EIA Studies of 3 Pre-Identified Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites in ...
EIA Studies of 3 Pre-Identified Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites in ... EIA Studies of 3 Pre-Identified Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites in ...
Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identified Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites in NCT - Delhi Page No.138 3.2.2 Future No Plan for developmen t Within development plan 4 4 16 There is no developmental plan made for the site by DSIDC. 3.3 Transportation impact Low High 5 3 15 The waste from different Industrial Estates will be transported via major state and national highways viz NH-1, 2, Bawana - Delhi road and Bawana -Narela road, etc will pass through several residential colonies in urban as well as rural area of NCT - Delhi. 3.4 Special ecological features within 300m No Yes 5 2 10 The site is a protected forest. Some endangerd species like Rodh (small deer like animals), Neelghai have been observed. Total 100 320 Environment Division, National Productivity Council, New Delhi 5
Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identified Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites in NCT - Delhi Page No.165 The scores obtained by all the proposed sites as per the evaluation criteria mentioned above are as given below: As per MOEF Ranking system As per the criteria adapted by NPC Sensitivity Rank Score Rank Index Site I 417 III 322 III Site II 406 II 339 II Site III 360 I 347 I Site IV 474 IV 320 IV As per MOEF criteria, the site with more score poses more risks to human health and environment. The hazard potential of the site is as follows depending upon the score: Overall Score Generalised level of Potential Hazard 750 - 1000 Very High 600 - 750 High 450 - 600 Moderate 300 - 450 Low Less than 300 Very low Development of SLF at Site I, II & III exhibit low potential hazard where as at Site IV, it is moderate hazard. Site III has minimum sensitivity index, therefore is the most suitable site. For a site to be selected (under the criteria adapted by NPC followed internationally), it should have a minimum score of 300. A site with a score of 400 is ideal. All the sites have scored more than 300. But Site III has the highest score, is therefore the most suitable site. The ranking order of the four sites as per MOEF criteria and criteria adapted by NPC and used internationally is similar. Site III has been ranked 1 as per MOEF criteria as well as criteria adapted by NPC. Therefore Site III is recommended for development of SLF for disposal of hazardous waste. 5.3.4 Conclusions & Recommendation All the four sites were evaluated as per CPCB, MOEF ranking system and International criteria. Some of the positive and negative attributes for each site are as given below: Environment Division, National Productivity Council, New Delhi 7
- Page 128 and 129: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 130 and 131: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 132 and 133: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 134 and 135: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 136 and 137: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 138 and 139: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 140 and 141: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 142 and 143: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 144 and 145: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 146 and 147: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 148 and 149: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 150 and 151: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 152 and 153: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 154 and 155: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 156 and 157: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 158 and 159: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 160 and 161: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 162 and 163: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 164 and 165: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 166 and 167: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 168 and 169: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 170 and 171: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 172 and 173: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 174 and 175: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 176 and 177: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 180 and 181: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 182 and 183: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 184 and 185: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 186 and 187: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 188 and 189: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 190 and 191: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 192 and 193: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 194 and 195: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 196 and 197: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 198 and 199: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 200 and 201: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 202 and 203: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 204 and 205: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 206 and 207: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 208 and 209: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 210 and 211: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 212 and 213: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 214 and 215: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 216 and 217: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 218 and 219: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 220 and 221: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
- Page 222 and 223: Annex I, Page No ii Topography: In
- Page 224 and 225: Annex I, Page No iv locate the site
- Page 226 and 227: Annex I, Page No vi 0.2 Bad (1) Lan
Rapid <strong>EIA</strong> <strong>Studies</strong> <strong>of</strong> 3 <strong>Pre</strong>-identified <strong>Hazardous</strong> <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Disposal</strong> <strong>Sites</strong> <strong>in</strong> NCT - Delhi<br />
Page No.165<br />
The scores obta<strong>in</strong>ed by all the proposed sites as per the evaluation criteria<br />
mentioned above are as given below:<br />
As per MOEF Rank<strong>in</strong>g system As per the criteria<br />
adapted by NPC<br />
Sensitivity Rank Score Rank<br />
Index<br />
Site I 417 III 322 III<br />
Site II 406 II 339 II<br />
Site III 360 I 347 I<br />
Site IV 474 IV 320 IV<br />
As per MOEF criteria, the site with more score poses more risks to human health<br />
and environment. The hazard potential <strong>of</strong> the site is as follows depend<strong>in</strong>g upon the<br />
score:<br />
Overall Score<br />
Generalised level <strong>of</strong> Potential Hazard<br />
750 - 1000 Very High<br />
600 - 750 High<br />
450 - 600 Moderate<br />
300 - 450 Low<br />
Less than 300<br />
Very low<br />
Development <strong>of</strong> SLF at Site I, II & III exhibit low potential hazard where as at Site IV,<br />
it is moderate hazard. Site III has m<strong>in</strong>imum sensitivity <strong>in</strong>dex, therefore is the most<br />
suitable site.<br />
For a site to be selected (under the criteria adapted by NPC followed<br />
<strong>in</strong>ternationally), it should have a m<strong>in</strong>imum score <strong>of</strong> 300. A site with a score <strong>of</strong> 400 is<br />
ideal. All the sites have scored more than 300. But Site III has the highest score, is<br />
therefore the most suitable site.<br />
The rank<strong>in</strong>g order <strong>of</strong> the four sites as per MOEF criteria and criteria adapted by NPC<br />
and used <strong>in</strong>ternationally is similar. Site III has been ranked 1 as per MOEF criteria as<br />
well as criteria adapted by NPC. Therefore Site III is recommended for<br />
development <strong>of</strong> SLF for disposal <strong>of</strong> hazardous waste.<br />
5.3.4 Conclusions & Recommendation<br />
All the four sites were evaluated as per CPCB, MOEF rank<strong>in</strong>g system and<br />
International criteria. Some <strong>of</strong> the positive and negative attributes for each site are as<br />
given below:<br />
Environment Division, National Productivity Council, New Delhi<br />
7