EIA Studies of 3 Pre-Identified Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites in ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Executive Summary Page No 2(9) ( 89.64 %) 136455 kg/d (4.49%) 6840 kg/d (0.068 %) 104 kg/d 1877 kg/d (1.23%) 6954 kg/d (4.57%) PCT (liquid) Incineration Recovery/ reuse Recovery/ reuse (liquid) SLF The management plan for different industrial estates/areas is shown in figure below: 50000,0 HW gen era ted (kg/ d) 45000,0 40000,0 35000,0 30000,0 WZP 25000,0 20000,0 15000,0 10000,0 RUN SSI OIA MP Badli Narela 5000,0 0,0 1 2 4 5 6 7 10 11 13 14 15 16 26 28 PCT (liquid) 400,0 200,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 2600,0 250,0 2850,0 6104,0 0,0 125,0 950,0 0,0 Incineration 28,4 29,8 1,4 0,5 3,4 0,9 366,5 0,1 45,9 527,3 36,9 5,2 25,6 17,9 Recovery/ reuse 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 7,1 0,0 7,6 51,3 37,5 0,0 0,0 0,0 Recovery/ reuse (liquid) 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 27,1 0,0 7,6 61,3 37,5 0,0 0,0 0,0 SLF 43901,3 5336,6 2554,6 13198,4 2584,4 14652,4 9785,7 6073,4 690,7 7443,0 10342,0 3066,2 5995,3 8111,4 IE Code The total quantity of hazardous wastes which is estimated to be 87,000 m 3 /annum from all the 28 approved industrial estates/areas (including CETPs) shall be disposed off in engineered landfill facility. Environment Division, National Productivity Council, New Delhi
Area required for developing engineered landfill facility Executive Summary Page No 3(9) For developing a SLF for disposal of 87,000 m 3 /annum of hazardous waste, 26.35 hectares of land is required for 20 years. Assessment and Evaluation of Sites from Environmental angle All the four pre-identified sites were assessed with respect to the locational criterias stipulated by CPCb, MOEf and that adapted by NPC. The compliance of the criterias by the four sites is summarised below: Site CPCB Criteria MOEF Guideline Internationally followed Criteria adapted by NPC Bawana relocation al industrial site Conforms to all Does not conform to - • The site shall be more than 25 Km away from ecologically and or other sensitive areas Conforms to all Wazirpur CETP site Old Bawana site Conforms all Conforms all to to • The site shall be 25 km away from the projected growth boundary of the settlement for (atleast a decade) • 1/2 km away from railway line or highway Conforms to all Conforms to all . Guman Hera site Conforms to all • The site shall be more than 25 Km away from ecologically and or other sensitive areas Conforms to all • The site shall be 25 km away from the projected growth boundary of the settlement for (atleast a decade) Further, detailed site investigation was carried out for all the four sites with respect to geotechnical properties, hydrological/hydrogeological, geological, soil, ambient air quality, landuse/landcover, meteorology, demography,etc. Based on the environmental settings, the sites were evaluated as per the Delphi technique stipulated by MOEF and by the internationally followed criteria adapted by NPC. Environment Division, National Productivity Council, New Delhi
Page 1 and 2: Rapid Environmental Impact Assessme
Page 3 and 4: STUDY TEAM (Environment Division) P
Page 5 and 6: TABLE OF CONTENT Sl. No. Descriptio
Page 7 and 8: Sl. No. Description Page No. 9.4 Pu
Page 9 and 10: Table. No. Content 4.22 Ambient air
Page 11 and 12: 4.24 Permeability versus depth of s
Page 13: Executive Summary Page No 1(9) EXEC
Page 17 and 18: generating industrial estates. Ther
Page 19 and 20: Κ Κ Executive Summary Page No 7(9
Page 21 and 22: Executive Summary Page No 9(9) area
Page 23 and 24: Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
Page 65 and 66:
Rapid EIA Studies of 3 Pre-identifi
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Annex I, Page No ii Topography: In
Page 224 and 225:
Annex I, Page No iv locate the site
Page 226 and 227:
Annex I, Page No vi 0.2 Bad (1) Lan
Page 228 and 229:
Annex II, Page No ii south of the s
Page 230 and 231:
Annex II, Page No iv is a open area
Page 232 and 233:
Annex II, Page No vi the site where
Page 234 and 235:
Annex III, Page No ii PRIMARY WATER
Page 236 and 237:
Annex IV, Page No ii Mappin Descrip
Page 238 and 239:
Mappin g Unit Description with loam
show all

EIA Studies of 3 Pre-Identified Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites in ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?