Fusió Freda, Tesla, Onda Scalar, Camp de Torsió, «Energia Lliure» = Tota les Ciència Escombraries?(Resum català) / Cold Fusion, Tesla, "Free Energy".. = All Junk Science?
(Resum català) El nou paradigma en la tecnologia de l'energia amb un impacte geo - socioeconòmica / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact (Resum català) El nou paradigma en la tecnologia de l'energia amb un impacte geo - socioeconòmica / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact
Impact 11: Manmade CO2 Global Warming Denial • ->>cont 10 Crisis Idea: eg2■ Man's CO2 only catastrophic warming idea ignores: • o-ElectroMagnetic Elements/Space Weather/Earth Geomagnetic activity as at least a key element(if not super dominant) in earth climate effects: This is common sense in some focused specific segments within Astrophysics & Atmospheric Physics(Gil Harrison+). Air born molecular ions & charged aerosol particle might have significant influences on weather & is created by (A)-Natural earth radioactivity-EM radiation (B)-Earth’s charge gap between its surface & ionosphere, (C)-Cosmic ray ionization(Gil Harrison, Carslaw+). Some examples: i-ii • i-Large scale examples are: Coronal Mass Ejections, Cosmic Ray, and other Sun’s electron related activities causing Storm-Enhanced Density /Geomagnetic Storm(this part is fully mainstream accepted). ii- In turn strongly affects smaller scale examples: Ion induced nucleation(F Yu+), ElectroFreezing/ElectroScavenging /Workman-Reynolds & ThermoDielectric effects(media type mainstream claims this is "interesting" with little practical importance, or selectively link certain phenomena to debunk). Also see elements in “a” & “b” in prior pages that are rarely discussed openly. Some signs of those topics intentionally disjointed from earth climate science in West - e.g: CERN Cloud Experiment is marketed by mainstream as isolated event & spun as “it proves nothing”. 397
Disclosure Impact - Review of Dubious Claims? 12: Denial of Catastrophic Global Warming By Manmade CO2 • ->>cont 10 Crisis Idea: eg2■ Man's CO2 only catastrophic warming idea ignores: • p-Other man/noman made element might have far more impact, etc : Hence this phenomena is not even Western science consensus, only main media/gov’t(except US since 2017 in west, but many non western nations actually passively not agreeing) /NGO/IPCC consensus(Lafrembois, Bo Carter, Moncton, J Lovelock, JL Ward+), which is opposite of media claims(science consensus but still media level debate exists): • i-IPCC founding charter itself says "Purpose is to show human is changing climate"(Maurice Strong), ii-Many scientists are forced into or tricked into signing(K-E Puls, Iv Giaever, Jud Curry+), iii-”Mistakenly" counted as supporting IPCC(Wil Soon, Al Carlin+), iv-Needs lawsuit to remove name from support(P Reiter+), v-Hurts career to disagree with media/NGO's view regardless of actual scientific consensus(Dav Bellamy, Phi Verdier+), vi-Education content altered to make sense of increasingly contradictory theory(Joh Ball+). • From pure data tracking/academic only point of view as of 2016 from 1990s when "crisis prediction" science-policy was formulated is still being adhered as correct can be safely stated either some kind of large well coordinated corruption, hoax, fraud, or beyond normal collective incompetency(Wil Happer, Dav Evans+), i.e. ignore data altering to keep funding/job security/public reputation etc is much more "practical way to do science" than sticking to pure science, 398
- Page 347 and 348: Inventor - ZPE Type Tech Has More I
- Page 349 and 350: Inventor - ZPE Type Tech Has More I
- Page 351 and 352: ZPE-Resonance TYPE Tech Has More Im
- Page 353 and 354: ZPE-Resonance TYPE Tech Has More Im
- Page 355 and 356: ZPE-Resonance Has More Impact Med 4
- Page 357 and 358: ZPE-Resonance Has More Impact - Med
- Page 359 and 360: ZPE-Resonance TYPE Tech Impact: Med
- Page 361 and 362: ZPE-Resonance Has More Impact Med 1
- Page 363 and 364: ZPE-Resonance Has More Impact Med 1
- Page 365 and 366: ZPE-Resonance Med 14 Different freq
- Page 367 and 368: ZPE-Resonance TYPE Tech Med 16: Rif
- Page 369 and 370: ZPE-Resonance 18: Low Temp/Pressure
- Page 371 and 372: ZPE-Resonance 20: Phrase-Catalyst M
- Page 373 and 374: ZPE-Resonance Impact 22: Low Electr
- Page 375 and 376: ZPE-Resonance TYPE Tech Has More Im
- Page 377 and 378: ZPE/Resonance Impact 26: Official G
- Page 379 and 380: Resonance Impact 28: GravityTech =
- Page 381 and 382: Resonance Impact 30: Low Temp Trans
- Page 383 and 384: ZPE-Resonance Impact 32: Abio7c Oil
- Page 385 and 386: Resonance Impact 34: Abio3c Oil Com
- Page 387 and 388: Resonance Impact 36: Abio3c Oil Pro
- Page 389 and 390: ZPE-Resonance Disclosure Impact - T
- Page 391 and 392: ZPE-Resonance Disclosure Impact - R
- Page 393 and 394: Disclosure Impact - Review of Other
- Page 395 and 396: Impact 8: Manmade CO2 Global Warmin
- Page 397: Impact 10: Manmade CO2 Global Warmi
- Page 401 and 402: Disclosure Impact - Review of Dubio
- Page 403 and 404: ZPE-Resonance Disclosure Impact - R
- Page 405 and 406: ZPE-Resonance Disclosure Impact - R
- Page 407 and 408: ZeroPoint-Resonance Type Impact- Ra
- Page 409 and 410: Outrageous claims : Energy-Tech Lob
- Page 411 and 412: Outrageous claims : Energy-Tech Lob
- Page 413 and 414: Outrageous claims on Tech Influence
- Page 415 and 416: Outrageous claims on Tech Influence
- Page 417 and 418: Outrageous claims on Tech Influence
- Page 419 and 420: Outrageous claims on Tech Influence
- Page 421 and 422: Outrageous claims on Energy & Gener
- Page 423 and 424: Outrageous claims on Energy Tech In
- Page 425 and 426: Outrageous claims on Tech Influence
- Page 427 and 428: Outrageous claims on Tech Influence
- Page 429 and 430: Outrageous claims on Tech Influence
- Page 431 and 432: Outrageous claims : ZPE-Resonance T
- Page 433 and 434: Outrageous claims : ZPE-Resonance T
- Page 435 and 436: Outrageous claims : ZPE-Resonance T
- Page 437 and 438: Outrageous Claims : ZPE-Resonance T
- Page 439 and 440: Outrageous Claims : ZPE-Resonance T
- Page 441 and 442: ZPE-Resonance Type Scalar 11 Closed
- Page 443 and 444: ZPE-Resonance Type Scalar 13 Closed
- Page 445 and 446: ZPE-Resonance Type Electrical Scala
- Page 447 and 448: Outrageous Claims : ZPE Scalar 17 T
Disclosure Impact - Review of Dubious Claims? 12:<br />
Denial of Catastrophic Global Warming By Manma<strong>de</strong> CO2<br />
• ->>cont 10 Crisis I<strong>de</strong>a: eg2■ Man's CO2 only catastrophic warming i<strong>de</strong>a ignores:<br />
• p-Other man/noman ma<strong>de</strong> element might have far more impact, etc : Hence this<br />
phenomena is not even Western science consensus, only main media/gov’t(except<br />
US since 2017 in west, but many non western nations actually passively not agreeing)<br />
/NGO/IPCC consensus(Lafrembois, Bo Carter, Moncton, J Lovelock, JL Ward+), which is<br />
opposite of media claims(science consensus but still media level <strong>de</strong>bate exists):<br />
• i-IPCC founding charter itself says "Purpose is to show human is changing<br />
climate"(Maurice Strong), ii-Many scientists are forced into or tricked into<br />
signing(K-E Puls, Iv Giaever, Jud Curry+), iii-”Mistakenly" counted as supporting<br />
IPCC(Wil Soon, Al Carlin+), iv-Needs lawsuit to remove name from support(P<br />
Reiter+), v-Hurts career to disagree with media/NGO's view regard<strong>les</strong>s of actual<br />
scientific consensus(Dav Bellamy, Phi Verdier+), vi-Education content altered to<br />
make sense of increasingly contradictory theory(Joh Ball+).<br />
• From pure data tracking/aca<strong>de</strong>mic only point of view as of 2016 from 1990s when<br />
"crisis prediction" science-policy was formulated is still being adhered as correct can<br />
be safely stated either some kind of large well coordinated corruption, hoax, fraud, or<br />
beyond normal collective incompetency(Wil Happer, Dav Evans+), i.e. ignore data<br />
altering to keep funding/job security/public reputation etc is much more "practical<br />
way to do science" than sticking to pure science,<br />
398