Fusió Freda, Tesla, Onda Scalar, Camp de Torsió, «Energia Lliure» = Tota les Ciència Escombraries?(Resum català) / Cold Fusion, Tesla, "Free Energy".. = All Junk Science?
Share Embed Flag
Download ePaper

Fusió Freda, Tesla, Onda Scalar, Camp de Torsió, «Energia Lliure» = Tota les Ciència Escombraries?(Resum català) / Cold Fusion, Tesla, "Free Energy".. = All Junk Science?

(Resum català) El nou paradigma en la tecnologia de l'energia amb un impacte geo - socioeconòmica / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact (Resum català) El nou paradigma en la tecnologia de l'energia amb un impacte geo - socioeconòmica / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact

NewNatureParadigm
from NewNatureParadigm More from this publisher
17.12.2014 Views

If LENR is Accepted First -1 Inventor Tech Status • Very small # but steadily growing users of inventor tech (p148-182), esp. for “part free energy” on-board HHO, emulsified water, FIR/Magnet fuel treating devices(Far exceed 0.01% market share in some nations eg China, Bulgaria+), Ion & Cavitation heater, yet other “full free energy” techs are mostly in low practicality as raw tech phase prototype: • ◙ No standardized review, No tech association, No full Western mainstream endorsed open commercialization, inventors isolated, they tend to believe to be “first” in world when numerous similar claims exist in past, mostly small power < 30KWh: Foster ground for deception, ◙ Often Sole inventor is a sales rep & tech server, might have “out of box” communication manner, business style, beliefs(S Allan) ◙ No local support due to non-“public consumer physics” nature ◙ Some of confirmed working techs are still not replicatable by 3rd party ◙ Cases of stock traded co/public institution prosecuted by use of “pseudo science” • ■ But experienced buyer concern of “science contested energy” is now similar to already commercialized “free energy techs”(p148-182), indicated in Baldface Dark Blue), • ➢Previous focus was to differentiate 1-Fraud, 2-Works occasionally, vs 3-Works Normally. ➢Current focus: to tell gap in Performance, Price & Reliability between inventions: i.e. heat & vibration durability, reliable service, operation instruction & warranty works, ➢Companies conduct low-cost unofficial pilot projects on $ back guarantee basis 343

If LENR is Accepted First -2, Inventor Tech Open Source • Would it lead to inventor tech academic review?: Inventors had long been isolated & self taught in development, but are finally star@ng to turn to informa@on exchange, open sourcing, mechanics disclosure & @ps • 1-Ambient power inducer(eg: Kapanadze, Lindemann, Aaron Murakami +) 2-Magne@c motor back EMF(Keppe, Hamel, Ainslie, Bedini, Stovbunenko+ 3-Rapid HHO-Brown-H2 gas produc@on(H-Cat, GEET, Ară Gabriel-Neculai+) 4-LENR(RWGresearch+), 5-Hydrodynamic Cavita@on(PP Fominskiy+), 6-Pyramid(Trawoeger+) ■ Web(free-energy-info, Rexresearch, Panacea-Bocaf, Peswiki, Energe@c Forum, American An@Gravity+) ■ LENR cold fusion related updates(lenr-coldfusion, cold fusion @mes +) ■ O]en fragmented, unprofessional looking/style presenta@ons • ✔ Some inventor tech seems to be backed by mid-sized corporate/3rd world gov’t, installed at pilot projects, military tests+;(e.g. Hidro?, Rosch+) ✔ LENR acceptance can cause it to surface as official produc@on of mul@ple “free energy” mechanics & it can suddenly become “norm”? • Mainstream tech: Cavita@on progress(Nanospire +)& LENR link, ICFusion experimental success 2013(more energy produced than consumed to ini@ate), new low cost Magne@zed Target Fusion(also op@on for anomalous rota@ng plasma effect genera@on). Taleyarkan's top mainstream academia suppressed, or likely na@onal security type classified(Ros Tessien: Impulse Device+) acous@c fusion is quietly carried on by other mainstream groups(Wyl Dunbar: AFTEC+) 344

If LENR is Accepted First -1 Inventor Tech Status<br />

• Very small # but steadily growing users of inventor tech (p148-182), esp. for “part free<br />

energy” on-board HHO, emulsified water, FIR/Magnet fuel treating <strong>de</strong>vices(Far<br />

exceed 0.01% market share in some nations eg China, Bulgaria+), Ion & Cavitation<br />

heater, yet other “full free energy” techs are mostly in low practicality as raw tech<br />

phase prototype:<br />

• ◙ No standardized review, No tech association, No full Western mainstream<br />

endorsed open commercialization, inventors isolated, they tend to believe to be<br />

“first” in world when numerous similar claims exist in past, mostly small power <<br />

30KWh: Foster ground for <strong>de</strong>ception, ◙ Often Sole inventor is a sa<strong>les</strong> rep & tech<br />

server, might have “out of box” communication manner, business style, beliefs(S<br />

<strong>All</strong>an) ◙ No local support due to non-“public consumer physics” nature ◙ Some of<br />

confirmed working techs are still not replicatable by 3rd party ◙ Cases of stock tra<strong>de</strong>d<br />

co/public institution prosecuted by use of “pseudo science”<br />

• ■ But experienced buyer concern of “science contested energy” is now similar to<br />

already commercialized “free energy techs”(p148-182), indicated in Baldface Dark<br />

Blue),<br />

• ➢Previous focus was to differentiate 1-Fraud, 2-Works occasionally, vs 3-Works<br />

Normally. ➢Current focus: to tell gap in Performance, Price & Reliability between<br />

inventions: i.e. heat & vibration durability, reliable service, operation instruction &<br />

warranty works, ➢Companies conduct low-cost unofficial pilot projects on $ back<br />

guarantee basis 343

logo

products

Resources

Company

Terms of service
Privacy policy
Cookie policy
Cookie settings
Imprint
Change language
Made with love in Switzerland
© 2024 Yumpu.com all rights reserved

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!