21.12.2014 Views

o_199m9vaui14ib1cnu10di10pocoj4h.pdf

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

346 THE NAVAL MUTINIES OF 1797<br />

and march across to the Clyde, in order to effect a<br />

junction with the insurgent army in Ireland. All the<br />

revolutionaries looked with hope to the French fleet in<br />

the harbour of Brest—the fleet that with fair weather and<br />

support from the inhabitants should achieve the liberation<br />

of Ireland, and perhaps might work a change in the<br />

government of Great Britain as well. These plans were<br />

all considered, but none of them was perfected. There<br />

was little co-operation among the different groups of<br />

conspirators. It was particularly difficult to bring about<br />

a joint action with the French and the Dutch, on whom<br />

the success of the whole movement depended. Rumours<br />

of intended invasions were continually issuing and failing,<br />

but no one, even in France, could tell how soon the<br />

fleets would be ready.<br />

After the Nore mutiny, Graham, the magistrate who<br />

had explored the causes of the rising at Spithead, together<br />

with Williams, who had helped him to collect evidence<br />

against the ringleaders at the Nore, sent to the Home<br />

Office a report on the connexion of the political societies<br />

with the mutineers. 1 Their chief conclusion was that<br />

there was no connexion. They admitted that mischievous<br />

and designing persons had mixed with the seamen and<br />

had encouraged them to prolong the Mutinies. But they<br />

denied that these persons were agents of the secret<br />

societies, and did not consider that they had the least<br />

influence with the mutineers. They believed rightly that<br />

there were men serving in the fleet who were capable of<br />

organizing and carrying out the mutiny without any help<br />

from people on shore. But they were certainly mistaken<br />

in their opinion that the conduct of the mutineers had<br />

been from the beginning "of a wild and extravagant<br />

nature, not reducible to anv sort of form or order."<br />

We<br />

1. The report was discovered by Dr. J. Holland Rose, and published<br />

by him in William Pitt and the Great War (pp. 316-317). The original<br />

is in the Home Office records, George III (Domestic), 41. In the same<br />

bundle there is much interesting intelligence of seditious practices on<br />

shore, — particularly a number of letters about a group of people who<br />

seemed to be spying out the south-west of England to prepare for a<br />

French invasion—but unfortunately nothing which throws fresh light<br />

on this obscure side of the Mutinies.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!