EIA Studies of 3 Pre-Identified Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites in ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Annex I, Page No vi 0.2 Bad (1) Landuse: Existing Landuse: The existing land cover depicts the economic importance of the site. Less the economic importance of the site more suitability of the site for waste disposal site development. Following scale has been developed for ranking the sites from existing landuse considerations: • Proposed Land use: Existing Landuse Evaluation (Relative Value) Wasteland/saline Excellent (5) Grazing/Fallow Ideal (4) Single Crop/non-irrigated Good (3) Double Crop/irrigated Poor (2) Plantation Bad (1) The proposed land use around the sites by the local development authority is another major consideration for evaluation of the sites. If any sort of development is envisaged by the development authority nearby the site, then the site should not be preferred. If the area around the site has the potentiality for development then the relative value of 1 i.e. bad has to be given otherwise a relative value of 5 i.e. excellent has to be assigned. • Impact of Waste Transportation: The transportation of waste poses threat to the areas through it passes. A site, which poses minimum threat to the health by virtue of its traffic linkage, should be considered as ideal site. Any site due to which there is possibility of increased exposure of the wastes to the population have to be assigned a relative value of 1 otherwise 5. • Special Ecological Features: Areas surrounding the site with special ecological features such as habitation endangered species should be avoided for waste disposal site development. The sites were given a relative value of 1 if close to such areas other wise 5.
Annex II, Page No i Annexure – 2 Preliminary Visit Reports Site I: Bawana Industrial Area Relocation Site A site visit was made on 17.01.2002 in order to assess the prima facie suitability of the above-proposed site. The site visit was made by the following officials: No. NAME /DESIGNATION ORGANISATION 1. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Department of Environment Deputy Secretary Govt of N.C.T. of Delhi 2. Dr. K. Kumar Department of environment Sr. Scientist Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi 3 Mr. Yogesh Gupta (Environment Division) Deputy Director National Productivity Council 4. Ms. Shukla Pal (Environment Division) Assistant Director NPC 5. Mr Shyam Lal DSIDC Junior Engineer The description of site is as follows: SITE - 1 : Bawana Industrial Area Relocation Site The proposed site is located within Bawana Industrial Area closed to CETP. The site falls between the Ghoga drain and the Bawana Escape. The main access road to the site is the road going to Sanoth village on the right side of the Bawana -Narela road. This road is almost opposite to the 91 MLD water treatment plant of Delhi Jal Board (DJB) located on the left side. The site is situated almost 18 km from Samai pur Badli. The total area of the site proposed for the development of hazardous waste disposal facility is 15 acres. A 220 KV high-tension line passes through the site. The site has flat topography and the soil is observed to be mixture of yellow and grey colour. The ground water table closed to the site is observed/reported to be around 1 meter below the existing ground level as some excavation work for bridge was in progress. There are some trees mainly eucalyptuses on and near the site. Towards the
Page 1 and 2:
Rapid Environmental Impact Assessme
Page 3 and 4:
STUDY TEAM (Environment Division) P
Page 5 and 6:
TABLE OF CONTENT Sl. No. Descriptio
Page 7 and 8:
Sl. No. Description Page No. 9.4 Pu
Page 9 and 10:
Table. No. Content 4.22 Ambient air
Page 11 and 12:
4.24 Permeability versus depth of s
Page 13 and 14:
Executive Summary Page No 1(9) EXEC
Page 15 and 16:
Area required for developing engine
Page 17 and 18:
generating industrial estates. Ther
Page 19 and 20:
Κ Κ Executive Summary Page No 7(9
Page 21 and 22:
Executive Summary Page No 9(9) area
Page 23 and 24:
Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
Page 222 and 223: Annex I, Page No ii Topography: In
Page 224 and 225: Annex I, Page No iv locate the site
Page 228 and 229: Annex II, Page No ii south of the s
Page 230 and 231: Annex II, Page No iv is a open area
Page 232 and 233: Annex II, Page No vi the site where
Page 234 and 235: Annex III, Page No ii PRIMARY WATER
Page 236 and 237: Annex IV, Page No ii Mappin Descrip
Page 238 and 239: Mappin g Unit Description with loam
show all

EIA Studies of 3 Pre-Identified Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites in ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?