Winter 2013 - Camarillo Chamber of Commerce
Winter 2013 - Camarillo Chamber of Commerce
Winter 2013 - Camarillo Chamber of Commerce
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Business Advocacy<br />
In light <strong>of</strong> the outcomes <strong>of</strong> the recent<br />
elections, the region’s business community<br />
has our work cut out for us in <strong>2013</strong>.<br />
Although, <strong>Chamber</strong> Alliance-endorsed<br />
lawmakers Congressman Buck<br />
McKeon and Assemblyman Jeff Gorell<br />
got reelected, the <strong>Chamber</strong> Alliance lost<br />
a reliable pro-job creation vote in Tony<br />
Strickland who narrowly lost his bid for<br />
Congress against Assemblywoman Julia<br />
Brownley. Sen. Strickland’s old seat will<br />
be represented by Senator-elect Hannah<br />
Beth Jackson.<br />
Furthermore, Democrats have<br />
achieved a rare two-thirds majority in<br />
both the State Senate and Assembly in<br />
addition to the governor’s <strong>of</strong>fice. Among<br />
other things, two thirds majorities will<br />
Election outcomes demonstrate<br />
need for more advocacy<br />
Brendan Huffman<br />
Executive Director<br />
make it far easier for taxes to be<br />
raised and emergency legislation to be<br />
passed resulting in such bills taking effect<br />
as soon as they are signed into law.<br />
As for ballot measures, the <strong>Chamber</strong><br />
Alliance is pleased that voters rejected<br />
Prop. 37 that would have forced<br />
food retailers to ensure that genetically<br />
modified food products they sell to be<br />
properly labeled by farmers and food<br />
producers—or face private right <strong>of</strong> action<br />
lawsuits. Voters also rejected Prop.<br />
38 that would have raised income taxes<br />
but approved Prop. 40 to keep the state<br />
senate boundaries as drawn up last year<br />
by the independent Citizens Redistricting<br />
Commission.<br />
Looking ahead, the <strong>Chamber</strong> Alliance<br />
is seeking to increase our presence in<br />
Sacramento next year to ensure that our<br />
region’s business perspective is considered<br />
more <strong>of</strong>ten in the legislative process.<br />
And we are weighing strategies to<br />
engage our lawmakers more <strong>of</strong>ten when<br />
they are in their districts.<br />
Nevertheless, it is more important<br />
than ever that our chambers be effective<br />
advocates for business. The <strong>Chamber</strong> Alliance<br />
is here to help all <strong>of</strong> our chambers<br />
raise the bar on their advocacy efforts,<br />
so please let us know how we can assist<br />
your chamber as we head into <strong>2013</strong>.<br />
For more information about the<br />
<strong>Chamber</strong> Alliance, please visit www.<br />
<strong>Chamber</strong>Alliance.biz.<br />
Cal<strong>Chamber</strong> Vote Record: Major Bills 2012<br />
The Journal <strong>Winter</strong> <strong>2013</strong><br />
30<br />
This report for the second year <strong>of</strong><br />
the 2011–2012 legislative session focuses<br />
on California legislators’ floor votes on<br />
California <strong>Chamber</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Commerce</strong> priority<br />
bills. This is the 38th vote record the<br />
Cal<strong>Chamber</strong> has compiled. The Cal<strong>Chamber</strong><br />
publishes this report in response to<br />
numerous requests by member firms and<br />
local chambers <strong>of</strong> commerce that would<br />
like a gauge by which to measure the<br />
performance <strong>of</strong> their legislators. To help<br />
readers assess legislators’ vote records, the<br />
charts group bills into six areas: economic<br />
development, environmental regulation,<br />
labor and employment, legal, taxation and<br />
workers’ compensation.<br />
Partial Picture<br />
No vote record can tell the entire story<br />
<strong>of</strong> a legislator’s attitude and actions on issues<br />
<strong>of</strong> importance to business. Each year,<br />
legislators cast thousands <strong>of</strong> votes on thousands<br />
<strong>of</strong> proposed laws. To fully evaluate<br />
your legislative representative, consult the<br />
legislative journals and<br />
examine your legislator’s<br />
votes in committee and on<br />
floor issues. You can view<br />
these via links at www.<br />
calchambervotes.com.<br />
Many anti-business bills were rejected<br />
by legislators in policy or fiscal committees,<br />
thus stopping proposals before they<br />
reached the floor for a vote. The vote record<br />
does not capture these votes.<br />
Most bills in this report cover major<br />
business bills that are <strong>of</strong> concern to both<br />
small and large companies. The Cal<strong>Chamber</strong><br />
recognizes that there are many bills<br />
supported or opposed by business that are<br />
not included in this vote record and analysis.<br />
Factors Considered<br />
The Cal<strong>Chamber</strong> considers the following<br />
factors in selecting vote record bills:<br />
● The bills and votes reflect legislators’<br />
attitudes toward private enterprise, fiscal<br />
responsibility and the business climate.<br />
● Each bill was a priority for the Cal-<br />
<strong>Chamber</strong> in a particular field. Priority bills<br />
have appeared in the “Status Report” sections<br />
<strong>of</strong> Alert.<br />
● The bills were voted upon by either<br />
the full Senate or Assembly. This year the<br />
vote record covers 10 votes in the Senate<br />
and 11 votes in the Assembly.<br />
● Unless otherwise noted, final floor<br />
votes are shown. Concurrence votes and<br />
conference report votes are considered final<br />
votes.<br />
When ‘Not Voting’ Helps<br />
Sometimes a legislator is unwilling to<br />
vote against a colleague, but is willing to<br />
Continued next page