- Page 1 and 2: Wave Inversion Technology WIT Annua
- Page 3: Wave Inversion Technology WIT Wave
- Page 7: Copyright c 2000 by Karlsruhe Unive
- Page 11 and 12: i TABLE OF CONTENTS Reviews: WIT Re
- Page 13 and 14: Wave Inversion Technology, Report N
- Page 15 and 16: 3 theory. It relates properties of
- Page 17: Imaging 5
- Page 21 and 22: ¡ 9 The lack of coherent energy
- Page 23 and 24: D D 11 0.6 Figure 3: Coherency meas
- Page 25 and 26: 13 we are looking for plane waves e
- Page 27 and 28: 15 Trace no. 1000 1500 2000 0.5 1.0
- Page 29 and 30: 17 We would like to stress that our
- Page 31 and 32: Wave Inversion Technology, Report N
- Page 33 and 34: u u u u 21 the user. To obtain a ma
- Page 35 and 36: U ‰ 23 pre-defined window. Here,
- Page 37: 25 Both macro-velocity models or sm
- Page 40 and 41: v G ° à £§¦©¨ G ¬ à £§
- Page 42 and 43: 9 v 0 v 4 & Ä Ã £ Ã > 30 Ze
- Page 44 and 45: Elements of the surface-to-surface
- Page 46 and 47: 34 β ∗ s q’ x’ x 1 β∗ s x
- Page 48 and 49: 36 (Tygel et al., 1997). In additio
- Page 50 and 51: Z G „ ½ ¢ ì è G è è
- Page 52 and 53: 40 Emergence angle section; 3) radi
- Page 54 and 55: 42 0.2 Distance [m] 1000 1500 2000
- Page 56 and 57: 44 The optimized radii of curvature
- Page 58 and 59: 46 CONCLUSION In this work, with a
- Page 61 and 62: Wave Inversion Technology, Report N
- Page 63 and 64: k ilm § 51 0 X 0 v 0 Depth [km] 1
- Page 65 and 66: § ¤ ¤ ¤ 53 Determination of Y t
- Page 67 and 68: £ £ £ £ õ ¤ Z § ó £ §
- Page 69 and 70:
¤ ¤ ¤ 57 Subsequent layers. As b
- Page 71 and 72:
59 We also plan to modify the softw
- Page 73:
61 Tygel, M., Müller, T., Hubral,
- Page 76 and 77:
64 evanescent parts of the wave fie
- Page 78 and 79:
66 (a) (b) Depth (m) 600 800 Depth
- Page 80 and 81:
68 Reflection Coefficient (a) 0.1 0
- Page 82 and 83:
70 By our numerical analysis, we ha
- Page 84 and 85:
È ¸ â ¹ Ë ¾œ¿ ¸ » ¸ Ç
- Page 86 and 87:
È Ä »¤¼ Ë ¾S¿8 ¸ óžô
- Page 88 and 89:
µ À Ã Ä_jÄ Å ð ¨ â 76 by t
- Page 90 and 91:
â Í ð Í ^ g ð Í [f} Í’» ^
- Page 92 and 93:
80 0 Depth (m) 200 400 600 800 1000
- Page 94 and 95:
82 900 950 Depth (m) 1000 1050 1100
- Page 96 and 97:
84 Residual Fresnel Zone (m) 2000 1
- Page 99 and 100:
Wave Inversion Technology, Report N
- Page 101 and 102:
´ ¯ ¡ ¤ ¡ 89 and coupling, geo
- Page 103 and 104:
º ¡ £ ì ¥ The stacking surface
- Page 105 and 106:
93 0 ksi1 demigration x ksi1 t Seis
- Page 107 and 108:
95 Figure 3: Isochrone. This curve
- Page 109 and 110:
97 Figure 7: 2D artificial migrated
- Page 111 and 112:
Wave Inversion Technology, Report N
- Page 113 and 114:
¤ ç ¡ ¨ ç Á ¤?¬ Ò ¡ ¡ ç
- Page 115 and 116:
103 summation (Hanitzsch, 1997). We
- Page 117 and 118:
105 Velocity [km/s] 6 5.5 5 4.5 4 3
- Page 119 and 120:
107 Porosity variation with Depth |
- Page 121 and 122:
Wave Inversion Technology, Report N
- Page 123 and 124:
Z c b J Z ` Z .- #0/RQTS 9 Z det #
- Page 125 and 126:
113 The interpolation of new rays o
- Page 127 and 128:
115 determine model parameters at a
- Page 129 and 130:
Wave Inversion Technology, Report N
- Page 131 and 132:
m &jf M r S &)h M r S b b 119 0 0.0
- Page 133 and 134:
‡½¸ Œg‰ ‘ 121 machine misp
- Page 135 and 136:
123 Synthetic example To demonstrat
- Page 137 and 138:
Ñ 125 Vp/Vs and Vs [km/s] 8 7 6 5
- Page 139 and 140:
127 Rock Physics and Waves in Rando
- Page 141 and 142:
Wave Inversion Technology, Report N
- Page 143 and 144:
ˆ ‘ Ö Ö Ö Ö 131 the both cas
- Page 145 and 146:
‘Î-È Ì©¨)¢ËÒ? ¨ 133 that
- Page 147 and 148:
Ö é Ö ó 0 ì 0 0 Ú ¬l“)º
- Page 149 and 150:
ä Ö E Ö Ö E Ö 137 Triggering
- Page 151 and 152:
V ˆ î V î 139 the hydraulic diff
- Page 153 and 154:
a 141 only. The quickest possible c
- Page 155 and 156:
143 CONCLUSIONS We have developed a
- Page 157 and 158:
Wave Inversion Technology, Report N
- Page 159 and 160:
¥ Ì Í » » » 0 ‘ ¥ p p p
- Page 161 and 162:
…„ƒ Î Î ÎÄȆ¨ Ìȇq
- Page 163 and 164:
…„ƒ 151 Thus, the range of val
- Page 165 and 166:
…„ƒ Î Î ÍÄȇq ¨ÛÈ;
- Page 167 and 168:
155 found at the respective sites e
- Page 169 and 170:
157 Shapiro, S. A., Royer, J.-J., a
- Page 171 and 172:
Wave Inversion Technology, Report N
- Page 173 and 174:
Ç Ò ¥ Ì äÒ Ö Òh-šŠˆ?•
- Page 175 and 176:
{ © u u “¦é À Ò ¬ £ ¥ ä
- Page 177 and 178:
Ç Ç ä é å¤æDç¢è í 165
- Page 179 and 180:
à ø Ú 8 á ã ã ø à ¢ )
- Page 181 and 182:
Figure 3: The contour plots show th
- Page 183 and 184:
f f 171 tuations, we can write the
- Page 185 and 186:
Wave Inversion Technology, Report N
- Page 187 and 188:
ü ã { | h ã å ó ø ø ê ê
- Page 189 and 190:
ååää çææçèèéé ããââ
- Page 191 and 192:
ã S ä ã ã d N R c ã ã a _ i {
- Page 193 and 194:
181 fluctuations (upper right-sided
- Page 195 and 196:
Wave Inversion Technology, Report N
- Page 197 and 198:
185 Ž No. crack length number poro
- Page 199 and 200:
187 1 0.8 top: SH− waves middle:
- Page 201 and 202:
189 1 0.9 top: bottom: SV− waves
- Page 203 and 204:
Wave Inversion Technology, Report N
- Page 205 and 206:
Ó e 193 SURVEY DESIGN AND RESOLUTI
- Page 207 and 208:
195 Figure 5: The central part of t
- Page 209 and 210:
197 0 HIKALISTO: Shotpoint T7 sourc
- Page 211 and 212:
199 Differences between the differe
- Page 213 and 214:
Modeling 201
- Page 215 and 216:
Wave Inversion Technology, Report N
- Page 217 and 218:
Ý ã ä and ã with the slowness v
- Page 219 and 220:
ò Ý ã þ ¥¿åLK D û Ý ò ý
- Page 221 and 222:
209 0.4 0.2 0 0.1 -0.2 -0.4 y [km]
- Page 223 and 224:
211 for Vidale. The resulting inter
- Page 225 and 226:
213 ing and Radu Coman for providin
- Page 227 and 228:
Wave Inversion Technology, Report N
- Page 229 and 230:
\]O‘N\¨’¨‘ U”“-•˜—
- Page 231 and 232:
219 Reflection coefficient 0.2 0 In
- Page 233 and 234:
Š Š Æ ³ Š » •ÌÃ)Í ½ Í
- Page 235 and 236:
§ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¢¢¢ § Ë Ê Ë ¨š
- Page 237 and 238:
£ • £ £ Í Í ’ Ú « ¦
- Page 239 and 240:
Wave Inversion Technology, Report N
- Page 241 and 242:
J 229 rays with different paths tha
- Page 243 and 244:
231 arrivals. In other words, we mu
- Page 245 and 246:
233 Detection of caustic regions Th
- Page 247 and 248:
and ¹ •$Œ Œ c Ç Ç Ç Ç g a
- Page 249 and 250:
237 Ettrich, N., and Gajewski, D.,
- Page 251 and 252:
Wave Inversion Technology, Report N
- Page 253 and 254:
x x Ž Ž • • • • • •
- Page 255 and 256:
243 [km] 0 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 0.5 0.
- Page 257 and 258:
¬ ’ £ }}¤† à £6 ¥ ‹ £
- Page 259 and 260:
Ð Ð Ð † ‘ £ÒÒ ‘ £ÒÒ
- Page 261 and 262:
Wave Inversion Technology, Report N
- Page 263 and 264:
traveltime and ¡ stands for the lo
- Page 265 and 266:
ö g gù 8 % ! ! ü ü g - ø
- Page 267 and 268:
Þ ö y ö ø Þ { ú ý ö
- Page 269 and 270:
257 1/spreading [1/m] 0 0.000 0.001
- Page 271 and 272:
259 Versteeg, J., and Grau, G., 199
- Page 273 and 274:
Other Topics 261
- Page 275 and 276:
Wave Inversion Technology, Report N
- Page 277 and 278:
¾ ° $ $ È ÄÉ Æ - ý ý
- Page 279 and 280:
ø + À ç ù ¹ ® + g ø ø
- Page 281 and 282:
â ù â - 269 Figure 1: Simple mod
- Page 283 and 284:
£ ¤ ù ' ¤ ù £ ù ' ' ù
- Page 285 and 286:
273 Ô- Ô- â ¢¡ ¢ ¢3ÏqÏ
- Page 287 and 288:
Appendix 275
- Page 289 and 290:
Wave Inversion Technology, Report N
- Page 291 and 292:
279 Research groups Research Group
- Page 293 and 294:
281 Norman Bleistein Teaching and d
- Page 295 and 296:
Wave Inversion Technology, Report N
- Page 297 and 298:
285 RWE-DEA AG für Mineralöl und
- Page 299 and 300:
287 Research Personnel Steffen Berg
- Page 301 and 302:
289 German Höcht received his dipl
- Page 303 and 304:
291 M. Amélia Novais investigates
- Page 305 and 306:
293 Jörg Schleicher received his
- Page 307 and 308:
295 Claudia Vanelle received her di