26.12.2014 Views

Rome Wasn't Digitized in a Day - Council on Library and Information ...

Rome Wasn't Digitized in a Day - Council on Library and Information ...

Rome Wasn't Digitized in a Day - Council on Library and Information ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

68<br />

funded with public m<strong>on</strong>ey <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the United K<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gdom are required to make their data publicly available,<br />

publish<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g m<strong>and</strong>ates differ greatly am<strong>on</strong>g U.S. funders.<br />

Open C<strong>on</strong>text, 207 an “open access data publicati<strong>on</strong> service for archaeology” created by the Alex<strong>and</strong>ria<br />

Archive Institute, is attempt<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g to address some of these issues of data shar<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <strong>and</strong> openly accessible<br />

publicati<strong>on</strong>. In an article that describes Open C<strong>on</strong>text, Kansa et al. (2007) explicate why data shar<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g<br />

<strong>and</strong> dissem<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ati<strong>on</strong> are particularly complicated for archaeology:<br />

Am<strong>on</strong>g the primary technical <strong>and</strong> c<strong>on</strong>ceptual issues <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> shar<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g field data is the questi<strong>on</strong> of how<br />

to codify our documentati<strong>on</strong>. Archaeologists generally lack c<strong>on</strong>sensus <strong>on</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards of<br />

record<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <strong>and</strong> tend to make their own customized databases to suit the needs of their <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dividual<br />

research agendas, theoretical perspectives, <strong>and</strong> time <strong>and</strong> budgetary c<strong>on</strong>stra<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ts. … Because of<br />

this variability, databases need extensive documentati<strong>on</strong> for others to decipher their c<strong>on</strong>tents<br />

(Kansa et al. 2007).<br />

C<strong>on</strong>sequently, the authors propose that just mak<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g archaeological data sets available for download<br />

will not solve this basic problem <strong>and</strong> that a better soluti<strong>on</strong> is to “serve archaeological databases <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

dynamic, <strong>on</strong>l<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e websites, thus mak<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g c<strong>on</strong>tent easy to browse <strong>and</strong> explore.” Open C<strong>on</strong>text seeks to<br />

make the publish<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <strong>and</strong> dissem<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ati<strong>on</strong> of cultural heritage collecti<strong>on</strong>s both easier <strong>and</strong> more affordable.<br />

The basic architecture of Open C<strong>on</strong>text is a flexible database that allows researchers to publish<br />

structured data, textual narratives, <strong>and</strong> media <strong>on</strong> the web us<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <strong>on</strong>ly open-source technologies. 208 Open<br />

C<strong>on</strong>text supports “publish<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g, explor<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g, search<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g, <strong>and</strong> analyz<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g multiple museum collecti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>and</strong><br />

field research datasets.”<br />

Open C<strong>on</strong>text utilizes <strong>on</strong>ly a subset of the “OCHRE data structure (ArchaeoML),” for Kansa states that<br />

while OCHRE “provides sophisticated data-management tools targeted for active research projects”<br />

the goal of Open C<strong>on</strong>text is “to support streaml<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed, web-based access <strong>and</strong> community organizati<strong>on</strong> of<br />

diverse cultural heritage c<strong>on</strong>tent” (Kansa et al. 2007). The project ultimately decided to use<br />

ArchaeoML 209 because of its flexibility:<br />

Overly rigid st<strong>and</strong>ards may <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>hibit <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>novati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> research design <strong>and</strong> poorly accommodate<br />

“legacy” datasets. … The flexibility of ArchaeoML enables Open C<strong>on</strong>text to deliver c<strong>on</strong>tent<br />

from many different research projects <strong>and</strong> collecti<strong>on</strong>s. A web-based publish<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g tool called<br />

“Penelope” enables <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dividual c<strong>on</strong>tributors to upload their own data tables <strong>and</strong> media files <strong>and</strong><br />

submit them for review <strong>and</strong> publicati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> Open C<strong>on</strong>text. This tool enables web publicati<strong>on</strong> of<br />

research while ensur<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g that a project’s orig<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>al record<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g system <strong>and</strong> term<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ology are reta<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed<br />

(Kansa et al. 2007).<br />

The ability of st<strong>and</strong>ards such as ArchaeoML to provide some basic level of <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>teroperability while also<br />

support<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g the <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>clusi<strong>on</strong> of legacy structures is thus an essential feature for any cyber<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>frastructure for<br />

archaeology.<br />

Another important issue that Open C<strong>on</strong>text seeks to address is the challenge of open access <strong>and</strong><br />

copyright. All Open C<strong>on</strong>text c<strong>on</strong>tributors reta<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> copyright to their own c<strong>on</strong>tent, but Kansa et al. (2007)<br />

state that they are encouraged to publish their data elsewhere to better support dissem<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ati<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

207 http://openc<strong>on</strong>text.org/<br />

208 Another project that seeks to provide an <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>tegrated open-source “Archaeological Informati<strong>on</strong> System” is the Open Archaeology Software Suite<br />

(https://launchpad.net/openarchaeology).<br />

209 Details <strong>on</strong> how ArchaeoML has been implemented <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Open C<strong>on</strong>text system, as well as <strong>on</strong> their approach to copyright <strong>and</strong> open access, can be found<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> Kansa et al. (2010).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!