Optimization of the Czochralski method for InSb crystal ... - CUMC
Optimization of the Czochralski method for InSb crystal ... - CUMC
Optimization of the Czochralski method for InSb crystal ... - CUMC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Orientation<br />
Background<br />
Analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>InSb</strong> <strong>crystal</strong><br />
Summary<br />
References<br />
The model<br />
Future work<br />
Alignment affects stress points in <strong>crystal</strong><br />
[001] ε1<br />
0.03<br />
0.045<br />
0.04<br />
0.035<br />
0.03<br />
[001] ε2<br />
0.18<br />
0.16<br />
0.14<br />
0.12<br />
0<br />
0.025<br />
0.02<br />
0.1<br />
0.08<br />
0.015<br />
0.06<br />
0.01<br />
0.04<br />
0.005<br />
0.02<br />
-0.03<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0.03<br />
[211] ε1<br />
0.045<br />
0.18<br />
0.04<br />
0.16<br />
0.035<br />
0.14<br />
6<br />
4<br />
0<br />
0.03<br />
0.025<br />
0.02<br />
[211] ε 2<br />
0<br />
0.12<br />
0.1<br />
0.08<br />
0.015<br />
0.06<br />
2<br />
0.01<br />
0.04<br />
0.005<br />
0.02<br />
0<br />
-0.03<br />
0<br />
[111] ε 1<br />
0<br />
[111] ε 2<br />
0<br />
-2<br />
0.03<br />
0.045<br />
0.18<br />
0.04<br />
0.16<br />
-4<br />
0.035<br />
0.14<br />
-6<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
-2<br />
-4<br />
-6<br />
-6<br />
-4<br />
-2<br />
0<br />
2<br />
4<br />
6<br />
0<br />
-0.03<br />
0.03<br />
0.025<br />
0.02<br />
0.015<br />
0.01<br />
0.005<br />
0.12<br />
0.1<br />
0.08<br />
0.06<br />
0.04<br />
0.02<br />
“Best” orientation [¯211]<br />
Devon Armstrong, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Science<br />
<strong>Optimization</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Czochralski</strong> <strong>method</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>InSb</strong> <strong>crystal</strong> growth
Change language