27.12.2014 Views

No. 4, 1998 - Tribology in Industry

No. 4, 1998 - Tribology in Industry

No. 4, 1998 - Tribology in Industry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figurc 13. Awiliary f,;ttction gt for detern<strong>in</strong>ation of tlrc<br />

ratio beh+'een energia consunted on frictiort<br />

betwcen the clea<strong>in</strong>g fuce and tlrc nnch<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

piece, and betw,een the chip and the rake face<br />

Figure 14. ALatilian, functiort g t for detenn<strong>in</strong>atiorr of tlrc<br />

ratio bet l,een encryics consutncd ott fticliott<br />

betv'een tlte cleat<strong>in</strong>g face and tlrc nnch<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

piece, and bctw,et:n tlre clip and the rake face<br />

Figure 15. Atuilicry functiort gt for detenr<strong>in</strong>ation of the<br />

ralio hetv,een energies cotrswtted on fricliort<br />

betv,eetr the clzar<strong>in</strong>g face and tl;e nuclt<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

piece, and bef,ueen<br />

qilr,7) = {).76327<br />

9z@):1'933'<br />

IJy substitut<strong>in</strong>g thc ubove uumerical values <strong>in</strong>to the equation,<br />

we obt;l<strong>in</strong>:<br />

A"t 0.0:0 ,,-<br />

) )" ='' i..j' . 0.76-127. 1.933 = 0.05901 6<br />

and the expression further gives:<br />

/'<br />

';; = 0.23529 .(1 + 0.05901A = 0.249176<br />

n^.<br />

so we conclude that <strong>in</strong> the above example the energy of<br />

friction over the clear<strong>in</strong>g face is 5.97o of the energy of<br />

friction over the rake face, and that the enerry offriction<br />

on the contact surfaces on lire rake and the clear<strong>in</strong>g faces<br />

rs 24.9Vo, and the energy for overcom<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>ternal<br />

friction is 75.1V of the energy needed for chip formation.<br />

Relatively high normal stress on the contact surface between<br />

the chip and the rake face, has as a consequence<br />

lower<strong>in</strong>g of the friction coefficient, and thus the real<br />

contact surface is <strong>in</strong>creased, over which the micro weld<strong>in</strong>g<br />

will occur betlr,een the asperities on the chip surface<br />

that is slid<strong>in</strong>g over the tool rake face.<br />

The friction conditions cu tire ruke face, as it is shown,<br />

are complicated due to appearance of friction on the<br />

clear<strong>in</strong>g face. Earlier, simplified force schematics, enables<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ation of the averzrge value of the friction<br />

coefficient on the rake face. It is based on the assumption<br />

about equality and coll<strong>in</strong>eariry of the resultant force and<br />

forces <strong>in</strong> the shear<strong>in</strong>gplane and the rake face (Figure 16).<br />

The friction coef-ficient determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> this way has not<br />

many comrnon po<strong>in</strong>ts with real condition. The more<br />

realistic scheme is that presented <strong>in</strong> Figure 3.<br />

Consider<strong>in</strong>g the complexity of the tribological conditions<br />

<strong>in</strong> metal cutt<strong>in</strong>g, to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!