REGIONAL COOPERATION AND ECONOMIC INTEGRATION
REGIONAL COOPERATION AND ECONOMIC INTEGRATION REGIONAL COOPERATION AND ECONOMIC INTEGRATION
measured and reflected in the overall increase in FDI, declining unemployment, increasing export activities and various other indicators of economic development. However, there are some positive signs that Serbia can use its development potential in the next ten years and can achieve economic growth and improve the standard of living of citizens, while turning into a competitive and functioning market economy. For example, the program of reform of laws and other regulations is in progress, in order to meet the standards of the European Union. Macroeconomic and business environment is constantly developing over the last few years, and the Government is passing a large number of new laws, stabilizing the annual budget, and it is achieving formal arrangements with the International Community about the debt and the questions to support the budget. There is more evidence of international and local approval on the progress that has been achieved in the speed and direction of the overall economic reform programs, which is seen in: • Relative readiness to begin negotiations on EU accession. • Renewal of credit support from the IMF in 2010. • Positive evaluation of legislative reforms of the OECD. • Increased dialogue and support to the Government of the domestic private sector and existing foreign investors. Positive attitude and active participation of foreign investors is an important factor in the overall business environment in the determination and allocation of priority, key initiatives for the improvement of the overall environment for business development in the country. CONCLUSION FDI FLOWS IN SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE Competition in new FDI is reflected in the global and rapid technological progress and development of logistics, together with the global need for reduced costs in most industrial sectors, all of which increases competition and raises the internal standards and expectations of the investors. Serbia must make efforts to catch up with the countries in the region. The Government has noted this need and presented it in all its plans and strategies. Therefore, a more active and accelerated approach and commitment for additional resources and initiatives should be adopted, in order to improve and enable the business environment. It is especially important to create conditions for effective application of discoveries and inventions (innovative results) in the economy, so that the time needed from the arising to commercialization of the innovation reduces to the level required in the world market. Innovative activity, together with the scientific research work, is the most important driving force of the total technological and economic development of the country. New knowledge and technologies, based on the inventive and innovative development, applied in the production and the process of creation of new products and services, can only increase the overall competitiveness of Serbian economy in the world frames. It can be concluded that the creation of a favorable environment for domestic and foreign investment is a major challenge for all countries. Competition in attracting FDI grows throughout the world, especially in the countries that have a small and open economy. Encouraging foreign direct investment in Serbia requires at the same time action and partnership relation of all stakeholders: central government, local government and foreign companies. 329
PART V: REFERENCES Bandiera, O., Caprio G. Honohan P. and Schiantarelli F. (2000) Does Financial Reform Raise or Reduce Saving, Review of Economics and Statistics, May. Barro, R. i J. Wha Lee (1993) Loser and Winners in Economic Growth, Proceedings of the World Bank Conference on Development Economics (Washington, DC: World Bank, 1994). Borensztein, E., De Gregorio J. and Lee J.W. (1995) How Does Foreign Investment Affect Growth, NBER Working Paper, 5057 (Cambridge: Mass: NBER). Bosworth B., S. Collins, (1996) Economic Growth in East Asia: Accumulation Versus Assimilation, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: 2, Brookings Institution. Bosworth, B., S. Collins, (1999) Capital Flows to Developing Economies: Implications for Savings and Investment, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1. Brahmbhatt, M. and U. Dadush (1996) Disparities in Global Integrations, Finance and Development, September. Burda, M. C. Wyploz, C. (2001) Macroeconomics: A European Text, Oxford University Press. Cho, Y. C. and Khatkhate D. (1990) Financial Liberalisation: Issues and Evidence, Economic and Political Weekly, May. Eitemann D. K. , Stonehill A. I. (1989) Multinational Business Finance, Addison Wesley Company. Meier, G. and J. E. Rauch (2000) Leading Issues in Economic Development, 7 th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press). Nacionalni program za integraciju u Evropsku Uniju (2008) Vlada Republike Srbije, Beograd. Obradović, S. (2006) Ekonomski razvoj, monografija, Autorsko izdanje, Interprint, Kragujevac. Papanek, G. (1973) Aid, Foreign Private Investment, Savings and Growth in Less Developed Countries, Journal of Political Economy, January-February. Vamvakidis, A. (1999) Regional Trade Agreements or Broad Liberalisation: Which Part Leads to Faster Growth, IMF Staff Papers, March. 330
- Page 289 and 290: PART V: Figure 3: EU FDI outward fl
- Page 291 and 292: PART V: (macroeconomic stability an
- Page 293 and 294: PART V: FDIPC- logarithm value of t
- Page 295 and 296: PART V: DIST shows that if the dist
- Page 297 and 298: PART V: University Press. Deichmann
- Page 299 and 300: PART V: developing countries, where
- Page 301 and 302: PART V: Figure 2: FDI inflow distri
- Page 303 and 304: PART V: The economic literature usu
- Page 305 and 306: PART V: The regression equation, wi
- Page 307 and 308: PART V: Table 1. Determinants of FD
- Page 309 and 310: PART V: The key determinants that w
- Page 311 and 312: PART V: REFERENCES Liebscher, K. (2
- Page 313 and 314: PART V: INTRODUCTION In the conditi
- Page 315 and 316: PART V: from government regarding a
- Page 317 and 318: PART V: 306 3.1. Comparative analys
- Page 319 and 320: PART V: are sufficiently developed.
- Page 321 and 322: PART V: monopolistic companies is e
- Page 323 and 324: PART V: Savić Lj., (2008.), Inostr
- Page 325 and 326: PART V: abandoned CEFTA membership)
- Page 327 and 328: PART V: Figure 1: FDI in selected c
- Page 329 and 330: PART V: 318 Table 3: Balance of pay
- Page 331 and 332: PART V: come true if stable politic
- Page 333 and 334: PART V: The task of the effective u
- Page 335 and 336: PART V: Cooperation between the pub
- Page 337 and 338: PART V: needs of Serbia and in that
- Page 339: PART V: conventional production and
- Page 343 and 344: PART V: stability and macroeconomic
- Page 345 and 346: PART V: By economic activity, the m
- Page 347 and 348: PART V: Table 3: Exports and import
- Page 349 and 350: PART V: In the last years, a series
- Page 351 and 352: PART V: Figure 4: Balance of paymen
- Page 353 and 354: PART V: because the level of per ca
measured and reflected in the overall increase in FDI, declining unemployment, increasing<br />
export activities and various other indicators of economic development.<br />
However, there are some positive signs that Serbia can use its development potential in<br />
the next ten years and can achieve economic growth and improve the standard of living of<br />
citizens, while turning into a competitive and functioning market economy. For example,<br />
the program of reform of laws and other regulations is in progress, in order to meet the<br />
standards of the European Union. Macroeconomic and business environment is constantly<br />
developing over the last few years, and the Government is passing a large number of<br />
new laws, stabilizing the annual budget, and it is achieving formal arrangements with the<br />
International Community about the debt and the questions to support the budget. There is<br />
more evidence of international and local approval on the progress that has been achieved in<br />
the speed and direction of the overall economic reform programs, which is seen in:<br />
• Relative readiness to begin negotiations on EU accession.<br />
• Renewal of credit support from the IMF in 2010.<br />
• Positive evaluation of legislative reforms of the OECD.<br />
• Increased dialogue and support to the Government of the domestic private sector<br />
and existing foreign investors.<br />
Positive attitude and active participation of foreign investors is an important factor in the<br />
overall business environment in the determination and allocation of priority, key initiatives<br />
for the improvement of the overall environment for business development in the country.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
FDI FLOWS IN SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE<br />
Competition in new FDI is reflected in the global and rapid technological progress and<br />
development of logistics, together with the global need for reduced costs in most industrial<br />
sectors, all of which increases competition and raises the internal standards and expectations<br />
of the investors. Serbia must make efforts to catch up with the countries in the region. The<br />
Government has noted this need and presented it in all its plans and strategies. Therefore,<br />
a more active and accelerated approach and commitment for additional resources and<br />
initiatives should be adopted, in order to improve and enable the business environment.<br />
It is especially important to create conditions for effective application of discoveries and<br />
inventions (innovative results) in the economy, so that the time needed from the arising<br />
to commercialization of the innovation reduces to the level required in the world market.<br />
Innovative activity, together with the scientific research work, is the most important driving<br />
force of the total technological and economic development of the country. New knowledge<br />
and technologies, based on the inventive and innovative development, applied in the<br />
production and the process of creation of new products and services, can only increase the<br />
overall competitiveness of Serbian economy in the world frames. It can be concluded that<br />
the creation of a favorable environment for domestic and foreign investment is a major<br />
challenge for all countries. Competition in attracting FDI grows throughout the world,<br />
especially in the countries that have a small and open economy. Encouraging foreign<br />
direct investment in Serbia requires at the same time action and partnership relation of all<br />
stakeholders: central government, local government and foreign companies.<br />
329