Fusió Freda, Tesla, Onda Scalar, Camp de Torsió, «Energia Lliure» = Tota les Ciència Escombraries?(Resum català) / Cold Fusion, Tesla, "Free Energy".. = All Junk Science?

(Resum català) El nou paradigma en la tecnologia de l'energia amb un impacte geo - socioeconòmica / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact (Resum català) El nou paradigma en la tecnologia de l'energia amb un impacte geo - socioeconòmica / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact

NewNatureParadigm
from NewNatureParadigm More from this publisher
17.12.2014 Views

Impact 11: Manmade CO2 Global Warming Denial • ->>cont 10 Crisis Idea: eg2■ Man's CO2 only catastrophic warming idea ignores: • o-ElectroMagnetic Elements/Space Weather/Earth Geomagnetic activity as at least a key element(if not super dominant) in earth climate effects: This is common sense in some focused specific segments within Astrophysics & Atmospheric Physics(Gil Harrison+). Air born molecular ions & charged aerosol particle might have significant influences on weather & is created by (A)-Natural earth radioactivity-EM radiation (B)-Earth’s charge gap between its surface & ionosphere, (C)-Cosmic ray ionization(Gil Harrison, Carslaw+). Some examples: i-ii • i-Large scale examples are: Coronal Mass Ejections, Cosmic Ray, and other Sun’s electron related activities causing Storm-Enhanced Density /Geomagnetic Storm(this part is fully mainstream accepted). ii- In turn strongly affects smaller scale examples: Ion induced nucleation(F Yu+), ElectroFreezing/ElectroScavenging /Workman-Reynolds & ThermoDielectric effects(media type mainstream claims this is "interesting" with little practical importance, or selectively link certain phenomena to debunk). Also see elements in “a” & “b” in prior pages that are rarely discussed openly. Some signs of those topics intentionally disjointed from earth climate science in West - e.g: CERN Cloud Experiment is marketed by mainstream as isolated event & spun as “it proves nothing”. 397

Disclosure Impact - Review of Dubious Claims? 12: Denial of Catastrophic Global Warming By Manmade CO2 • ->>cont 10 Crisis Idea: eg2■ Man's CO2 only catastrophic warming idea ignores: • p-Other man/noman made element might have far more impact, etc : Hence this phenomena is not even Western science consensus, only main media/gov’t(except US since 2017 in west, but many non western nations actually passively not agreeing) /NGO/IPCC consensus(Lafrembois, Bo Carter, Moncton, J Lovelock, JL Ward+), which is opposite of media claims(science consensus but still media level debate exists): • i-IPCC founding charter itself says "Purpose is to show human is changing climate"(Maurice Strong), ii-Many scientists are forced into or tricked into signing(K-E Puls, Iv Giaever, Jud Curry+), iii-”Mistakenly" counted as supporting IPCC(Wil Soon, Al Carlin+), iv-Needs lawsuit to remove name from support(P Reiter+), v-Hurts career to disagree with media/NGO's view regardless of actual scientific consensus(Dav Bellamy, Phi Verdier+), vi-Education content altered to make sense of increasingly contradictory theory(Joh Ball+). • From pure data tracking/academic only point of view as of 2016 from 1990s when "crisis prediction" science-policy was formulated is still being adhered as correct can be safely stated either some kind of large well coordinated corruption, hoax, fraud, or beyond normal collective incompetency(Wil Happer, Dav Evans+), i.e. ignore data altering to keep funding/job security/public reputation etc is much more "practical way to do science" than sticking to pure science, 398

Disclosure Impact - Review of Dubious Claims? 12:<br />

Denial of Catastrophic Global Warming By Manma<strong>de</strong> CO2<br />

• ->>cont 10 Crisis I<strong>de</strong>a: eg2■ Man's CO2 only catastrophic warming i<strong>de</strong>a ignores:<br />

• p-Other man/noman ma<strong>de</strong> element might have far more impact, etc : Hence this<br />

phenomena is not even Western science consensus, only main media/gov’t(except<br />

US since 2017 in west, but many non western nations actually passively not agreeing)<br />

/NGO/IPCC consensus(Lafrembois, Bo Carter, Moncton, J Lovelock, JL Ward+), which is<br />

opposite of media claims(science consensus but still media level <strong>de</strong>bate exists):<br />

• i-IPCC founding charter itself says "Purpose is to show human is changing<br />

climate"(Maurice Strong), ii-Many scientists are forced into or tricked into<br />

signing(K-E Puls, Iv Giaever, Jud Curry+), iii-”Mistakenly" counted as supporting<br />

IPCC(Wil Soon, Al Carlin+), iv-Needs lawsuit to remove name from support(P<br />

Reiter+), v-Hurts career to disagree with media/NGO's view regard<strong>les</strong>s of actual<br />

scientific consensus(Dav Bellamy, Phi Verdier+), vi-Education content altered to<br />

make sense of increasingly contradictory theory(Joh Ball+).<br />

• From pure data tracking/aca<strong>de</strong>mic only point of view as of 2016 from 1990s when<br />

"crisis prediction" science-policy was formulated is still being adhered as correct can<br />

be safely stated either some kind of large well coordinated corruption, hoax, fraud, or<br />

beyond normal collective incompetency(Wil Happer, Dav Evans+), i.e. ignore data<br />

altering to keep funding/job security/public reputation etc is much more "practical<br />

way to do science" than sticking to pure science,<br />

398

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!