26.12.2014 Views

Plantations, poverty and power - Critical Information Collective

Plantations, poverty and power - Critical Information Collective

Plantations, poverty and power - Critical Information Collective

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

151<br />

paper industry along ecological lines. She concludes that a complete restructuring is the only way that the<br />

industry can begin to address the environmental problems that it has created. 701<br />

With this sort of alternative structure of the pulp <strong>and</strong> paper industry in mind, the following list is a<br />

suggestion for how paper should be produced. It is not intended to be a set of guidelines for investing in a<br />

“sustainable” pulp <strong>and</strong> paper industry. Instead it is intended to be a way of alerting both the industry <strong>and</strong><br />

its financiers to the problems currently created by the industry.<br />

Paper should be produced:<br />

•without destroying native forests;<br />

•without establishing large scale monoculture tree plantations;<br />

•without impacting on local peoples’ rights <strong>and</strong> access to l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> livelihoods;<br />

•without resulting in extensive environmental impacts: depletion of water resources, biodiversity loss,<br />

introduction of invasive species;<br />

•without polluting air, water <strong>and</strong> soils; <strong>and</strong><br />

•without benefiting from government direct or indirect subsidies (including ECAs, multilateral banks, or<br />

bilateral aid).<br />

Any pulp mill project that cannot meet these guidelines should not be funded <strong>and</strong> should not be built.<br />

This may seem impossible to achieve, or hopelessly idealistic. But there is no such thing as “responsible<br />

investment” in the pulp <strong>and</strong> paper industry, as it currently exists. Why should the industry be allowed to<br />

continue establishing vast areas of monoculture tree plantations in the South Why should the industry be<br />

allowed to “restructure” by sacking thous<strong>and</strong>s of workers in the North while it employs cheaper labour in<br />

dangerous <strong>and</strong> often temporary jobs in the global South Why should the industry continue to exp<strong>and</strong>,<br />

continue to promote wasteful consumption <strong>and</strong> continue to produce huge amounts of greenhouse gases<br />

Why should the pulp <strong>and</strong> paper industry be allowed to continue destroying local communities’ <strong>and</strong><br />

Indigenous Peoples’ livelihoods <strong>and</strong> environments<br />

Currently, development “aid” is one of the factors that helps to support the industry to continue business<br />

as usual, rather than looking for innovative solutions to the problems that it is creating. For this reason,<br />

this report dem<strong>and</strong>s an end to “aid” to industrial tree plantations. It also dem<strong>and</strong>s an end to “aid” to the<br />

pulp <strong>and</strong> paper industry, for the simple reason that aid is supposed to promote development which is<br />

beneficial to communities in the South. Industrial tree plantations <strong>and</strong> the pulp <strong>and</strong> paper industry are not<br />

beneficial to communities in the South.<br />

701 Maureen Smith (1997) “The U.S. Paper Industry <strong>and</strong> Sustainable Production: An Argument for Restructuring”, MIT<br />

Press.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!