21.12.2014 Views

o_199m9vaui14ib1cnu10di10pocoj4h.pdf

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

i<br />

334 THE NAVAL MUTINIES OF 1797<br />

warning to Admiral King that Connolly was " a very<br />

dangerous person," and H was intended to be sent by<br />

the United Irishmen of Dublin to stir up sedition in the<br />

fleet." And he added that Connolly was a poet and had<br />

composed several seditious songs about the Mutinies.<br />

But these events came after the first outbreak in 1796.<br />

The question remains whether the same plan had been<br />

adopted before any actual mutiny had occurred. Wolfe<br />

Tone's letter is not conclusive in itself, because it is<br />

not dated. The doubt is resolved, however, by evidence<br />

from another source. In a letter written by Cooke, the<br />

Under-Secretary at Dublin Castle, in June 1797, it<br />

is said<br />

that more than a year before that time the United Irishmen<br />

in Ulster had openly discussed the chance of a<br />

mutiny in the fleet. 2 This important letter tends to<br />

confirm the date that has been assigned to Tone's address,<br />

and it leaves no room for doubt that the United Irishmen<br />

helped in some measure to bring about the Mutinies, that<br />

long before there was any sign of disorder in the fleet it<br />

had been a part of their policy to seduce the seamen<br />

.from their allegiance.<br />

In all probability the extent of their influence in the<br />

fleet will never be known. It would be easy to refer to<br />

them the whole responsibility for the outbreak; to imagine<br />

that they had planned a general mutiny in the home<br />

fleets in order to clear the seas for the invasions from<br />

France and Holland.<br />

But there are general indications that they had no such<br />

complete plan of campaign before the Mutinies. Even<br />

in 1798 there was no proper co-operation between the<br />

1. Captain Lambert Brabazon to Sir Richard King, 2 June. With<br />

King's dispatch B 456, A.S.I. 312.<br />

2. Cooke to Greville, 21 June (A.S.I. 4172). I have not been able to<br />

find the letter to which he alludes, written by him in the previous year<br />

and containing the rumour of an intention to mutiny. It was probably<br />

a private letter which was not sent to the Admiralty. Cooke was<br />

transferred from the Irish War Office at the beginning of 1795. See an<br />

interesting letter to Buckingham, in which Cooke says :<br />

" It was through<br />

your Lordship's kind and affectionate partiality that I was placed in the<br />

War Office." Buckingham Memoirs, vol. ii, p. 329.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!