DEliverable 2.3 - the School of Engineering and Design - Brunel ...

DEliverable 2.3 - the School of Engineering and Design - Brunel ... DEliverable 2.3 - the School of Engineering and Design - Brunel ...

dea.brunel.ac.uk
from dea.brunel.ac.uk More from this publisher
27.12.2014 Views

ICT Project 3D VIVANT– Deliverable 2.3 Contract no.: 248420 User Acceptance Validation Plan Olsson, R., Sjostrom, M.: “Multiview image coding scheme transformations: artifact characteristics and effects on perceived 3D quality.” SPIE New Display Technology for Military Applications Journal. Vol. 7524, 75240Z, (2010). Onural, L., et al.: “An Assessment of 3DTV Technologies.” In: Proceedings of NAB Broadcast Engineering Conference, (2006), pp. 456-467. Reis, G. A., Havig, P. R.et al.: “Color and shape perception on the Perspecta 3D volumetric display.” SPIE New Display Technology for Military Applications Journal. Vol. 6558, 65580I (2007). Rogers, E.: “Diffusion of Innovations”, New York (1995). Rubin, J. and Chisnell, D.: “Handbook of Usability Testing: How to Plan, Design and Conduct Effective Testing.” London (2008). Saygili, G., Gurler, C.G., Tekalp, A. M.: “3D display dependent quality evaluation and rate allocation using scalable video coding.” In: Proceedings of 16th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), (2009), pp.717-720, 7-10. Seale, C.: “The quality of qualitative research.” London, Sage (1999). Thompson, Ronald L. Higgins, Christopher A. and Howell, Jane M. Influence of Experience on Personal Computer Utilization: Testing a Conceptual Model. Journal of Management Information Systems Vol. 11, No. 1 (Summer, 1994), pp. 167-187 (1994) Veit, Quirin: “Vergleichende Untersuchung und Bewertung von Codierverfahren für dreidimensionales Fernsehen“, Bachelor’s Thesis, University of Applied Sciences Amberg-Weiden (2011). Wolf, S. and Pinson, M.: “Video Quality Measurement Techniques,” NTIA Report 02-392, (Jun. 2002) (available online at www.its.bldrdoc.gov/n3/video/documents.htm). Yamazaki, T., K. Kamijo, and S. Fukuzumi: “Quantitative evaluation of visual fatigue.” In: Proceedings of Japan Display, (1989), pp. 606-609. IEEE Standards • P3333: Standard for the Quality Assessment of Three Dimensional (3D) Displays, 3D Contents and 3D Devices based on Human Factors (2010), information online at: http://standards.ieee.org/develop/project/3333.html ITU-R Recommendations • ITU-R BT.500: Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures. Latest version 12 (September 2009) available online at: http://www.itu.int/rec/R-REC-BT.500- 12-200909-I/en • ITU-R BS.1116-1: Methods for the subjective assessment of small impairments in audio systems including multichannel sound systems (1994-1997) • ITU-R BS.1284-1: General methods for the subjective assessment of sound quality (1997-2003) • ITU-R BT.1438 Subjective assessment of stereoscopic television pictures (2000) • ITU-R BS.1534-1: Method for the subjective assessment of intermediate quality level of coding systems(2001-2003) 01.09.11 28

ICT Project 3D VIVANT– Deliverable 2.3 Contract no.: 248420 User Acceptance Validation Plan ANNEX 1 A.1.1 INTRODUCTION This document refers to the need of calibrations and monitoring during the production process of a typical TV product. A.1.2 CALIBRATIONS AND MONITORING This section lists the main parameters involved in a TV production, indicating also the monitoring tool and/or measuring instrument usually adopted in a TV studio or a post-processing environment. Table 3: Shot parameters Parameter Parameters Relevant to the Shooting Phase Related to… Suggested monitor or measuring instrument Focus Focus regulation 2D monitor pixel-to-pixel Depth of focus Focus regulation Iris diameter 2D monitor pixel-to-pixel Viewing angle Focal length (zoom) 2D monitor pixel-to-pixel Screen position in depth Transversal and longitudinal magnification (i.e., volumetric distortion) In stereo: convergence distance In holoscopic: it depends on the optical system In stereo: focal length In holoscopic: if applicable 3D monitor 3D monitor Normal use Setting before shot / continuous control (1) Setting before shot Setting before shot / continuous control (1) Setting before shot / continuous control (1) (scene definition) Setting before shot (1) (good representation of real world) Horizontal disparity range In stereo: base, convergence angle, focal length In holoscopic: if applicable Still open problem Setting before shot (1) (to avoid eye fatigue) Signal parameters White level Iris and overall gain Waveform monitor and calibration panel (white) Setting before shot (signal range) Black pedestal Pedestal level gain Waveform monitor and calibration panel (black) Setting before shot (signal range) Gamma Gamma regulation Waveform monitor and calibration panel (grey scale) Setting before shot (colorimetry) Component gain Component gain Waveform monitor, vectorscope and calibration panel (colour bars) Setting before shot (colorimetry) Notes: 01.09.11 29

ICT Project 3D VIVANT– Deliverable <strong>2.3</strong><br />

Contract no.:<br />

248420<br />

User Acceptance Validation Plan<br />

Olsson, R., Sjostrom, M.: “Multiview image coding scheme transformations: artifact characteristics<br />

<strong>and</strong> effects on perceived 3D quality.” SPIE New Display Technology for Military Applications<br />

Journal. Vol. 7524, 75240Z, (2010).<br />

Onural, L., et al.: “An Assessment <strong>of</strong> 3DTV Technologies.” In: Proceedings <strong>of</strong> NAB Broadcast<br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> Conference, (2006), pp. 456-467.<br />

Reis, G. A., Havig, P. R.et al.: “Color <strong>and</strong> shape perception on <strong>the</strong> Perspecta 3D volumetric display.”<br />

SPIE New Display Technology for Military Applications Journal. Vol. 6558, 65580I (2007).<br />

Rogers, E.: “Diffusion <strong>of</strong> Innovations”, New York (1995).<br />

Rubin, J. <strong>and</strong> Chisnell, D.: “H<strong>and</strong>book <strong>of</strong> Usability Testing: How to Plan, <strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> Conduct<br />

Effective Testing.” London (2008).<br />

Saygili, G., Gurler, C.G., Tekalp, A. M.: “3D display dependent quality evaluation <strong>and</strong> rate<br />

allocation using scalable video coding.” In: Proceedings <strong>of</strong> 16th IEEE International Conference on<br />

Image Processing (ICIP), (2009), pp.717-720, 7-10.<br />

Seale, C.: “The quality <strong>of</strong> qualitative research.” London, Sage (1999).<br />

Thompson, Ronald L. Higgins, Christopher A. <strong>and</strong> Howell, Jane M. Influence <strong>of</strong> Experience on<br />

Personal Computer Utilization: Testing a Conceptual Model. Journal <strong>of</strong> Management Information<br />

Systems Vol. 11, No. 1 (Summer, 1994), pp. 167-187 (1994)<br />

Veit, Quirin: “Vergleichende Untersuchung und Bewertung von Codierverfahren für<br />

dreidimensionales Fernsehen“, Bachelor’s Thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Applied Sciences Amberg-Weiden<br />

(2011).<br />

Wolf, S. <strong>and</strong> Pinson, M.: “Video Quality Measurement Techniques,” NTIA Report 02-392, (Jun.<br />

2002) (available online at www.its.bldrdoc.gov/n3/video/documents.htm).<br />

Yamazaki, T., K. Kamijo, <strong>and</strong> S. Fukuzumi: “Quantitative evaluation <strong>of</strong> visual fatigue.” In:<br />

Proceedings <strong>of</strong> Japan Display, (1989), pp. 606-609.<br />

IEEE St<strong>and</strong>ards<br />

• P3333: St<strong>and</strong>ard for <strong>the</strong> Quality Assessment <strong>of</strong> Three Dimensional (3D) Displays, 3D Contents<br />

<strong>and</strong> 3D Devices based on Human Factors (2010), information online at:<br />

http://st<strong>and</strong>ards.ieee.org/develop/project/3333.html<br />

ITU-R Recommendations<br />

• ITU-R BT.500: Methodology for <strong>the</strong> subjective assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> television pictures.<br />

Latest version 12 (September 2009) available online at: http://www.itu.int/rec/R-REC-BT.500-<br />

12-200909-I/en<br />

• ITU-R BS.1116-1: Methods for <strong>the</strong> subjective assessment <strong>of</strong> small impairments in audio systems<br />

including multichannel sound systems (1994-1997)<br />

• ITU-R BS.1284-1: General methods for <strong>the</strong> subjective assessment <strong>of</strong> sound quality (1997-2003)<br />

• ITU-R BT.1438 Subjective assessment <strong>of</strong> stereoscopic television pictures (2000)<br />

• ITU-R BS.1534-1: Method for <strong>the</strong> subjective assessment <strong>of</strong> intermediate quality level <strong>of</strong> coding<br />

systems(2001-2003)<br />

01.09.11 28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!