EIA Studies of 3 Pre-Identified Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites in ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identified Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites in NCT - Delhi Page No.148 References 1. Manual on "Municipal Solid waste management" published by Central Public Health Engineering 2. “Landfill of Hazardous Waste – A Training Manual”, Technical Report No.17 UNEP, March, 1994) 3. Industrial Solid Waste Management and Landfilling Practice by M.Dutta, B.P.Parida, B.K.Guha, T.R.Surkrishan, 1997 4. Design, Construction and Monitoring of Landfills (Second edition) by Amalendu Bagchi, 5. Environmental Impact Assessment for Waste Treatment and Disposal Facilities, Judith Petts and Gen Eduljee, John Wiley Sons, 1994 Source: Guidelines for "An Appropriate Management Of Domestic Sanitary Landfill Sites" by H. Oeltzschner and D. Mutz, Publication: Deutche Gesellschaft fur Tecnische Zusanmmenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH., 1994.) ((2). "Landfill of Hazardous Industrial Wastes-A Training Manual", Technical Report No. 17, UNEP, March 1994.) Environment Division, National Productivity Council, New Delhi 7
Annex I, Page No i Annexure – 1 Reasons for scaling the criteria and assigning the weightages as per the criteria adapted by NPC The key factors involved for the assessment and selection of site for the disposal of hazardous wastes is divided into three groups. Each group is further subdivided into relevant parameters. The reasons for assigning the due weightage to different factors are given below. General Information: 25 % weightage has been given to "General information" as this pertains to the key features of sites. The factors like "Transportation Economy ", "Land Slope", "Flood Proneness" and "Wind Direction" have been assigned weightages as per their relative importance. The following reasons were considered for assigning the weightage: • Transportation Economy: The transportation of waste from the source of waste generation to the disposal site is one of the important factors in order to decide the economic location of site. So the sites for this evaluation have to be given relative value from 5 to 2 corresponding to excellent to poor as per their distance form the source of generation Distance Evaluation Km (Relative Value) 0-5.00 Excellent (5) 5.00-10.00 Ideal (4) 10.00-20.00 Good (3) 20.00-40.00 Poor (2) >40.00 Bad (1) Slope Percent: Natural slope of a site is important from the drainage consideration. But, more sloppy land may pose difficulty in the construction and may need levelling up. To prevent water logging the site should not be concave i.e. there should not be any depression. Therefore, following scales have been developed for evaluating the slope percent of the sites: First Scale Second Scale Evaluation (Slope %) (Slope %) (Relative Value) 1.5 1.5 Excellent (5) 1.5-1.2 1.5-2.5 Ideal (4) 1.2-0.75 2.5-7.0 Good (3) 0.75-0.50 7.0-15 Poor (2) < 0.5 >15 Bad (1)
Page 1 and 2:
Rapid Environmental Impact Assessme
Page 3 and 4:
STUDY TEAM (Environment Division) P
Page 5 and 6:
TABLE OF CONTENT Sl. No. Descriptio
Page 7 and 8:
Sl. No. Description Page No. 9.4 Pu
Page 9 and 10:
Table. No. Content 4.22 Ambient air
Page 11 and 12:
4.24 Permeability versus depth of s
Page 13 and 14:
Executive Summary Page No 1(9) EXEC
Page 15 and 16:
Area required for developing engine
Page 17 and 18:
generating industrial estates. Ther
Page 19 and 20:
Κ Κ Executive Summary Page No 7(9
Page 21 and 22:
Executive Summary Page No 9(9) area
Page 23 and 24:
Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
Page 222 and 223: Annex I, Page No ii Topography: In
Page 224 and 225: Annex I, Page No iv locate the site
Page 226 and 227: Annex I, Page No vi 0.2 Bad (1) Lan
Page 228 and 229: Annex II, Page No ii south of the s
Page 230 and 231: Annex II, Page No iv is a open area
Page 232 and 233: Annex II, Page No vi the site where
Page 234 and 235: Annex III, Page No ii PRIMARY WATER
Page 236 and 237: Annex IV, Page No ii Mappin Descrip
Page 238 and 239: Mappin g Unit Description with loam
show all

EIA Studies of 3 Pre-Identified Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites in ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?