26.12.2014 Views

Rome Wasn't Digitized in a Day - Council on Library and Information ...

Rome Wasn't Digitized in a Day - Council on Library and Information ...

Rome Wasn't Digitized in a Day - Council on Library and Information ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

176<br />

resources, <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>clud<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g digital facsimiles, is Audenaert <strong>and</strong> Furuta (2010), which will be exam<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

further detail below.<br />

As the discipl<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e of classics falls under the larger umbrella of the humanities discipl<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>es <strong>and</strong> this<br />

review has primarily focused <strong>on</strong> open-access digital resources <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> classics, a number of studies that<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>vestigated the use of freely available digital resources <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the humanities have been chosen for further<br />

exam<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ati<strong>on</strong> to see what general <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>sights might be determ<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed. For this reas<strong>on</strong>, this review has<br />

exam<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed various studies that have explored the citati<strong>on</strong> of electr<strong>on</strong>ic resources <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> classics (Dalbello et<br />

al. 2006), the behaviors of digital humanists with e-texts (Toms <strong>and</strong> O’Brien 2008), humanist use of<br />

primary source materials <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>clud<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g digital facsimiles (Audenaert <strong>and</strong> Furuta 2010), the scholarly<br />

creators of digital humanities resources (Warwick et al. 2008b), <strong>and</strong> the “traditi<strong>on</strong>al” scholarly use of<br />

digital humanities resources (Harley et al. 2006b, Brown <strong>and</strong> Greengrass 2010, Meyer et al. 2009,<br />

Warwick et al. 2008a).<br />

Citati<strong>on</strong> of Digital Classics Resources<br />

One method of explor<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g how digital resources are be<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g used with<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> a discipl<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e is to determ<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e how<br />

many citati<strong>on</strong>s to different digital resources can be found with<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> “c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al” publicati<strong>on</strong>s. Pursu<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g<br />

the traditi<strong>on</strong>al task of bibliometrics to exam<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e how <strong>and</strong> when digital resources are cited <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> scholarly<br />

publicati<strong>on</strong>s is a grow<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g area of research, <strong>and</strong> a general methodological approach is described as part<br />

of the JISC-funded “Toolkit for the Impact of Digitised Scholarly Resources (TIDSR).” 564 In their<br />

efforts to determ<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e how often five digital projects had been cited, the project team searched for<br />

citati<strong>on</strong>s to these resources us<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g Google Scholar, 565 Scopus, 566 <strong>and</strong> ISI Web of Knowledge. 567 One<br />

major issue, they reported, was that bibliometrics “with regard to n<strong>on</strong>-traditi<strong>on</strong>al scholarly outputs is<br />

that citati<strong>on</strong> habits <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> many fields favour cit<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g the orig<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>al paper versi<strong>on</strong> of a document, even if the<br />

<strong>on</strong>ly versi<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>sulted was electr<strong>on</strong>ic.” 568 In fact, they found that of those scholars who published<br />

papers as a result of their work with digital materials <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the five projects, more than <strong>on</strong>e-third cited<br />

<strong>on</strong>ly the physical item that was represented <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the collecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> made no reference to the digital<br />

project; almost half cited the orig<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>al publicati<strong>on</strong> but also <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>cluded the URL; <strong>and</strong> less than <strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> five<br />

cited <strong>on</strong>ly the digital versi<strong>on</strong>. Thus they cauti<strong>on</strong>ed aga<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>st simply rely<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <strong>on</strong> bibliometrics to analyze<br />

the actual scholarly impact of a digital project. As Project Director Eric Meyer expla<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed:<br />

This means that rely<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <strong>on</strong> f<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>d<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g citati<strong>on</strong>s to <strong>on</strong>e's digitised resource based <strong>on</strong> look<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g for<br />

URL's with<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> journal citati<strong>on</strong>s is almost certa<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ly go<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g to yield an artificially low number<br />

because of the uses that d<strong>on</strong>'t cite it at all, <strong>and</strong> because of <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>c<strong>on</strong>sistencies <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> how the URLs are<br />

cited. Nevertheless, do<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g regular searches for citati<strong>on</strong>s to a collecti<strong>on</strong>'s material is an<br />

important way to establish the impact it is hav<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <strong>on</strong> the scholarly community. 569<br />

Thus, while <strong>on</strong>e way to measure the impact of a resource <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> digital classics is to perform a citati<strong>on</strong><br />

analysis look<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g for citati<strong>on</strong>s to project URLs or references to digital projects <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> article text us<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g<br />

various tools such as Google Scholar, the actual amount of use of different digital projects may be<br />

quite higher than can be easily determ<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed. Meyer’s po<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>t also illustrates the importance of<br />

ma<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ta<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g stable URLs to encourage the citati<strong>on</strong> of resources <strong>and</strong> their subsequent discovery <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

bibliometric analyses.<br />

564 http://microsites.oii.ox.ac.uk/tidsr/kb/53/bibliometrics-enhanc<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g-ability-track-projects-scholarly-impacts<br />

565 http://scholar.google.com/<br />

566 http://www.scopus.com/<br />

567 http://www.isiknowledge.com/<br />

568 http://microsites.oii.ox.ac.uk/tidsr/kb/53/bibliometrics-enhanc<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g-ability-track-projects-scholarly-impacts<br />

569 “What Is Bibliometrics <strong>and</strong> Scientometrics” Eric T. Meyer. http://microsites.oii.ox.ac.uk/tidsr/kb/48/what-bibliometrics-<strong>and</strong>-scientometrics

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!