Plantations, poverty and power - Critical Information Collective
Plantations, poverty and power - Critical Information Collective
Plantations, poverty and power - Critical Information Collective
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
67<br />
CEDHA has also filed complaints with the OECD against Finnvera 334 <strong>and</strong> Nordea, 335 claiming that the<br />
Finnish export credit agency <strong>and</strong> the bank failed to comply with the OECD Guidelines for Multinational<br />
Enterprises in its support of Botnia.<br />
Decades of subsidies<br />
The international support for the pulp industry in Uruguay is not a one-off case of helping to cover a<br />
private company’s risks with public money. For more than 50 years, plantation proponents have helped to<br />
build the political <strong>and</strong> physical infrastructure to enable the development of large scale industrial tree<br />
plantations in Uruguay.<br />
In 1951, a joint FAO <strong>and</strong> World Bank mission made a series of recommendations for the development of<br />
forestry in Uruguay. Among the recommendations was the promotion of suitable species for the timber<br />
industry. In 1985, the Japanese International Cooperation Agency funded a study of the feasibility of<br />
building a chemical pulp mill in Uruguay. JICA produced a “Master plan study for the establishment of<br />
tree plantations <strong>and</strong> use of planted wood in the Oriental Republic of Uruguay”, which promoted the<br />
establishment of pine <strong>and</strong> eucalyptus plantations. The 1988 Uruguayan National Forestry Plan is based on<br />
the JICA master plan.<br />
In 1989, the World Bank provided a forestry loan to Uruguay, which enabled a series of benefits to the<br />
industry, including: “tax exemptions, partial refund of plantation costs, long-term soft loans, duty cuts on<br />
the import of machinery <strong>and</strong> vehicles, construction of roads <strong>and</strong> bridges, equal benefits for foreign<br />
investors.” 336<br />
By 2000, the Uruguayan government had provided more than US$400 million in subsidies to the<br />
plantations industry, through direct subsidies, tax breaks, cheap loans <strong>and</strong> investments in infrastructure. 337<br />
Monocultures <strong>and</strong> water shortages<br />
Botnia <strong>and</strong> its subsidiaries in Uruguay now own over 180,000 hectares of l<strong>and</strong>, of which almost 100,000<br />
hectares is to be planted with monoculture eucalyptus plantations. The plantations have caused serious<br />
problems for communities in rural Uruguay. 338<br />
Earth International, 18 May 2006. http://www.cedha.org.ar/en/initiatives/paper_pulp_mills/compliance-complaintcalyon.pdf<br />
334 “Commentary by CEDHA regarding the case of the Finnvera Specific Instance to Finnish NCP Rebuttal to<br />
Finnvera’s Commentary”, CEDHA, 30 August 2006.<br />
http://www.cedha.org.ar/en/initiatives/paper_pulp_mills/commentary-cedha-finnvera-specific-instance.pdf<br />
335 “OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises Specific Instance Regarding Nordea’s involvement in Pulp Paper<br />
Mill Investment in Fray Bentos Uruguay by Botnia S.A.”, CEDHA <strong>and</strong> The Bellona Foundation, 28 June 2006.<br />
http://www.cedha.org.ar/en/initiatives/paper_pulp_mills/nordea-specific-instance.pdf<br />
336 “Uruguay: Either with the people or with pulp mills <strong>and</strong> tree plantations”, World Rainforest Movement Bulletin 83,<br />
June 2004. http://www.wrm.org.uy/bulletin/83/Uruguay.html<br />
337 “Uruguay: The absurd injustice of promoting tree plantations”, World Rainforest Movement Bulletin 68, March<br />
2003. http://www.wrm.org.uy/bulletin/68/Uruguay.html<br />
338 Raúl Pierri (2006) “Uruguay: Pulp Factions: Uruguay’s Environmentalists v. Big Paper”, CorpWatch, 16 January<br />
2006. http://www.corpwatch.org/article.phpid=13111