27.12.2014 Views

Strategic Thought Transformation - The IIPM Think Tank

Strategic Thought Transformation - The IIPM Think Tank

Strategic Thought Transformation - The IIPM Think Tank

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

S T R A T E G I C I S S U E S<br />

trinomial trend lines, we also have to take<br />

note of the fact that on moving from right<br />

to left (decreasing order of the per capita<br />

income) along the horizontal axis of the<br />

linear, logarithmic or the trinomial trend<br />

line, we come to a per capita income value<br />

of INR 131,001.24 beyond which, if we<br />

move in the decreasing order of per capita<br />

income, the per capita trips become negative<br />

– a practically impossible situation!<br />

In all practicality, the possible values of<br />

trips per capita can be anywhere between 0<br />

(zero) and ∞ (infinity) but never less than<br />

0 (zero). Hence we can judiciously dismiss<br />

the three different trend lines represented<br />

by the linear, logarithmic and trinomial<br />

(polynomial) series on grounds of empirical<br />

invalidity and impracticality! Conclusively,<br />

we can vindicate that there are just the<br />

remaining two trend lines – power and<br />

exponential estimation trend lines – that<br />

can be taken under consideration for providing<br />

an estimation of the trips per capita.<br />

And even among these two, the exponential<br />

trend line is the most reliable one with a<br />

greater value of R 2 .<br />

Estimations and Recommendations<br />

for industry strategists<br />

(E&R)<br />

Based on what we can infer from calculations<br />

made and the most appropriate trend<br />

development process followed, a couple<br />

of estimations can be made for the aviation<br />

industry and recommendations can<br />

be given to guide new ventures entering/<br />

planning to enter the aviation industry in<br />

any geographical region. We can use this<br />

model for the estimation of demand in the<br />

aviation sector in any country when its per<br />

capita income (in terms of PPP) is known.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore for countries like India, with its<br />

per capita income doubling by the year<br />

2010 (according to Assocham estimates), if<br />

we look at the graph then we can infer that<br />

Aviation industry in<br />

the United States<br />

made losses due to<br />

no other negative<br />

factor other than<br />

the existence of<br />

unhealthy<br />

competition<br />

even when the per capita income doubles,<br />

which means an increase of 100%, the per<br />

capita trip will increase from 0.0125 to just<br />

0.0145, which means a rise of just 16%!<br />

This basically means that though the per<br />

capita income is doubling, the trips per<br />

capita have not doubled. And the reason is<br />

very straight-forward. If explained on purely<br />

quantitative grounds, the logic behind<br />

the non-linear change can be attributed<br />

to the nature of the curve. Pragmatically<br />

explained, we can only expect it to happen<br />

if the entire raise in earning was to be spent<br />

totally in travel services – which of course<br />

stands false under any scope practicality<br />

and not true for any economy. This therefore<br />

explains sufficiently and gives us an<br />

analytical relationship between the Gross<br />

Domestic Product/Per Capita Income and<br />

the number of trips by an individual in a<br />

year’s time-span and the relationship becomes,<br />

y=0.0108e 0.1465(x) -->Eqn. I<br />

If the total GDP changes by ‘n’ times,<br />

then the value of per capita income ‘x’<br />

also changes by ‘n’ times. For example,<br />

when the national GDP doubles, the per<br />

capita income ‘x’ also becomes ‘2x’ and<br />

the number of trips per capita ‘y’ should<br />

therefore appreciate in accordance with<br />

equation I (above).<br />

Al this therefore means that the new<br />

value of ‘y’ will be obtained by multiplying<br />

the Right Hand Side of equation I (above)<br />

by e 0.1465 (n-1)x . <strong>The</strong>refore, if the GDP changes<br />

by ‘n’ times in terms of absolute value, the<br />

altered value of per capita trips,<br />

y // 0.1465 (n-1)x<br />

= y * e -->Eqn. II<br />

Abnormal growth of per capita<br />

trips and ‘Break-off Point’<br />

And interesting disclosure observed from<br />

the study is that the growth of per capita<br />

trips with increase in GDP (or per capita<br />

income in terms of PPP) demonstrates an<br />

abnormal growth trajectory beyond a<br />

certain level of per capita income. This<br />

is primarily due to the inherent nature of<br />

the exponential curve which progressively<br />

diverges from the abscissa. Besides, an appreciation<br />

in the value of per capita income<br />

also causes some definite increase in the<br />

level of economic activity and hence a natural<br />

need to travel by air creeps in.<br />

From empirical analysis, we can analytically<br />

conclude that this decisive per capita<br />

income level stands roughly around a per<br />

capita income of INR 1,00,000 and this<br />

critical value is called the ‘Break-off point’.<br />

Beyond this value, there is a staggering<br />

growth in the trajectory representing the<br />

number of trips per capita and dependent<br />

on the per capita income (PPP). Conversely<br />

the limitation on the growth of trips per<br />

capita reduces as per capita income rises.<br />

Recommendations to new<br />

ventures<br />

According to IATA, the financial year 2005<br />

witnessed airlines globally making losses<br />

16<br />

STRATEGIC INNOVATORS<br />

An <strong>IIPM</strong> Intelligence Unit Publication

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!