21.12.2014 Views

o_199m9vaui14ib1cnu10di10pocoj4h.pdf

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

;<br />

DEMAND FOR A BOARD IN SHEERNESS 147<br />

said that Parker behaved in a most insolent manner, and<br />

assured Buckner that he was not to be intimidated. 1<br />

The mutineers were much irritated by the flat refusal<br />

of the Admiralty to comply with any of their demands.<br />

The natural disposition of the ringleaders, encouraged<br />

by the early success of their enterprise, and stimulated,<br />

perhaps, by the infiltration of revolutionary ideas, had<br />

aroused in<br />

the seamen an inflated estimate of their own<br />

importance. They believed that they would become so<br />

formidable that the Admiralty must of necessity show<br />

them as much consideration as had been shown to the<br />

seamen at Spithead. They did not like to deal with<br />

Buckner alone; they would not accept a pardon from<br />

2<br />

him ;<br />

and they clamoured for a deputation from the<br />

Admiralty. On 22 May Parker had written in a letter to<br />

Buckner :<br />

The Lords of the Admiralty have been remiss in their duty<br />

in not attending when their appearance would have given<br />

satisfaction.<br />

And he added that no accommodation could take place<br />

until their arrival. 3 The Lords of the Admiralty,<br />

however, had given an answer which was intended to be<br />

final, and they saw no use in going to Sheerness to enter<br />

into a discussion with the seamen when they had nothing<br />

1. Evidence of Buckner and Captain Dixon at Parker's trial<br />

Cunningham, pp. 21, 22. Both Buckner and Dixon said that the<br />

incident happened on 23 May. Cunninghkim (p. 23) assigns it to the<br />

twenty-first. He suggests that the success of the mutineers on this<br />

occasion may have encouraged them to publish their list of demands.<br />

This is careless on his part, for even according to his own showing the<br />

demands had already been sent in. He must have written his account<br />

of this part of the mutiny from a confused recollection, without<br />

checking the dates. Cunningham was present at the interview, and he<br />

says that Parker's insolence made him so angry that he would have<br />

killed the mutineer if Captain Blackwood, of the Brilliant, had not<br />

intervened. Buckner said in his evidence that Parker was accompanied<br />

by Davis, the mutineer who acted as captain of the Sandwich, and<br />

three or four others.<br />

2. Buckner to Nepean, 24 May (A.S.I. 727, C 336) :<br />

" All are<br />

clamorous to have the pardon notified to them in a more solemn manner<br />

than they conceive the notification of it by me would impress it with<br />

(at least, I am inclined to think that is their idea)."<br />

3. Papers of the Repulse, no. 5.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!