University of Aarhus ECOTOURISM AS A WAY TO PROTECT ...
University of Aarhus ECOTOURISM AS A WAY TO PROTECT ...
University of Aarhus ECOTOURISM AS A WAY TO PROTECT ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Ecotourism as a sustainable way to protect nature<br />
2.5.4. Structural framework <strong>of</strong> ecolabel schemes<br />
In the following parts, we will mention some organisational aspects <strong>of</strong><br />
ecolabel schemes.<br />
Human resources: some <strong>of</strong> them run by volunteers (NGO), private<br />
associations, or they are part <strong>of</strong> a bigger association with broader interests. For<br />
example the Green Leaf recently now.<br />
Financial resources: financing <strong>of</strong> the ecolabel schemes are provided mostly by<br />
the membership fees.<br />
The fees are related to:<br />
• annual turnover <strong>of</strong> the applicants<br />
• physical size <strong>of</strong> the applicant's operation<br />
• type <strong>of</strong> accommodation (hotels, hostels etc.)<br />
• geographical origin -hotels in developed countries pay double price<br />
comparing to developing countries (UNEP, 1998).<br />
For example the fees <strong>of</strong> the Green Globe 21 members are based on an<br />
annual turnover with a fee <strong>of</strong> US$ 5,000 for a turnover more than US$ 30<br />
millions per operating unit (UNEP, 1998).<br />
The National Ecotourism Accreditation Program follows the same system,<br />
where the members pay Aus$ 1,325 for turnover over Aus$ 3 millions (UNEP,<br />
1998).<br />
2.5.5. Ecolabels as a future for ecotourism regulation<br />
The field <strong>of</strong> tourism ecolabels is still a bit confusing because <strong>of</strong> the<br />
different approaches (wide or very narrow), different promoters (NGOs, private<br />
and industry associations and public authorities) and different levels<br />
27