Strategic Thought Transformation - The IIPM Think Tank
Strategic Thought Transformation - The IIPM Think Tank
Strategic Thought Transformation - The IIPM Think Tank
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CORPORATE H I E R A R C H Y<br />
Learn how you can leverage data to<br />
enable more targeted marketing to businesses<br />
Sudip Chakraborty, Principal, Inductis<br />
Designing a marketing database,<br />
especially for businesses, can be<br />
challenging. Compared to the consumer<br />
world, this is still a relatively new<br />
field with sparsely available expertise in<br />
data, rules and models. This provides an<br />
opportunity to sophisticated users to gain<br />
competitive advantage in marketing effectively<br />
to businesses.<br />
In this article, we propose an extension<br />
to traditional corporate hierarchies used in<br />
many marketing databases & show how<br />
you can actually implement this by leveraging<br />
internal & external data, matching<br />
and data integration rules and technology.<br />
This article is intended for leaders in a marketing<br />
organization including managers of<br />
marketing databases, database designers,<br />
data modelers & database architects.<br />
Companies have been deploying single<br />
view databases based on traditional corporate<br />
hierarchies provided by data vendors<br />
such as D&B and Experian for several<br />
years. <strong>The</strong>se hierarchies typically indicate<br />
legal relationships between companies, e.g.<br />
branches and subsidiaries. This information<br />
can be very effective for marketing<br />
especially for cross-selling. Other data<br />
sources are also available such as DDM<br />
(DUNS Decision Makers), EHA (Executive<br />
Home Address) from D&B and BOL (Business<br />
Owner List) from Experian that provide<br />
information about decision makers.<br />
Our experience in designing marketing<br />
databases indicates that the traditional<br />
corporate hierarchy can be extended by<br />
integrating these data sources to enable<br />
more targeted marketing.<br />
A traditional corporate hierarchy consists<br />
primarily of 3 levels of institutions :<br />
Ultimate – <strong>The</strong> Ultimate is the top<br />
most responsible entity within the global<br />
family tree. <strong>The</strong> Ultimate may have branches<br />
and/or subsidiaries reporting directly or<br />
indirectly to it. For multinational companies<br />
there will be a Domestic Ultimate as<br />
well as a Global Ultimate.<br />
Subsidiary – A subsidiary is a corporation<br />
that is more than 50% owned by<br />
another corporation and will have a different<br />
legal business name from its parent<br />
company. A subsidiary may have branches<br />
and/or subsidiaries of its own.<br />
Branch – A branch is a secondary<br />
location of its headquarters. It has no legal<br />
responsibility for its debts, even though<br />
bills may be paid from the branch location.<br />
It will have the same legal business name<br />
Companies have<br />
been deploying<br />
single view<br />
databases based<br />
on traditional<br />
corporate<br />
hierarchies<br />
as its headquarters, although branches<br />
frequently operate under a different trade<br />
style than the headquarters establishment.<br />
A branch may be located at the same address<br />
as the headquarters if it has a unique<br />
trade style. This is traditionally the lowest<br />
level of granularity of a business (business<br />
at a location) and is the level at which a<br />
unique business identifier (e.g. DUNS<br />
number from D&B) is assigned.<br />
This hierarchy was primarily developed<br />
from a risk management perspective and<br />
while it has been used by marketing organizations,<br />
it does not fit there very well.<br />
Marketing organizations are concerned<br />
with identifying as large a universe of decision<br />
makers as possible and identifying<br />
all possible contact points for each of them<br />
which this hierarchy does not provide. We<br />
propose an alternate or extended hierarchy<br />
that addresses these concerns.<br />
<strong>The</strong> extended hierarchy can be considered<br />
at the following 3 levels for each<br />
business at a location:<br />
Business Contact Points (B-CP)<br />
Business Decision Makers (BDM)<br />
BDM Contact Points (BDM-CP)<br />
Some of this information, e.g. Business<br />
Contact Points, is traditionally available<br />
for businesses. However, due to the multiple<br />
types and numbers of contact points<br />
available for both businesses and people,<br />
the information may not be used optimally<br />
unless it is structured appropriately. Structuring<br />
the corporate hierarchy in this manner<br />
by integrating available information<br />
will enable marketers to make marketing<br />
decisions in a more targeted manner. For<br />
An <strong>IIPM</strong> Intelligence Unit Publication STRATEGIC INNOVATORS 61