2011 Focus Six min walk test .PPT - Foocus
2011 Focus Six min walk test .PPT - Foocus
2011 Focus Six min walk test .PPT - Foocus
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The <strong>Six</strong> Minute Walk Test<br />
What can be learned after just 6 <strong>min</strong>utes<br />
Carl D. Mottram, BA RRT RPFT FAARC<br />
Director - Pulmonary Function Labs and Rehabilitation<br />
Associate Professor of Medicine - Mayo Clinic College of Medicine<br />
<strong>Six</strong> <strong>min</strong>ute <strong>walk</strong> - Background<br />
• 12 <strong>min</strong>ute field<br />
performance <strong>test</strong><br />
• 115 military personnel<br />
• Age: 17-52, mean 22 yrs<br />
• 1 mile flat hard surface<br />
course-mostly running<br />
• Compared the data with<br />
VO 2max<br />
<strong>Six</strong> <strong>min</strong>ute <strong>walk</strong> - Background<br />
• 29 patients with chronic bronchitis<br />
• 12 <strong>min</strong>ute <strong>walk</strong><br />
• level enclosed hospital corridor<br />
• cover as much ground as possible<br />
• Compared O 2max , FVC, FEV 1 , Distance<br />
<strong>walk</strong>ed<br />
McGavin CR et al. BMJ 1 822-3, 1976
<strong>Six</strong> <strong>min</strong>ute <strong>walk</strong> - Background<br />
• 10 subjects<br />
• 12 <strong>min</strong>ute <strong>walk</strong>s times 5<br />
per subject<br />
• Distance at two <strong>min</strong>ute<br />
intervals<br />
• Conclusion: <strong>Six</strong> <strong>min</strong>ute<br />
<strong>walk</strong> would give you<br />
information without over<br />
tiring subject<br />
<strong>Six</strong> <strong>min</strong>ute <strong>walk</strong>- Background<br />
• Guyatt GH<br />
• Control group not<br />
encouraged during <strong>walk</strong><br />
• Encouraged <strong>walk</strong><br />
• Conclusion: Statisically<br />
significant difference inbetween<br />
those subject<br />
encouraged and those<br />
not.<br />
<strong>Six</strong> <strong>min</strong>ute <strong>walk</strong><br />
• Advantages • Disadvantages<br />
• Practical and inexpensive • Difficult to assess<br />
• Requires no apparatus effort (e.g. HR, E )<br />
• Adjust own pace and use • Reduced<br />
breathing strategies monitoring<br />
• Walking distance is more<br />
clinically related to ADLs<br />
• Objective & reproducible<br />
outcome measurement
<strong>Six</strong> <strong>min</strong>ute <strong>walk</strong> - Current Applications<br />
• Exercise tolerance in patients with disease<br />
(functional status)<br />
• Natural history of disease (morbidity and<br />
mortality)<br />
• Pre and post medical intervention comparisons<br />
• Medical intervention<br />
• medication or rehab.<br />
• Surgical intervention (Lung Tx, LVRS)<br />
• Pacemaker<br />
<strong>Six</strong> <strong>min</strong>ute <strong>walk</strong><br />
Why was a Standard developed<br />
Coached O 2 & mode HR RPE S PO 2 Hall<br />
McGavin (1976) Y<br />
Mungall (1979) Y<br />
Butland (1982) Y<br />
Guyatt (1984) Y Y<br />
Bernstein (1994) Y Y Y<br />
Cahalin (1995) N Y/N Y Y >80 Y<br />
Cooper J. (1995)<br />
Y/N<br />
Peeters (1996) Y Y Y<br />
Kotloff (1996) N >90<br />
Mayo Y Y/Y Y Y Y Y<br />
<strong>Six</strong> <strong>min</strong>ute <strong>walk</strong><br />
Why was a Standard developed<br />
• Intralaboratory<br />
• Useful and cost effective tool in<br />
monitoring exercise tolerance<br />
• Interlaboratory<br />
• Consensus on the protocol
<strong>Six</strong> Minute Mosey<br />
Am J Resp Crit Care Med Vol 166. pp 111–117, 2002<br />
<strong>Six</strong> <strong>min</strong>ute <strong>walk</strong><br />
ATS Consensus Statement Am J Respir Crit Care Med Vol 166. pp 111–117, 2002<br />
• Unobstructed level corridor, 30 meters or 100 ft<br />
long or greater<br />
• Start and end of course should be marked with tape<br />
on floor<br />
• Method to measure distance (e.g floor marks etc.)<br />
• Suggest traffic cones at the end of course<br />
• Use of a treadmill not recommended<br />
• Stevens D. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 160:1540-1543<br />
• Equipment<br />
• Stopwatch, lap counter, Borg scale, chair,<br />
worksheet and pulse oximeter
<strong>Six</strong> <strong>min</strong>ute <strong>walk</strong> - ATSs Standard<br />
<strong>Six</strong> <strong>min</strong>ute <strong>walk</strong> - ATSs Standard<br />
<strong>Six</strong> <strong>min</strong>ute <strong>walk</strong> - ATSs Standard<br />
• Subject preparation<br />
• Comfortable clothing, light meal, usual<br />
medications<br />
• Pre<strong>test</strong> measurements<br />
• Blood pressure<br />
• ECG within last 6 months, no c/o angina<br />
• Pulse oximetry (optional)<br />
• Use oxygen if appropriate
<strong>Six</strong> <strong>min</strong>ute <strong>walk</strong> - ATSs Standard<br />
• Contraindications<br />
• Absolute<br />
• Unstable coronary disease<br />
• Myocardial infarction within a month<br />
• Relative<br />
• Resting tachycardia > 120 beats/<strong>min</strong><br />
• Systolic BP > 180 mmHg<br />
• Diastolic BP > 100 mmHg<br />
• Syncope with exercise<br />
Salzman Chest 2009<br />
<strong>Six</strong> <strong>min</strong>ute <strong>walk</strong> - ATSs Standard<br />
• Safety issues<br />
• Performed in a location where a rapid,<br />
appropriate response to an emergency is<br />
possible – crash cart, medications, phone<br />
• Trained medical staff (RRT, RN, CPFT)<br />
with BLS, although ACLS preferred<br />
• If a patient is on oxygen use their<br />
standard rate or as directed by a<br />
physician or a protocol.<br />
<strong>Six</strong> <strong>min</strong>ute <strong>walk</strong> - ATSs Standard
<strong>Six</strong> <strong>min</strong>ute <strong>walk</strong> - ATSs Standard<br />
• Instruct patient to cover as much ground as<br />
possible in the given time<br />
• Coach and give encouragement<br />
• Standard phases of encouragement<br />
• Practice <strong>test</strong>s - controversial<br />
• Document and monitor: O 2 flow, mode of<br />
transport, rest and end-exercise S P O 2<br />
• HR & RPE<br />
<strong>Six</strong> <strong>min</strong>ute <strong>walk</strong> - ATSs Standard<br />
• Instruct patient to cover as much ground<br />
as possible in the given time<br />
• Coach and give encouragement<br />
• Standard phases of encouragement<br />
• You are doing well, you have 5 <strong>min</strong>utes to go<br />
• You are doing well, you have 4 <strong>min</strong>utes to go<br />
• You are doing well, youre half way done etc.<br />
• Do not use other words of encouragement<br />
<strong>Six</strong> <strong>min</strong>ute <strong>walk</strong> - ATSs Standard
<strong>Six</strong> <strong>min</strong>ute <strong>walk</strong> - Report<br />
6-MINUTE WALK<br />
Date Distance Inspired Gas Mode of O2 Transport SpO2 (end exer.) RPE (6-20)<br />
(ft)<br />
5/18/2002 1,173 3.0 L/<strong>min</strong> NC Pt. carried unit 90 17<br />
7/26/2002 1,266 3.0 L/<strong>min</strong> NC Pt. carried unit 94 18<br />
8/15/2002 1,420 2.5 L/<strong>min</strong> Pt. carried unit 92 17<br />
Interpretation<br />
• 117 healthy men and 173 healthy women, aged 40 -80<br />
• The median distance <strong>walk</strong>ed was 576m (1889 ft) for<br />
men and 494m (1620 ft) for women.<br />
• Men = (7.57*ht) – (5.02*age) – 1.76*wt – 309m<br />
• Women = (2.11*ht) – (2.29*wt) – (5.78*age) – 667m<br />
AJRCCM 158; 1384-87 1998
• Minimal clinically important difference<br />
(MCID) for the 6MWT is conservatively<br />
estimated to be 54-80 m (~175-260 ft) using<br />
both distributional and discri<strong>min</strong>ative<br />
methods.<br />
• For an individual patient, the 6MWT would<br />
need to change by about 86 m (280 ft) to be<br />
statistically confident that there has been a<br />
change.<br />
• 460 COPD patients with a<br />
mean FEV1 of 39.2 ±<br />
14.1% predicted and<br />
6MWD of 361 ± 112 m at<br />
baseline.<br />
• Distance should change by<br />
~ 35 m for patients with<br />
moderate to severe COPD<br />
(10% change of baseline)<br />
Eur Respir J 2008; 32: 637–643<br />
Recent Literature
Chest / 135 /5 / May 2009<br />
• Clinical and research role<br />
• Technique<br />
• Coding and reimbursement<br />
Galeazzo IJCOPD August 2009<br />
• 284 patients aged 41 to 86 years (mean age 69.4<br />
years) divided into two groups<br />
• study group (222 patients) undergoing a PR<br />
program<br />
• control group (62 patients) treated only with<br />
drugs.<br />
• 64% had an increase of at least 54 m in the 6MWT<br />
whereas 13% in the control group<br />
• Conclusion: PR is highly effective in improving the<br />
exercise capacity of patients with COPD<br />
• 42 patients post-lung transplant<br />
• 29 performed 6MWT<br />
• Results/Conclusions:<br />
• Patients who <strong>walk</strong>ed > 330 m had a median survival of<br />
1178 days versus 263 days for those who <strong>walk</strong>ed less<br />
• 6MWD provides more accurate prognostic information<br />
than the commonly used FEV1 or changes in the FEV1<br />
over the 3 months post-BOS onset.
• 64 consecutive patients<br />
with advanced NSCLC<br />
• An initial 6MW 400 m<br />
might be a useful<br />
prognostic factor for<br />
survival in patients with<br />
advanced non-small cell<br />
lung cancer.<br />
• 115 PH patients<br />
• Pulmonary arterial<br />
pressure was 49 + 17<br />
mm Hg<br />
• PH patients with a<br />
6MWD 399 m had a<br />
significantly better<br />
prognosis<br />
Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 40, No. 10, pp.<br />
1725–1732, 2008<br />
• 9 pts with NYHA Class II–IV PAH who<br />
were stable on 2 months of sildenafil.<br />
• Decreased by 100 meters
• 23 patients with heart failure<br />
• EF 23±7%, were diagnosed as functional class<br />
NYHA II-III<br />
Am Heart J 2009;158:768<br />
• 24 patients with HF and<br />
reduced inspiratory<br />
pressure (MIP < 70% pred)<br />
• Conclusion: The addition of<br />
inspiratory muscle strength<br />
training to aerobic exericse<br />
improves cardiorespiratory<br />
responses to exercise in<br />
selected patients with CHF<br />
and IMW.<br />
• 17 patients with dilated<br />
cardiomyopathy,<br />
moderate to severe<br />
mitral regurgitation, EF<br />
40%, and a 6-<strong>min</strong>ute<br />
<strong>walk</strong> distance between<br />
150 and 450 m were<br />
enrolled
Reimbursement<br />
• AMA-CPT code 94620 – Simple Pulmonary Stress<br />
Test<br />
• Minnesotas CMS 2010 technical - $73.73<br />
Case 1<br />
• 28 y.o. male reports increased shortness<br />
of breath<br />
• Occupation: Works in a<br />
manufacturing job, grinding carbide<br />
• CXR ordered<br />
Case 1<br />
• Hard metal disease is a "giant cell interstitial<br />
pneumonitis" that affects a small <strong>min</strong>ority of<br />
workers who manufacture or use high-speed<br />
tungsten carbide saw tips, drill tips, or discs.<br />
• Exposed to fume or dust from the cobalt<br />
used as a binder in the cemented tungsten<br />
carbide metal. Also known as cobalt lung<br />
• Lung transplant 1 year later<br />
• <strong>Six</strong> <strong>min</strong>ute <strong>walk</strong> data:
Case 1<br />
Case 2<br />
• 64 y.o female with pulmonary fibrosis<br />
• Evaluation for surgery for a elevated<br />
left hemidiaphragm<br />
• PFT and CXR ordered
Case 2<br />
• Pulmonary rehab<br />
ordered to improve<br />
exercise tolerance<br />
Keep on trucking!<br />
Questions