21.12.2014 Views

o_199m9vaui14ib1cnu10di10pocoj4h.pdf

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A DELEGATE IN LONDON 113<br />

the Admiral." He said that he was on his way to<br />

Portsmouth—he was travelling in a post-chaise—and that<br />

he had power to draw money wherever he pleased. 1<br />

Perhaps this mutineer was the man who was arrested<br />

in Exeter, nearly a fortnight later, as a deserter from a<br />

ship in Plymouth. The deserter, Thomas Williams, was<br />

heard to say in a public house in Exeter that he was a<br />

delegate from Sheerness ;<br />

that he had done his business<br />

in Plymouth, and was returning to the Nore. He said<br />

that he could draw money in any town, and to any<br />

amount—a boast which is curiously like that of the<br />

mutineer in Leman Street,—and added "that the sailors<br />

had long been put upon, but now they would get their<br />

rights." When he was arrested, Williams denied that<br />

he was a sailor, but a seaman's outfit was found in his<br />

baggage, and he was soon identified as a quota-man who<br />

had recently joined the Braakel at Plymouth, had<br />

received his bounty money on 6 June, and had almost<br />

immediately deserted. It appeared that Williams made<br />

a regular practice of volunteering and deserting, for he<br />

confessed to having had more than ^200 in bounties<br />

during the war. 2<br />

Whether the sailor in Leman Street was really Thomas<br />

Williams or another, his behaviour was characteristic of<br />

the mutineers. Their aggressive conduct and their<br />

truculent speech were natural to a body of ill-educated<br />

men used to poverty and oppressive discipline, who<br />

suddenly found themselves in a position of power, free<br />

from the law itself. And to some extent their confidence<br />

was justified by the friendly attitude of the public on<br />

shore, who connected this mutiny with the risings at<br />

1. Evidence of John and Sarah Carter (Solicitor's letters, A.S.I.<br />

3685). This conversation took place on Saturday 27 May. In the<br />

evidence the date is wrongly given as the 26th.<br />

2. The Mayor of Exeter to Admiral King, 9 June (A.S.I. 812, B 464).<br />

Williams was tried, and punished with a severe flogging. His statement<br />

in regard to bounties is not impossible, for the recruiting officers found<br />

such difficulty in supplying the fleet with men that they made little<br />

inquiry into the life histories of the volunteers.<br />

I

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!