Brand Failures
Brand Failures Brand Failures
The people behind a brand are its main ambassadors. If those people fall out with each other, act illegally or make negative statements about their products, then a crisis may quickly develop. This is especially true in those cases where the people are the brand, as in the case of a pop group or a TV personality such as Martha Stewart or Rosie O’Donnell (both of whom have done much to diminish the value of their branded personalities in the United States). It is also true when people at the highest level of the company are caught acting irresponsibly. The most obvious case of ‘people failure’ in recent times is that of the Enron scandal, where fraudulent activities were associated with individuals at the very top of the company. However, corruption is only an extreme and rather dramatic aspect of people failure. Sometimes brands can die as a result of the words that come out of the chief executive’s mouth. For instance, the Ratner’s brand of jewellery lost its market value overnight when Gerald Ratner declared his products were ‘crap’. Whether or not this was a fair assessment was beside the point, the very fact that he said it was enough to destroy the brand. The real lesson is that no matter how much time, money and energy is poured into a brand or corporate strategy, it ultimately depends on the behaviour of individuals whether or not this strategy remains on track. The higher up the individual, the more he or she is seen as representative of the brand. To borrow a useful phrase from John Karolefski, former editor-inchief of Brand Marketing magazine, ‘the fish rots from the head.’ In other words, those with the most responsibility must act the most responsibly. ‘The CEO must buy into and be part of the strategy from its inception,’ says Karolefski. ‘The head of the company sets the tone throughout the entire organisation. He or she will also be the most likely spokesperson for the company and must be credible.’ Karolefski has also written lucidly about the Enron and related Arthur Andersen scandals. ‘A critical element in these cases is that the crisis and the
- Page 139 and 140: PR failures 131 common purpose thro
- Page 141 and 142: PR failures 133 Lesson from Pan Am
- Page 143 and 144: PR failures 135 In addition, Snow B
- Page 145 and 146: PR failures 137 45 Rely tampons Pro
- Page 147 and 148: PR failures 139 Lessons from Rely
- Page 149 and 150: PR failures 141 As Gerber saw it, a
- Page 151 and 152: PR failures 143 regarding youth mar
- Page 153 and 154: PR failures 145 buying about 40 per
- Page 155 and 156: PR failures 147 Be sensitive. By s
- Page 157: PR failures 149 Remember that comp
- Page 161: Brands operate on a global scale. B
- Page 164 and 165: 156 Brand failures of the Bombay St
- Page 166 and 167: 158 Brand failures Coca-Cola. The
- Page 168 and 169: 160 Brand failures Lessons from Kel
- Page 170 and 171: 162 Brand failures Translation trou
- Page 172 and 173: 53 Schweppes Tonic Water in Italy I
- Page 174 and 175: 55 Electrolux in the United States
- Page 176 and 177: 57 Coors in Spain Coors beer had eq
- Page 178 and 179: 59 Clairol’s Mist Stick in German
- Page 180 and 181: 61 American Airlines in Mexico When
- Page 182 and 183: 63 Kentucky Fried Chicken in Hong K
- Page 184 and 185: 176 Brand failures ment. Pretty soo
- Page 186 and 187: 178 Brand failures 65 Quaker Oats
- Page 188 and 189: 180 Brand failures Lessons from Sna
- Page 192 and 193: 184 Brand failures resulting damage
- Page 194 and 195: 186 Brand failures made matters wor
- Page 196 and 197: 188 Brand failures Lessons from Art
- Page 198 and 199: 190 Brand failures When a company s
- Page 200 and 201: 192 Brand failures 69 Planet Hollyw
- Page 202 and 203: 194 Brand failures 70 Fashion Café
- Page 204 and 205: 196 Brand failures 71 Hear’Say Fr
- Page 206 and 207: 198 Brand failures 72 Guiltless Gou
- Page 209: CHAPTER 8 Rebranding failures
- Page 212 and 213: 204 Brand failures But while there
- Page 214 and 215: 206 Brand failures There is a wise
- Page 216 and 217: 208 Brand failures Lessons from Con
- Page 218 and 219: 210 Brand failures Part of this ‘
- Page 220 and 221: 212 Brand failures 75 BT Cellnet to
- Page 222 and 223: 214 Brand failures 76 ONdigital to
- Page 224 and 225: 216 Brand failures for digital tele
- Page 226 and 227: 218 Brand failures 77 Windscale to
- Page 228 and 229: 78 Payless Drug Store to Rite Aid I
- Page 230 and 231: 80 MicroPro Remember MicroPro In th
- Page 233 and 234: On the Internet, brand failure has
- Page 235: Internet and new technology failure
- Page 238 and 239: 230 Brand failures ‘Pets.com has
The people behind a brand are its main ambassadors. If those people fall out<br />
with each other, act illegally or make negative statements about their<br />
products, then a crisis may quickly develop. This is especially true in those<br />
cases where the people are the brand, as in the case of a pop group or a TV<br />
personality such as Martha Stewart or Rosie O’Donnell (both of whom have<br />
done much to diminish the value of their branded personalities in the United<br />
States). It is also true when people at the highest level of the company are<br />
caught acting irresponsibly.<br />
The most obvious case of ‘people failure’ in recent times is that of the Enron<br />
scandal, where fraudulent activities were associated with individuals at the<br />
very top of the company. However, corruption is only an extreme and rather<br />
dramatic aspect of people failure.<br />
Sometimes brands can die as a result of the words that come out of the chief<br />
executive’s mouth. For instance, the Ratner’s brand of jewellery lost its market<br />
value overnight when Gerald Ratner declared his products were ‘crap’.<br />
Whether or not this was a fair assessment was beside the point, the very fact<br />
that he said it was enough to destroy the brand.<br />
The real lesson is that no matter how much time, money and energy is<br />
poured into a brand or corporate strategy, it ultimately depends on the<br />
behaviour of individuals whether or not this strategy remains on track. The<br />
higher up the individual, the more he or she is seen as representative of the<br />
brand. To borrow a useful phrase from John Karolefski, former editor-inchief<br />
of <strong>Brand</strong> Marketing magazine, ‘the fish rots from the head.’ In other<br />
words, those with the most responsibility must act the most responsibly. ‘The<br />
CEO must buy into and be part of the strategy from its inception,’ says<br />
Karolefski. ‘The head of the company sets the tone throughout the entire<br />
organisation. He or she will also be the most likely spokesperson for the<br />
company and must be credible.’<br />
Karolefski has also written lucidly about the Enron and related Arthur<br />
Andersen scandals. ‘A critical element in these cases is that the crisis and the