4.38 P9: Your bank insists on error free 3.84 -0.54<br />

on error free records<br />

records.<br />

Average Reliability SERVQUAL -0.68<br />

score<br />

Responsiveness<br />

Responsiveness<br />

E10: Employees <strong>of</strong> excellent 4.51 P10: Employees in your bank tell you 3.25 -1.26<br />

banks will tell customers exactly when services will be<br />

exactly when services will be performed.<br />

performed.<br />

E11:Employees <strong>of</strong> excellent 4.62 P11: Employees in your bank give you 3.25 -1.37<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

43


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

banks will give prompt service<br />

to customers.<br />

E12:Employees <strong>of</strong> excellent<br />

banks will always be willing to<br />

help customers.<br />

E13:Employees <strong>of</strong> excellent<br />

banks will never be too busy to<br />

respond to customers’ requests.<br />

Assurance<br />

E14: The behaviour <strong>of</strong><br />

employees in excellent banks<br />

will instill confidence in<br />

customers.<br />

E15: Customers <strong>of</strong> excellent<br />

banks will feel safe in<br />

transactions<br />

E16: Employees <strong>of</strong> excellent<br />

banks will be consistently<br />

courteous with customers.<br />

E17: Employees <strong>of</strong> excellent<br />

banks will have the knowledge<br />

to answer customers’ questions.<br />

Empathy<br />

E18: Excellent banks will give<br />

customers individual attention<br />

E19: Excellent banks will have<br />

operating hours convenient to<br />

all their customers.<br />

E20: Excellent banks will have<br />

employees who give customers<br />

personal attention.<br />

E21: Excellent banks will have<br />

their customer’s best interests at<br />

heart.<br />

E22:The employees <strong>of</strong> excellent<br />

banks will understand the<br />

specific needs <strong>of</strong> their customer<br />

prompt service.<br />

4.67 P12: Employees in your bank are<br />

always willing to help you.<br />

4.56 P13: Employees in your bank are<br />

never too busy to respond to your<br />

request.<br />

Average Responsiveness SERVQUAL<br />

score<br />

Assurance<br />

4.12 P14: The behaviour <strong>of</strong> employees in<br />

your bank instill confidence in you.<br />

4.12 P15: You feel safe in your transactions<br />

with your bank.<br />

4.35 P16: Employees in your bank area<br />

consistently courteous with you.<br />

4.70 P17: Employees in your bank have the<br />

knowledge to answer your questions.<br />

Average Assurance SERVQUAL<br />

score<br />

Empathy<br />

4.90 P18: Your bank gives you individual<br />

attention<br />

4.90 P19: Your bank has operating hours<br />

convenient to all its customers<br />

4.90 P20: Your bank has employees who<br />

give you personal attention.<br />

4.92 P21: Your bank has your best interest<br />

at heart.<br />

4.77 P22: The employees <strong>of</strong> your bank<br />

understand your specific needs.<br />

3.13 -1.54<br />

3.13 -1.43<br />

-1.12<br />

3.33 -0.79<br />

3.43 -0.69<br />

3.20 -1.15<br />

3.00 -1.70<br />

-1.08<br />

3.8 -1.1<br />

4.07 -0.83<br />

3.8 -1.1<br />

3.7 -1.22<br />

4.16 -0.61<br />

Average Empathy SERVQUAL scores -0.97<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Table 6 depicts the Average Weighted SERVQUAL scores <strong>of</strong> the private sector banks under study. In case<br />

<strong>of</strong> the private sector banks also it has been observed that the banks are in the ‘zone <strong>of</strong> pain’. HDFC Bank is<br />

the best among the private banks and Axis Bank is the worst <strong>of</strong> the five banks under study in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

service delivery. HDFC Bank has to work in the empathy dimension to perform better and move to the<br />

‘zone <strong>of</strong> satisfaction’ and then to the ‘zone <strong>of</strong> delight’. HSBC Bank which is just near HDFC Bank in<br />

service delivery has to work in assurance and empathy dimensions. ICICI Bank has also to work in the<br />

assurance and empathy dimensions. Federal Bank has to work in the responsiveness, assurance and the<br />

empathy dimensions. Axis Bank has to work in the dimensions <strong>of</strong> tangibility, assurance and empathy to<br />

move out <strong>of</strong> the ‘zone <strong>of</strong> pain’ to ‘zone <strong>of</strong> satisfaction’ and ‘delight’.<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

44


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

Table 6: Average Weighted ‘SERVQUAL’ Scores <strong>of</strong> Private Sector Banks<br />

Name<br />

bank<br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

Dimensions <strong>of</strong> Service Quality<br />

Tangible Reliability Responsiveness Assurance Empathy<br />

Average<br />

Weighted<br />

SERVQUAL<br />

Score<br />

ICICI Bank -0.45 -0.79 -0.74 -1.00 -1.07 -16.92<br />

HDFC -0.86 -0.59 -0.44 -0.99 -1.09 -15.29<br />

HSBC -0.38 -0.83 -0.41 -1.00 -1.09 -15.41<br />

Axis Bank -1.45 -0.93 -0.65 -1.01 -1.08 -19.27<br />

Federal<br />

Bank<br />

-1.06 -0.68 -1.12 -1.08 -0.97 -18.94<br />

The present research has been undertaken with the help <strong>of</strong> SERVQUAL analysis and is trying to find the<br />

level <strong>of</strong> service quality in the Private Banks. Further research in this field can be carried out with the help<br />

<strong>of</strong> other tools <strong>of</strong> measuring service quality like the Kano’s Model <strong>of</strong> Product quality or Fuzzy based<br />

algorithmic analysis. The research provides a new approach to understanding the contribution and the<br />

condition <strong>of</strong> the Private Sector Banks. A lot more interesting approach can be a comparative study between<br />

Public and Private Sector banks in India. Along with that a comparison <strong>of</strong> foreign banks and performance<br />

on service delivery in India and the same banks service delivery in other country can be a good piece <strong>of</strong><br />

work.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Asubonteng, P., McCleary, K.J. and Swan, J.E. (1996). ‘SERVQUAL revisited: a critical review <strong>of</strong> service<br />

quality’, Journal <strong>of</strong> Services Marketing, 10(6): 62-81.<br />

Berry, L.L., Shankar, V., Parish, J.T., Cadwallader, S. & Dotzel, T. (2006). ‘Creating new markets through<br />

service innovation’, Sloan Management Review, 47(2): 56-63.<br />

Cronin, J.J. Jr and Taylor, S.A. (1992), ‘Measuring service quality: a re-examination and extension’,<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Marketing, 56: 55-68.<br />

Edvardsson et al., (2005). ‘Services portrait in service research: a critical review’. International Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Service Industry Management, 16(1): 107-121.<br />

Edvardsson. (2005). ‘Service quality: beyond cognitive assessment Service Sweden Managing Service<br />

Quality’, 15 (2):127-131.<br />

Grönroos, C. (2000). ‘Service Management and Marketing, Lexington Books’, Lexington, MA.<br />

Grönroos, C. (2001). ‘The Perceived Quality Concept: a mistake’ Managing Service Quality, 11(3): 150-<br />

152.<br />

Grönroos, C.A. (1984). ‘Service model and its marketing implications’, European Journal <strong>of</strong> Marketing,<br />

18(4): 36-44.<br />

Heskett, J.L., et al., (1994). ‘Putting the service-pr<strong>of</strong>it chain to work’, Harvard Business Review, 3(4):164-<br />

74.<br />

Kotler & Keller (2006). ‘Marketing Management’, Pearson Prentice Hall. Hardcover, New Jearsy .<br />

Lovelock (1991). ‘Services Marketing’ 2 nd Edition. Englewood Cliffs, New Jearsy, Prentice Hall.<br />

Lovelock C. & Wirtz J., (2007). ‘Services Marketing: People, Technology, Strategy’, (6 th ed.), Pearson<br />

Prentice Hall, New Jersey .<br />

Mano and Oliver’s (1993). ‘Assessing the dimensionality and structure <strong>of</strong> the consumption experience:<br />

evaluation, feeling, and satisfaction’, Journal <strong>of</strong> Consumer Research, December, 20: 451-66.<br />

Newman, K. and Cowling, A. (1996). ‘Service quality in retail banking: the experience <strong>of</strong> two British<br />

clearing banks’, International Journal <strong>of</strong> Bank Marketing, 14(6): 3-11.<br />

Nitin S. et al., (2005). ‘Service Quality Models: a review.’ International Journal <strong>of</strong> Quality & Reliability<br />

Management, 22(9): 913-949.<br />

Parasuraman et al., (1985). ‘A Conceptual Model <strong>of</strong> Service Quality and its implications for future<br />

research’, Journal <strong>of</strong> Marketing. 49: 41-50.<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

45


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

Parasuraman, A. et al., (1988). ‘SERVQUAL: a multiple item scale for measuring customer perceptions <strong>of</strong><br />

service quality’, Journal <strong>of</strong> Retailing, 64:12-40.<br />

Pepper et al., (1999). ‘Is your Company Ready for One-to-One Marketing’ Harvard Business<br />

Review,77(1): 151-156.<br />

Regan (1963) (cited in S.W. Brown et al., 1994, pg 23). Development and Emergence <strong>of</strong> Service Marketing<br />

Thought. International Journal <strong>of</strong> Service Industry Management, 5(1): 21-48.<br />

Rosen, L.D. Karwan, K.R. Scribner, L.L. (2003). ‘Service quality measurement and the disconfirmation<br />

model: taking care in interpretation’, Total Quality Management, 14(1): 3- 14.<br />

Sherry, J. Jr (ed.)(1998).‘Service Scapes: The Concept <strong>of</strong> Place in Contemporary Markets’, American<br />

Marketing Association, Chicago.<br />

Vargo, S.L. and Lusch, R.F. (2004). “The four service marketing myths – remnants <strong>of</strong> a goods-based,<br />

manufacturing model”, Journal <strong>of</strong> Service Research, 6(4): 324- 35.<br />

Wong, A. (2004). “The role <strong>of</strong> emotions in service encounters”, Managing Service Quality, 14(5): 365-76.<br />

Zeithaml and Bitner (2003 in Edvardsson et al., (2005), ‘Services Marketing: Integrating Customer Focus<br />

across the Firm’, (3rd ed.), McGraw-Hill, New York.<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

46


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

A Boss causes mental disorder - Stay or Leave<br />

K.R.Sowmya<br />

Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Management Studies,Rajalakshmi Engineering<br />

College,Chennai.saumiyaa@gmail.com<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

The case is a real time problem faced by a school teacher in her workplace from her boss<br />

which led to her mental disorder and now she is under medical treatment slowly<br />

recovering from her mental illness. This case is a unique attempt by the researcher to<br />

highlight about then dynamics <strong>of</strong> power and politics in workplace, managing superior<br />

subordinate relationship, and managing the relationship with Boss. This will be a value<br />

addition to the existing literature <strong>of</strong> Politics in the universal scenario.<br />

Keywords: Power, politics, organizational behavior, superior, subordinate, managing boss<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Shruthi was walking very fast towards her home the un-walkable distance absent-minded, from school on<br />

a mid afternoon on one <strong>of</strong> the working days in the midst <strong>of</strong> her class. However she managed to reach her<br />

home safely by walk, not realizing that she has walked beyond 15 kms in the hot sun. She was affected<br />

beyond her limits to realize the heat or the leg pain that she suffered due to walking that long in the mid<br />

afternoon. She could not stop the tears rolling down her cheeks. She was unaware <strong>of</strong> anybody who would<br />

notice her crying and was not bothered about it too. Tears are sometimes a symbol <strong>of</strong> anger. She was angry<br />

beyond limits. She did not know what to do, except to cry helplessly thinking <strong>of</strong> her family and the<br />

economic need to work. She slowly recalled the miserable events that led to this mess <strong>of</strong> her maddening,<br />

while walking home about the happenings in the last eight months in her new school that she had joined to<br />

support her husband in running a family with two children in the most important metropolitan city,<br />

Chennai.<br />

CASE BACKGROUND<br />

Shruthi joined one <strong>of</strong> most important Schools in Chennai. She is a very traditional introvert woman from a<br />

rural background transferred to Chennai along with her husband. After 12 years <strong>of</strong> experience in normal<br />

schools Shruthi got an opportunity to enter into a school beyond her standards, her life style etc. The school<br />

environment was to totally different and very competitive in terms <strong>of</strong> the syllabus, methodology, standard<br />

<strong>of</strong> students, class <strong>of</strong> people, standard <strong>of</strong> peers etc. Although she was developed an inferiority complex on<br />

joining the new school, she decided there could be no other school which would pay her as much as this<br />

popular school. So she strived as much as possible to prove her best efforts to stay on par in the school in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> teaching and behavior. She changed her life style, body mannerism and dissolved herself<br />

completely in her performance in the school. Her performance in form <strong>of</strong> teaching, results and extracurricular<br />

contributions was appreciated highly by her school principal. This extraordinary performance<br />

made her Boss to view her as a threat in the workplace. Therefore he started involving himself in various<br />

activities causing damage to her goodwill like hiding information from her that has to be revealed on time,<br />

claiming the credit for hardwork done by her, etc. Shruthi being an introvert was not able to handle him. So<br />

she carried all the stress within and became mentally affected. Now she is under medical treatment and not<br />

in a position to continue work anywhere with mental peace. She is confronted with two issues;<br />

1. How to manage without a job<br />

2. Whether to continue in the same school If so how<br />

Nature <strong>of</strong> Shruthi<br />

Shruthi aged 40 years old , was a simple, and a matured woman with very clear thoughts about her own self<br />

and her family status. Shruthi is basically from a remote village in the deep south <strong>of</strong> Tamilnadu. She was<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

47


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

from a lower middle class joint family. She already had two sisters (one younger and another elder). Both<br />

<strong>of</strong> them were mentally disordered after the divorce <strong>of</strong> the younger sister and the death <strong>of</strong> the elder sister’s<br />

husband. Now Shruthi also was travelling in the same path due to her job confusions. Shruthi was by nature<br />

a very understanding woman who never wished for more than her possibilities. But now the new job that<br />

she was enjoying has given her more expectations and is not enabling her experience her life with peace.<br />

Now how much ever she was getting she was unable to enjoy it. She felt she needed more.<br />

Nature <strong>of</strong> Shruthi’s Husband<br />

Anand (name changed) was an understanding person who was a single son <strong>of</strong> their family, a relative <strong>of</strong><br />

Shruthi too. He was already a person who lived completely in Chennai for almost 25 years. Hence he was<br />

not carried away by the life style <strong>of</strong> Chennai as Shruthi was. So he was able to accept the changes in her<br />

and he tried to advice her. However he was earning less than her and was not in a stable job.<br />

Case description<br />

She was worried over two issues. One is about the definite need to work and the further possibility <strong>of</strong><br />

surviving in this school. After a long struggle in convincing her husband , she could finally succeed in<br />

relocating to Chennai, one <strong>of</strong> the important metropolitan cities in India. It was a jaint leap in the life <strong>of</strong><br />

Shruthi in terms <strong>of</strong> her career and her living. At first she found a simple Tamil teacher job in a school <strong>of</strong><br />

average standard in which she was able to perform well but had lot <strong>of</strong> work pressure. Later after 15 years <strong>of</strong><br />

service she managed to get a job in a high standard school catering CBSE syllabus to highest society <strong>of</strong><br />

students.<br />

At first Shruthi was delighted and felt proud to be a part <strong>of</strong> such a great school which was almost a dream<br />

in her life. She started changing her dressing and her life style based on the demands <strong>of</strong> the school.<br />

Although she was the least paid teacher as per that school standards , according to her it three times the<br />

salary which she was drawing at her previous school. So she forgot her family, relatives, and children and<br />

started struggling to survive in her job. The school and her peers were beyond her standard and looked<br />

down upon her. She was able to read her environment and she managed to crush the inferior complex that<br />

was overtaking her. She concentrated in her job with great care. She felt she was inferior to all and so she<br />

started working hard and giving her best to the students and to the school. The school principal was very<br />

happy with her performance. According to her this job was enough for her life. But she was very confused<br />

and upset about the possibility <strong>of</strong> continuing with the job at this place.<br />

Question paper Incident<br />

The teachers are expected to prepare a copy <strong>of</strong> the question paper and handover to the Head <strong>of</strong> the<br />

department as per the school rules. Same way even Shruthi also did as per the rules. But somehow she<br />

found that the questions were changed in a different manner and was not the same as always submitted.<br />

Shruthi for the first two times thought it was printing mistake. But the third time she found out that it is not<br />

accidental but incidental. The sad part was in spite <strong>of</strong> the questions being changed the principal also warned<br />

her to prepare questions clearly and as per requirements <strong>of</strong> the school. Shruthi then understood that the<br />

situation has been picturized that she is not capable <strong>of</strong> preparing a question paper as per standards.<br />

Cultural Events Organizing event<br />

Shruthi actively participated and organized several cultural events as per the instructions <strong>of</strong> the school<br />

principal. Similarly, for the recent programme also shruthi contributed effectively. But the sad part is every<br />

activity, approval etc has to happen through the Head <strong>of</strong> the Department. This time also the programme was<br />

a grand success, but shruthi did not receive even a single word <strong>of</strong> appreciation from the principal. She then<br />

realized that it has been projected by the Head <strong>of</strong> the department as if he had done everything by his own<br />

self.<br />

Principal meeting event<br />

Shruthi, was devastated by the above two incidents and so she complained to the school principal about her<br />

worries in surviving in the school. The principal immediately took up her complaint and called the Head <strong>of</strong><br />

the department for discussion. The joint discussion by principal with shruthi, Head <strong>of</strong> the department,<br />

assistant in charge <strong>of</strong> the department ended in vain as there was no strong pro<strong>of</strong> against the complainant,<br />

the Head <strong>of</strong> the Department. Shruthi, observed that although the principal was acting neutrally she was<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

48


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

unable to take action without any evidence. This made it very clear to shruthi, that nothing could be done<br />

against her head <strong>of</strong> the department due to his powers he was enjoying as per hierarchy in the school.<br />

Confusions <strong>of</strong> Shruthi<br />

She did not have any other big aim in life. In order to survive in this continuous threat she had to struggle a<br />

lot and with all her struggle she was able to perform well in the school as an individual and very well in her<br />

department too. This created a very big problem for her peers and her boss. Her boss became aware <strong>of</strong> her<br />

popularity in a very short time. He started to play tricks and games against her. He started hiding her<br />

performance and started claiming the reward for all the hard work she put in. Shruthi was unable to<br />

withstand the politics played by her boss. She found lot <strong>of</strong> manipulations in her original work, but was<br />

unable to prove it. For example, the question paper she submits for the exam would be different when it<br />

was printed. Shruthi was really upset and did not know the way to handle the problem. She was worried<br />

about the loss that would be created if she loses her job and she was also unable to face her situations in the<br />

job. Situation became worse day by day and therefore she made a complaint to the Principal about the Head<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Department and his tricks played on her. The principal was able to understand the position. But she<br />

was in a helpless position and so she asked Shruthi to prove her situation. This was not possible for Shruthi.<br />

She was a very shy and a timid lady from a very narrow minded family background. She was not even able<br />

to raise her voice to her peers and therefore to her boss was impossible according to her. Hence she choked<br />

within, hiding all the worries within her.<br />

On the other side, her husband Anand (name changed) was very unhappy with her because she did not<br />

respect him as earlier after joining this school. She was earning more than him, not bothered about cleaning<br />

the house, not bothered about her two children Abhinaya in 11 th standard and Kumaran in 10 th standard.<br />

Shruthi also failed to visit her in laws in her native place . He was very unhappy about her behaviour and<br />

her cultural changes. So he insisted that she should discontinue with her new school and get back to her old<br />

school. Shruthi did not heed to his words. This led to continuous war between them at home.<br />

Now Shruthi was confronted with two issues. One is the need to work in this school to be successful, but its<br />

impossibility due to the politics in workplace. The second is the trauma she was undergoing at home with<br />

her husband and her in laws.<br />

Outcomes<br />

As an outcome <strong>of</strong> her two major problems, Shruthi has become mentally disturbed. Now she is unable to<br />

cook, unable to realize her husband & children. She is identifying everybody as a spy around her sent by<br />

her department head and thereby is mentally disordered. She is hugging close to a god’s calendar and under<br />

medication <strong>of</strong> high dosage drugs (Sizopin 150mg). This tablet <strong>of</strong> 25mg keeps a normal person in a sleeping<br />

state for 48 hours. But with 150mg <strong>of</strong> the same she is unable to sleep even one <strong>full</strong> night. She is worried<br />

that she is not able to continue in her job and she is not able to compromise her job. She is also worried that<br />

she will not be able to survive even a single month without a job. Knowing that her husband cannot support<br />

the family alone she could not think <strong>of</strong> leaving her job. She also was not willing to compromise on the life<br />

style the new school had given her.<br />

Exhibit 1 Organizational Chart at the present school<br />

Top management<br />

The principal<br />

Head <strong>of</strong> the Department<br />

Teachers (Shruthi)<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

49


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

Exhibit 2 Department seating arrangements at school in each room<br />

HOD Table Teacher 1<br />

Teacher 2<br />

Teacher 3<br />

(Shruthi)<br />

Note : The distance between the table oh HOD and Shruthi was just 10 foot long.<br />

A Boss causes mental disorder - Stay or Leave<br />

Teaching Note<br />

I. Case Summary<br />

Shruthi is a Tamil teacher in a popular schools in Chennai. She was pressurized due to politics by her head<br />

<strong>of</strong> the department and she became mentally disordered. She is now forced to stop going to school due to her<br />

mental status. She feels people are talking about her behind her back, when there is nobody around at all.<br />

She feels that any man front <strong>of</strong> her has come to spy her on behalf <strong>of</strong> her Head <strong>of</strong> the department. The<br />

previous school was very comfortable about the salary was not sufficient. So she felt the new school would<br />

suit her need. Now Shruthi is not able to continue in her new school and she has also lost her selfconsciousness.<br />

Kindly, advice her on how to proceed with her family and career.<br />

II. Learning Objectives<br />

The objective <strong>of</strong> the case is to study about the superior-subordinate relationships, or managing the boss at<br />

the workplace. This could suit the syllabus <strong>of</strong> power and politics in the organizational behavior subject for<br />

the 1 st year MBA students.<br />

The case is a very plain problem faced by any normal individual in the colleges and schools. It narrates a<br />

real time problem practically faced in the work environment. Analyzing this case will give experience to<br />

the present and future pr<strong>of</strong>essional to manage their boss in the workplace.<br />

1. To expose the audience to real time problem in the workplace in form <strong>of</strong> politics, thereby enabling<br />

them to face their future workplace effectively.<br />

2. To inculcate analyzing and problem solving skills in future managers.<br />

3. To enable decision making and action implementing skills among the future managers.<br />

III. Assignment Questions<br />

1. What should Shruthi do Whether to continue in present job or leave the Job<br />

2. Is the problem on side <strong>of</strong> Shruthi or HOD Is her Principal Genuinely in support <strong>of</strong> Shruthi or is<br />

pretending to do so<br />

3. Is the problem <strong>of</strong> Shruthi due to her family history like her sisters<br />

4. The psychological problem <strong>of</strong> Shruthi is due to her two problems she is facing in life and career.<br />

Discuss.<br />

5. Does this case give a clear picture <strong>of</strong> workplace politics leading to Psychological disorder <strong>of</strong> a<br />

person Discuss.<br />

6. Is politics at educational institutions healthy for the employees<br />

Teaching Plan<br />

1. Introduction (10 Minutes)<br />

Discussion about the case in simple language so as to reach all the class students <strong>of</strong> MBA.<br />

Shruthi, is traditional introvert woman from the deep south <strong>of</strong> India. She was basically a tamil<br />

teacher and has experience <strong>of</strong> 15 years from various school. As a lucky <strong>of</strong>fer beyond her standards<br />

she managed to get a job through her friends’ reference (front <strong>of</strong>fice executive in the same school),<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

50


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

in a famous CBSE school in Chennai, a metropolitan city in India. Shruthi was very happy about<br />

the job, salary, perks, work environment etc. She also worked very hard to survive as she was not<br />

on par with the other teachers in language and lifestyle. The school principal also was very happy<br />

with her work and appreciated her always at several incidents. But, lately several events caused a<br />

strong friction between Shruthi and her head <strong>of</strong> the department. Shruthi basically being an<br />

introvert is unable to fight the situation nor able to survive in the position. She is also heavily<br />

worried that if she loses the job she will be unable to support her family. This trauma within her<br />

caused a strong mental disorder and now she is strong medication. She is currently not in an<br />

advisable position to go to school.<br />

2. Diagnosis (30 Minutes)<br />

How did Shruthi get into this mess<br />

Three incidents have been quoted in the case that has landed shruthi in this mess. Shruthi should<br />

basically be taught interpersonal relationship in order to handle her boss and peers. Because events<br />

<strong>of</strong> such narrated types happens in every work environment and almost many <strong>of</strong> them fall victim to<br />

such events. Shruthi should be taught to manage relationships. She must also be made understand<br />

that as she feels happy for her job beyond her standards so will be there be pressure & problems<br />

also beyond standards and she has to face it boldly. These are general view about the researcher.<br />

However, the teacher can discuss about the reasons for “shruthi entering into such a mess” among<br />

the students.<br />

Did Shruthi take the right Job<br />

The teacher must get the opinion about the students about whether shruthi took up a right job. The<br />

various possible answers and the relevant justification for the same should be got from the<br />

students. However, the researcher feels that there is no job called as the right job on this earth.<br />

Every job has its own demands and blessings, Just like how life is a bed <strong>full</strong> <strong>of</strong> roses and thorns.<br />

She did not understand the power dynamics and politics in workplace.<br />

Relationship management is lagging in shruthi that she has to be taught. Such schools <strong>of</strong> good<br />

standards normally train their teachers according to the school requirements irrespective <strong>of</strong> their<br />

years <strong>of</strong> experience. As the training is given for handling classes, so should it be given even for<br />

relationship management. The teacher can give this as her conclusion after listening to the<br />

students’ opinion about the arised point <strong>of</strong> discussion.<br />

3. Action plan (30 Minutes)<br />

What should she do now/Whether to stay or leave/What if she decides to stay<br />

Opportunities for Shruthi in the same school.<br />

The students can give their opinion about whether there is any further opportunities for shruthi in<br />

the same school. If yes, what she should do and if no what other scope is available for her in the<br />

market.<br />

4. Conclusion (20 Minutes)<br />

Other options available for Shruthi.<br />

General discussion as to how to confront such issues with boss in the workplace.<br />

General relationship management between boss and subordinate can be discussed in order to relate<br />

to the power and politics concept in organizational behavior subject.<br />

The teacher can call one <strong>of</strong> the student to give a conclusion for the case , then can give his or her<br />

opinion in front <strong>of</strong> the class room. The entire can debate about the conclusions from both ends and<br />

come to a mutual understanding on any suggestions that could be given to shruthi.<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

51


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION<br />

The researcher has made this effort <strong>of</strong> writing a case study because <strong>of</strong> the work place politics that leads to<br />

psychological affecting <strong>of</strong> the mental status <strong>of</strong> a person. The researcher has written several papers on<br />

Organizational politics in banks and educational institutions. But they have highlighted about the job<br />

dissatisfaction and thereby the turnover <strong>of</strong> an employee from the organization. But here the case highlights<br />

a situation where the affected person is neither able to voice out the problem and is nor able to face it.<br />

However the person is forced to leave the organization but due to mental disorder. This gives way to a new<br />

idea <strong>of</strong> studying politics with relevance to causing mental problems in workplace. This is a real life<br />

situation faced by a person presently in her life. This case can be discussed for MBA students <strong>of</strong> all B-<br />

Schools under the category <strong>of</strong> Organizational Behaviour – Organizational Politics. In this case the politics<br />

has been shown in illegitimate manner through legitimate hierarchy. The HOD as a person using his<br />

authority has indulged in politics but in a hidden manner.<br />

Sowmya, K.R. & Panchantham,N. (2011) a in their study about perception <strong>of</strong> politics identified six forms <strong>of</strong><br />

political involvements in work place. Of which going along to get ahead over another person for their own<br />

survival is one <strong>of</strong> the factor. The same has been adopted by the Head <strong>of</strong> the department in this case, in order<br />

to save his own position in the School. But inspite <strong>of</strong> Shruthi having complained to the Principal no action<br />

has been taken on their behalf. This creates a need for the school to revamp its staff grieviance policies and<br />

procedures in order to protect the employees being affected by hidden politics which ultimately will erode<br />

the workplace and thereby the lives <strong>of</strong> the future citizens. It is a pity that the workplace politics has not<br />

spared even the educational institutions.<br />

Sowmya, K.R. & Panchantham,N. (2011) b in their study tried to find out the reason for turnover intention<br />

in educational institutions and found that Organizational politics was one <strong>of</strong> the major reason for the same.<br />

Sowmya, K.R. & Panchantham,N. (2012) c in their study tried to find out the correlation between turnover<br />

intention and organizational politics in educational institutions using Karl Pearson’s Coefficient <strong>of</strong><br />

correlation and found that there was a strong correlation between the both.<br />

The mentioned secondary sources stimulated to write this case study. This is an unique attempt on behalf <strong>of</strong><br />

the researcher because the concept <strong>of</strong> politics has been tried in form <strong>of</strong> a case study for the first time. The<br />

case is a real situation faced by shruthi. The names have been changed as the career <strong>of</strong> the mentioned lady<br />

may be destroyed if in case, Shruthi intends to continue in the same school and it will damage her goodwill<br />

if she intends to change schools because she has a definite need to work. The intention <strong>of</strong> the researcher is<br />

not to <strong>of</strong>fend the school or the HOD, but make the future managers understand how politics will damage<br />

the workplace and destroy the mental peace <strong>of</strong> the person.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Sowmya, K.R. & Panchantham,N. (2011) a : “Employees’ perception about organizational politics in<br />

banking sector”, International Journal for Research in Commerce and Management, Issue No 2<br />

(February), Volume 2, Pg. 27-31<br />

Sowmya, K.R. & Panchantham,N. (2011) b :“Faculty turnover intention in educational institutions”, Indian<br />

journal <strong>of</strong> Applied research, 1(6), 155-156.(2012)<br />

Sowmya, K.R. & Panchantham,N. (2011)c :“Influence <strong>of</strong> Organizational Politics on Turnover Intention <strong>of</strong><br />

employees in Education Sector, Chennai-India", Arth prabhand: A journal <strong>of</strong> Economics and<br />

management, 1(1), 19-25.(2012).<br />

Kind Note: The researcher has no objection in revealing the name <strong>of</strong> the persons involved and the name <strong>of</strong><br />

the school to the Publisher on request. The publisher is requested to claim replies and comments about the<br />

case to its own <strong>of</strong>fice.<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

52


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Business Studies<br />

Vol: 4, No: 1. January, 2013 ISSN 2156-7506<br />

Available online at http://www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

Enrich the <strong>Knowledge</strong> through<br />

Quality Research<br />

An International Journal Published by<br />

<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

www.akpinsight.webs.com<br />

Copyright © 2013 IJCBS<br />

2013©<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Process</strong><br />

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!