Brand Failures
Brand Failures Brand Failures
190 Brand failures When a company starts a message by admitting a problem, people tend to almost instinctively open their minds. Think about the times that someone came to you with a problem and how quickly you got involved and wanted to help. Now think about people starting off a conversation about some wonderful things they are doing. You probably were a lot less interested. Another example given is that of Listerine mouthwash, a brand that successfully deployed the slogan: ‘The taste you hate twice a day.’ However, despite the many successful examples of frank candour, there are times when honesty is not the best policy. Of course, if there is a serious and indisputable flaw with a product then it needs to be recognized and addressed by brand managers, so that they can move on to a more positive message. But if it is only an honest but negative opinion that is being expressed, it usually causes brand damage. As Ries and Trout themselves acknowledge, ‘the law of candour must be used carefully and with great skill.’ To understand what can happen when great skill is not deployed, you could do worse than ask Gerald Ratner. During the 1980s he built his Ratner’s business into the world’s biggest brand of jewellery, through a series of publicity stunts and takeover deals. In 1991, however, Ratner managed to destroy his brand in the space of a sentence. In a speech to the Institute of Directors in London, he said the secret to Ratner’s success was that many of its items of jewellery were ‘total crap’. He also joked that Ratners earrings were likely to last for less time than a Marks & Spencer sandwich. Although the room filled with laughter, Ratner’s investors and customers couldn’t see the joke. Shortly afterwards he backtracked, saying that he was referring only to a very few items, but the damage had been done. The Ratner’s brand name was now synonymous with ‘crap’ products and a lack of respect for its customers. The company’s share price plummeted from £2 to less than 8p, and consumer confidence sank without trace. Group profits fell from £112 million in 1991 to losses of £122 million a year later. ‘Consumers would have been totally embarrassed and humiliated to have bought its product. It just became impossible,’ says Tom Blackett, group deputy chairman of London-based branding consultancy Interbrand. Gerald Ratner, and his eponymous brand of jewellery, were forced to make an exit. Shortly after he left the jewellery trade, he took part in an interview and appeared to be taking the situation in his stride. ‘Someone said he had
People failures 191 met comedians who wanted to be millionaires, but I must have been the only millionaire who wanted to be a comedian,’ he told the interviewer. However, in 2002 Ratner was back on a mission to resurrect the Ratner’s name and create an online version of the brand, called simply Ratners-Online. ‘I didn’t want to use the Ratner’s name but research shows that it is still the best-known name in the jewellery business despite the fact that there hasn’t been a Ratner’s shop for years,’ Gerald told the Evening Standard in 2001. In another interview, for the Guardian, he said the name would provoke curiosity from Web users. ‘We were going to call it something else but thought it was more likely to get hits on the Internet – even from a curiosity point of view.’ Whether this curiosity will be converted into long-term sales remains to be seen. Gerald also needs to make sure that this time he keeps his foot a good distance away from his mouth. ‘It is difficult for me to resist jokes, even if I am the only one that really finds them funny,’ he chuckles. ‘But I really will try.’ Lessons from Ratners Think before you speak. It often takes years to build trust among consumers, but as Gerald Ratner proved, that trust can be blown in a couple of words. Remember that most dangers come from within. Most brand damage does not arise from product flaws or distribution problems. A lot of it comes from employees or managers who fail to live up to their role as ambassadors of the brand. In service industries, where most employees are interacting with the public on a regular basis, it is especially important to maintain a positive attitude.
- Page 147 and 148: PR failures 139 Lessons from Rely
- Page 149 and 150: PR failures 141 As Gerber saw it, a
- Page 151 and 152: PR failures 143 regarding youth mar
- Page 153 and 154: PR failures 145 buying about 40 per
- Page 155 and 156: PR failures 147 Be sensitive. By s
- Page 157: PR failures 149 Remember that comp
- Page 161: Brands operate on a global scale. B
- Page 164 and 165: 156 Brand failures of the Bombay St
- Page 166 and 167: 158 Brand failures Coca-Cola. The
- Page 168 and 169: 160 Brand failures Lessons from Kel
- Page 170 and 171: 162 Brand failures Translation trou
- Page 172 and 173: 53 Schweppes Tonic Water in Italy I
- Page 174 and 175: 55 Electrolux in the United States
- Page 176 and 177: 57 Coors in Spain Coors beer had eq
- Page 178 and 179: 59 Clairol’s Mist Stick in German
- Page 180 and 181: 61 American Airlines in Mexico When
- Page 182 and 183: 63 Kentucky Fried Chicken in Hong K
- Page 184 and 185: 176 Brand failures ment. Pretty soo
- Page 186 and 187: 178 Brand failures 65 Quaker Oats
- Page 188 and 189: 180 Brand failures Lessons from Sna
- Page 191 and 192: The people behind a brand are its m
- Page 193 and 194: People failures 185 66 Enron Failin
- Page 195 and 196: People failures 187 67 Arthur Ander
- Page 197: People failures 189 68 Ratner’s W
- Page 201 and 202: People failures 193 was out, Planet
- Page 203 and 204: People failures 195 is wrong to lea
- Page 205 and 206: People failures 197 had lost the su
- Page 207: People failures 199 tortilla brand
- Page 211 and 212: Brands, like people, have a fear of
- Page 213 and 214: Rebranding failures 205 73 Consigni
- Page 215 and 216: Rebranding failures 207 of the name
- Page 217 and 218: Rebranding failures 209 74 Tommy Hi
- Page 219 and 220: Rebranding failures 211 style that
- Page 221 and 222: Rebranding failures 213 in the Repu
- Page 223 and 224: Rebranding failures 215 former secr
- Page 225 and 226: Rebranding failures 217 Lessons fro
- Page 227 and 228: Rebranding failures 219 neighbours
- Page 229 and 230: 79 British Airways When British Air
- Page 231: CHAPTER 9 Internet and new technolo
- Page 234 and 235: 226 Brand failures now believe bran
- Page 237 and 238: 81 Pets.com In the mid-1990s, when
- Page 239 and 240: Internet and new technology failure
- Page 241 and 242: Internet and new technology failure
- Page 243 and 244: Internet and new technology failure
- Page 245 and 246: Internet and new technology failure
- Page 247 and 248: Internet and new technology failure
190 <strong>Brand</strong> failures<br />
When a company starts a message by admitting a problem, people tend<br />
to almost instinctively open their minds. Think about the times that<br />
someone came to you with a problem and how quickly you got involved<br />
and wanted to help. Now think about people starting off a conversation<br />
about some wonderful things they are doing. You probably were a lot<br />
less interested.<br />
Another example given is that of Listerine mouthwash, a brand that successfully<br />
deployed the slogan: ‘The taste you hate twice a day.’<br />
However, despite the many successful examples of frank candour, there are<br />
times when honesty is not the best policy. Of course, if there is a serious and<br />
indisputable flaw with a product then it needs to be recognized and addressed<br />
by brand managers, so that they can move on to a more positive message. But<br />
if it is only an honest but negative opinion that is being expressed, it usually<br />
causes brand damage.<br />
As Ries and Trout themselves acknowledge, ‘the law of candour must be<br />
used carefully and with great skill.’ To understand what can happen when<br />
great skill is not deployed, you could do worse than ask Gerald Ratner.<br />
During the 1980s he built his Ratner’s business into the world’s biggest<br />
brand of jewellery, through a series of publicity stunts and takeover deals. In<br />
1991, however, Ratner managed to destroy his brand in the space of a<br />
sentence. In a speech to the Institute of Directors in London, he said the secret<br />
to Ratner’s success was that many of its items of jewellery were ‘total crap’.<br />
He also joked that Ratners earrings were likely to last for less time than a<br />
Marks & Spencer sandwich. Although the room filled with laughter, Ratner’s<br />
investors and customers couldn’t see the joke. Shortly afterwards he backtracked,<br />
saying that he was referring only to a very few items, but the damage<br />
had been done.<br />
The Ratner’s brand name was now synonymous with ‘crap’ products and<br />
a lack of respect for its customers. The company’s share price plummeted<br />
from £2 to less than 8p, and consumer confidence sank without trace. Group<br />
profits fell from £112 million in 1991 to losses of £122 million a year later.<br />
‘Consumers would have been totally embarrassed and humiliated to have<br />
bought its product. It just became impossible,’ says Tom Blackett, group<br />
deputy chairman of London-based branding consultancy Interbrand.<br />
Gerald Ratner, and his eponymous brand of jewellery, were forced to make<br />
an exit. Shortly after he left the jewellery trade, he took part in an interview<br />
and appeared to be taking the situation in his stride. ‘Someone said he had