BANCO BILBAO VIZCAYA ARGENTARIA, S.A. AND ... - BBVA
BANCO BILBAO VIZCAYA ARGENTARIA, S.A. AND ... - BBVA
BANCO BILBAO VIZCAYA ARGENTARIA, S.A. AND ... - BBVA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
consideration. These figures are supplemented by periodic stress comparisons, back-testing and scenario<br />
analyses.<br />
7.3 LIQUIDITY RISK<br />
The aim of liquidity risk management and control is to ensure that the payment commitments can be duly<br />
met without having to resort to borrowing funds under burdensome terms, or damaging the image and<br />
reputation of the institution.<br />
The Group’s liquidity risk monitoring is centralized in each bank and takes a dual approach: the short-term<br />
approach (90-day time horizon), which focuses basically on the management of payments and collections of<br />
Treasury and Markets, calculates the Bank’s possible liquidity requirements; and the structural, long-term<br />
approach, which focuses on the financial management of the balance sheet as a whole, with a minimum<br />
monitoring time frame of one year.<br />
The evaluation of asset liquidity risk is based on whether or not assets are eligible for rediscounting at the<br />
corresponding central bank. For normal situations, both in the short and medium term, those assets that are<br />
on the eligible list published by the European Central Bank ("ECB") or the corresponding monetary authority<br />
are considered to be liquid. Non-eligible assets, quoted or non-quoted, are considered to represent a second<br />
line of liquidity for the entity when analyzing crisis situations.<br />
Liquidity management is performed entirely by the Bank's Assets and Liabilities Committee (“ALCO”),<br />
through Financial Management. For its implementation, it uses a broad scheme of limits, sublimits and alerts,<br />
approved by the Executive Committee, based on which the Risk Area carries out its independent<br />
measurement and control work. It also provides the manager with back-up decision-making tools and<br />
metrics. Each of the local risk areas, which are independent from the local manager, complies with the<br />
corporative principles of liquidity risk control that are established by the Global Risk Management Unit, the<br />
Structural Risks unit for the entire Group.<br />
For each entity, the management areas request an outline of the quantitative and qualitative limits and alerts<br />
for short and medium-term liquidity risk. This request must be authorized by the Executive Committee. A<br />
core principle in the <strong>BBVA</strong> Group’s liquidity management has long been to encourage the financial<br />
independence of its subsidiaries. This aims to ensure that the cost of liquidity is correctly reflected in price<br />
formation and that there is sustainable growth in the lending business.<br />
Also, the Risk Area performs periodic (daily and monthly) risk exposure measurements, develops the related<br />
valuation tools and models, conducts periodic stress tests, measures interbank counterparty concentration,<br />
prepares the policies and procedures manual, and monitors the authorized limits and alerts, which are<br />
reviewed at least once every year.<br />
Information on liquidity risk is sent at least monthly to the Group’s ALCO and to the managing areas<br />
themselves. Under the Contingency Plan, the Technical Liquidity Group (“TLG”), in the event of an alert of a<br />
possible crisis, conducts an initial analysis of the Bank’s short- and long-term liquidity situation. The TLG is<br />
made up of specialized staff from the Short-Term Cash Desk, Financial Management and the Structural Risk<br />
unit. If the alert is serious, the TLG reports the matter to the Liquidity Committee, which is composed of the<br />
managers of the related areas. The Liquidity Committee is responsible, in situations requiring urgent<br />
attention, for calling a meeting of the Funding Committee.<br />
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the decisive role that central banks and governments assumed<br />
favored the liquidity conditions on interbank markets. The Group has not had to resort to using the measures<br />
established in Spain to mitigate bank funding issues.<br />
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, within its framework of projects, the Basel Committee on Banking<br />
Supervision carried out a quantitative impact study (QIS) on its proposals, in order to reinforce the regulation<br />
standards for the international financial system in terms of capital and liquidity. The preliminary results will be<br />
presented throughout the second half of 2010.<br />
61