28.12.2014 Views

Brand Failures

Brand Failures

Brand Failures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Idea failures 51<br />

Mattel explained that the new look was an effort to bring Ken up to date.<br />

‘We did a survey where we asked girls if Barbie should get a new boyfriend<br />

or stick with Ken,’ explained Lisa McKendall, Mattel’s manager of marketing<br />

and communications. ‘They wanted her to stay with Ken, but wanted him<br />

to look. . . cooler.’<br />

However, pretty soon ‘New Ken’ was being dubbed ‘Gay Ken’. The New<br />

York Times, CNN, People magazine and talk-show host Jay Leno saw the doll<br />

as a symbol of shifting gender and sexual identities and values. Ken, whose<br />

apparent purpose in life was to help define the conventional ideal of masculinity<br />

for generations of young girls, had apparently come out of the closet.<br />

This hadn’t been Mattel’s intention. ‘Ken and Barbie both reflect mainstream<br />

society,’ said Lisa McKendall. ‘They reflect what little girls see in their<br />

world – what they see their dads, brothers and uncles wearing they want Ken<br />

to wear.’<br />

Of course, Mattel was now positioned ‘between a rock and a hard place’.<br />

A ‘gay’ doll aimed at children was not going to do them any favours among<br />

middle America. However, if they acted too appalled by the associations they<br />

risked being accused of homophobia.<br />

Crunch-time came when columnist Dan Savage published an article for<br />

gay-oriented newspaper The Stranger, which said that ‘Earring Magic Ken’<br />

included too many signifiers of gay culture for it to be coincidental. ‘Remember<br />

the sudden appearance of African-American Barbie-style dolls after the<br />

full impact of the civil rights movement began to be felt’ Savage asked his<br />

readers. ‘Queer Ken is the high-water mark of, depending on your point of<br />

view, either queer infiltration into popular culture or the thoughtless<br />

appropriation of queer culture by heterosexuals.’<br />

Savage went even further, slamming Mattel’s statement that Ken was<br />

representative of the relatives of the little girls who took part in the research:<br />

‘What the little girls were seeing, and telling Mattel was cool, wasn’t what<br />

their relations were wearing – unless they had hip-queer relatives – but the<br />

homoerotic fashions and imagery they were seeing on MTV, what they saw<br />

Madonna’s dancers wearing in her concerts and films and, as it happens, what<br />

gay rights activists were wearing to demos and raves,’ he wrote.<br />

Following this article, and the interest it caused, Mattel discontinued the<br />

Ken dolls and recalled as many as they could from the shelves. Ken’s brush<br />

with controversy was now over and Barbie could sleep easier knowing her<br />

boyfriend was still interested in her.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!