Fusió Freda, Tesla, Onda Scalar, Camp de Torsió, «Energia Lliure» = Tota les Ciència Escombraries?(Resum català) / Cold Fusion, Tesla, "Free Energy".. = All Junk Science?
(Resum català) El nou paradigma en la tecnologia de l'energia amb un impacte geo - socioeconòmica / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact (Resum català) El nou paradigma en la tecnologia de l'energia amb un impacte geo - socioeconòmica / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact
What Are Harmonious Free Energy Intro Scenarios? 4 • —>cont 4-If tech coexistence model β is used for LENR, it would be like... • E-Public convinced by absurd failure test since real mechanics is unknown to them: i-Test it for unintended purpose(simulated e.g.: tow car by mopet), ii-Misconfigure device(eg drive 100km/h at reversed gear, use diesel instead of gas, plug air intake), iii-Repeat the process till it doesn’t work, only then publicize failed result, iv-If fraudulent test details are found out, “scientist” says “Results would be the same with requested set up anyway, it’s scientifically proven so”, Make this type of old info available on mainstream group documents for many yrs without any updating. • F- Regulators, “Consumer Group”, “Independent” Advertising Watch, BBB receives “LENR complaint”, & science panel hearing concludes false advertisement /fabrication, New law mandates LENR machine to label “No scientific base that this works”. This & below might happen when actual open commercialization starts. • G- When LENR is confirmed effective, use of last attempt "wild card" of mainstream favorite health hazard fear: have top medical doctors vouch for exaggerated "deadly radiation" effect in order to legislate official ban except specially authorized/licensed large power company: ie power price stays the same for consumers at least in West • H- Those insist on LENR validity at mainstream media stage is called “unqualified as scientist” or “insane” & expelled from group/job in ways colleagues notice why I - Private forums split opinions with science types vocally denying effectiveness/validity. 339 linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada
What Are Harmonious Free Energy Intro Scenarios? 5 • —>cont 4-If tech coexistence model β is used for LENR, it would be like... J- When finally several mainstream ins2tu2ons start accep2ng tech validity, others in mainstream would use another favorite: it is a tech with “controversial claims”, and widely labeled such(as adjec8ve) by main media/NGO/gov't, K- End result: majority stays with conven8onal energy for extra 10+yrs, Large corporate would install LENR but not involving execu2ves officially, instead floor level people(or make it completely unofficial: employee non disclosure agreement or even "na2onal security" label might kick in). L- Then gradually shiQ western social engineering mode from model β to α: i.e. transi2on to co-thriving mode. • But this model might fail; Europe might rebels(eg AIIB+), Russia/China/BRICS might have different preference on "reality projec2on"(BRICS Bank, GMO ban, UGRG, Space+), There are too many official mainstream scien2st witnesses. Also Energy, unlike medical tech, is too instantly obvious not to no2ce effects etc. • 5- Free energy use at remote mines/marine/military/space(e.g. Boeing: Mike Gamble), 6-Media should endorse 3-15% power save on Car/Residen8al Power Factor Correc2on for Ac2ve Power(MP-R fuel, Kvar.com, EnergyMizer Residen>al +)(: actual decreased use of electricity, not just Reac8ve power saving only by decreased supply side waste electricity with conven8onal PFC device), also water emulsion/HHO addi2ve use at gov't grant level, 7-Sell disrup2ve proprietary tech as “slightly efficient”(Bloom, Enstroj, Keppe+), 8-Commercialize mainstream accepted 24hr Solar Infrared Harves2ng. If too disrup2ve, allow only residen2al use but permit unlimited net metering(power trade-in for future use). 340
- Page 289 and 290: Used "Copy & Paste" 2: Imprinting t
- Page 291 and 292: Copy & Paste 4: Imprinting to Matte
- Page 293 and 294: Copy & Paste 6: Schumann For Other
- Page 295 and 296: 2: Bio Activation Copy & Paste •
- Page 297 and 298: 4: Oscillation & Resonance Copy & P
- Page 299 and 300: Copy & Paste 6: Difference 2 • --
- Page 301 and 302: Copy-Paste 2: Difference • -->> T
- Page 303 and 304: 2: Identification • ■ MISIDENTI
- Page 305 and 306: 4: Applications, Magic Cards Make u
- Page 307 and 308: Even More Far-Out - 2 “Re”-Disc
- Page 309 and 310: Even More Far-Out - 4 Unusual Menta
- Page 311 and 312: Far-Out -6 Non-Biological Industria
- Page 313 and 314: Even More Far-Out - 8 Science Link-
- Page 315 and 316: Even More Far-Out - 10 Science Link
- Page 317 and 318: - 12 Science Link - Superconductivi
- Page 319 and 320: - 14 Other Likely Related Material
- Page 321 and 322: Free Energy Inventors & Scien2sts:
- Page 323 and 324: LENR - Cold Fusion 2: Update/ Who i
- Page 325 and 326: LENR - Cold Fusion 4: Commercializa
- Page 327 and 328: LENR - Cold Fusion 6: Commercializa
- Page 329 and 330: LENR - Cold Fusion 8: Commercializa
- Page 331 and 332: LENR - Cold Fusion 10: Companies Lo
- Page 333 and 334: “Free Energy” Impact, Breaking
- Page 335 and 336: “Free Energy”, Breaking Balance
- Page 337 and 338: What Are Harmonious Free Energy Int
- Page 339: What Are Harmonious Free Energy Int
- Page 343 and 344: Disruptive Tech Co-Existence Exampl
- Page 345 and 346: If LENR is Accepted First -2, Inven
- Page 347 and 348: Inventor - ZPE Type Tech Has More I
- Page 349 and 350: Inventor - ZPE Type Tech Has More I
- Page 351 and 352: ZPE-Resonance TYPE Tech Has More Im
- Page 353 and 354: ZPE-Resonance TYPE Tech Has More Im
- Page 355 and 356: ZPE-Resonance Has More Impact Med 4
- Page 357 and 358: ZPE-Resonance Has More Impact - Med
- Page 359 and 360: ZPE-Resonance TYPE Tech Impact: Med
- Page 361 and 362: ZPE-Resonance Has More Impact Med 1
- Page 363 and 364: ZPE-Resonance Has More Impact Med 1
- Page 365 and 366: ZPE-Resonance Med 14 Different freq
- Page 367 and 368: ZPE-Resonance TYPE Tech Med 16: Rif
- Page 369 and 370: ZPE-Resonance 18: Low Temp/Pressure
- Page 371 and 372: ZPE-Resonance 20: Phrase-Catalyst M
- Page 373 and 374: ZPE-Resonance Impact 22: Low Electr
- Page 375 and 376: ZPE-Resonance TYPE Tech Has More Im
- Page 377 and 378: ZPE/Resonance Impact 26: Official G
- Page 379 and 380: Resonance Impact 28: GravityTech =
- Page 381 and 382: Resonance Impact 30: Low Temp Trans
- Page 383 and 384: ZPE-Resonance Impact 32: Abio7c Oil
- Page 385 and 386: Resonance Impact 34: Abio3c Oil Com
- Page 387 and 388: Resonance Impact 36: Abio3c Oil Pro
- Page 389 and 390: ZPE-Resonance Disclosure Impact - T
What Are Harmonious <strong>Free</strong> Energy Intro Scenarios? 5<br />
• —>cont 4-If tech coexistence mo<strong>de</strong>l β is used for LENR, it would be like...<br />
J- When finally several mainstream ins2tu2ons start accep2ng tech validity, others<br />
in mainstream would use another favorite: it is a tech with “controversial claims”,<br />
and wi<strong>de</strong>ly labeled such(as adjec8ve) by main media/NGO/gov't, K- End result:<br />
majority stays with conven8onal energy for extra 10+yrs, Large corporate would<br />
install LENR but not involving execu2ves officially, instead floor level people(or<br />
make it completely unofficial: employee non disclosure agreement or even<br />
"na2onal security" label might kick in). L- Then gradually shiQ western social<br />
engineering mo<strong>de</strong> from mo<strong>de</strong>l β to α: i.e. transi2on to co-thriving mo<strong>de</strong>.<br />
• But this mo<strong>de</strong>l might fail; Europe might rebels(eg AIIB+), Russia/China/BRICS might<br />
have different preference on "reality projec2on"(BRICS Bank, GMO ban, UGRG,<br />
Space+), There are too many official mainstream scien2st witnesses. Also Energy,<br />
unlike medical tech, is too instantly obvious not to no2ce effects etc.<br />
• 5- <strong>Free</strong> energy use at remote mines/marine/military/space(e.g. Boeing: Mike<br />
Gamble), 6-Media should endorse 3-15% power save on Car/Resi<strong>de</strong>n8al Power<br />
Factor Correc2on for Ac2ve Power(MP-R fuel, Kvar.com, EnergyMizer Resi<strong>de</strong>n>al<br />
+)(: actual <strong>de</strong>creased use of electricity, not just Reac8ve power saving only by<br />
<strong>de</strong>creased supply si<strong>de</strong> waste electricity with conven8onal PFC <strong>de</strong>vice), also water<br />
emulsion/HHO addi2ve use at gov't grant level, 7-Sell disrup2ve proprietary tech<br />
as “slightly efficient”(Bloom, Enstroj, Keppe+), 8-Commercialize mainstream<br />
accepted 24hr Solar Infrared Harves2ng. If too disrup2ve, allow only resi<strong>de</strong>n2al<br />
use but permit unlimited net metering(power tra<strong>de</strong>-in for future use). 340