Annual Report 2000 - WIT
Annual Report 2000 - WIT Annual Report 2000 - WIT
Wave Inversion Technology, Report No. 4, pages 27-35 Analytic Moveout formulas for a curved 2D measurement surface and near-zero-offset primary reflections Pedro Chira-Oliva and Peter Hubral 1 keywords: Analytic Moveout formulas, curved 2D measurement surface, CRS stack ABSTRACT Analytic moveout formulas for primary near-zero-offset reflections in various types of gathers (e.g. common shot, common midpoint) play a significant role in the seismic reflection method. They are required in stacking methods like the common-midpoint (CMP) or the Common-Reflection Surface (CRS) stack. They also play a role in Dixtype traveltime inversions. Analytic moveout formulas are particularly attractive, if they can be given a “physical” or “quasi-physical” interpretation, involving for instance the wavefront curvatures of specific waves. The formulas presented here have such a form. They give particular attention to the influence that a curved measurement surface has on the moveout or normal-moveout (NMO) velocity. This influence should be accounted for in the CMP or CRS stack and in the computation of interval velocities. INTRODUCTION Analytic moveout formulas for isotropic media have a long tradition of being applied in the seismic reflection method. Just to mention a few papers that may be considered as some milestone contributions we would like to refer to the works of (Dürbaum, 1954; Dix, 1955; Shah, 1973; Fomel and Grechka, 1998). Particularly in the light of macro-model-independent reflection imaging (Hubral, 1999) analytic moveout formulas in midpoint(m)-half-offset(h) coordinates like Polystack (de Bazelaire, 1988; de Bazelaire and Viallix, 1994; Thore et al., 1994) and Multifocusing (Gelchinsky et al., 1999a,b) have gained a new relevance and importance. Here we generalize the socalled Common-Reflection-Surface (CRS) stack formula (Müller et al., 1998), which is used to simulate zero-offset sections from prestack data in a macro-velocity-model independent way (Jäger et al., 2001). The generalized CRS stack moveout formula 1 email: Pedro.Chira@gpi.uni-karlsruhe.de 27
- Page 1 and 2: Wave Inversion Technology WIT Annua
- Page 3: Wave Inversion Technology WIT Wave
- Page 7: Copyright c 2000 by Karlsruhe Unive
- Page 11 and 12: i TABLE OF CONTENTS Reviews: WIT Re
- Page 13 and 14: Wave Inversion Technology, Report N
- Page 15 and 16: 3 theory. It relates properties of
- Page 17: Imaging 5
- Page 20 and 21: 8 two hypothetical eigenwave experi
- Page 22 and 23: 7 ¢¥£§¦©¨ ; < calculate sear
- Page 24 and 25: 7 7 searches ¡ HNJOL for ¢IHNJML
- Page 26 and 27: 14 Trace no. 1000 1500 2000 0.5 1.0
- Page 28 and 29: 16 CDP number 3100 3000 2900 2800 2
- Page 30 and 31: 18 REFERENCES Höcht, G., de Bazela
- Page 32 and 33: 20 INVERSION BY MEANS OF CRS ATTRIB
- Page 34 and 35: 22 For synthetic data, it is easy t
- Page 36 and 37: — J J J J J J G J - J J G
- Page 40 and 41: v G ° à £§¦©¨ G ¬ à £§
- Page 42 and 43: 9 v 0 v 4 & Ä Ã £ Ã > 30 Ze
- Page 44 and 45: Elements of the surface-to-surface
- Page 46 and 47: 34 β ∗ s q’ x’ x 1 β∗ s x
- Page 48 and 49: 36 (Tygel et al., 1997). In additio
- Page 50 and 51: Z G „ ½ ¢ ì è G è è
- Page 52 and 53: 40 Emergence angle section; 3) radi
- Page 54 and 55: 42 0.2 Distance [m] 1000 1500 2000
- Page 56 and 57: 44 The optimized radii of curvature
- Page 58 and 59: 46 CONCLUSION In this work, with a
- Page 61 and 62: Wave Inversion Technology, Report N
- Page 63 and 64: k ilm § 51 0 X 0 v 0 Depth [km] 1
- Page 65 and 66: § ¤ ¤ ¤ 53 Determination of Y t
- Page 67 and 68: £ £ £ £ õ ¤ Z § ó £ §
- Page 69 and 70: ¤ ¤ ¤ 57 Subsequent layers. As b
- Page 71 and 72: 59 We also plan to modify the softw
- Page 73: 61 Tygel, M., Müller, T., Hubral,
- Page 76 and 77: 64 evanescent parts of the wave fie
- Page 78 and 79: 66 (a) (b) Depth (m) 600 800 Depth
- Page 80 and 81: 68 Reflection Coefficient (a) 0.1 0
- Page 82 and 83: 70 By our numerical analysis, we ha
- Page 84 and 85: È ¸ â ¹ Ë ¾œ¿ ¸ » ¸ Ç
- Page 86 and 87: È Ä »¤¼ Ë ¾S¿8 ¸ óžô
Wave Inversion Technology, <strong>Report</strong> No. 4, pages 27-35<br />
Analytic Moveout formulas for a curved 2D<br />
measurement surface and near-zero-offset primary<br />
reflections<br />
Pedro Chira-Oliva and Peter Hubral 1<br />
keywords: Analytic Moveout formulas, curved 2D measurement surface, CRS stack<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Analytic moveout formulas for primary near-zero-offset reflections in various types of<br />
gathers (e.g. common shot, common midpoint) play a significant role in the seismic<br />
reflection method. They are required in stacking methods like the common-midpoint<br />
(CMP) or the Common-Reflection Surface (CRS) stack. They also play a role in Dixtype<br />
traveltime inversions. Analytic moveout formulas are particularly attractive, if<br />
they can be given a “physical” or “quasi-physical” interpretation, involving for instance<br />
the wavefront curvatures of specific waves. The formulas presented here have<br />
such a form. They give particular attention to the influence that a curved measurement<br />
surface has on the moveout or normal-moveout (NMO) velocity. This influence<br />
should be accounted for in the CMP or CRS stack and in the computation of interval<br />
velocities.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Analytic moveout formulas for isotropic media have a long tradition of being applied<br />
in the seismic reflection method. Just to mention a few papers that may be considered<br />
as some milestone contributions we would like to refer to the works of (Dürbaum,<br />
1954; Dix, 1955; Shah, 1973; Fomel and Grechka, 1998). Particularly in the light of<br />
macro-model-independent reflection imaging (Hubral, 1999) analytic moveout formulas<br />
in midpoint(m)-half-offset(h) coordinates like Polystack (de Bazelaire, 1988; de<br />
Bazelaire and Viallix, 1994; Thore et al., 1994) and Multifocusing (Gelchinsky et al.,<br />
1999a,b) have gained a new relevance and importance. Here we generalize the socalled<br />
Common-Reflection-Surface (CRS) stack formula (Müller et al., 1998), which<br />
is used to simulate zero-offset sections from prestack data in a macro-velocity-model<br />
independent way (Jäger et al., 2001). The generalized CRS stack moveout formula<br />
1 email: Pedro.Chira@gpi.uni-karlsruhe.de<br />
27