Fusió Freda, Tesla, Onda Scalar, Camp de Torsió, «Energia Lliure» = Tota les Ciència Escombraries?(Resum català) / Cold Fusion, Tesla, "Free Energy".. = All Junk Science?
(Resum català) El nou paradigma en la tecnologia de l'energia amb un impacte geo - socioeconòmica / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact (Resum català) El nou paradigma en la tecnologia de l'energia amb un impacte geo - socioeconòmica / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact
Mainstream “Pseudoscientific Free Energy” claims / Academia's LENR-Cavitation. -vs- tech • ■ LENR & Cavitation quickly “proven false”, “No results” fusion$ criticized, yet “COP>1” Hydrodynamic + Sonic Cavitation was already commercialized in Ex-soviet nations(p136) and scientists win national invention award(VN Kuchin - ВН Кучин «Темир мен Мыс»[Kazakhstan]+) • ■ Similar physics law breaking mechanics & “anomalies” both at LENR- Cavitation & Inventor techs, but latter more openly admit • ■ Past main academics explain similar mechanics(Webb, Kelvin, TJJ See, Dirac, Kaluza, Faraday, Whittaker, W Crookes, Poynting, Loschmidt, Maxwell, Myshkin+), • ■ Presence of Corporate & Gov't project whistle blower inventor types including gravity field propulsion/gravity control(Bushman, Carol Rosin, Rob Wood, W Pawalek, J Black, McCandlish, D Morris+). • 1&2 LENR-Cavitation both seem to have similarity to Inventor tech. As of 2017, only a few of their scientists still ignore inventor type tech believing there is no validity in non academic peer reviewed data while bulk of them are suspecting or investigating its link. -->>cont: 145 linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada
LENR-Cavitation-vs- & Eniology Link 2 • -->>cont: LENR(mainstream "free energy") vs Inventor free energy tech link: • ■ But almost all of following pages’ inventor type techs were investigated in depth or developed & a few commercialized(eg Potapov, RI Mustafayev+) by Russian/ex-Soviet university/institute academic: significant diversity & academic freedom allowed unlike West(many worry about compromizing future promotion, not getting grant, or sometimes even losing job when openly discuss outside of set narrative in scientific "indisputable facts" or even geopolitical info). • While data access from West was often restricted, and occasionally quite suppressive for new technology for political reasons(ЕК Наумов, Kozyrev[likely due to early stage of psychotronic tech]+), science even in Soviet was lot less compartmentalized & in a way freerer than West. • Soviet openly affirmed ideas such as Eniology(Эниология) /Bio-Energo- Informatics(Биоэнергоинформатика): biological nonlocal information exchange(VP Kaznacheev, Huping Hu+): part of this is now commonly demonstrated by mentalists/Illusionists in mixture with conventional tricks in West. This includes idea of physically manifesting effects by mind(psychic /telekinesis), conventional Kinetic, or electronic means(torsion field) locally & non locally both as fundamental physics base. >>cont: 146 linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada
- Page 95 and 96: Super Low Cost Wind 5 Oscillation/R
- Page 97 and 98: Super Low Cost Hydro 2 MHD, Wave Su
- Page 99 and 100: Super Low Cost Hydro 4 Resonance/Os
- Page 101 and 102: Lowest Cost Energy From Biomass 2 C
- Page 103 and 104: Lowest Cost Energy As Biomass -4, W
- Page 105 and 106: Lowest Cost Energy: Vast Biomass -6
- Page 107 and 108: New Perspective -“Lowest Cost”
- Page 109 and 110: Energy From Vast Biomass 10, Wood E
- Page 111 and 112: Energy From Vast Biomass 12, Black
- Page 113 and 114: Energy From Vast Biomass 14, Agri C
- Page 115 and 116: New Perspective -“Lowest Cost”
- Page 117 and 118: Energy From Vast Biomass 18, Waste
- Page 119 and 120: Energy From Vast Biomass 20, Plasti
- Page 121 and 122: New Perspective -“Lowest Cost”
- Page 123 and 124: Energy From Vast Biomass 24, SCW, D
- Page 125 and 126: Energy From Vast Biomass 26, SCW Ga
- Page 127 and 128: Energy From Vast Biomass 28, Biomas
- Page 129 and 130: New Perspective -“Lowest Cost”
- Page 131 and 132: Energy From Vast Biomass 32, SWC De
- Page 133 and 134: New Perspective -“Lowest Cost”
- Page 135 and 136: New Perspective -“Lowest Cost”
- Page 137 and 138: Energy From Vast Biomass 38, Algae
- Page 139 and 140: Energy From Vast Biomass 40, Peat,
- Page 141 and 142: Lowest Cost Energy: Clean Under-Uti
- Page 143 and 144: Lowest Cost Energy: Clean Under-Uti
- Page 145: Mainstream “Pseudoscientific Free
- Page 149 and 150: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy ,
- Page 151 and 152: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy ,
- Page 153 and 154: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy ,
- Page 155 and 156: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy H
- Page 157 and 158: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy H
- Page 159 and 160: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy H
- Page 161 and 162: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy H
- Page 163 and 164: 's HHO, OxyHydrogen Gas 9: Ohmasa G
- Page 165 and 166: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy C
- Page 167 and 168: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy C
- Page 169 and 170: 'sFree Energy Compressed Air/Vortex
- Page 171 and 172: 'sFree Energy Compressed Air/Vortex
- Page 173 and 174: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy R
- Page 175 and 176: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy H
- Page 177 and 178: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy H
- Page 179 and 180: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy A
- Page 181 and 182: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy F
- Page 183 and 184: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy O
- Page 185 and 186: World Trend; When Starts Establishi
- Page 187 and 188: Trend; When Starts Establishing New
- Page 189 and 190: World Trend; When Starts Establishi
- Page 191 and 192: Free Energy Challenge: Quest to Mee
- Page 193 and 194: Free Energy Challenge: Quest to Mee
- Page 195 and 196: LAWs of THERMO-DYNAMICS: vs Invento
Mainstream “Pseudoscientific <strong>Free</strong> Energy” claims /<br />
Aca<strong>de</strong>mia's LENR-Cavitation. -vs- tech<br />
• ■ LENR & Cavitation quickly “proven false”, “No results” fusion$ criticized,<br />
yet “COP>1” Hydrodynamic + Sonic Cavitation was already commercialized in<br />
Ex-soviet nations(p136) and scientists win national invention award(VN<br />
Kuchin - ВН Кучин «Темир мен Мыс»[Kazakhstan]+)<br />
• ■ Similar physics law breaking mechanics & “anomalies” both at LENR-<br />
Cavitation & Inventor techs, but latter more openly admit<br />
• ■ Past main aca<strong>de</strong>mics explain similar mechanics(Webb, Kelvin, TJJ See,<br />
Dirac, Kaluza, Faraday, Whittaker, W Crookes, Poynting, Loschmidt, Maxwell,<br />
Myshkin+),<br />
• ■ Presence of Corporate & Gov't project whistle blower inventor types<br />
including gravity field propulsion/gravity control(Bushman, Carol Rosin, Rob<br />
Wood, W Pawalek, J Black, McCandlish, D Morris+).<br />
• 1&2 LENR-Cavitation both seem to have similarity to Inventor tech. As of<br />
2017, only a few of their scientists still ignore inventor type tech believing<br />
there is no validity in non aca<strong>de</strong>mic peer reviewed data while bulk of them<br />
are suspecting or investigating its link. -->>cont:<br />
145<br />
linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada
Change language