21.12.2014 Views

o_199m9vaui14ib1cnu10di10pocoj4h.pdf

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

LIST OF AUTHORITIES 395<br />

the Admirals' letters. The Board's Minutes, A.S.M. 118, are<br />

much more formal, and contain very few allusions to the<br />

Mutinies.<br />

The Bridport Papers, British Museum, Addl. MSS. 35,i97><br />

are a useful supplement to Bridport's official dispatches.<br />

PRINTED BOOKS :—<br />

Neale, W. J., History of the Mutiny at Spithead and the Nore<br />

(1842). Neale is the author of " Paul Periwinkle " and other<br />

nautical novels. His account of the Mutinies has very little<br />

historical value : it resolves itself into an attack on Pitt and<br />

his colleagues, and it is very inaccurate in detail. Neale seems<br />

to have drawn his information from Schomberg or Brenton and<br />

newspapers of 1797, but he introduces mistakes which are not<br />

found elsewhere.<br />

Cunningham, Rear-Admiral Charles, A Narrative of the<br />

Occurrences that took place during the Mutiny at the Nore<br />

(1829). A reliable account (with the exception of one or two<br />

slight mistakes in chronology) written by an observant and<br />

fair-minded eye-witness. The book was written thirty-two years<br />

after the Mutiny, but it was evidently worked up from a diary<br />

made at the time of the rising. There is an excellent portrait<br />

of Cunningham as a frontispiece.<br />

Colpoys, Rear-Admiral E. G. (formerly Captain E. Griffiths,<br />

of the London), Letter to Vice-Admiral Sir Thomas Byam Martin<br />

(1825). A pamphlet containing an account of the author's<br />

uncle, vSir John Colpoys, written to correct Brenton 's description<br />

of the mutiny on the London.<br />

Short Accounts of the Mutinies :<br />

Annual Register, vol. 39, chap. xii.<br />

Schomberg, Naval Chronology (1802), vol. iii, p. 8-38. A<br />

contemporary account, correct in the main outlines, but—in<br />

spite of the title—with some confusion in dates.<br />

James, Naval History (1822-4), vol. ii, pp. 22-27, 62-66. A<br />

very short description, with only one or two minor inaccuracies.<br />

James gives a very good sketch of the characteristic quota-man.<br />

Brenton, Naval History of Great Britain (1837), vol. i, chap. xv.<br />

Brenton follows Schomberg's account and adds a good deal of<br />

true and false information of his own. His pages on the Spithead<br />

Mutinies should be read in conjunction with Colpoys 's<br />

Letter to Sir T. B. Martin. For the mutiny in the North Sea

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!