24.12.2014 Views

PhD Arthur Decae 2010 - Ghent Ecology - Universiteit Gent

PhD Arthur Decae 2010 - Ghent Ecology - Universiteit Gent

PhD Arthur Decae 2010 - Ghent Ecology - Universiteit Gent

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

genera are classified in the subfamily Nemesiinae (Raven 1985) and they represent the<br />

western most taxa of a more or less continuous Palaearctic longitudinal distribution range<br />

running from the Pacific in the East to the Atlantic in the West (see Chapter 5). They are<br />

absent from the northern permafrost affected regions of Eurasia indicating a low dispersal<br />

capacity when compared with Atypus. The Mediterranean diversity at the genus level is fully<br />

restricted to regions that originated in the Neoeuropean Archipelago (Figs. 2-5) and only the<br />

genus Nemesia has one species (N. cellicola Audouin 1826) on the African continental plate.<br />

The general Palaearctic longitudinal diversity pattern of Nemesiinae is continued within the<br />

Mediterranean Region with Raveniola in eastern Anatolia (Fig. 2), Brachythele in<br />

southeastern Europe (Fig. 3) and Iberesia in the western, Atlantic regions (Fig. 4). Only<br />

Nemesia has a much broader Mediterranean distribution running from the Atlantic coast to the<br />

eastern Mediterranean. Nemesia has a very different pattern of diversity in the western and<br />

eastern parts of its distribution range that reflects palaeogeographic configurations in its<br />

present distribution rather than the present geography (Chapter 5). A strong positive effect on<br />

building Nemesia diversity should therefore be attributed to situations of geographical<br />

fragmentation and isolation during the millions of years of existence of the Neoeuropean<br />

Archipelago. The idea that Nemesiidae in Europe have been repeatedly ‘pushed back’ into<br />

small fragmented and isolated refuge populations in a series of Pleistocene glaciations, and<br />

that these ongoing cycles of fragmentation and isolation have lasted sufficiently long for<br />

further diversification and speciation cannot be ruled out however. Thorough species level<br />

revision of all nemesiid genera is needed to clarify these propositions.<br />

Cyrtauchenius<br />

Raven 1985 grouped the genera Cyrtauchenius and Homostola in an all African subfamily<br />

Cyrtaucheniinae, with a disjunct distribution to the North and South of the tropics (Fig. 6<br />

inset). Tropical African cyrtaucheniids are placed in another subfamily, Aporoptychinae,<br />

together with the Australian and American taxa. The Asian genus Anemesia (WSC Platnick<br />

<strong>2010</strong>) is probably wrongly placed in the Cyrtaucheniidae and should be moved to Nemesiidae<br />

(probably genus Raveniola). The grouping with Homostola of Cyrtauchenius suggests an<br />

African origin of the Mediterranean cyrtaucheniids. From biogeography this seems difficult to<br />

explain and from this perspective the Cyrtaucheniinae are expected to be paraphyletic. On the<br />

other hand however the Mediterranean cyrtaucheniids have clearly southern affinities,<br />

although the comparatively high species diversity seems to be related to a long history of<br />

fragmentation and isolation of populations in the western Neoeuropean Archipelago. A<br />

problem with the interpretation of the currently known distribution of Cyrtaucheniinae is the<br />

complete absence of information from sub-Saharan North Africa and from southwestern<br />

Africa. Information on the mygalomorph fauna of the Sahel region is expected to aid<br />

importantly to the information presented here.<br />

Ummidia<br />

The Mediterranean Ummidia population is revised in Chapter 6. It was found to contain at<br />

least four species all distributed in the Iberian-Maghreb region (Fig. 7). Traditionally<br />

Ummidia is grouped with Conothele in the subfamily Ummidiinae (formerly Pachylomerinae)<br />

with a remarkably wide distribution in the Northern Hemisphere and the Indo-Australian<br />

Region. In the revision presented in Chapter 6 Ummidia and Conothele are placed in<br />

synonymy in which the name Ummidia has priority. Ummidia therefore has an almost<br />

worldwide distribution, mainly although not entirely north of the equator. The East Asian<br />

genus Latouchia probably is the closest living relation of Ummidia (personal observation).<br />

The Mediterranean Ummidia population appears to be a remnant of a much wider European<br />

distribution as is evidenced by the finding of fossil Ummidia specimens in Baltic amber

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!