DEliverable 2.3 - the School of Engineering and Design - Brunel ...

DEliverable 2.3 - the School of Engineering and Design - Brunel ... DEliverable 2.3 - the School of Engineering and Design - Brunel ...

dea.brunel.ac.uk
from dea.brunel.ac.uk More from this publisher
27.12.2014 Views

ICT Project 3D VIVANT– Deliverable 2.3 Contract no.: 248420 User Acceptance Validation Plan 6 CONCLUSION This deliverable has presented the methodology, user acceptance metrics as well as time plan to be employed for the user acceptance validation in 3D VIVANT. Both professional as well as (prospective consumers) end-users will be recruited for the purposes of testing and evaluating the various components of the 3D VIVANT system. Qualitative assessment methods will be mainly employed for the user validation and testing of the new audio-visual experience to be created by the 3D holoscopic video and 3D audio as well as the functionality, usability and user experience of the Broadcast TV and Online Hyperlinking use cases. The outcomes of these tests will be reported in D7.3 “Results of User Perception and Usability Testing”, due in M34. 01.09.11 26

ICT Project 3D VIVANT– Deliverable 2.3 Contract no.: 248420 User Acceptance Validation Plan 7 REFERENCES Benton, S. A.: “Elements of Holographic Video Imaging.” In: Proceedings of SPIE 1600, Lake Forest, Ill., USA, 15-19 July. (1991), pp. 82- 86. Chen, W. et al.: “New Requirements of Subjective Video Quality Assessment Methodologies for 3DTV” In: Proceedings of Fifth International Workshop on Video Processing and Quality Metrics for Consumer Electronics - VPQM 2010, Scottsdale, Arizona, U.S.A. September 26-29 (2010), pp 4025- 4028. Creswell, J. W.: “Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches.” London (2008). Davis, F. D.: “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology.” MIS Quarterly (13:3), (1989), pp. 319-339. De Abreu, N., Blanckenburg, C., et al.: “Qualitatives Wissensmanagement. Neue wissensbasierte Dienstleistungen im Wissenscoaching und in der Wissensstrukturierung. “ Berlin, (2006). De Silva, D.V.S.X.; Fernando, W.A.C.; Nur, G.; Ekmekcioglu, E.; Worrall, S.T.: “3D video assessment with Just Noticeable Difference in Depth evaluation.” 26-29 Sept. 2010, 17th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), (2010), pp.4013-4016. Farag, H., et al.: “Psychoacoustic Investigations on Sound-Source Occlusion.” Journal of Audio Engineering Society, Vol. 51, No. 7/8. (July 2003), pp. 635-646. Hewage, C.T.E.R.; Worrall, S.T.; Dogan, S.; Villette, S.; Kondoz, A.M.: “Quality Evaluation of Color Plus Depth Map-Based Stereoscopic Video.” Selected Topics in Signal Processing, IEEE Journal of, vol.3, no.2, pp.304-318, April 2009. Honda, T. "Holographic display for movie and video" in Three Dimensional Image Technology ITE Japan (1991), pp 619-22. Leon, G.; Kalva, H.; Furht, B.: “3D Video Quality Evaluation with Depth Quality Variations.” 3DTV Conference (28-30 May 2008): The True Vision - Capture, Transmission and Display of 3D Video, (2008), pp.301-304. Kalva, Christodoulou, et al.: “Design and evaluation of a 3D video system based on H.264 view coding.” In: Proceedings of the 2006 international Workshop on Network and Operating Systems Support For Digital Audio and Video (Newport, Rhode Island, November 22 - 23, 2006). NOSSDAV '06. ACM, New York, NY, (2006), pp. 1-6. Knorr, S., Kunter, M., Sikora, T.: “Stereoscopic 3D from 2D video with super-resolution capability” In: Signal Processing: Image Communication, Volume 23, Issue 9, (October 2008), pp. 665-676. Lambooij, M.T.M., W. A. IJsselsteijn, I. Heynderickx: “Visual Discomfort in Stereoscopic Displays: A Review.” In: Proceedings of SPIE-IS&T Electronic Imaging, SPIE Vol. 6490, (2007). Lincoln, Y. S., Guba, E.G.: “Naturalistic Inquiry” Beverly Hills, Sage (1985). Norman, D.: “User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-computer Interaction.” New York, CRC Press, (1986). Norman, D.: “The Design of Everyday Things.” New York, Doubleday Business, (1990). 01.09.11 27

ICT Project 3D VIVANT– Deliverable <strong>2.3</strong><br />

Contract no.:<br />

248420<br />

User Acceptance Validation Plan<br />

6 CONCLUSION<br />

This deliverable has presented <strong>the</strong> methodology, user acceptance metrics as well as time plan to be<br />

employed for <strong>the</strong> user acceptance validation in 3D VIVANT. Both pr<strong>of</strong>essional as well as<br />

(prospective consumers) end-users will be recruited for <strong>the</strong> purposes <strong>of</strong> testing <strong>and</strong> evaluating <strong>the</strong><br />

various components <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 3D VIVANT system. Qualitative assessment methods will be mainly<br />

employed for <strong>the</strong> user validation <strong>and</strong> testing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> new audio-visual experience to be created by <strong>the</strong><br />

3D holoscopic video <strong>and</strong> 3D audio as well as <strong>the</strong> functionality, usability <strong>and</strong> user experience <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Broadcast TV <strong>and</strong> Online Hyperlinking use cases.<br />

The outcomes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se tests will be reported in D7.3 “Results <strong>of</strong> User Perception <strong>and</strong> Usability<br />

Testing”, due in M34.<br />

01.09.11 26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!