27.12.2014 Views

Minutes- Sept 25 2008.doc - Vista Unified School District

Minutes- Sept 25 2008.doc - Vista Unified School District

Minutes- Sept 25 2008.doc - Vista Unified School District

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

OFFICIAL COPY<br />

Greg Moser of Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch<br />

stated he did review the website of the Classical Academy and<br />

addressed some of his concerns. Mr. Moser stated that they are WASC<br />

accredited and have been established since 1999. He also stated that<br />

when he went to look at the documents a lot of information is fairly<br />

current. They include a lot of appendices which are not part of the<br />

charter document. Mr. Moser advised that four areas be covered:<br />

1. That the appendices be included in the charter document.<br />

2. They reference the other charters that they have but nothing states<br />

in the charter or appendices how the Classical Academy relates to<br />

the other schools.<br />

3. New employees need to go into STRS and not social security.<br />

4. Will they be a school of the <strong>District</strong> or their own LEA.<br />

5. Notice of where the site will be located.<br />

6. Specify Insurance.<br />

Discussions continued regarding appendices not being included in the<br />

petition and the possible reasons for that. Member Guffanti wanted more<br />

clarification on the conditions to approve by Greg Moser.<br />

Member Lilly stated we can approve, disapprove or approve with<br />

conditions. He stated I am persuaded by staff analysis that there are<br />

pretty systemic and multiple short comings in this proposal and it’s not<br />

our job to make the proposal hold, that’s not our job and it’s not our job to<br />

write a set of conditions to make sure the proposal holds. Member Lilly<br />

continued and I’m not prepared to approve this charter school with this<br />

many questions remaining unanswered even though we’ve given them<br />

multiple opportunities to answer those questions.<br />

Member Lilly moved to deny the charter, seconded by Member<br />

Hubbard.<br />

Member Guffanti stated the positive aspects of the school. He also<br />

mentioned their other charters that have been successful. Member<br />

Guffanti would like to suggest that the Board do a conditional acceptance<br />

and have Greg Moser and Classical Academy work out the details.<br />

Member Hubbard stated the conditions of the petition do not meet his<br />

expectations regarding racial ethnic balance, special education and<br />

securing of a facility/site for the school.<br />

Member Herrera expressed her concerns of a past charter school that<br />

did not last a year due to the charter itself was very poorly written.<br />

Member Herrera did not want to see the students of this <strong>District</strong> out on a<br />

limb. They would be better served in receiving a quality education by<br />

staying were they are within the <strong>District</strong>. She would vote against the<br />

Classical Academy.<br />

Member Gibson stated competition is good for the public school system.<br />

Charter <strong>School</strong>s offer an alternative for parents. If they are not meeting<br />

the needs of the students they should fail. Competition adds quality.<br />

Member Gibson stated if he had a choice he would ask for a conditional.<br />

Believes this could be a successful charter school.<br />

Page 6 of 8<br />

9/<strong>25</strong>/08<br />

Regular Board Meeting <strong>Minutes</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!