28.12.2014 Views

Brand Failures

Brand Failures

Brand Failures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

84 <strong>Brand</strong> failures<br />

only did it launch its own tartar-control toothpaste, but it also started work<br />

on a toothpaste which would cover all of the perceived tooth care needs.<br />

Whereas Crest kept on offering new variations on the same theme, thereby<br />

confusing the toothpaste-buying public, Colgate launched Colgate Total.<br />

This came with fluoride, tartar control and gum protection. In other words<br />

it provided everything within one product. Soon after its triumphant launch,<br />

Colgate was back on top of the market and eating into Crest’s sales.<br />

So what happened Why wasn’t Crest able to offer a Crest Total or Crest<br />

Complete before its rival’s product<br />

There are a number of possible reasons, and one relates to Procter &<br />

Gamble’s method of branding. Procter & Gamble’s brand strategy in the<br />

1980s seemed to be: why launch one product, when 50 will do Indeed, at<br />

one point there were 52 versions of Crest on the market. The belief was: the<br />

higher number of sub-brands the higher number of sales. So why risk<br />

threatening this scenario by telling consumers there is now one Crest<br />

toothpaste which caters for all their dental requirements<br />

However, increased choice equalled increased confusion. As a result, Crest<br />

lost market share. Indeed, true to the law of diminishing returns the more<br />

products Crest had on offer, the lower its overall share of the market. When<br />

Crest had one product, its share soared above 50 per cent. By the time Crest<br />

had 38 products it was down to 36 per cent of the market. As soon as there<br />

were 50 Crest toothpastes, its market share dipped to 25 per cent and fell<br />

behind Colgate.<br />

These problems were not unique to the Crest brand. For instance, Procter<br />

& Gamble had seen the same thing happen with its Head & Shoulders brand.<br />

Did consumers really need 31 varieties of anti-dandruff shampoo<br />

When the marketing strategy firm Ries & Ries went to work for Crest, they<br />

identified this problem. In The 22 Immutable Laws of <strong>Brand</strong>ing Al and Laura<br />

Ries recount the experience:<br />

When we worked for Crest, the marketing manager asked us, ‘Crest has<br />

thirty-eight stock-keeping units. Do you think that’s too many or too<br />

few’<br />

‘How many teeth do you have in your mouth’ we asked.<br />

‘Thirty-two.’

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!