Fusió Freda, Tesla, Onda Scalar, Camp de Torsió, «Energia Lliure» = Tota les Ciència Escombraries?(Resum català) / Cold Fusion, Tesla, "Free Energy".. = All Junk Science?
(Resum català) El nou paradigma en la tecnologia de l'energia amb un impacte geo - socioeconòmica / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact (Resum català) El nou paradigma en la tecnologia de l'energia amb un impacte geo - socioeconòmica / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact
Lowest Cost Energy: Clean Under-Utilized Methane 3: Methane Hydrate extraction, CBM/CSG • ■ Under-Utilized Methane ●1 Methane Hydrate-Clathrate/Gas Hydrate: • Currently officially applied or tested main methods are Thermal injection(hot water/steam), Depressurization, & CO2 replacement methods etc. • Temporal wells: Ignik Sikumi(US), Mallik(Canada), Atsumi Peninsula 400m off Coast (Japan), Permanent types;(Mount Elbert)(US), all negligible production volume (0.01million m3/day range): Some of known participators: ConocoPhillips, BP, Vnnigaz Gazprom «Газпром ВНИИГАЗ», Oil and Natural Gas Corporation of India, GNS Science, German gas hydrate initiative, JMH, JAPEX , , , 가스하이드레이트 사업단 Gas Hydrate R&D Organization. Also smaller private operators participation: Hydrate Resources Corporation+ • ●2 Coalbed Methane(CBM)/Coal Seam Gas(CSG): Started as coal mine degasification program for safety in 1980s in US. Natural gas contained in highly porous coal molecule structure & seams in relation to bacterial action/generation(speed of CH4 production seem to widely vary by conditions), also fair volume of Methane would be additionally produced by injecting CO2 into the coal bed which bacteria reduces (removing oxygen) to Methane for future yield(Golding-Rudolph-Esterle+): (see Abiotic oil p381-386) 141 linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada
Lowest Cost Energy: Clean Under-Utilized Methane 4: CBM/CSG - background • -->> cont: ■ Under-Utilized Methane: ●2 Coalbed Methane(CBM)/Coal Seam Gas(CSG): • As of 2014 close to 2% volume of Natural gas production world wide with US is more than its 80% share, helped by government back up. Mainstream western media's CBM availability idea is often about 1/20-100 of Natural gas volume reserve, but full scientific consensus projects rather on par volume with conventional Natural Gas: Western media often quotes fringe segment of mainstream(somehow main media never calls them pseudoscience) that ignores massive oil & other hydrocarbon availability world wide at publicly known & less known sites in order to still advocate peak oil idea. • Natural gas would be likely gradually shift to CBM in the future as main gas source. CBM promoters emphasize on it is able to stop methane escaping for carbon foot print reduction, or gas is actually overall even less emission(sweet gas) containing than conventionally extracted natural gas, while preventor groups focus on repeat of fracking water issue etc. • Some new production areas would be lower cost than existing energy source despite extra water handling issue: Much shallower depth etc. Different types of technology (eg altered type hydraulic fracturing is already used in Australia) might be needed to fully tap its potential. ->> cont linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada 142
- Page 91 and 92: Science-Accepted “Super Low Cost
- Page 93 and 94: Super Low Cost Wind 3 Rotor, Multi
- Page 95 and 96: Super Low Cost Wind 5 Oscillation/R
- Page 97 and 98: Super Low Cost Hydro 2 MHD, Wave Su
- Page 99 and 100: Super Low Cost Hydro 4 Resonance/Os
- Page 101 and 102: Lowest Cost Energy From Biomass 2 C
- Page 103 and 104: Lowest Cost Energy As Biomass -4, W
- Page 105 and 106: Lowest Cost Energy: Vast Biomass -6
- Page 107 and 108: New Perspective -“Lowest Cost”
- Page 109 and 110: Energy From Vast Biomass 10, Wood E
- Page 111 and 112: Energy From Vast Biomass 12, Black
- Page 113 and 114: Energy From Vast Biomass 14, Agri C
- Page 115 and 116: New Perspective -“Lowest Cost”
- Page 117 and 118: Energy From Vast Biomass 18, Waste
- Page 119 and 120: Energy From Vast Biomass 20, Plasti
- Page 121 and 122: New Perspective -“Lowest Cost”
- Page 123 and 124: Energy From Vast Biomass 24, SCW, D
- Page 125 and 126: Energy From Vast Biomass 26, SCW Ga
- Page 127 and 128: Energy From Vast Biomass 28, Biomas
- Page 129 and 130: New Perspective -“Lowest Cost”
- Page 131 and 132: Energy From Vast Biomass 32, SWC De
- Page 133 and 134: New Perspective -“Lowest Cost”
- Page 135 and 136: New Perspective -“Lowest Cost”
- Page 137 and 138: Energy From Vast Biomass 38, Algae
- Page 139 and 140: Energy From Vast Biomass 40, Peat,
- Page 141: Lowest Cost Energy: Clean Under-Uti
- Page 145 and 146: Mainstream “Pseudoscientific Free
- Page 147 and 148: LENR-Cavitation-vs- & Eniology Link
- Page 149 and 150: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy ,
- Page 151 and 152: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy ,
- Page 153 and 154: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy ,
- Page 155 and 156: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy H
- Page 157 and 158: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy H
- Page 159 and 160: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy H
- Page 161 and 162: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy H
- Page 163 and 164: 's HHO, OxyHydrogen Gas 9: Ohmasa G
- Page 165 and 166: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy C
- Page 167 and 168: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy C
- Page 169 and 170: 'sFree Energy Compressed Air/Vortex
- Page 171 and 172: 'sFree Energy Compressed Air/Vortex
- Page 173 and 174: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy R
- Page 175 and 176: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy H
- Page 177 and 178: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy H
- Page 179 and 180: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy A
- Page 181 and 182: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy F
- Page 183 and 184: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy O
- Page 185 and 186: World Trend; When Starts Establishi
- Page 187 and 188: Trend; When Starts Establishing New
- Page 189 and 190: World Trend; When Starts Establishi
- Page 191 and 192: Free Energy Challenge: Quest to Mee
Lowest Cost Energy: Clean Un<strong>de</strong>r-Utilized Methane<br />
4: CBM/CSG - background<br />
• -->> cont: ■ Un<strong>de</strong>r-Utilized Methane: ●2 Coalbed Methane(CBM)/Coal Seam<br />
Gas(CSG):<br />
• As of 2014 close to 2% volume of Natural gas production world wi<strong>de</strong> with US is<br />
more than its 80% share, helped by government back up. Mainstream western<br />
media's CBM availability i<strong>de</strong>a is often about 1/20-100 of Natural gas volume<br />
reserve, but full scientific consensus projects rather on par volume with<br />
conventional Natural Gas: Western media often quotes fringe segment of<br />
mainstream(somehow main media never calls them pseudoscience) that ignores<br />
massive oil & other hydrocarbon availability world wi<strong>de</strong> at publicly known & <strong>les</strong>s<br />
known sites in or<strong>de</strong>r to still advocate peak oil i<strong>de</strong>a.<br />
• Natural gas would be likely gradually shift to CBM in the future as main gas source.<br />
CBM promoters emphasize on it is able to stop methane escaping for carbon foot<br />
print reduction, or gas is actually overall even <strong>les</strong>s emission(sweet gas) containing<br />
than conventionally extracted natural gas, while preventor groups focus on repeat<br />
of fracking water issue etc.<br />
• Some new production areas would be lower cost than existing energy source<br />
<strong>de</strong>spite extra water handling issue: Much shallower <strong>de</strong>pth etc. Different types of<br />
technology (eg altered type hydraulic fracturing is already used in Australia) might<br />
be nee<strong>de</strong>d to fully tap its potential. ->> cont<br />
linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada<br />
142