21.12.2014 Views

o_199m9vaui14ib1cnu10di10pocoj4h.pdf

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

22 THE NAVAL MUTINIES OF 1797<br />

when scarcely half the petitions were finished, and before<br />

the plans of the seamen were properly arranged.<br />

The men from the Queen Charlotte and the Royal<br />

George, in their tour round the fleet, boarded each ship<br />

and addressed the crew. They had very wisely decided<br />

that the officers should still be allowed to command the<br />

ships, and that their orders should be obeyed as usual,<br />

except in the matter of putting to sea. Each ship's<br />

company was instructed to choose two x men to represent<br />

the ship on a central committee, and to send these men<br />

in the evening to the Queen Charlotte. For the present<br />

the whole fleet was to remain passive, waiting until the<br />

petitions were answered by the Admiralty. When the<br />

boats came to the London, Admiral Colpoys, who was<br />

in command of the ship, refused to let the men come on<br />

board, and called out the marines. There might have<br />

been a struggle, but the danger was averted by a message<br />

from Bridport, that Colpoys should not resist the intruders.<br />

They mounted the quarter-deck, and addressed<br />

the crew in moderate terms. Then they withdrew to the<br />

forecastle where (according to Colpoys's nephew, who<br />

was captain of the London) "it is reasonable to suppose<br />

a very different language was held." It is very probable<br />

that the language held in the forecastle was only to<br />

the effect that delegates should be chosen. Possibly,<br />

also, the crew were asked whether they had any particular<br />

grievances of their own.<br />

1. It is an indication of Neale's inaccuracy that he was not sure<br />

whether two or four delegates were sent from each ship. Towards the<br />

end of the second mutiny at Spithead, Bridport and Captain Bedford<br />

received letters from trie Royal Sovereign asking them to persuade<br />

Gardner to return to the ship (J 293). The letters were signed by the<br />

" Committee of the Royal Sovereign " : in two cases there were nine<br />

names, in the third there were eleven. It appears, therefore, that this<br />

ship had a committee of its own, distinct from the central committee of<br />

delegates, and presumably there were similar committees on the other<br />

ships. But these committees, in all probability, were only appointed in<br />

the second mutiny, when a large number of officers were sent ashore.<br />

During the first mutiny the officers were still in command, and there<br />

could be very little use for committees on the separate ships. At the<br />

Nore the officers were deprived of their authority, and each ship was<br />

controlled by a committee, with a president who acted as the captain.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!