Fusió Freda, Tesla, Onda Scalar, Camp de Torsió, «Energia Lliure» = Tota les Ciència Escombraries?(Resum català) / Cold Fusion, Tesla, "Free Energy".. = All Junk Science?

(Resum català) El nou paradigma en la tecnologia de l'energia amb un impacte geo - socioeconòmica / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact (Resum català) El nou paradigma en la tecnologia de l'energia amb un impacte geo - socioeconòmica / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact

NewNatureParadigm
from NewNatureParadigm More from this publisher
17.12.2014 Views

Free Energy Challenge: Quest to Meet Academic Protocol 4: Scientific Integrity Depends on Ignoring • ➢ Successful free energy inventor has never been investigated OFFICIALLY by modern Western full scientific protocol. In turn declared to media: “In our entire history, free energy validity has never been found“, "if we were ever wrong, why all other trusted mainstream people are in such consensus?", ”It’s a proven scientific fact”. • ➢ Influencers can use system to create scientific reality by exclusively selected convenient evidence(T Gold, Huyghe, McClenon, Broad & Wade+), Decisions made by use of non-scientific/empirical paradigm(Schwinger, Kuhn+), Are majority of scientists mentally cannot cope with discomfort of paradigm change?(Lightman & Gingerich+), While unprecedented pseudoscience is suddenly valid at geo-political events even if all experimental evidence disproves(Ri Gage, Cr Roberts, Da Ganser, BK Partin, Nie Harrit, SE Jones, Kev Ryan, Jud Wood, DR Griffin, ADM Moorer, Dav Gapp, Chr Bollyn, Chris Emery+) • ➢ This is commonly observed, not exception, across science: Water, Monetary, Gene, Consciousness, Human origin, Peak oil(Bakken formation+), Biotic only hydrocarbon (p381-386), Big bang, Climate(though indecisive, p391-399) Ancient edifice/civilization, Archeology, Giants & Dwarfs, Medical (p351-366), Advanced structures on Moon/Mars(Brandenburg, Carolotto, Van Flandern, M Bara, J Escamilla, Ir Shapiro, Vasin, Chatelain+), History of tech-medicine-geopolitics + 193

LAWs of THERMO-DYNAMICS: vs Inventors & “Dissident” Scientists: 1: Closed System? • ■ 1ST LAW: Energy cannot be created or destroyed- only change forms ■ 2ND LAW: Energy always evens out to create a neutral entropy state ■ 1+2: Mainstream interpretation: Must not appear to generate more energy than it's used; Even some of LENR/Cavitation scientists subscribe to ■ Above’s conventional interpretation is based on closed system which rarely exist in strict sense, yet Taboo of questioning even interpretation itself of the law in main academia & in turn media till very recently, in rare cases scientists group up to appeal for law reformulation, sometimes they are described as “delusional, crackpots” • Inventors & small # of mainstream scientists point out flaw/contradiction in (LOTD)law of Thermodynamics),(Da Sheehan[scientist, not same as a lawyer on p36], Heyrovská, Sachs, PD Keefe, PT Pappas, G Pellegrini, X Fu, Nikulov, Graeff, Čápek, L Gordon, Denur, Coffey, Molnar, D’Abramo, Garamella, Tim H Boyer, Allahverdyan, Semura, Crosignani, Ale Kaivarainen, M Devereux, Nieuwenhuizen, Dubonos, Bok, Špička, Mar Comings +): 1st law is ok, but 2nd law only covers Closed System; the law is more of a rule of thumb from statistics; —>>cont: 194 linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada

LAWs of THERMO-DYNAMICS: vs Inventors<br />

& “Dissi<strong>de</strong>nt” Scientists: 1: Closed System?<br />

• ■ 1ST LAW: Energy cannot be created or <strong>de</strong>stroyed- only change forms<br />

■ 2ND LAW: Energy always evens out to create a neutral entropy state<br />

■ 1+2: Mainstream interpretation: Must not appear to generate more<br />

energy than it's used; Even some of LENR/Cavitation scientists subscribe to<br />

■ Above’s conventional interpretation is based on closed system which<br />

rarely exist in strict sense, yet Taboo of questioning even interpretation<br />

itself of the law in main aca<strong>de</strong>mia & in turn media till very recently, in rare<br />

cases scientists group up to appeal for law reformulation, sometimes they<br />

are <strong>de</strong>scribed as “<strong>de</strong>lusional, crackpots”<br />

• Inventors & small # of mainstream scientists point out flaw/contradiction in<br />

(LOTD)law of Thermodynamics),(Da Sheehan[scientist, not same as a<br />

lawyer on p36], Heyrovská, Sachs, PD Keefe, PT Pappas, G Pellegrini, X Fu,<br />

Nikulov, Graeff, Čápek, L Gordon, Denur, Coffey, Molnar, D’Abramo,<br />

Garamella, Tim H Boyer, <strong>All</strong>ahverdyan, Semura, Crosignani, Ale<br />

Kaivarainen, M Devereux, Nieuwenhuizen, Dubonos, Bok, Špička, Mar<br />

Comings +): 1st law is ok, but 2nd law only covers Closed System; the law<br />

is more of a rule of thumb from statistics; —>>cont:<br />

194<br />

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!