Fusió Freda, Tesla, Onda Scalar, Camp de Torsió, «Energia Lliure» = Tota les Ciència Escombraries?(Resum català) / Cold Fusion, Tesla, "Free Energy".. = All Junk Science?
(Resum català) El nou paradigma en la tecnologia de l'energia amb un impacte geo - socioeconòmica / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact (Resum català) El nou paradigma en la tecnologia de l'energia amb un impacte geo - socioeconòmica / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact
“Lowest Cost” Energy From Vast Biomass 1 Intro • ■ Biomass: Heavily related to human habitat/cultural activities with enormous energy potential even without major technological paradigm change, and usually not perceived as such, but often becomes Lowest cost energy when apply different sets of energy criteria. • α- Even simply by use of conventional tech, •i Applying different cost structure as by-product(eg Fuel from cellulosic content of plant, Sugar Cane Bagasse, Wood chips etc. High energy required waste water treatment reduces energy needs 30%+, might even net energy, •ii Minimum human living condition by-product(Energy produced from Waste or Landfill Gas removal), •iii Regional or Operational based: Sawmill residue burned with cost is now made into Pellets for income, •iv Reevaluating existing criteria of energy(Peat, Gas Hydrate+): • β- Long researched tech with official breakthrough declared types, Some of well known energy industry disruptive techs entered into mainstream accepted commercialization during 2013-2015. This would also gradually reinforce idea of far more energy availability than demand for entire world if combined, •v Cellulosic ethanol - second generation biofuel, •vi Sub-SuperCritical Water (SCW) or Hydrothermal Liquefaction(related tech is marked as "◎", often mainstream approved lowest cost tech for biomass/organic waste energy production). • linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada 99
Lowest Cost Energy From Biomass 2 Categories • -->cont ■ Biomass : β- Breakthrough Tech Types After Long Research: • Feed stocks % used to sustain SCW fuel producing operation can be as low as 2- 4%, while other methods requires at least 20% + of feedstcok consumption simply to run same fuel making process itself. Also SCW process can be completed as short as in seconds rather than conventional methods of hrs(combustion etc), days & weeks(AD), and this operation emits very low emission and CO2 is easily recoverable, • Biomass related technologies are categorized 1-4 as follows in this presentation, but there is a large degree of cross over: • •1FOREST RESOURCE, •2 AGRICULTURAL, •3 SOLID/LIQUID MINICIPAL- INDUSTRY-AGRI WASTE: to Gas/Methane, Gasoline, Diesel, Ethanol, Crude Oil, Compressed or as is fuel, Bio Coal, •4 THER BIOMASS: Seaweed/Algae/Peat: As is or processed • •1FOREST RELATED: Largest vol use in biomass, 1a Non-industrial private wood burning/firewood use, particularly in non developed nations is deemed very large but no precise figure agreements, many nations allow access for logging or growth debris by private individuals freely or by license, Very low efficiency heat use. >>cont: 100 linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada
- Page 49 and 50: Science-Accepted Past Grid Parity T
- Page 51 and 52: Science-Accepted Past Grid Parity T
- Page 53 and 54: Science-Accepted Past Grid Parity T
- Page 55 and 56: Science-Accepted Past Grid Parity T
- Page 57 and 58: Science-Accepted Past Grid Parity T
- Page 59 and 60: Past Grid Parity Tech 14: H.R. V Th
- Page 61 and 62: Science-Accepted Past Grid Parity T
- Page 63 and 64: Science-Accepted Past Grid Parity T
- Page 65 and 66: Science-Accepted Past Grid Parity T
- Page 67 and 68: Science-Accepted Past Grid Parity T
- Page 69 and 70: Science-Accepted Past Grid Parity T
- Page 71 and 72: Science-Accepted Past Grid Parity T
- Page 73 and 74: Science-Accepted Past Grid Parity T
- Page 75 and 76: Science-Accepted Past Grid Parity T
- Page 77 and 78: Science-Accepted “Super Low Cost
- Page 79 and 80: Science-Accepted “Super Low Cost
- Page 81 and 82: Science-Accepted “Super Low Cost
- Page 83 and 84: Science-Accepted “Super Low Cost
- Page 85 and 86: Science-Accepted “Super Low Cost
- Page 87 and 88: Science-Accepted “Super Low Cost
- Page 89 and 90: Science-Accepted “Super Low Cost
- Page 91 and 92: Science-Accepted “Super Low Cost
- Page 93 and 94: Super Low Cost Wind 3 Rotor, Multi
- Page 95 and 96: Super Low Cost Wind 5 Oscillation/R
- Page 97 and 98: Super Low Cost Hydro 2 MHD, Wave Su
- Page 99: Super Low Cost Hydro 4 Resonance/Os
- Page 103 and 104: Lowest Cost Energy As Biomass -4, W
- Page 105 and 106: Lowest Cost Energy: Vast Biomass -6
- Page 107 and 108: New Perspective -“Lowest Cost”
- Page 109 and 110: Energy From Vast Biomass 10, Wood E
- Page 111 and 112: Energy From Vast Biomass 12, Black
- Page 113 and 114: Energy From Vast Biomass 14, Agri C
- Page 115 and 116: New Perspective -“Lowest Cost”
- Page 117 and 118: Energy From Vast Biomass 18, Waste
- Page 119 and 120: Energy From Vast Biomass 20, Plasti
- Page 121 and 122: New Perspective -“Lowest Cost”
- Page 123 and 124: Energy From Vast Biomass 24, SCW, D
- Page 125 and 126: Energy From Vast Biomass 26, SCW Ga
- Page 127 and 128: Energy From Vast Biomass 28, Biomas
- Page 129 and 130: New Perspective -“Lowest Cost”
- Page 131 and 132: Energy From Vast Biomass 32, SWC De
- Page 133 and 134: New Perspective -“Lowest Cost”
- Page 135 and 136: New Perspective -“Lowest Cost”
- Page 137 and 138: Energy From Vast Biomass 38, Algae
- Page 139 and 140: Energy From Vast Biomass 40, Peat,
- Page 141 and 142: Lowest Cost Energy: Clean Under-Uti
- Page 143 and 144: Lowest Cost Energy: Clean Under-Uti
- Page 145 and 146: Mainstream “Pseudoscientific Free
- Page 147 and 148: LENR-Cavitation-vs- & Eniology Link
- Page 149 and 150: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy ,
Lowest Cost Energy From Biomass 2 Categories<br />
• -->cont ■ Biomass : β- Breakthrough Tech Types After Long Research:<br />
• Feed stocks % used to sustain SCW fuel producing operation can be as low as 2-<br />
4%, while other methods requires at least 20% + of feedstcok consumption<br />
simply to run same fuel making process itself. Also SCW process can be<br />
completed as short as in seconds rather than conventional methods of<br />
hrs(combustion etc), days & weeks(AD), and this operation emits very low<br />
emission and CO2 is easily recoverable,<br />
• Biomass related technologies are categorized 1-4 as follows in this<br />
presentation, but there is a large <strong>de</strong>gree of cross over:<br />
• •1FOREST RESOURCE, •2 AGRICULTURAL, •3 SOLID/LIQUID MINICIPAL-<br />
INDUSTRY-AGRI WASTE: to Gas/Methane, Gasoline, Diesel, Ethanol, Cru<strong>de</strong> Oil,<br />
Compressed or as is fuel, Bio Coal, •4 THER BIOMASS: Seaweed/Algae/Peat: As is<br />
or processed<br />
• •1FOREST RELATED: Largest vol use in biomass,<br />
1a Non-industrial private wood burning/firewood use, particularly in non<br />
<strong>de</strong>veloped nations is <strong>de</strong>emed very large but no precise figure agreements, many<br />
nations allow access for logging or growth <strong>de</strong>bris by private individuals freely or<br />
by license, Very low efficiency heat use. >>cont:<br />
100<br />
linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada
Change language