REGIONAL COOPERATION AND ECONOMIC INTEGRATION
REGIONAL COOPERATION AND ECONOMIC INTEGRATION REGIONAL COOPERATION AND ECONOMIC INTEGRATION
CEFTA-2006 AND ANHANCING COMPETITIVENESS OF THE REGION - SOME SECTORAL ASPECTS even when flexibility may be preferable. There are other views as well. They include the minority view that the rule of law guarantees democracy. In 1959, an international gathering of over 185 judges, lawyers, and law professors from 53 countries, meeting in New Delhi and speaking as the International Commission of Jurists, made a declaration as to the fundamental principle of the rule of law. This was the Declaration of Delhi. They declared that the rule of law implies certain rights and freedoms, that it implies an independent judiciary, and that it implies social, economic and cultural conditions conducive to human dignity. The Delhi Congress gave rise to three important elements in the concept of the Rule of Law. First, that the individual is possessed of certain rights and freedoms and that he/she is entitled to protection of these rights and freedoms by the State. Second, that there is an absolute need for an independent judiciary and bar as well as for effective system for the protection of fundamental rights and freedoms and third, that the establishment of social, economic and cultural conditions would permit men to live in dignity and to fulfill their legitimate aspirations. The Declaration of Delhi reaffirms the principles expressed in the Act of Athens adopted by the International Congress of Jurists in 1955, particularly the one that independent judiciary and legal profession are essential to the maintenance of the Rule of Law and to the proper administration of justice. It recognizes that the Rule of Law is a dynamic concept for the expansion and fulfillment of which jurists are primarily responsible and which should be employed not only to safeguard and advance the civil and political rights of the individual in a free society, but also to establish social, economic, educational and cultural conditions under which his legitimate aspirations and dignity may be realized. In the twenty-first century, the rule of law has been considered as one of the key dimensions that determines the quality and good governance of a country. 2. The independent judiciary An important bond of political freedoms of citizens, legal state and rule of law is the separation and independence of the judiciary from the legislative and executive. For the rule of law and legal state technical division of powers between the legislature, executive and judiciary is not sufficient as it exists in almost all modern states. What characterizes the organization of the legal state and the rule of law is an independent judiciary. As a significant institutional and procedural bond, the rule of law and the legal state, the independence of the judiciary provides effective judicial and administrative protection and realization of freedom and rights of citizens, because “there is no liberty if the judicial power is not separate from the legislative and executive authorities” ( Monteskje, 1989, pp. 176). Independence of the judiciary is a necessary prerequisite of a democratic political environment. It is the institutional bond and the rule of law and fundamental human rights and civil liberties. Because of its importance, the independence of the judiciary has reached the level of achievements of civilization and social values. It contributes to protecting and ensuring legal security and legal equality as important legal values. All these are reasons why the European Union affirms the independence of the judiciary and the realization sets in Serbia as an important condition for joining the European Union. The United Nations has endorsed the essential importance of an independent judiciary by its adoption of the Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary at its Seventh 267
PART IV: Congress in 1985. As a consequence of the adoption of the Basic Principles by the UN General Assembly, each member state is expected to guarantee the independence of its judiciary in its constitution or the laws of the country. Independence of the judiciary is the value that is affirmed by both United Nations and the European Union. Namely, it is the subject of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as well as specific recommendations on the independence, efficiency and role of judges made by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe (R-94/12). Independent judiciary and the separation of powers assume the central position in the intensified process of regional cooperation and the integration of Serbia in the EU. Establishment of an independent judiciary in the Republic of Serbia is set as a priority in the reform process by the European Commission and the Council of Europe. Since the reform of the judiciary system is a priority in the process of Serbian attempts to join the EU, it is necessary to establish independent, competent and efficient judiciary capable of enforcing laws by European standards. For that reason, the Ministry of Justice has proposed the National Judiciary Reform Strategy, which was adopted by the National Assembly on May 25th of 2006. Its basic objective is to restore public trust in the judicial system of the Republic of Serbia by establishing the rule of law and legal certainty. The judicial independence becomes one of the necessary conditions for the improvement of regional cooperation and inclusion of Serbia into European integrations. It is a priority of the reform financed by the EU through European Agency for Reconstruction, and is undertaken by the Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly. When discussing the Republic of Serbia, we should not forget that in the last half century, the judiciary in Serbia was in the unity government. It is then the separate state functions, not a separate government, which is independent of the legislative and executive authorities. The principle of separation of powers is a prerequisite for the independence of the judiciary. However, he only proclaimed the Constitution of Serbia in 1990, and the Constitution of Yugoslavia in 1992. After half a century long experience of the unity government, the independence of the judiciary remained only at the level of constitutional proclamation. Therefore, it is necessary for a comprehensive reform of the judiciary with the goal of establishing high-quality, independent and effective judiciary that will guarantee the rule of law. 3. Reform of the judiciary - a necessary condition for the inclusion of Serbia into the European Integration Reform of the judiciary in Serbia is the central point in the process of joining the European Union. The reason for this is an imperative to ensure that laws governing the area of the judiciary are compliant with standards and practices the Council of Europe. Since the reform of the Serbian judiciary a priority in the process of Serbia joining the 268
- Page 227 and 228: PART IV: INTRODUCTION The manufactu
- Page 229 and 230: PART IV: 12 Figure 2: Main developm
- Page 231 and 232: PART IV: Firms’ characteristics F
- Page 233 and 234: PART IV: 3.2. Measurement and data
- Page 235 and 236: PART IV: high and high technologica
- Page 237 and 238: PART IV: study. Firstly, companies
- Page 239 and 240: PART IV: and Consumption Studies, U
- Page 241 and 242: PART IV: medium-sized enterprises,
- Page 243 and 244: PART IV: Balkan transition economie
- Page 245 and 246: PART IV: evidence that human capita
- Page 247 and 248: PART IV: of involving Serbia in a u
- Page 249 and 250: PART IV: REFERENCES Arandarenko, M.
- Page 252 and 253: CEFTA-2006 AND ANHANCING COMPETITIV
- Page 254 and 255: CEFTA-2006 AND ANHANCING COMPETITIV
- Page 256 and 257: CEFTA-2006 AND ANHANCING COMPETITIV
- Page 258 and 259: CEFTA-2006 AND ANHANCING COMPETITIV
- Page 260: CEFTA-2006 AND ANHANCING COMPETITIV
- Page 263 and 264: PART IV: INTRODUCTION Air transport
- Page 265 and 266: PART IV: 2. Air transport market Ge
- Page 267 and 268: PART IV: Finally, it is necessary t
- Page 269 and 270: PART IV: Figure 2: PSO routes conne
- Page 271 and 272: PART IV: 2012), and 9% lower in the
- Page 273 and 274: PART IV: b) Second phase from 2011
- Page 275 and 276: PART IV: IATA Passenger Forecast (2
- Page 277: PART IV: determined by legal rules
- Page 281 and 282: PART IV: 4. The rule of law and ind
- Page 283 and 284: PART IV: the establishment of the r
- Page 285 and 286: PART IV: REFERENCES Barro, R. (1991
- Page 287 and 288: PART V: the association process ear
- Page 289 and 290: PART V: Figure 3: EU FDI outward fl
- Page 291 and 292: PART V: (macroeconomic stability an
- Page 293 and 294: PART V: FDIPC- logarithm value of t
- Page 295 and 296: PART V: DIST shows that if the dist
- Page 297 and 298: PART V: University Press. Deichmann
- Page 299 and 300: PART V: developing countries, where
- Page 301 and 302: PART V: Figure 2: FDI inflow distri
- Page 303 and 304: PART V: The economic literature usu
- Page 305 and 306: PART V: The regression equation, wi
- Page 307 and 308: PART V: Table 1. Determinants of FD
- Page 309 and 310: PART V: The key determinants that w
- Page 311 and 312: PART V: REFERENCES Liebscher, K. (2
- Page 313 and 314: PART V: INTRODUCTION In the conditi
- Page 315 and 316: PART V: from government regarding a
- Page 317 and 318: PART V: 306 3.1. Comparative analys
- Page 319 and 320: PART V: are sufficiently developed.
- Page 321 and 322: PART V: monopolistic companies is e
- Page 323 and 324: PART V: Savić Lj., (2008.), Inostr
- Page 325 and 326: PART V: abandoned CEFTA membership)
- Page 327 and 328: PART V: Figure 1: FDI in selected c
PART IV:<br />
Congress in 1985. As a consequence of the adoption of the Basic Principles by the UN<br />
General Assembly, each member state is expected to guarantee the independence of its<br />
judiciary in its constitution or the laws of the country.<br />
Independence of the judiciary is the value that is affirmed by both United Nations and the<br />
European Union. Namely, it is the subject of the European Convention for the Protection<br />
of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as well as specific recommendations on the<br />
independence, efficiency and role of judges made by the Committee of Ministers of the<br />
Council of Europe (R-94/12).<br />
Independent judiciary and the separation of powers assume the central position in<br />
the intensified process of regional cooperation and the integration of Serbia in the EU.<br />
Establishment of an independent judiciary in the Republic of Serbia is set as a priority in<br />
the reform process by the European Commission and the Council of Europe. Since the<br />
reform of the judiciary system is a priority in the process of Serbian attempts to join the<br />
EU, it is necessary to establish independent, competent and efficient judiciary capable of<br />
enforcing laws by European standards. For that reason, the Ministry of Justice has proposed<br />
the National Judiciary Reform Strategy, which was adopted by the National Assembly on<br />
May 25th of 2006. Its basic objective is to restore public trust in the judicial system of the<br />
Republic of Serbia by establishing the rule of law and legal certainty.<br />
The judicial independence becomes one of the necessary conditions for the improvement<br />
of regional cooperation and inclusion of Serbia into European integrations. It is a priority<br />
of the reform financed by the EU through European Agency for Reconstruction, and is<br />
undertaken by the Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly.<br />
When discussing the Republic of Serbia, we should not forget that in the last half century, the<br />
judiciary in Serbia was in the unity government. It is then the separate state functions, not a<br />
separate government, which is independent of the legislative and executive authorities. The<br />
principle of separation of powers is a prerequisite for the independence of the judiciary.<br />
However, he only proclaimed the Constitution of Serbia in 1990, and the Constitution of<br />
Yugoslavia in 1992. After half a century long experience of the unity government, the<br />
independence of the judiciary remained only at the level of constitutional proclamation.<br />
Therefore, it is necessary for a comprehensive reform of the judiciary with the goal of<br />
establishing high-quality, independent and effective judiciary that will guarantee the rule<br />
of law.<br />
3. Reform of the judiciary - a necessary condition for the inclusion of Serbia into the<br />
European Integration<br />
Reform of the judiciary in Serbia is the central point in the process of joining the European<br />
Union. The reason for this is an imperative to ensure that laws governing the area of the<br />
judiciary are compliant with standards and practices the Council of Europe.<br />
Since the reform of the Serbian judiciary a priority in the process of Serbia joining the<br />
268