21.12.2014 Views

o_199m9vaui14ib1cnu10di10pocoj4h.pdf

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

50 THE NAVAL MUTINIES OF 1797<br />

(u May) reported that " some persons from London had<br />

been distributing handbills through the fleet, inflaming<br />

the minds of the seamen, and saying their Bill had been<br />

thrown out of the House of Lords." In the True Briton<br />

(9 May) it was said: "We yesterday learnt that the<br />

present ferment in the fleet arose from a gross misrepresentation<br />

of what passed a few days ago in Parliament,<br />

upon the subject of the late complaints of the seamen<br />

conveyed through the medium of a Jacobin Evening<br />

Newspaper, which got on board the fleet." Perhaps the<br />

"Jacobin Evening Newspaper" was the London Courier,<br />

which was mentioned by a Secret Committee of the<br />

House of Commons as having helped to foment the<br />

mutiny. 1<br />

Some further evidence of the work of incendiaries in<br />

the Channel fleet will be discussed in a later chapter,<br />

dealing with the political aspect of the mutinies. We<br />

may notice here one incident which shows how the<br />

mischievous documents were circulated among the ships<br />

at St. Helens. On 5 or 6 May a boat from the Mars<br />

came alongside the Queen Charlotte. The men in the<br />

boat threw in a bundle of newspapers through a lowerdeck<br />

port-hole, and shouted that Parliament was going<br />

to refuse the promised redress. 2<br />

The false news was firmly believed. Those men in<br />

the fleet who for political reasons, or from sheer love of<br />

disorder, preferred mutiny to obedience—and perhaps<br />

others who honestly feared that "the seaman's cause"<br />

1. House of Commons Iteports, vol. x, p. 790. Some of the mutineers<br />

at the Nore wrote that the Star was the only newspaper which remained<br />

friendly to the seamen (A.S.M. 137, Papers of the Inflexible, No. 50).<br />

But there is very little in the Star itself to support this opinion. In<br />

common with nearly all the contemporary press it favoured the demands<br />

of the seamen at Spithead, but deplored the method of advancing them,<br />

and it consistently opposed the Nore Mutiny. On 29 May it spoke<br />

favourably of the conduct of the delegates, and this observation probably<br />

gave the mutineers the impression that the Star was their friend.<br />

As a matter of fact the Morning Chronicle was much better disposed<br />

towards them.<br />

2. Papers of the Queen Charlotte, 6 May (A.S.I. 5125). This event<br />

probably happened on 5 May, as the dates given in these Papers are<br />

often one day in advance of the fact.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!