28.12.2014 Views

Brand Failures

Brand Failures

Brand Failures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

148 <strong>Brand</strong> failures<br />

49 Farley’s infant milk<br />

The salmonella incident<br />

When the UK Central Public Health Laboratory made the connection<br />

between Farley’s infant milk and salmonella in 1985, the story made the headlines.<br />

The product was recalled immediately at a cost of £8 million. Farley’s<br />

parent company Glaxo Smith-Kline was forced to put Farley’s into liquidation<br />

and sold its two plants to high-street chemist Boots for £18 million.<br />

Boots had an almost impossible task in rebuilding the brand, given the<br />

amount of negative media coverage it had suffered. After all, health scares are<br />

always damaging for brands, but health scares involving babies are, if<br />

anything, even more catastrophic.<br />

Furthermore, while Farley’s had been off the shelves, its two main competitors<br />

– Cow & Gate and Wyeth – had stepped up their production leaving<br />

little room for Farley’s to squeeze back in. Although Boots ploughed millions<br />

into promoting and marketing Farley, the brand’s market share was never able<br />

to return to the levels it had reached before the salmonella incident. After<br />

years of persistence, eventually Boots sold the business to Heinz in 1994.<br />

Lessons from Farley’s<br />

Keep a look out for internal threats. The salmonella incident had been<br />

avoidable because it had been caused by an employee not following<br />

adequate procedures.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!