EIA Studies of 3 Pre-Identified Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites in ...
EIA Studies of 3 Pre-Identified Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites in ... EIA Studies of 3 Pre-Identified Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites in ...
Annex I, Page No ii Topography: In general the site topography is to be convex in relation to the surrounding so that the rain water is drained away from the site naturally. So, a site with convex topography can be regarded as excellent and that with concave topography can be regarded as bad. • Wind Direction: Though, generation of toxic fumes are not expected due to very nature of the waste to be disposed off, handling of waste in the disposal facility may create air pollution in form of dust formation. Prominent wind direction may affect the population on the downstream side of the facility. So any village within a distance of one km downstream of the sites can be vulnerable to any air pollution due to the operation of the waste disposal site. The sites have to be ranked as per the degree of impact on the downstream. The location of the facility should be selected in such a manner that there is no or minimum effect at the downstream habitation. Following relative value scale is developed for ranking the sites: Downstream Evaluation (Relative Value) Distance (Km) >1 Excellent (5) 1-0.5 Ideal (4) 0.5-0.2 Good (3) 0.2-0.1 Poor (2)
Annex I, Page No iii Surface water bodies & drinking water sources should be protected and site should not be close to these sources. Following scale has been developed for ranking the sites: • Rainfall Distance Evaluation (Km) (Relative Value) >5 Excellent (5) 5-3 Ideal (4) 3-2 Good (3) 2-1 Poor (2) 15 Excellent (5) 15-10 Ideal (4) 10-5 Good (3) 5-1 Poor (2)
- Page 172 and 173: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 174 and 175: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 176 and 177: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 178 and 179: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 180 and 181: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 182 and 183: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 184 and 185: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 186 and 187: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 188 and 189: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 190 and 191: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 192 and 193: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 194 and 195: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 196 and 197: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 198 and 199: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 200 and 201: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 202 and 203: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 204 and 205: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 206 and 207: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 208 and 209: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 210 and 211: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 212 and 213: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 214 and 215: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 216 and 217: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 218 and 219: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 220 and 221: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 224 and 225: Annex I, Page No iv locate the site
- Page 226 and 227: Annex I, Page No vi 0.2 Bad (1) Lan
- Page 228 and 229: Annex II, Page No ii south of the s
- Page 230 and 231: Annex II, Page No iv is a open area
- Page 232 and 233: Annex II, Page No vi the site where
- Page 234 and 235: Annex III, Page No ii PRIMARY WATER
- Page 236 and 237: Annex IV, Page No ii Mappin Descrip
- Page 238 and 239: Mappin g Unit Description with loam
Annex I, Page No iii<br />
Surface water bodies & dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water sources should be protected and site should<br />
not be close to these sources. Follow<strong>in</strong>g scale has been developed for rank<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
sites:<br />
• Ra<strong>in</strong>fall<br />
Distance<br />
Evaluation<br />
(Km)<br />
(Relative Value)<br />
>5 Excellent (5)<br />
5-3 Ideal (4)<br />
3-2 Good (3)<br />
2-1 Poor (2)<br />
15 Excellent (5)<br />
15-10 Ideal (4)<br />
10-5 Good (3)<br />
5-1 Poor (2)<br />