REGIONAL COOPERATION AND ECONOMIC INTEGRATION
REGIONAL COOPERATION AND ECONOMIC INTEGRATION REGIONAL COOPERATION AND ECONOMIC INTEGRATION
REGIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS AND REGIONAL COOPERATION hopes of building a knowledge based society, a fast execution of structural reforms and in general strengthening the role of the business sector. High-tech start-up companies were expected to develop fast, the integration of the innovation sector was expected to make fast progress and in general the EU was expected to catch up fast. This is where it was first stated that the basis of all this and the driving force of the future in general must be the area of Information Technology (Zádor, 2004, 2004a). The 2006, 2007 and 2008 Spring European Council identified four priority areas (R&D and innovation, business environment, employment opportunities and an integrated energy/infrastructure policy) which are the pillars of the renewed Lisbon Strategy (Zádor, 2006, European Commission, 2007). Within these areas the European Council agreed a limited number of specific actions which it urged Member States to complete by set deadlines. The 2008 Spring European Council launched the second cycle of the renewed Lisbon Strategy, which will be completed in 2010. The Council adopted in May 2008 a recommendation on the broad economic policy guidelines for the Member States and the Community (2008 to 2010) and in July 2008 a decision on guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States, which together form the “Integrated guidelines for growth and jobs”. In the context of the current economic downturn, the Commission has proposed a European Economy Recovery Plan (hereafter ‘the Recovery Plan’6), which the European Council in December 2008 agreed. This plan provides for a co-ordinated budgetary stimulus, within the Stability and Growth Pact, to boost demand and restore confidence, taking account of Member States starting positions and efforts already undertaken in response to the economic problems. The Recovery Plan agreed by the European Council called on Member States to submit updated stability or convergence programmes, which the Commission has assessed, taking due account of the need to ensure the reversibility of the fiscal deterioration, improving budgetary policy-making, and ensuring long-term sustainability of public finances. To fully implement the Lisbon strategy for growth and jobs, this recommendation should also contain specific recommendations to the Member States belonging to the euro area. (12) The European Parliament has adopted a resolution regarding this Recommendation, 4 OJ L 137, 27.5.2008, p. 13. 5 OJ L 198, 26.7.2008, p. 47. 6 COM(2008) 800. 2. The Budapest Concept: the sustainable Post-Lisbon strategy – a Renewal The strategic task of the EU today is the elaboration of a set of tasks to ensure a new type of catching up in a qualitative way. The renewal of strategic thinking is a leading notion of today (Gáspár, 2008), mostly with the new emerging trends of the global world. The content thereof can only be determined in the context of fitting into the entirety of sustainable development. Equally, competitiveness can only be realistically increased to the extent of sustainability. The actual content of sustainable development must be determined keeping in mind the importance of social and environmental issues and the resolutions thereof, as well as taking into consideration the diverse correlation between 59
PART I: these problems and economic development (Szabó, 2007). The international position of the Balkan and East Central European countries can only be evaluated by way of analysing these three areas separately as well as by examining their interactions and the tasks emerging as a result of this evaluation must also be approached in the same way. In order to examine the individual factors we have established a thesis for each of them as follows here: Thesis No. 1.: the development and growth of the economy can only be sustained, i.e. balanced if the stability of the economy is ensured in a socially sustainable way and in no way is it ecologically harmful long term. In other words: a) Economic growth is not accompanied by the breaking up of the internal and external balances, when the involvement of external resources mainly finances an already imbalanced situation, b) The external and internal financing of growth is secured by the integration of the human resources of the national economy on the basis of a modernising economic structure resulting from the induction and absorption of technical development, c) The extensive factors of economic growth do not expand at the expense of the environment; whereas the intensive factors prefer an environmentally conscious way of technological development. Thesis No. 2.: by social sustainability we mean a parallel progression of economic growth and social cohesion. I.e. there is a social and political consensus to do away with reproductive social falling behind. To be able to achieve this, the systems of social distribution are operated and the international resources available are used in a way that solidarity, fairness and social incentivisation can all equally prevail. I.e. the redistribution of centralised revenues contributes to the creation of opportunities via the education policy and the efficient operation of the health care system. Within the scope of social sustainability there is an endeavour to have a social dialogue which enhances knowledge and innovative commitment as well. Besides the economic aspect of financiability, the interaction between social sustainability and a sustainable society refers to the environmental sustainability of the quality of life. I.e. it presupposes a type of development where work and life conditions are shaped in an environmentally conscious way. Thesis No. 3.: one of the most relevant conditions of sustainable development is a global approach: where both planning and control take into consideration the interrelations of society, economy and environment in a balanced way. From an environmental aspect this can be achieved in the event that a) the economic and social players have an inherent interest in using inputs for reproduction which do not represent any harm to the immediate environmental factors, b) urbanisation is carried out and the transport systems are built such that the quality of life of the members of society is of the utmost priority, c) if the energy supplies are available for development, the enhancement of the efficiency thereof is accepted by all players of the economy. 60
- Page 19 and 20: PART I: ratio could ultimately rais
- Page 21 and 22: PART I: 3. CEFTA regional cooperati
- Page 23 and 24: PART I: any other type of economic
- Page 25 and 26: PART I: including Kosovo, who is de
- Page 27 and 28: PART I: Rodrik, Dani. (1999), The N
- Page 29 and 30: PART I: The paper examines how West
- Page 31 and 32: PART I: What are the main reasons f
- Page 33 and 34: PART I: EU growth rates and a sign
- Page 35 and 36: PART I: only a limited portion of t
- Page 37 and 38: PART I: on a larger trade deficit;
- Page 39 and 40: PART I: and world trade in goods an
- Page 42 and 43: REGIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS AND REGIO
- Page 44 and 45: REGIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS AND REGIO
- Page 46 and 47: REGIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS AND REGIO
- Page 48 and 49: REGIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS AND REGIO
- Page 50 and 51: REGIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS AND REGIO
- Page 52: REGIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS AND REGIO
- Page 55 and 56: PART I: was developed especially fo
- Page 57 and 58: PART I: 2. Theoretical background,
- Page 59 and 60: PART I: focus on the way in which t
- Page 61 and 62: PART I: of private incomes by addin
- Page 63 and 64: PART I: the GDP per capita: the 53.
- Page 65 and 66: PART I: received EU-transfers, but
- Page 68 and 69: Dr Márta Zádor, PhD Deputy Genera
- Page 72 and 73: REGIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS AND REGIO
- Page 74 and 75: REGIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS AND REGIO
- Page 76 and 77: Macedonia REGIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS
- Page 78 and 79: REGIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS AND REGIO
- Page 80 and 81: REGIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS AND REGIO
- Page 82 and 83: REGIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS AND REGIO
- Page 84 and 85: REGIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS AND REGIO
- Page 86 and 87: Goran Buturac, Ph.D., Research Fell
- Page 88 and 89: REGIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS AND REGIO
- Page 90 and 91: c in total exports of country a in
- Page 92 and 93: 2.3. Comparative advantages REGIONA
- Page 94 and 95: REGIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS AND REGIO
- Page 96 and 97: REGIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS AND REGIO
- Page 98 and 99: 2.6. Export similarities The paper
- Page 100: REGIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS AND REGIO
- Page 103 and 104: PART II: INTRODUCTION CEFTA-2006 is
- Page 105 and 106: PART II: Agreement for Modification
- Page 107 and 108: PART II: only provide temporary rep
- Page 109 and 110: PART II: The Leaders of the Group o
- Page 111 and 112: PART II: messages over the past yea
- Page 113 and 114: PART II: INTRODUCTION Central Europ
- Page 115 and 116: PART II: Table 1: Gross domestic pr
- Page 117 and 118: PART II: Figure 3: Distribution of
- Page 119 and 120: PART II: Table 6: Countries of West
<strong>REGIONAL</strong> TRADE AGREEMENTS <strong>AND</strong> <strong>REGIONAL</strong> <strong>COOPERATION</strong><br />
hopes of building a knowledge based society, a fast execution of structural reforms and in<br />
general strengthening the role of the business sector. High-tech start-up companies were<br />
expected to develop fast, the integration of the innovation sector was expected to make<br />
fast progress and in general the EU was expected to catch up fast. This is where it was first<br />
stated that the basis of all this and the driving force of the future in general must be the area<br />
of Information Technology (Zádor, 2004, 2004a).<br />
The 2006, 2007 and 2008 Spring European Council identified four priority areas (R&D<br />
and innovation, business environment, employment opportunities and an integrated<br />
energy/infrastructure policy) which are the pillars of the renewed Lisbon Strategy (Zádor,<br />
2006, European Commission, 2007). Within these areas the European Council agreed<br />
a limited number of specific actions which it urged Member States to complete by set<br />
deadlines. The 2008 Spring European Council launched the second cycle of the renewed<br />
Lisbon Strategy, which will be completed in 2010. The Council adopted in May 2008 a<br />
recommendation on the broad economic policy guidelines for the Member States and the<br />
Community (2008 to 2010) and in July 2008 a decision on guidelines for the employment<br />
policies of the Member States, which together form the “Integrated guidelines for growth<br />
and jobs”.<br />
In the context of the current economic downturn, the Commission has proposed a European<br />
Economy Recovery Plan (hereafter ‘the Recovery Plan’6), which the European Council<br />
in December 2008 agreed. This plan provides for a co-ordinated budgetary stimulus,<br />
within the Stability and Growth Pact, to boost demand and restore confidence, taking<br />
account of Member States starting positions and efforts already undertaken in response to<br />
the economic problems.<br />
The Recovery Plan agreed by the European Council called on Member States to submit<br />
updated stability or convergence programmes, which the Commission has assessed, taking<br />
due account of the need to ensure the reversibility of the fiscal deterioration, improving<br />
budgetary policy-making, and ensuring long-term sustainability of public finances.<br />
To fully implement the Lisbon strategy for growth and jobs, this recommendation should<br />
also contain specific recommendations to the Member States belonging to the euro area.<br />
(12) The European Parliament has adopted a resolution regarding this Recommendation, 4<br />
OJ L 137, 27.5.2008, p. 13. 5 OJ L 198, 26.7.2008, p. 47. 6 COM(2008) 800.<br />
2. The Budapest Concept: the sustainable Post-Lisbon strategy – a Renewal<br />
The strategic task of the EU today is the elaboration of a set of tasks to ensure a new<br />
type of catching up in a qualitative way. The renewal of strategic thinking is a leading<br />
notion of today (Gáspár, 2008), mostly with the new emerging trends of the global world.<br />
The content thereof can only be determined in the context of fitting into the entirety of<br />
sustainable development. Equally, competitiveness can only be realistically increased<br />
to the extent of sustainability. The actual content of sustainable development must be<br />
determined keeping in mind the importance of social and environmental issues and the<br />
resolutions thereof, as well as taking into consideration the diverse correlation between<br />
59