"Under the Sign of Scorpion" by Juri - Gnostic Liberation Front

analysis virtually annihilated the objective historical value of the work and
showed it for what it really was: political propaganda. Engels made a
selection suitable for his work from obsolete facts from the years 1801-
1818, never indicating that this was the case. There were also falsi-
fications and misquotations amounting to a total of 23 pages (over 5 per
cent of the book's 354 pages). Henderson and Chaloner demonstrated with
their analysis that Engels had not been honest in his researching.
So Marx used a work of that calibre as the only source of his statements
and conclusions. He was fully aware of the falsifications, since the
German economist Bruno Hildebrand had already revealed most of them
in 1948, and Marx had been informed of the criticism.
Marx used misquotations himself. He misquoted William Gladstone and
the economist Adam Smith. He even misquoted official reports. The two
researchers from Cambridge showed in their examination "Comments on
the Use of the Blue Books by Karl Marx in Chapter XV of "Das Kapital"
(1985), that Marx had not only been careless but had intentionally falsified
Paul Johnson came to the same conclusion: that one must be sceptical
about all of Marx's texts and that one could never rely on his assertions.
For example, Marx claimed that railway accidents had become more
frequent whereas the case was exactly the opposite.
The Moral Bankruptcy of Marxism
According to blind Marxists, of whom there are plenty in Sweden, Marx
stood for humanism and human values, liberty and belief in mankind.
They probably have not read the following lines about Marx by Friedrich
Engels: "Who is chasing with wild endeavour? A black man from Trier, a
remarkable monster. He does not walk or run, he jumps on his heels and
rages full of anger..." (Marx and Engels, "Selected Works" in German,
supplementary tome II, p. 301.)
The exiled Estonian non-socialist writer Arvo Magi stated in a radio
programme that Marx was not a terrorist who wished to destroy the ideas
of others. But he was! Marx tolerated no ideas but the Illuminist ones
which were later known as Marxist. Marxism merely gave the dark
Illuminist powers a hypocritical method and a verbose phraseology, which
91