REGIONAL COOPERATION AND ECONOMIC INTEGRATION
REGIONAL COOPERATION AND ECONOMIC INTEGRATION REGIONAL COOPERATION AND ECONOMIC INTEGRATION
Part V FDI FLOWS IN SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE Prof. Vesna Bucevska, Ph.D. Ss. Cyril and Methodius University Faculty of Economics-Skopje Macedonia KEY DETERMINANTS OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENTS: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM THE EU CANDIDATE COUNTRIES INTRODUCTION Foreign direct investment (FDI) has been a centrepiece of economic literature and empirical studies over the past two decades as a result of its rapid growth, on one hand and its multi-fold contribution to economy of a host country, on the other hand. The importance of FDI for the growth and economic development of the South-Eastern European countries to which the present European Union (EU) candidate countries (Croatia, Macedonia and Turkey) belong has been highlighted in numerous papers. First of all, FDI provides capital for closing the gap between the low domestic savings in these countries and the huge need for investment. So, FDI inflows are of vital importance for improving and accelerating the long-term economic growth and development of EU candidate countries. FDI does not only provide the recipient country with fresh capital, but also with transfer of technology and managerial and other skills (Estrin et.al, 1997 and Lankes and Venables, 1996. This in turn increases the international competitiveness of its goods and services, leading to higher volumes of sales and profits of it companies. FDI can contribute to job creation on a long run. However, effects of FDI on job creation in the EU candidate countries are not straightforward due to the fact that the majority of FDI in those countries represent acquisitions of existing companies, rather than greenfield investment. Another potential benefit of FDI is speeding up the EU accession process. Those countries that experienced higher FDI inflows in the early years of transition have been more advanced in fulfilling two economic criteria for joining the EU and have started 275
PART V: the association process earlier (Zakharov, V. and Kusic, S., 2003, pp.8). That explains the role of FDI in the acceleration of the EU integration process. Taking into account the importance of FDI for the economy, governments of the EU candidate countries, are faced with the challenge how to attract more foreign direct investment. To answer the question, this paper uses data on EU FDI outward stocks per capita in the EU candidate countries in the period between 1999 and 2007 to investigate the determinants of foreign direct investments and to provide econometric estimation of these determinants. It is a first attempt of that kind since the previous empirical research on the determinants of FDI to EU accession countries focused on the world FDI to those countries and not specifically on the part of FDI coming from the EU member countries to EU candidate countries. This is of crucial importance for establishing a relationship, if any, between the EU economic integration and foreign direct investment. Before we proceed with econometric estimation of the determinants of FDI, in Section 2 we undertake a comparison of the world FDI patterns and FDI patterns of the EU candidate countries. In Section 3 we investigate a number of determinants that could influence the level of EU FDI outward stock in the EU candidate countries. In Section 4 we describe the econometric methodology for identifying the key determinants of FDI and discuss the obtained estimation results. The last section concludes the paper and recognizes some of the policy implications of the econometric results presented in this paper. 1. Global FDI trends and FDI trends in the EU candidate countries World FDI have increased considerably over the past two decades, reaching a record level of $1.8 trillion in 2007, well above the previous all-time high set in 2000. According to the World investment report 2008, the region of South-Eastern Europe, to which the EU candidate countries (Croatia, Macedonia and Turkey) belong, has also seen seven years of uninterrupted growth. FDI flows to these countries in 2007 increased by 50%, seting a new record of $86 billion. As for the world FDI inflows to the EU candidate countries (Croatia, Macedonia and Turkey), they are relatively small, but highly focused to Croatia. Macedonia has received a negligible share of FDI among the EU candidate countries (See Table 1). 276 Table 1: Distribution of world FDI flows among the EU - - candidate countries by range, 2007 Range FDI Inflows FDI Outflows Over $5.0 bn Turkey $1.0 bn to $4.9 bn Croatia Turkey $0.1 bn to $0.9 bn Macedonia Croatia Less than $0.1 bn Macedonia Source: UNCTAD, FDI/TNC database (www.unctad.org/fdistatistics) and annex table B.1. in World Investment Report 2008
- Page 235 and 236: PART IV: high and high technologica
- Page 237 and 238: PART IV: study. Firstly, companies
- Page 239 and 240: PART IV: and Consumption Studies, U
- Page 241 and 242: PART IV: medium-sized enterprises,
- Page 243 and 244: PART IV: Balkan transition economie
- Page 245 and 246: PART IV: evidence that human capita
- Page 247 and 248: PART IV: of involving Serbia in a u
- Page 249 and 250: PART IV: REFERENCES Arandarenko, M.
- Page 252 and 253: CEFTA-2006 AND ANHANCING COMPETITIV
- Page 254 and 255: CEFTA-2006 AND ANHANCING COMPETITIV
- Page 256 and 257: CEFTA-2006 AND ANHANCING COMPETITIV
- Page 258 and 259: CEFTA-2006 AND ANHANCING COMPETITIV
- Page 260: CEFTA-2006 AND ANHANCING COMPETITIV
- Page 263 and 264: PART IV: INTRODUCTION Air transport
- Page 265 and 266: PART IV: 2. Air transport market Ge
- Page 267 and 268: PART IV: Finally, it is necessary t
- Page 269 and 270: PART IV: Figure 2: PSO routes conne
- Page 271 and 272: PART IV: 2012), and 9% lower in the
- Page 273 and 274: PART IV: b) Second phase from 2011
- Page 275 and 276: PART IV: IATA Passenger Forecast (2
- Page 277 and 278: PART IV: determined by legal rules
- Page 279 and 280: PART IV: Congress in 1985. As a con
- Page 281 and 282: PART IV: 4. The rule of law and ind
- Page 283 and 284: PART IV: the establishment of the r
- Page 285: PART IV: REFERENCES Barro, R. (1991
- Page 289 and 290: PART V: Figure 3: EU FDI outward fl
- Page 291 and 292: PART V: (macroeconomic stability an
- Page 293 and 294: PART V: FDIPC- logarithm value of t
- Page 295 and 296: PART V: DIST shows that if the dist
- Page 297 and 298: PART V: University Press. Deichmann
- Page 299 and 300: PART V: developing countries, where
- Page 301 and 302: PART V: Figure 2: FDI inflow distri
- Page 303 and 304: PART V: The economic literature usu
- Page 305 and 306: PART V: The regression equation, wi
- Page 307 and 308: PART V: Table 1. Determinants of FD
- Page 309 and 310: PART V: The key determinants that w
- Page 311 and 312: PART V: REFERENCES Liebscher, K. (2
- Page 313 and 314: PART V: INTRODUCTION In the conditi
- Page 315 and 316: PART V: from government regarding a
- Page 317 and 318: PART V: 306 3.1. Comparative analys
- Page 319 and 320: PART V: are sufficiently developed.
- Page 321 and 322: PART V: monopolistic companies is e
- Page 323 and 324: PART V: Savić Lj., (2008.), Inostr
- Page 325 and 326: PART V: abandoned CEFTA membership)
- Page 327 and 328: PART V: Figure 1: FDI in selected c
- Page 329 and 330: PART V: 318 Table 3: Balance of pay
- Page 331 and 332: PART V: come true if stable politic
- Page 333 and 334: PART V: The task of the effective u
- Page 335 and 336: PART V: Cooperation between the pub
PART V:<br />
the association process earlier (Zakharov, V. and Kusic, S., 2003, pp.8). That explains<br />
the role of FDI in the acceleration of the EU integration process.<br />
Taking into account the importance of FDI for the economy, governments of the EU<br />
candidate countries, are faced with the challenge how to attract more foreign direct<br />
investment. To answer the question, this paper uses data on EU FDI outward stocks per<br />
capita in the EU candidate countries in the period between 1999 and 2007 to investigate<br />
the determinants of foreign direct investments and to provide econometric estimation of<br />
these determinants. It is a first attempt of that kind since the previous empirical research<br />
on the determinants of FDI to EU accession countries focused on the world FDI to those<br />
countries and not specifically on the part of FDI coming from the EU member countries to<br />
EU candidate countries. This is of crucial importance for establishing a relationship, if any,<br />
between the EU economic integration and foreign direct investment.<br />
Before we proceed with econometric estimation of the determinants of FDI, in Section<br />
2 we undertake a comparison of the world FDI patterns and FDI patterns of the EU<br />
candidate countries. In Section 3 we investigate a number of determinants that could<br />
influence the level of EU FDI outward stock in the EU candidate countries. In Section<br />
4 we describe the econometric methodology for identifying the key determinants of<br />
FDI and discuss the obtained estimation results. The last section concludes the paper<br />
and recognizes some of the policy implications of the econometric results presented in this<br />
paper.<br />
1. Global FDI trends and FDI trends in the EU candidate countries<br />
World FDI have increased considerably over the past two decades, reaching a record level<br />
of $1.8 trillion in 2007, well above the previous all-time high set in 2000.<br />
According to the World investment report 2008, the region of South-Eastern Europe, to<br />
which the EU candidate countries (Croatia, Macedonia and Turkey) belong, has also seen<br />
seven years of uninterrupted growth. FDI flows to these countries in 2007 increased by<br />
50%, seting a new record of $86 billion.<br />
As for the world FDI inflows to the EU candidate countries (Croatia, Macedonia and<br />
Turkey), they are relatively small, but highly focused to Croatia. Macedonia has received a<br />
negligible share of FDI among the EU candidate countries (See Table 1).<br />
276<br />
Table 1: Distribution of world FDI flows among the EU -<br />
- candidate countries by range, 2007<br />
Range FDI Inflows FDI Outflows<br />
Over $5.0 bn<br />
Turkey<br />
$1.0 bn to $4.9 bn Croatia Turkey<br />
$0.1 bn to $0.9 bn Macedonia Croatia<br />
Less than $0.1 bn<br />
Macedonia<br />
Source: UNCTAD, FDI/TNC database (www.unctad.org/fdistatistics) and annex table B.1. in World Investment<br />
Report 2008